Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: The MMA Hour Is Back

Bruin Bites: Chaminade Profile, $1.4 Million for Anderson School, and Chandler Hoffman Profile

Once again, the legions of Bruin faithful will enjoy a Sunday afternoon following a characteristic bounce-back win for the Bruins, after UCLA dismantled absolutely woeful Colorado, 45-6.  The Bruins got hot early and put their cleats on the throats of the Buffalos, going up 21-0 in the first quarter.  The offense was multi-dimensional, the defense played tight, and the Bruins scored 7 points when given the chance, rather than settling for the leg of Tyler Gonzalez. Naturally, it made many of us wonder where this more dynamic looking UCLA squad was all year long.

But, of course, as pointed out this morning, this is a pathetic Colorado team.  Just pitiful.  Given how poor Colorado has been this year and given how much talent UCLA has (and Rick has under-utilized), UCLA should give Colorado a total beat-down.  So, no bonus points for doing what you should do, despite what Rick and his shrinking clique of sycophantic Neubs tell you.

It was shaping up to be a nice evening, where UCLA blew away the competition, and for once, Bruin fans could take joy in a complete and total drubbing of an opponent (something we should have done against scrubs like San Jose State, Washington State, and Arizona).  But, Rick had to go and ruin it. Despite our repeated insistence that the "Slick Rick" and "Neuweasel" monikers be banned on BN, he flashed a side of himself fitting of those insults: in his post-game comments leaving the field, he had to be dishonest and disingenous. As noted this morning, Rick went out and claimed that "no one thought" UCLA would be in a position to play in the inaugural Pac-12 championship game.

And nothing could be further from the truth. First, our expectation would be that Rick would, in his fourth year in charge, be contending for the Pac-12 title, while the prediction would be a struggle to 6-6 but show progress in his squad meeting the "Eye Test" each week.  Sounds like we nailed that prediction (except for the part about meeting the Eye Test, which has been a categorical failure for Rick).  But those predictions weren't limited to BN: ESPN's Kirk Herbstreit predicted the Bruins would finish behind U$C but make it to the title game by virtue of U$C's sanctions. And the always very well-informed Peter Yoon also called the Bruins contenders in a Pac-12 South that was "wide open" with U$C ineligible due to sanctions, Arizona State being inconsistent (and as we saw this year, undisciplined and unable to win on the road), Utah struggling to adjust to the Pac-12 (also proven true), and Arizona having injury concerns (and being a total fail across the board).

So yeah, Rick, you're playing in what is clearly the weaker half of the conference that was considered wide-open at the beginning of the year, with the best team ineligible, with a roster stacked with talent at every position but QB, being the other favorite pick to win the division (beside ASU), and you're still struggling to grab the conference title.  Trying to low-ball us isn't going to win you any fans Rick.

Rick, we've been nice because you've been a classy guy, a great Bruin, and despite your struggles, have represented UCLA well.  We like you as a Bruin.  We just don't think you're the right fit.  But mark my words, if you take a play out of the Karl Dorrell playbook (remember throwing players under the bus, blaming the fan-base, and playing the race card?), we will make this a nasty divorce instead of an amicable split.

Turning back to the game, so while yesterday was a good win for the guys (and I'm sure an especially good one for Mr. Stone Hands, Taylor Embree), and a good win for UCLA, the fact that Rick has adopted the classic Morgan Center low-ball spin tactic, it further leaves us convinced we still need wholesale regime change in Westwood, meaning both Rick Neuheisel and Dan Guerrero must be fired.

With that, let's turn to the bits and pieces of news from around the UCLA-iverse for this lazy fall Sunday evening:

Star-divide

Alright folks, that's your Bruin Bites round-up of news from around the UCLA-iverse.  Great win for the young guys yesterday, although we will need to keep our eye on the prize: doing right by those players by giving them a real coaching staff as part of a complete regime change in Westwood.

GO BRUINS

Comment 23 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

"Playing the race card"

Can we please end the usage of this fraudulent phrase? If Karl Dorrell felt that decisions were made upon his status based upon his race, that’s his impression, right or wrong. But the idea that by mentioning race as a factor is “playing the race card” does a disservice to the fight against racism. Using that phrase continues the fallacious idea that those experiencing must jump through incredibly difficult hoops in order to prove that their accusations are true. That, instead of looking at each circumstance in its totality. No one would EVER think about accusing a woman of “playing the rape card” and thereby dismissing her concerns as being part of some systematic problem when it came to rape. Don’t do it for race. Simply say, “And without presenting any compelling evidence, Dorrell also thought race had a part in his dismissal.” That’s an argument which can be discussed, not dismissed.

Lawrence Ross

by alpha1906 on Nov 20, 2011 5:45 PM PST reply actions  

Interesting

I never thought of it this way. I have used the term myself a lot. In fact I have used the term in the same context B used before. I see where you are coming from on this and will keep in mind. However, as you pointed out Dorrell threw out this factor without any compelling facts to make a credible case. It was laughble and disingenuous on his part. I’d also call it craven and cynical.

by Nestor on Nov 20, 2011 6:12 PM PST via mobile up reply actions  

I disagree, alpha

I think the phrase “played the race card” in this context means that CTS’s allegations of racism were examined and deemed to be without merit. I don’t particularly like the phrase because it is both stale and trite, but it remains an effective shorthand term to describe a concept. In my opinion, of course

by Fox 71 on Nov 20, 2011 6:12 PM PST reply actions  

The problem...

is that the shorthand is incredibly destructive and chilling. And it’s used to subvert the valid claims of minorities who may have experienced racism, both systematically and individually. Using the term creates a notion that the weight behind invalid claims of racisms are equal to those valid claims, and that’s a disingenuous belief. Thus, playing the race card becomes a shorthand that goes beyond the individual actors and makes a general societal comment.

Alright, back to sports…

Lawrence Ross

by alpha1906 on Nov 20, 2011 6:30 PM PST up reply actions  

We'll have to agree to disagree

As Fox said, it’s a useful phrase to describe someone’s attempt to claim racism factored into something, when in reality, there’s no supporting evidence of such.

That took me 16 words (from attempt to such) to describe what it took me 4 words to do before.

I understand what you’re saying, about how the phrase can be misused, and I apologize if you found it offensive. I just chose to use it because it effectively stated what I wished to state in fewer words (especially given how much longer the lead-in was in this particular post). But that’s just my take/opinion (as a member of a minority in the United States).

Back to the main point: Dorrell made claims without any support and which insinuated something about UCLA which I think many of us (who take immense pride from coming from the university of Jackie Robinson and Arthur Ashe) felt was very insulting. It was discussed at some length at BN and it left a nasty taste in a lot of folks mouths about KD.

If Rick tries the same routine, making false excuses, building up strawmen to beat down, and blaming the fan-base, things will get nasty.

by Bellerophon on Nov 20, 2011 7:07 PM PST up reply actions  

The race card

It is what it is.

But hey, what do I know. I’m just the 800 lbs bruin in the room.

by tasser10 on Nov 20, 2011 9:07 PM PST up reply actions  

ad nauseum

don’t count me amongst the neubs – RN must be canned this year – but let’s not ponder too much about one more post-game innuendo.

That being said, I’m wondering if that new UCLA mouthwash could eliminate the decay of Bruin football, too. Beta test Guerror!

wanting to be able we certainly wished,
... but being allowed to try we didn`t dare

by c bruin 84 on Nov 20, 2011 6:15 PM PST reply actions  

Pac 12 South standings

As of today USC sits on top at 6-2 with us one spot behind at 5-3. If we win next week, we will both be tied at 6-3 with UCLA holding the tie breaker. This is the appropriate way to win a berth in the inaugural Pac 12 Championship game. Head to head competition.

If however, we lose and Utah loses and we back door our way into the Championship game; it will be a craven and cowardly person that proclaims it some form of accomplishment. I expect Dan Guerrero to use false accomplishment as a way to feather his cap. The Rick, however, was a ferocious competitor on the field. I would lose what little respect that remains for him if he were use this cheap way out.

Let’s do it on the field Bruins! Beat SC!

Winning is not a sometime thing; it's an all the time thing. You don't win once in a while; you don't do things right once in a while; you do them right all the time. Winning is a habit. Unfortunately, so is losing. ~ Vince Lombardi

by MexiBruin on Nov 20, 2011 8:04 PM PST reply actions  

Not pulling the trigger on Rick earlier puts us in a no-win situation (I read that here this week).

Beat SC, and we Tie SC with the best record at 5-2. 5-2 looks respectable when going strictly by the record. We know our “5” is a farce compared to SC’s “5”. Yet, with an euphoric SC victory, “Rose Bowl, Rose Bowl, Rose Bowl!” will be the post-game battle cry, with CRN in the stands, leading the chants and cheers. Naturally, this makes my comment below “mean”. Heck… even getting in the back door (Utah loses, we lose)… Rick and Dan will still jump for joy: “We Got Our Goal!” Checkmate is coming and we’re at the wrong end. Go Bruins!

U-C-L-A Fight, Fight, Fight! Go Bruins!
NBA: Where Greed Happens. RIP 10/10/11.

by Bruins78 on Nov 20, 2011 8:56 PM PST up reply actions  

Agreed. But I have a lot of faith in Rick

Faith he’ll clench is sphincter muscle in the biggest game of the season, and embarrass us against USC.

Winning is not a sometime thing; it's an all the time thing. You don't win once in a while; you don't do things right once in a while; you do them right all the time. Winning is a habit. Unfortunately, so is losing. ~ Vince Lombardi

by MexiBruin on Nov 21, 2011 3:47 AM PST up reply actions  

Rick's Last Game. Period.

Karl Dorrell, with a far, far superior win-loss record than Rick Neuheisel (the ultimate bottom line except for NCAA scandal), was shown the door after the SC game. The regular season is over. No post season rewards… just like Karl. The Race Card does not offend me as much as the vile venom leveled at Karl Dorrell… way before his references to heritage. Whether you Sleep Well, Blame The Players, Blame Race, or Wax Poetic About The Passion Bucket, Recruit The Best Kids in America, or Give Great Sound Bites… the bottom line is win-loss. This is Rick’s Last Game – period. Rick must not coach the Championship Game, because based on his record compared to the coach he replaced… he does not deserve to coach the bowl game – no matter the bowl. USC = This Is It. No Special Treatment.

U-C-L-A Fight, Fight, Fight! Go Bruins!
NBA: Where Greed Happens. RIP 10/10/11.

by Bruins78 on Nov 20, 2011 8:21 PM PST reply actions   1 recs

I hope Reeves Nelson flew Southwest.

no change fees, and they don’t charge for bags. And Reeves has lots of baggage!

by Skeptical Dawg on Nov 20, 2011 10:14 PM PST reply actions  

I don't care anymore - BEAT USC and SHUT THE UTES UP!

Utah fan’s are really starting to piss me off.

Reading: Peter Yoon’s coverage about UCLA titled "UCLA survives ups and downs, still in hunt

and you get Utah fan’s posting comments like this -

" TrojanTroll
If UCLA wins, USC is still the south champion….

Snakes22
That’s a fact.
 
This article should be about Utah because the Utes are almost guaranteed a win v. Colorado on Friday so really it’s only Utah and ASU that are still in the hunt.
 
UCLA is done. "

or

“phramahaphil
USC is the real champ, and this is from a Ute fan. Utah may have had a shot to beat out everyone (but SC) if Jordan Wynn wasn’t so injury prone and Utah wouldn’t have had to wade through the offense finding their bearings with a D-II qb for a month.
 
However, UCLA having control of the south with the worst record of the top three teams is incredibly lame. It doesn’t matter, because SC is going to pulverize UCLA and (MLTN) ASU will be the (official if not legitimate) South champs. Here’s hoping ASU throws up on itself”

On numerous other completely unrelated posts, such as the Arizone vs ASU debacle, Utah fans continue their obnoxiousness, sucking on u$c’s teet

“SLC Ute
I would love to see ASU finish off their epic collapse. Just so the Utes could have a shot at the Rose bowl. Not that I think we can beat UO or Stanford, but I’ed at least like a shot. I want to see what the Utah D can do against those teams.”

“UtahAlumnus
I love this conference, they are going out of their way to make sure we make it into the conference championship game in our first year. Thanks Pac 12 teams!!

utefandc
Even with a berth in the CC game every Ute fan knows it comes with a BIG asterisk next to it. Congrats on winning the south Troy. Can’t wait to have you at our house next year."

wtf is the deal with all these ute fans sucking up to $c?

by Ganplosive on Nov 20, 2011 10:51 PM PST reply actions  

lolol it just reminds me

of the new kid in high school, finding the qewlest qid and setting themselves up to be the favorite lackey.

FYI UTE’S, $c’s good will towards you in repping the south isn’t because “It’ll be cool to let the new guys get a chance at it”, it’s because they don’t want the Bruins playing in it. Get it through your rose colored lenses, and into those skulls.

by Ganplosive on Nov 20, 2011 11:00 PM PST up reply actions  

What's up with them? It's simple.

They’ve punked us big time whenever we play them there. Fricking, embarrassing beat downs when we’ve traveled to Utah under KD and CRN.

You have to win to earn their respect.

We have to beat SUC to earn their respect.

Unil then, we don’t deserve it.

by uclahy on Nov 20, 2011 11:04 PM PST up reply actions  

Rick forgot the qualifying statement

No one expected us to be in this position after we redefined rock bottom in Tucson.

Keep up the pressure on wholesale regime change at Morgan, BN!

by 99von on Nov 21, 2011 9:57 AM PST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Bruins Nation, an unofficial daily online scrap book covering the greatest collegiate athletic program in the nation. Established June 16, 2005. GO BRUINS.

Managers

Uclabear1_small Nestor

Arron_afflalo1_small Tydides

Brad_pitt_as_achilles_small Achilles

377011_2642084725867_1068030137_32302525_1166539782_n_small Ryan Rosenblatt

Telemachus_small Telemachus

Licenseplate_small gbruin

2761_small tasser10

Blue_bellerophon_small Bellerophon

Img_0052_2_small Patroclus

Small DCBruins

Of Counsels

094_small Ajax

Menelaus2_small Menelaus

Small Meriones

Small Odysseus

Associates

Eee_small freesia39

Uclabruins_small AHMB