Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Indy 500: Coverage of the 'Greatest Spectacle In Racing'

The "Eye Test": Bruins' GPA After Reality Bites in Utah

I am not going to blog my usual detailed Monday "Eye Test" post this week. There is really no need to go into too much detail to analyze what we are seeing on the field.  freesia's observations in post-game thread were on point, as were the big picture reflections from gbruin this am.

Still since we have been doing them for every game, I think I will just go ahead and jot down the simple grades for every category, so that we can keep track of the overall GPA average for the season.

Let's go through them after the flip.

Star-divide

1) Is our defense prepared for each and every team we play?

Quoting freesia here:

We had one job - stop John White.  Guess who we didn't stop?  John White.  167 yards.  Two touchdowns rushing.  One touchdown receiving.  COME ON.

Let me add a quick note. As noted by freesia Utah came into this game as one dimensional team with a QB who was playing in FCS program last year (which ended up folding). Bruins were down 3-7 and were facing a critical 3rd and 13 in their own red zone in the first drive of second half. Even Bill McDonald, who doesn't really know much about this game wondered out loud that Bruins needed to bring the heat. Instead the "bend don't break" nonsense stayed in bend format and you know what happened rest. A total EPIC FAIL. The grade for this category is an F:0.0.

2) Do we call offensive plays to catch our opponents off guard?

Well the Bruins brought in Derrick Coleman in the very first series and put him in on 3rd and 6 situation. That was about the only "interesting" thing we got from Rick Neuheisel in a game in which he potentially had his "job on the line" (even though he should have been canned two weeks ago). One would think with his career on the line Neuheisel would go all out. Not so much. I understand the Bruins had to be "conservative" in the snow. However, the run to pass ratio in first half was absurd when Bruins only attempted 1 pass in their first 19 plays. They never made any effort to take their advantage of mismatch at TE early. They never made any effort to get their explosive players in space. Instead we were treated to nsufferable and predictable Neuheisialian offense that has bored us to disgust for three+ years. The grade for this category is an F:00.

3) Do our players look like they know what they should be doing at all times?

Again read freesia's post and this from gbruin:

Once again, the Bruins came in to a winnable game, and never had a chance at winning.   The players were poorly prepared (anyone want to stop the Utah running back?), poorly coached (12 men in the huddle, again?!, wasting a timeout at the start of the second half, another bad offensive scheme), and poorly disciplined (penalty after penalty after penalty).  It showed what we get with Rick Neuheisel - a team that loses winnable games more often than it wins them, a team that makes the same mistakes over and over, a team that isn't competitive in the conference, let alone on a national scale.

As noted by Telemachus for the game thread, "Penalties" (12 of them for 91 yards) was the leading "rusher" and "receiver" for UCLA Bruins. The grade for this category is also an F: 0.0.

4) Do our players play for 60 G-D minutes every game?

Our players played as hard as they could most of the game. However, their effort was fruitless because as mentioned they looked ill prepared and shackled with vanilla, boring and pathetic conservative schemes. Still for their effort I will give a generous grade of B+:3.3.

5) Do our players execute?

See answers to question number 3.  I'd also add that as courageous as Kevin Prince has been for UCLA, he hasn't been consistent at all when it comes to completing easy passes. Then again it was a total stumbling, bumbling team fail. I mean senior OL Mike Harris racked up 4 penalties himself! Ok, I will give some points to Tyler Gonzalez. So not a total fail in this category and we will give a grade of D-:0.7.

6) Do we have leaders on the field?

I didn't see much. Sorry I didn't see any leadership from any level of this team with supposedly a "divisional championship" on the line. The grade for this category is F: 0.0.

Final Grade Card for Utah Utes

Based on the discussion here is how it shapes up:

1) Is our defense prepared for each and every team we play? [F: 0.0]
2) Do we call offensive plays to catch our opponents off guard? [F: 0.0]
3) Do our players look like they know what they should be doing at all times? [F: 0.0]
4) Do our players play for 60 G-D minutes every game? [B+: 3.3]
5) Do our players execute? [D-: 0.7]
6) Do we have leaders on the field? [F: 0.0]

Utah GPA: 0.67

The grade card for Arizona State was 2.78, California was 3.28, Arizona was 0.13, Washington State was 1.95, grade card for Stanford was 1.97, grade card for Oregon State was 2.12, grade card for Texas was 0.22, the grade card for San Jose State was 0.67, and the grade card for Houston was 2.05. So the cumulative GPA after 9games according to our "Eye Test" is now at 1.58 (down from 1.69 from last week).

So there you have it. The only thing I will add to this post for now that no matter what transpires in next two regular season games, we will need a wholesale regime change in Westwood. I will have lot more on the need for regime change - NOW - tomorrow am.

GO BRUINS.

This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of BruinsNation's (BN) editors. It does reflect the views of this particular fan though, which is as important as the views of BN's editors.

Comment 4 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Thanks for Sticking to the Task

One might think that it’s all over but for playing out the season, but with another win and/or a win over sc the Neubs will be back arguing that the corner has been turned (one win worked for CTS).

The grading has been consistent, and in my eyes fair and generous.

Your body of work analyzing RN’s body of work this year — and Fox’s efforts this year presenting the cold hard stat’s — establish the empirical base needed to refute the emotional “he deserves one more year to finish the task” arguments.

Grading is never fun, especially when the work is so poor that it’s not fun to review and relive.

Stay the path — it really is a worthy effort.

sjh

by Class of 66 on Nov 13, 2011 3:18 PM PST reply actions  

Thanks 66

This has been brutal. Your comment about being “generous” is funny. It’s funny because number of Neubs have accused us of being unnecessarily harsh and overly negative. Yet as you can see from the entire season (and off-season) we have gone out our way to be fair to Neuheisel and wishing he would succeed at UCLA. It just hasn’t worked out.

by Nestor on Nov 13, 2011 3:29 PM PST up reply actions  

What the Neubs Don't Know

because they did not stop by until after we beat Cal and or ASU — is that the front pagers bent over backwards to stay open to RN returning for another year — even though many regulars here were calling for him to resign or be terminated long ago.

Some of us wanted him gone after last year’s sc game and the DC debacle that followed. Others, after the poor performances in our first few games.

And, what the Neubs don’t know, because they are new to the site, is that there have been very strong disagreements between the front pagers and regulars — and none of those who disagreed with your patience or generous grading were sanctioned or banned. In fact, you and I have had some strong disagreements in posts without straining our respect for each other.

I’ve disagreed with your grading — I would have been tougher — but respect your efforts to find something good to say and your efforts to give the highest grades possible.

Interestingly, people complain about your negativity — but don’t back it up by taking one of your grades and using the data from the game to show how it is too low. I don’t recall one post in which a complainer used the stat’s to show you were wrong.

Having graded students for many many years, I think consistency is an important component when evaluating a body of work.

You have been fair and consistent and that is all anyone can ask.

sjh

by Class of 66 on Nov 13, 2011 3:53 PM PST up reply actions  

How the f*** did you have the stomach to even do this?

OMG you should get a medal. Forget the bone to Tyler, who is a great story. It should be 0.00 across the board.

Utah is a very average team. I never saw a DL line disappear so quickly on simple cutback runs or flail so helplessly to scrape off a block and get after the QB. How many of those Utes wanted to play for UCLA but were turned down and had to go to SLC?

Yet they looked ten times faster than our guys. The whole program is a mess, from big, slow players to speedy ones who are now slow after a year in, to players who are always unprepared or never get a chance to really get in.

Analysis assumes a certain level of competence. We have none. It is an epic fail across the Board.

My only question is what color should the bag over my head be next week?

As long as the dead man walking is in charge, we will fall lower. That goes for Donut Dan, too. Duh.

by uclahy on Nov 13, 2011 4:15 PM PST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Bruins Nation, an unofficial daily online scrap book covering the greatest collegiate athletic program in the nation. Established June 16, 2005. GO BRUINS.

Managers

Uclabear1_small Nestor

Arron_afflalo1_small Tydides

Brad_pitt_as_achilles_small Achilles

377011_2642084725867_1068030137_32302525_1166539782_n_small Ryan Rosenblatt

Telemachus_small Telemachus

Licenseplate_small gbruin

2761_small tasser10

Blue_bellerophon_small Bellerophon

Img_0052_2_small Patroclus

Small DCBruins

Of Counsels

094_small Ajax

Menelaus2_small Menelaus

Small Meriones

Small Odysseus

Associates

Eee_small freesia39

Uclabruins_small AHMB