Bruin Bites: Dan Guerrero, Morgan Center, UCLA Total Fail Edition
The title pretty much says it all, doesn't it? This has to be one of the worst weekends in recent UCLA history. On Friday, Howland's overweight, slow, lazy, entitled squad came out flat and uninspired against a vastly inferior (in terms of talent) Loyola Marymount squad, and got promptly beat-down 58-69 at the decrepit Sports Arena, marking the first time the Lions beat the Bruins since World War II. Not to be out-done, Rick took his hapless team to Salt Lake City, where the Bruins embarrassed themselves with stupid penalties and lazy, unimaginative play, leading to a 31-6 Utah victory.
Now, any weekend where both UCLA's football and basketball team is a bad weekend. But on this weekend, it wasn't just the losses, but the manner in which UCLA lost both games, and the simple fact that UCLA, in both games, had vastly superior talent, and both games were games in which the Bruins should have won. Instead, they didn't just lose, they got spanked.
Naturally, the little Neuheisel apologists and their Neub mindset have gone quiet this weekend. Where are all of you losers now? Want to come back and sing some more sunshine-and-rainbows bulls**t about how Rick is "turning the corner"?
From the weak, sub-par arena that UCLA has to play it's "home" games in, to the garbage football program we are subjected to every Saturday, to the idiotic entitlement mindset that Morgan Center has developed (and is shown through the idiotic actions of players on both squads), this weekend has been an illustration of why Dan Guerrero must be fired as part of wholesale regime change in Westwood.
For the third time, I've had to write a "Rick and Dan fail" edition for Bruin Bites (prior two are here and here). And it's time to repeat what I said prior to the Utah game:
So, please, everyone, let's take a moment to stop and think. When have both of our two major revenue programs been as much of a joke as they have been the past three years? When have we had a run, like these past three years, where both UCLA football and basketball were national punchlines?
We're a joke. Our football team is a joke. We went on national television and got absolutely stomped by an Arizona program that was 1-5 and without a real head coach. They had a defensive coordinator with zero head coaching experience. And they smoked us. Our basketball team is a joke. We don't have the athletes to play "Ben Ball" defense and we haven't been relevant since the true Ben Ball Warriors (DC, LRMAM, LMR, KL, etc.). These current UCLA basketball players don't even deserve to be mentioned in the same sentence as those guys.
It's now time to focus on the root of UCLA's problems: the tone-deaf, ineffectual chump running Morgan Center. As we've said on BN (and as many of you, on Facebook, on MexiBruin's petition, and other places across the social media landscape), nothing short of wholesale regime change will suffice.
DAN GUERRERO MUST BE FIRED.
With that, let's turn to the Sunday afternoon edition of the bits and pieces of news from around the UCLA-iverse after the jump:
- Starting with the obvious, as ESPN's Peter Yoon reports, basketball season ticket sales are significantly down for UCLA this year. With a loss of 25%, total failure Dan Guerrero has known lying scumbag Mark Harlan out to put things in full spin mode for the dolts at
MoronMorgan Center, saying that this decrease was "expected" and that the "walk-in" numbers are "very good" using the exhibition in Ontario as proof. Except, as was noted on BN by folks at that game, Cal State San Bernardino (which is about 22 miles from Ontario, as opposed to the nearly 60 miles between Westwood and Ontario) had a huge contingent of fans. So, nice try Mark: your numbers were inflated by the opposing team's fans. And, we saw more of the same in our listless loss to LMU, with an mostly empty Sports Arena (5,382 was the official attendance in an arena that seats 16,000+). Just another black mark in Dan Guerrero's continuing Reign of Error. Oh and hey Mark, you realize you're not even good at lying, right? - Fortunately for UCLA basketball, the gem of Howland's current recruiting class (assuming he doesn't land Shabazz), Kyle Anderson is still feeling good about UCLA despite watching the embarrassment at the hands of LMU on Friday night. Apparently, he's the only one.
- On the other hand, it seems like Howland has fallen behind Calipari in the race to land the one year of college basketball that Shabazz Muhammad is offering. That being said, unless Anderson can become a Magic Johnson style PG (in terms of his size), landing Shabazz won't address the glaring hole in Howland's roster: the lack of a true PG, which is where the de-commitment of Dominic Artis will hurt the Bruins for years to come (assuming Anderson ends up at SG or SF instead of PG).
- Speaking of UCLA point guards, Matthew Bell at The World has a feature on former Bruin PG Jordan Farmar, who has taken up playing with Maccabi Tel Aviv in Israel during the NBA lock-out. Great that JF is keeping himself game-sharp and is playing in a country he personally enjoys (he has family connections to Tel Aviv, being one of the few players with Jewish ancestry in the NBA). Shame we haven't found an adequate replacement for his position (ironic, given that Howland produced JF, RW, and DC).
- While we're on the subject of former UCLA players, there's someone out there who could have helped out the Bruins' woeful perimeter defense against LMU. His name is Mike Moser and he put up a nice double-double in his UNLV debut, grabbing 20 rebounds and putting up 16 points. And to think he was stuck on the bench in Westwood while loser scrubs like Dragovic ate up all the minutes. Coaching and player development total fail for Howland.
- Finally, Ben Bolch at the Los Angeles Times sat down with former UCLA great Marques Johnson for a Q&A, where Marques channeled BN: calling out UCLA for not having adequate guard play, that with our personnel, playing zone would be more appropriate, and that Josh Smith's apparently lack of commitment to conditioning was disappointing. Pretty good thoughts from a guy who knows how to win it all and to do it the right (read: John Wooden) way.
Alright folks, that's your Bruin Bites round-up of news from around the UCLA-iverse. Sad way to end a terrible weekend for UCLA's big two sports, further highlighting the need for WHOLESALE REGIME CHANGE IN WESTWOOD, STARTING WITH DAN GUERRERO.
GO BRUINS
32 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
As I posted on an earlier article, all the apologists need to read the new
book Wooden, Basketball and Beyond, so they can read what UCLA excellence once meant. The apologists who allow the athletic administration to continue in its current state represent the opposite of all that Coach Wooden taught…
Well put B
it is sad that we have to talk this way about our once proud program. We now have many classes (if not an entire generation!) of Bruins that are not upset, not proud, but apathetic towards the athletic program. We need a leader, a visionary…we need it soon.
I recently listened to an interview with Coach Shaw. He mentioned how the players and coaches expect to be “great” like the rest of Stanford’s programs (academics!). Here is a university that will not accept anything but the very best for all the students and athletics. Sadly, I don’t see that at UCLA. A friend of mine mentioned that Saturday afternoon, NOT ONE TV in the Wooden Center had the football game on…out of sync, out of sight, out of mind….out the window. I’ll be back after I go throw up.
Not one TV?
Why am I surprised?
These guys have no clue how to market themselves. Unbelieveable.
Winning is not a sometime thing; it's an all the time thing. You don't win once in a while; you don't do things right once in a while; you do them right all the time. Winning is a habit. Unfortunately, so is losing. ~ Vince Lombardi
Can't believe that!
That would NEVER EVER HAPPEN at any “similar” school (Texas, Michigan, etc.)
Speaking of which, anyone notice how tiny the student section has been at football games this year? I brought a buddy of mine from Michigan to the ASU game & he thought it was a joke. Also, was there even 1000 students at Friday night’s basketball game? I get that it’s not on campus, but, they have to have arranged busses or something…right?!
Just goes to show the sad apathetic state of affairs Dan has created.
No juice, no life, no passion…
by Flem on Nov 13, 2011 11:18 PM PST via mobile up reply actions
I can't wait to beat Colorado, get annihilated by USC
And have Neuheisel get the Gatorade bath at the Coliseum when we find out we’re still in the Pac-12 title game.
Dan Guerrero has destroyed this program beyond belief
Are we still considered division I??
What an utterly humiliating weekend…..
I really hate Dan Gurerro.
Hard not to hate special dan
I bet though that he’ll be our AD for the foreseeable future. I HIGHLY doubt he’s even being considered on the chopping block.
"A legend is an old man with a cane known for what he used to do. I'm still doing it." Miles Davis
by milesdavis93 on Nov 13, 2011 1:16 PM PST up reply actions
Win or lose, Ricky must resign after Colorado game
The honorable thing for Ricky to do is announce after the Colorado game that the Monopoly of football mediocrity is over in Los Angeles. That way the players and fans will be inspired against SC.
Not likely
According to his quotes in the la times, he thinks he’s a ‘good coach.’ not the words of someone who’s likely to resign
by Scotucla03 on Nov 13, 2011 4:57 PM PST via mobile up reply actions
Why o why o why?
With 0 to lose didn’t MJ call for some different low% plays in 2nd 1/2? The announcers even said UT was and winning. Into their D teeth and punt? I never get it.??
I'm madder at Howland than Neuheisel....
Because Howland is presiding over the death of the greatest legacy in the history of college sports, Neuheisel has simply taken a good program and destroyed it.
Plenty of blame to go around, but the loss to LMU upset me far more than the Utah debacle.
Pardon me if I missed it but...
are the moderators and commenters calling for the dismissal of Howland on the ground that he did okay for awhile and/or we wouldn’t be able to get anyone better, or are they in my camp that he must go too?
Just so I’m clear, I’m 100% behind Guerror getting the ax yesterday.
The moderators speak for themselves.
I speak for myself. I think Coach Howland is a good coach. I don’t think he’s forgotten how to coach. That’s today, Sunday, November 13. There doesn’t seem to be a perfect correlation between being a good coach and producing victories for the school. If he has forgotten how to do that, then he needs to go. I haven’t reached the point of thinking he needs to go yet.
Someone else’s turn to weigh in.
I'm with you.
I don’t think Howland needs to go. YET.
Based on the idea that you don’t fire a coach unless you have clearly better option you can bring in. With Neuheisel it’s easy. Mike Leach, Rich Rod are both free and available. Gary Patterson, Chris Petersen, Mike Riley could potentially be hired away from their current positions. I can’t do the same for Basketball Coaches.
Winning is not a sometime thing; it's an all the time thing. You don't win once in a while; you don't do things right once in a while; you do them right all the time. Winning is a habit. Unfortunately, so is losing. ~ Vince Lombardi
I know one game isn't a good sample
Especially with how long basketball season can be, but I think this should be Howland’s last chance if we don’t make a conference title and a potentially deep tournament run. 3 final fours is great, but I believe he wasted that cushion with the terrible losing season in 2009.
I like Howland because he’s a high character coach who can be attributed for transforming lesser recruits into stars. Performance should count too though. With UCLA’s legacy, there should be a ton of coaches who would want to be here. Maybe doughtnut dan is just terrible at appealing to them.
We've been nationally irrelevant for 3 years now, going to be 4 if this season gets off to a bad start
I believe he is a good defensive coach but it seems we’ve struggled offensively for the past few years. Our players seem to be lost and confused at times, and I’ve seen so many of our fast breaks fail while other teams capitalize on our poor transition defense.
Some of this may be due to poor guard play, which also falls on Howland. Whether he can coach up players to become good guards, or recruit good players to fit his system, lately it’s feeling like he’s underachieving.
No one has called for "dismissal" of Ben Howland
However, Ben Howland’s seat is certainly warm in Bruins Nation.
This community has set the reasonable expectations for this season.
Win the Pac 12 Championship. I don’t think talk about CBH being replaced would occur until it was clear that that was not going to happen.
Just like the line in the sand was crossed with RN after the Arizona loss.
by orlandobruin on Nov 13, 2011 3:53 PM PST up reply actions
Some thoughts.
The donut statement about ‘walk ins’ really just reinforces how these guys only care about money. They don’t see a difference between loyal, return customers and ‘visitors.’ What is appalling is how really bad they are at making the money they are so preoccupied with. Morgan Center has repeatedly put out an inferior product, marketed it poorly, and is surprised with the diminishing returns!
I’ve got an idea. Why not let the members of the business school to weigh in on such matters as building a working business model. Why not let the art and design department handle the job of getting us cool looking Unis? The Film School should be in charge of developing all promotional videos.
Anybody but those fools.
Winning is not a sometime thing; it's an all the time thing. You don't win once in a while; you don't do things right once in a while; you do them right all the time. Winning is a habit. Unfortunately, so is losing. ~ Vince Lombardi
I think you have hit upon something here, Mexi.
It is amazing that, with the resources at UCLA, there is no call of action to recruit to soon-to-be stars in their professions to assist the University (in this case, the athletic deparment) to improve themselves.
Like you stated, use teh film school to develop promotional videos. Use the art department to develop functional, high tech uniforms that retain the UCLA tradition. Use MBA students to help with the business end of things. Students could get credit as an internship.
Seems like a no-brainer to me . . .
by orlandobruin on Nov 13, 2011 3:57 PM PST up reply actions
Marketing?
Do we still have marketing? This is the worst crushing of a brand since Enron. These fools couldn’t promote a frat party. As I looked at the Sports Arena on TV I couldn’t help but think how incredibly bad it looked. The football game looked terrible too. The uni’s suck. Why can’t we get a real UCLA stripe?!? I am beyond sick of all the character’s in this play. Ugh.
I'm glad the focus is on Dan Guerrero
While I agree that Neuheisel should be fired, I believe that it would be a mistake to fire Neuheisel with Guerrero still at the helm. A common misconception is that changing a bad situation can only make it better, but the reality is that change has the potential to make a bad situation even worse. Guerrero hired Karl Dorrell, who took the program from decent to mediocre, and then hired CRN, who took the program from mediocre to really bad. If CRN is fired, then I truly believe that Guerrero’s next hire will take the program from really bad to really, really bad. Neuheisel must go, but it CANNOT happen before Dan Guerrero is fired. Until Guerrero is fired, I don’t really think firing or keeping Neuheisel will make much of a positive difference.
by youseeellay_brewin' on Nov 13, 2011 11:39 PM PST reply actions

























