Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: L'Equipe Claims He's Coming To Chelsea On Five Year Deal

Is Ben Howland Cooking Up Another Toxic UCLA Basketball Season FAIL?

Ben Howland is responsible for the toxic atmosphere around UCLA program which appears to be heading for another FAIL season in 2011-12 (Photo by Chris Chambers/Getty Images)

The 0-3 Bruins (we don't really care for a "win" over a D-2 program) are going to take on Michigan Wolverines for the consolation, third place game this evening in Hawaii (4:30 pm PST). Normally I'd get really excited about this matchup against my all around second favorite college program. I'd also get excited if this was a case of old school Ben Howland taking on a John Beilein led Wolverines team. That stuff was fun to discuss and go over in those long gone glory days of Ben Ball warriors.

Times are ... uhm ... a little different now on BruinsNation. After three games against D-1 teams this season, it is not as much about scouting our opponents, it is more about whether the head coach of our basketball program has a grip on reality. It is increasingly becoming clear that Howland's post game comments about what he should have done or could have done, are filled with the same BS as we are now used to hearing from Rick Neuheisel's pressers.

For all the talk about UCLA trying out different approaches including using zone defense with its slow, unathletic and out of shape forwards, we haven't seen much of it in Hawaii. More alarmlingly though while it is becoming clear what lineup the Bruins need to use make UCLA a credible program from the West coast this season, Howland remains stuck in his stubborn world devoid of reality. From the LA Times today:

Howland said his best lineup in the game was Anderson, Lamb, David and Travis Wear and Reeves Nelson, the junior forward who came off the bench to collect 12 points, five rebounds and two steals. The Wear twins combined for six points on two-for-10 shooting to go with six rebounds.

I have not seen any specific quotes from Howland yet on that comment. However, the game mins breakdown from yesterday certainly confirms Howland's mindset:

  • 63 minutes combined for the Wear Twins who produced 6 points, 6 rebounds and 3 turnovers
  • 5 total minutes for Norman Powell and Anthony Stover

So if Howland really believes that having the Twins on the floor at the same time gives him the best chance to win, then this season is headed towards being another catastrophic season ala 2009-10, when he completely wrecked this program by playing favorites with the Nikola Dragovic. Howland's other on the record comment in the AP wire was just as absurd.

Star-divide

From the AP wire:

"I was really happy the way the guys fought back in the second half," UCLA coach Ben Howland said. "We had it down to five ... and I think we ran out of gas."

Did anyone point to Howland that our players ran out of gas because he stuck with the same 5 players (mentioned above) without bothering to give any minutes to Powell, Stover and Brendan Lane?

Oh and BTW I have not even brought up Zeek Jones yet. After these past few games it's pretty clear now that he has no business being our starting point guard. Too bad for UCLA fans though Howland apparently didn't come to this realization until Zeek had gotten himself into foul trouble, which followed one of the most selfish displays I have ever seen come out of a Bruin "point guard." The fact is Jones should have never  been our starting guard. He had some gutty moments last year but he has always been less than adequate when it comes to defense and his shoot-first mindset was never a fit for "Ben Ball." I don't trust Howland at this point to take his word that he will increase Jerime's mins at the expense of Jones.

Meanwhile, speaking of Powell, what Howland did to him was flat out insulting and uncalled for. If he was not going to punish Powell for taking one bad 3 point shot (never mind Wears kept making bad basketball decisions all freaking game long), by bringing him in 30 seconds left in the game, then why should Powell bother trying?

This is second time in last three games Howland has made a jerk move with his players as he screwed around with Lane by bringing him in for 26 seconds in each half against MTSU. I have heard from few folks now how furious Lane's parents are with Howland and how Howland has not given them any rhyme or reason for jerking around their son for last two plus years.

Shabazz Muhammad's Dad was at the game last night. If I were him, I'd take note of the toxic chemistry that is engulfing Howland's program. I'd take note of how unfairly Howland treats his players and how it has destroyed the foundation of the very program he rebuilt in his early years at UCLA.  What he has done to Lane and to Powell (to date) is not acceptable.

At this point, no one is going to blame Powell if he decides to pack up like Mike Moser, Chace Stanback and number of others players who have bailed from Westwood to get out of Howland's program. It is telling now why even a great kid like Malcolm Lee rather hang around in his apartment during a lockout season than be part of Howland's mess.

I will always be grateful to Howland for making those Final-4 runs. However, going to three Final-4s do not make him untouchable. He got a mulligan because of those Final-4's when he crashed this program during the "Season of Ragovic" two years ago. If he sticks with his same tired favoritism shtick and crashes this program with a non-tourney season, his time will be up at UCLA.

No we are not calling for a new coach. Not yet. However, as we made it clear the trust is no longer there and what we have seen to date is not acceptable. If Ben Howland wants to keep coaching in Westwood, he'd better make sure he doesn't turn this into a toxic "Season of Wears."

GO BRUINS.

Comment 98 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Ben is just too darn stubborn

If you remember, it took him until Pac 10 play to start playing a zone a few years back when everyone else could tell from day 1 he had a team that had not chance playing man to man.

I am guessing he is going to keep giving both Wears major minutes until he realizes what most casual fans have realized after one game: They are not athletic enough to be starters at this level. They should be playing a combined 20 minutes a game at most.

I expect Ben will realize this sometime in late December/early January.

by silverlakebruin on Nov 23, 2011 8:36 AM PST reply actions  

Right

It’s up to him to make the adjustments. If he is making the adjustments re. Wear twins when it is becoming clear that UCLA is headed towards a non-tourney season, it will be too late. He doesn’t get the luxury to put together two losing seasons (I am giving him a mulligan for the first one after taking over for Lavin) and make the argument for returning as our coach.

by Nestor on Nov 23, 2011 8:39 AM PST up reply actions  

Wear Twins

We clawed back to 61-56 with a little over four minutes to go when Howland put both Wear twins in, and left them in for good. This allowed Kansas to go on an 11-0 run to close us out and waste Reeves, Anderson, and Lamb’s effort. Travis can play and he showed this during his one backdown and layup, but mostly he is shooting and trying to play on the perimeter and should be a reserve for Reeves. David just isn’t very good at anything. Neither one play defense or are very athletic. Also, in the first half after he took out Stover and put in both Wear’s was when their lead originally expanded to 20. UCLA was a minus 20 or more with both of them in. We have a team that is good and can compete, but both Wear’s cannot be in at the same time.

by uclakrause on Nov 23, 2011 3:02 PM PST up reply actions  

50 Point Strategy

You could have the Showtime Lakers and Ben would limit them to 50 points per game.this is neanderthal BB.

by bruin75 on Nov 23, 2011 8:57 AM PST via mobile reply actions  

Honestly

I wish we could go back to the days of Ben Ball when the games were slugfests as our guys were balling out on D, suffocating opponents with on ball pressure, playing solid, fundamental ball. Some of those games were low scoring but I didn’t mind it because the offense was efficient. Howland has totally lost that identity and doesn’t seem too concerned about getting it back.

by Nestor on Nov 23, 2011 9:07 AM PST up reply actions  

One key thing to remember about the Ben Ball days

… we were pockmarked with countless and seemingly endless injuries. We had to play our bench, and they did very well. Arguably, if we did not have the fortune (weird way to put it) of multiple injuries, our younger guys may not have gotten the experience they did (Collison, Westbrook at PG, our big guys). Howland may have gotten lucky there – it’s clear that he has a strange decision-making thought process when it comes to personnel (ahem, Rago). At the same time, Westbrook getting a lot of experience early at PG arguably put him in the draft that year.

by bruinbunz on Nov 23, 2011 9:21 AM PST up reply actions   1 recs

Exactly!

I’ve been a LONG TIME supporter of Ben. Seeing the photo on him with Collison, Mbah a Moute, and the other winning the Maui Invitational brought back a lot of sentimental feelings.

Unfortunately, Ben’s been on this path too long and I think it might be time to think about parting ways. Those first couple years when we were ravaged with injuries people like Collision and Westbrook developed because they got PLAYING TIME. Now, without those injuries, none of our young players can learn they way that’s sometimes the fastest: TRAIL BY FIRE.

It’s sad. I still think Ben is a great coach, but his stubbornness and lack of self-examination isn’t helping this program, or himself, out.

by Christian L. on Nov 23, 2011 9:35 AM PST up reply actions  

I'm content with the 50 point strategy

I would much rather win 56-54 than lose 126-125. I don’t think Coach Howland is the guy to do it any more, and I don’t know why he has lost it. The guys aren’t winning 56-54, they’re losing 72-56. We’re not competitive. We are the group of players that just fills out the schedule for actual teams.

by Fox 71 on Nov 23, 2011 2:49 PM PST up reply actions  

Or.....

This team is going to end up being a pretty damn good team. It may not be a FF or NC favorite, but it will win 20 or more games in the regular season, it will make the tourney and it will compete. That won’t be bad for a team with only two returning starters from a 23 win squad last season. We saw the embers of the fire for the first 16 minutes of the second half last night. We saw what the Bruins capable of doing. Kansas didn’t slack off or coast. We put the clamps down on them defensively and were more effective on offense. The players saw this too; which is a great “coach-able” moment for CBH and staff. I firmly believe they’ll get it together and become steadily more dangerous as the season progresses. I’m actually excited about their potential.

by loyalopp on Nov 23, 2011 9:20 AM PST reply actions  

Kansas is a over-rated basketball team

We shouldn’t have been in position to make a run. Howland cost us a winnable game with his boneheaded starting lineup in the first half and then dumb founding personnel decisions in second.

But hey … if you are feeling good about moral victories in a double digit loss … have at it.

by Nestor on Nov 23, 2011 9:30 AM PST up reply actions   1 recs

well then, let's add insult to injury

Rock Chalk Talk is referring to us as ‘just UCLA.’

Winning is not a sometime thing; it's an all the time thing. You don't win once in a while; you don't do things right once in a while; you do them right all the time. Winning is a habit. Unfortunately, so is losing. ~ Vince Lombardi

by MexiBruin on Nov 23, 2011 10:29 AM PST up reply actions  

How can you blame anyone for mocking us when we deserve mocking?

Our trogan friends don’t even waste their energy mocking us.

One of the defenses to a defamation action is truth. Rock Chalk has the perfect defense to anyone who feels insulted about being called “just UCLA.” They’re correct. We are “just UCLA.” If you were a college team, would you look at UCLA as a sure loss or a sure win on your schedule?

by Fox 71 on Nov 23, 2011 2:51 PM PST up reply actions  

Never said I felt good about this or any other double-digit loss.

However, having actually coached many, many teams over the past 25 years, I know a team finding itself when I see one. This team is on the path to finding itself, and will do so. The Drago-plagued team two years ago didn’t have the make up to find itself. This team does. I stand by my prediction.

by loyalopp on Nov 23, 2011 11:07 AM PST up reply actions  

It's easy to stand by a prediction before any results are in

Let’s see you stand behind it afterwards. Furthermore, we are not grading this team and this coach on the team’s ability to “find itself”. That’s a bullshit metric. All we care about is this team achieving the reasonable goals and expectations laid out by BN in the preseason. If you’re going to predict that this team will find itself enough to win the conference and earn a protected seed, then I’m listening. If not, then keep them to yourself because any such prediction that is less than that is weak and meaningless. Thanks.

by Tydides on Nov 23, 2011 11:20 AM PST up reply actions  

Ben Howland

is in his 9th year at UCLA. He’s one of the top 10 paid college hoops coaches in the country. A coach of CBH’s caliber should not have to find itself against LMU, MTST, Chaminaude & Kansas. This team is full of guys who’ve been in the program far too long for us them to be “finding themselves”.

by King J77 on Nov 23, 2011 11:56 AM PST up reply actions   1 recs

Shouldn't you have your team find itself before the season starts?

Your figure of speech makes me think of guys scurring all around the arena, looking under the grandstands, in the restroom, and up in the rafters. They you hear someone yell “Hey coach! I found a sneaker! We’re getting close to finding the team!”

Also, the concept of a team finding itself suggests that the team lost itself to start with. We pay this coach how much and he can’t even locate his team?

I hope you are right, and that we win 20 games. I can’t imagine who those 20 wins will come against.

by Fox 71 on Nov 23, 2011 2:55 PM PST up reply actions  

More effective on offense

= Making a bunch of desperation threes. It’s not completely ridiculous because they were made by Lamb and Anderson, but it doesn’t instill a lot of confidence in the “comeback” especially when it took that offensive outburst to still score only 56 points. If that’s where our offense is going to come from this year, then this team will come closer to 20 losses than 20 wins. The defense looked better, but that’s not saying very much.

Much like in football, the Pac 12 is terrible, and that may help Howland in the record book, but it will not get him closer to meeting expectations.

We hope that you’ll stick around (unlike the Neubs) if/when this team continues to flounder as this season Wears on due to Howland’s terrible personnel management so you can answer for your predictions.

by Tydides on Nov 23, 2011 9:45 AM PST up reply actions  

I think they'll do fine in what looks to be a pretty weak Pac12

But that’s not saying much. I agree that they’ll likely make the tourney, at around 20-ish wins. But that’s not progress over last year. Sure, only two returning starters, but the rest of the main rotation is returning as well.

What’s alarming is that the mistakes UCLA is making are easily correctable — in other words, why are they still making these mistakes five games in? That’s a coaching flaw. If Howland can’t see that the Wears + Zeek are a net negative, that’s on him. If he insists on keeping guys in a M2M when they can’t do so to save their lives, that’s on him. They’re easily correctable mistakes, but I’m not seeing any obvious attempt to fix them.

by indigo27 on Nov 23, 2011 10:26 AM PST up reply actions  

A good AD

always has a list.

But hey, what do I know. I’m just the 800 lbs bruin in the room.

by tasser10 on Nov 23, 2011 9:54 AM PST up reply actions  

Still early for sure ... just not Brad Stevens.

Nothing more humorous than fans who complain about UCLA’s tempo and then want Howland replaced with Brad Stevens.

by indigo27 on Nov 23, 2011 10:30 AM PST up reply actions  

Wears.

Just being on floor that long you would think they would have more points by accident. Had a feeling they were over hyped coming into the season, but they might as well not exist on the floor.

by Bruin'96 on Nov 23, 2011 9:43 AM PST reply actions  

The Wears can be useful role players

However, they shouldn’t be more than options no. 5 and 6 in our frontcourt.

by Nestor on Nov 23, 2011 10:08 AM PST via mobile up reply actions  

They should be getting Lane and Stover minutes

and Powell, Stover and Lane should be getting their minutes. Cut Josh Smith to minimal minutes as well. Hell have him running sprints on the sideline during games to get him in shape.

by King J77 on Nov 23, 2011 10:16 AM PST up reply actions  

The Wears

are a poor man’s James Keefe.

But hey, what do I know. I’m just the 800 lbs bruin in the room.

by tasser10 on Nov 23, 2011 3:40 PM PST up reply actions  

JK was pretty sound fundamentally

It’s for his effort we won the Elite Eight game in 2008. He got hurt and then he was jerked around by Howland when he didn’t redshirt him. JK was too classy and never said anything. But I’d take JK over any of the Wear twins any day.

by Nestor on Nov 23, 2011 3:43 PM PST up reply actions  

Keefe had his limitations, for sure. But he too bought into and executed Howland's system

Still looking for the same from Travis & David.

As an aside, wasn’t Keefe set to redshirt but another injury necessitated his playing time?

by indigo27 on Nov 23, 2011 4:25 PM PST up reply actions  

Thank God for 49ers Football

I feel like it’s going to be a very long sports year without them.

Winning is not a sometime thing; it's an all the time thing. You don't win once in a while; you don't do things right once in a while; you do them right all the time. Winning is a habit. Unfortunately, so is losing. ~ Vince Lombardi

by MexiBruin on Nov 23, 2011 9:44 AM PST reply actions  

+1

For too long, we have been witness to one sports embarrassment after another between football & basketball.

by Nor-Cal Bruin on Nov 23, 2011 10:00 AM PST up reply actions  

You got that right

I’ve been a 49ers season ticket holder for 30 years. They are showing how great coaching changes a team. Without them and the Giants I would be in sports hell. Especially because my sister went to Stanford and my father went to Cal. Sick of hearing their smack talk.

by SF Bruin on Nov 23, 2011 1:06 PM PST up reply actions  

OUR fight song.

Winning is not a sometime thing; it's an all the time thing. You don't win once in a while; you don't do things right once in a while; you do them right all the time. Winning is a habit. Unfortunately, so is losing. ~ Vince Lombardi

by MexiBruin on Nov 23, 2011 1:38 PM PST up reply actions  

He is old

still talking about the ’40’s.

by SF Bruin on Nov 23, 2011 1:39 PM PST up reply actions  

disgusting

we should expect to beat kansas. Maui should provide UCLA a pseudo home advantage of most other programs, so no excuse there. Also, youth and lack of practice is not a good excuse- other teams have the same issues.

No fire to start the game, odd choice of players on the court this season. We had a lot coming back, and our front court (supposed strength area) looks worse than our back court.

I think that even a second place finish in the pac 10 will not get us to the tourney. The league is terrible, Cal got pounded last night by another Big 12 -2 team.

by realfabfive on Nov 23, 2011 9:59 AM PST reply actions  

yeah,

it was almost like playing at the Phog last night. All you heard was rock top jaycrap chants.

by King J77 on Nov 23, 2011 10:19 AM PST up reply actions  

It's interesting to note that

David Wear was the only Bruin with a positive +/- for the game. Anderson and Jones each had a +/- of -18 for the game.

by ScottishBruin on Nov 23, 2011 10:09 AM PST reply actions  

IIRC

DWear came in to lounge around and lollygag while our guards fired off 3’s during our “comeback” in the second half. Even Howland couldn’t stunt our momentum at that time since even though he went double Wear, no one passed it to them.

by Tydides on Nov 23, 2011 10:14 AM PST up reply actions  

I don't recall seeing David Wear "lounge around and lollygag."

In fact, it didn’t happen. If you don’t like David Wear, that’s fine, but it’s simply not accurate to claim that he wasn’t giving a good effort, whatever the results.

BTW, David Wear’s off court +/- for the game was 18 (i.e., the +/ for the team while he was on the bench), so clearly the rest of the Bruins were struggling even when David Wear was sitting.

by ScottishBruin on Nov 23, 2011 10:26 AM PST up reply actions  

thanks for the link

looking at their breakdown, the DWear stats really seem to reflect that he didn’t play in that really cold opening, or the poor close to the first half. In the second half, his 5 is basically the same (4) as the guys who played the whole half.

Whether you treat the lack of DWear as the causal factor for that slow opening is more a matter of judgement based on what you saw. I’m guessing not many here would subscribe to that interpretation of events…

by VeniceBruin on Nov 23, 2011 11:28 AM PST up reply actions  

David could have easily swapped in for Travis to start

They play basically the same way anyway, and then David would have a negative +/- and Travis would have a positive (or at least a less negative) one and we’d be hearing “the plus minus for the Wears isn’t that bad so blah blah blah” which is a laughable premise to those of us who actually watched the game last night.

by Tydides on Nov 23, 2011 11:32 AM PST up reply actions  

watching last night

I have no idea what either of them contributes in a positive way to the team on either end.

by VeniceBruin on Nov 23, 2011 11:38 AM PST up reply actions  

I'm trying to think of something, but I'm struggling

I suppose if one of them gets hot on offense you can ride them for a few baskets and then yank them before they give back all those points on the other end of the floor.

by Tydides on Nov 23, 2011 11:43 AM PST up reply actions  

This is more in response to your leading statement

Suggesting that David Wear was a positive to the team last night when anyone who actually watched that game who knows anything sees that he was a space filler at best. All you did was show how misleading the +/- stat is, especially over the course of a single game.

by Tydides on Nov 23, 2011 11:28 AM PST up reply actions  

Just my 2 cents...

Coach Howland would have been a perfect coach during a different era. His system obviously requires a few years to install and requires the buy-in of the athletes. He reminds me, minus the personal histrionics and baggage, of Bobby Knight. However, the same thing that drove out KNight is driving out Holwand. In the 21st century,kids with talent will not stay in a program for more than a year or two. In the 21st century, the kids are too immature and coddled to want to work at being part of a system and would rathert show off their “talents” individually. I know there are kids that are exceptions to this rule, but the pool of athletes who fit this mode seem to gravitate to few programs, and UCLA under Howland is not one of them(hence, the absolute dearth of athleticism on this team). As hard as it is for me to accept, I don’t think the players respect Howland (see Nelson, Anderson, Smith off the court behavior). I also think Howland’s sutbborness regarding playing time has been an issue for years, not just this year. You may also recall that he almost NEVER adjust personnel playing time unless forced by injuries. While I am sure he will be here next year, I sincerely doubt that we will see him in 2013…

by Gary72 on Nov 23, 2011 10:11 AM PST reply actions  

That's a very "in" thing to say...

but, please indulge me and walk me through Howlands’ system is any different than Coach K’s or Bill Self’s for that matter. From what I could tell, both Coach K and Bill Self have their teams playing intense half court defense and methodical, probing offensive sets with a focus on working well into the shot clock for a high percentage shot. I would describe Coach Howland’s system the exact same way. Where am I wrong?

by loyalopp on Nov 23, 2011 11:13 AM PST up reply actions  

So then, what exactly is Howland's problem?

But something is clearly wrong.

Winning is not a sometime thing; it's an all the time thing. You don't win once in a while; you don't do things right once in a while; you do them right all the time. Winning is a habit. Unfortunately, so is losing. ~ Vince Lombardi

by MexiBruin on Nov 23, 2011 1:41 PM PST up reply actions  

A few

Defense – he’s stuck on man-man D which doesn’t suit the players he’s recruited. Self and coach K can play zone and adapt to their players strenghts..actually, they recruit players who show the strenghts required to fit their systems.

Recruiting – He hasn’t brought in many athletes in the last few classes. Every day on sportscenter I see all these college freshmen and sophmores who just look like grown men. We’re stuck with UNC’s rejects, the next tractor taylor and a guy who’s claim to fame is having played HS ball with Rose. Our team is made up of transfers and JC recruits…That’s a MAJOR problem.

Yes, Self and K might run similar offensive approaches but they still have the ball handles and athletes who can create on their own when they’re against the shot clock. we don’t have that or haven’t displayed it (Anderson and Powell look like the can).

After all that, the biggest issue right now is being too stuborn to admit he overhyped the wears and also to switch up to a zone D.

by King J77 on Nov 23, 2011 1:51 PM PST up reply actions  

a different era doesn't appy here

He was successful just about all his career except in the last 3 years, the era has not changed at since he got into 3 straight final fours. There are many issues contributing to this mess, but I don’t think Howland is in the mold of old timers such as Bobby Knight

by cyberdbk on Nov 23, 2011 11:50 AM PST up reply actions  

His results have certainly changed from three final fours

Cyber, do you remember what you were thinking going into those final four seasons? I know what I was thinking. I was thinking that we were back to where we were under coach, and that every year we should fully expect to have a shot at the championship. I haven’t had those kinds of thoughts in a long time. What I’m thinking now is that we have no hope. We can pummel a Division 2 (or is it Division 3) team like Chaminade, but we get blown out by D1 teams.

All that said, I don’t have the answer. I probably don’t even have the right questions. Alas, neither does our coach.

by Fox 71 on Nov 23, 2011 3:03 PM PST up reply actions  

Team Future

Based on what we have witnessed so far…our center is so poorly conditioned he is suffering balance problems. An ESPN announcer suggested one of his falls resulted in a Richter scale reading. ESPN also captured his back-fist to the chair one of the Wear bros was sitting in. The glare by the Wear brother said a lot. JS’s attention deficit behaviors are an embarassment to UCLA Athletics. The point guard [ZJ] has simply not developed. The Wear brothers always work and stay in the game. They will only improve. Lane deserves a chance to prove he has developed. Note that when they played defense [well, when they wanted to] their offense improved. I see no real-time bench teaching, coaching or lectures by other UCLA coaches as players foul out or exit the game.

by Vernon Cook on Nov 23, 2011 10:25 AM PST reply actions  

Accountability

Anthony Stover should be the poster child for attitude and effort. Those guys who show that spirit should be on the court. Those who can’t even run up and down the court (hmm, wonder who that is) should have limited minutes.

But I’ll bring this up again – why not have everyone giving their all, and then having quick substitutions to keep everyone fresh. Oh wait…that would mean playing 9 or 10 guys. I love you, Coach, but you’re testing all our patience.

by rocket rod forever on Nov 23, 2011 10:35 AM PST reply actions  

Agreed

Stover needs to play a lot more. Even though he can’t score, he brings energy, especially on defense. The more he plays, the more it reinforces to the other players that hard-nosed defense gets rewarded.

by vanaaron on Nov 23, 2011 10:53 AM PST up reply actions  

Smith has been such a massive disappointment this year

I can’t even say it’s a silver lining that it means he’ll stick around next year. What NBA team would draft this kid right now?

by Orz on Nov 23, 2011 10:43 AM PST reply actions  

"The team seems to be fighting the coach"

I thought this was an interesting comment yesterday by Jay Bilas. And I would agree with it based on what I have seen the last 2 1/2 years. Even last year, I thought the team was somewhat dysfunctional. It all began, IMO, about midway through J’rue Holliday’s one season with the team, which concluded with an embarrassing loss to SC in the Pac 10 tourney and the trouncing by Villanova. Things have just not been right since. You can see that at times the team can play hard and effectively, but they can’t sustain it. Things seem so toxic at this point that I wonder if Howland can turn it around. I have serious doubts. I give it one more year to turn around.

by bruin7982 on Nov 23, 2011 11:20 AM PST reply actions  

BN what should we do?

BN: Help me figure this out. I appreciate your insight on all things Bruin.

1. How may years remain on CBH current contract?
2. Is this team physically fit?
3. Does this team deserve more time to find its mojo? Afterall it has to recover from RN (mental/emotional breakdowns) and JA (behaviour problem) and JS(not in shape).

I will give Jerime a pass and deem him over his past. Not so with RN and JS. If RN and JS were benched and relegated to back ups, what would we look like?

Lets see: Starting Five: Lamb, Powell, Anderson, Stover, and Wear (pick one). Sixth men: Lane, Wear (the other) and Zeke. Further into the game but when I can’t say: Josh Smith and Reeves Nelson. I just don’t think these guys deserve a prominent role on our team at least not yet. HELP!

by BornBruin on Nov 23, 2011 11:30 AM PST reply actions  

Josh and Reeves are both frustrated

but I have much more sympathy for Reeves being frustrated than Josh. Josh didn’t put in the work over the offseason to be in a position to succeed, doesn’t move quickly enough to avoid BS foul calls and isn’t in good enough shape to contribute.

Reeves on the other hand is probably our best player, and with Josh not being reliably on the court I think Reeves should be the focal point of the offense – but instead is watching the Wears take shots that cannot possibly be good choices. Not an excuse to be a bad teammate, but I think Josh has no-one to blame but himself, while Reeves is in a different category.

However, if Reeves has really been a headcase off the court, maybe Howland is doing what he thinks he has to do on the court to try to get Reeves’ head on straight. Either way, for us to be successful we need ‘Good Reeves’ to be engaged and playing 28-32 mins per game.

by VeniceBruin on Nov 23, 2011 11:46 AM PST up reply actions  

Reeves is a great player but not a good team leader

He is obviously convinced of his own greatness but he doesn’t make other players any better. If you had five great players maybe you don’t need leadership. By the way who is the floor leader of this team?

by BornBruin on Nov 23, 2011 11:54 AM PST up reply actions  

I think I agree on him not being a good team leader

I disagree on him not making other players better – he has become a better passer over time, creates open shots for others and also has an ability to finish if people feed him (a few lapses notwithstanding). I don’t really see why he should give up a contested shot to allow a Wear to take a worse shot though.

Zeek and Jerime need to be senior leaders – which means Zeek needs to snap out of his current bad play in a hurry. We need steady point guard play, decent play from Lamb (who seems to have some talent and a decent work ethic) on both ends, whatever we can get from the 3-spot (my preference so far is for most of this to come from Parker and Powell in rotation with Lamb), and some serious scoring, rebounding and foul-drawing from Reeves and Josh.

by VeniceBruin on Nov 23, 2011 12:04 PM PST up reply actions  

Making the correct pass is expected of a great player but his attitude

and demeanor just doesn’t inspire confidence in other players. They may fear his outbursts but I don’t see him as a leader. In fact If I were on that team I would be pretty pissed off that a player like RN is afforded special treatment. He showed that same mopiness and lopiness at the end of the game. Bring him in off the bench and if he can’t handle it let him go and find a walk on we can give his scholarship to (like Abbott on the football team).

If JS wants to walk because he is told to get in shape or sit on the bench, let him go too. Next year the Wears will be back and we will have powell, parker, stover, lane, and the new recruits to build for the future.

You see players on the football team with ego issues and it drives me crazy to see gutty little Bruins playing their hearts out while strutters flake out and provide no leadership.

by BornBruin on Nov 23, 2011 12:29 PM PST up reply actions  

Your analysis is really insightful N

If you and so many others on BN can see what’s going on, why is that Howland can’t figure it out. I ask myself, is he going senile? Has he had a stroke sometime in the last 3 years? What has happened to this guy ? Is Morgan center tainting the coach’s meals with some sort of potion to get them to turn into complete bumbling idiots? I just don’t get it.

by cyberdbk on Nov 23, 2011 11:42 AM PST reply actions  

I have no sports coaching bonafides

let alone elite college basketball. What I don’t get is how Ben cannot see or react to what the fans and the intelligent bloggers on BN see so clearly. It makes me think that he has made promises to the Wears and their family (and maybe to the transfer recruits such as Drew for next year?) that is creating Drago part 2 (and 3 and 4). Apparently, he made no such promises to Lane, Stover or Powell. Also, this team goes no where without Reeves, who by the way was 3-4 from 3 pt range. If he is on the team, he should start and play max minutes, if he needs further punishment, then kick him off entirely.

by Vanman7475 on Nov 23, 2011 12:17 PM PST reply actions  

You may have a point there

But hey, what do I know. I’m just the 800 lbs bruin in the room.

by tasser10 on Nov 23, 2011 3:45 PM PST up reply actions  

I love Bruin basketball and I can't help commenting

I believe the tv announcers made the comment that a great team disciplines itself. In other words the players police themselves on and off the court. What happened to this group of players? Who was calling out JS out for not getting in shape? Did any teammate bother to check with RN and rather he understoond how important he was to the success of the team this season, how much the team needed his leadership?

by BornBruin on Nov 23, 2011 12:29 PM PST reply actions  

I'm sick of all the "Wear" puns.

Wearing us out. Patience Wearing thin. Etc. etc.

Well, not me. You can look everyWear but noWear in this post will you see a “Wear” pun. It’s just not in my softWear.

by Bruinut on Nov 23, 2011 2:35 PM PST via mobile reply actions  

Sorry

You’re right. After four cups and a whopper junior I’m going with the French roast-junk food defense.

by Bruinut on Nov 23, 2011 4:50 PM PST via mobile up reply actions  

Use your "strengths"

Apologize if this concept has already been discussed on this board, however I thought it worth bringing up either again or for the first time…

Howland is committed to the Wears. That’s obvious. But, what’s also obvious is we have several (10? 11?) players of somewhat comparable ability. Why not use that to our advantage? How can we do that? Play an up tempo game while still concentrating on the defense so integral to Ben’s system. Duke does it…evidence of which is bolstered by Coach K’s mindset and coaching in the Olympic program. Use the 10 players if that’s what you’re committed to doing, but use it to your advantage. Use it to run, use it to tire the other team out and if players such as J. Smith can’t commit, let them run suicides until they can.

I’m not suggesting we can average 110 points per game. However, it appears we have several players that can run an up tempo style. And, contrary to Ben’s apparent philosophy, we do not necessarily have to sacrifice defense to make this happen. Further, this would provide more minutes for Lane, Powell, Parker…etc. Run them until they can’t run any more, tell them there’s no shame in tapping out and replace them with fresh bodies.

This team apparently is not talented enough to win games scoring 50-something points. I don’t see many teams that can use a rotation of 10 quasi-legitimate D1 level players. At this point, what’s the harm in adjusting your coaching style? As it stands now, it may be Ben’s last hope.

by Blue29 on Nov 23, 2011 2:43 PM PST reply actions  

I agree, Blue

Coach ran and ran and ran and pushed the ball, but his goal was not to score 110 points. His goal was to get the other team uncomfortable and out of their style of play and ultimately to make a bad pass to allow us to score in transition. The full court zone press of our first undefeated season did not result in super high scoring games, but they were in the 80’s and 90’s, and that was because of one or two “Bruin Blitzes” where we would get a 10 or 12 point run.

Today’s players are all more skillful ball handlers than the best ball handlers when I started watching Bruin basketball. We can’t expect Coach’s strategy to work the same now as it did then. We know that what we’re doing now is producing double-digit losses, so why not try something new? Use all your guys, and pressure the other team insessantly. And on offense push the ball instead of walking the ball up court. I don’t understand the concept of letting the defense get set, instead of pushing the ball and exploiting the one guy who’s a little slow or is a little out of position.

But what do I know, and what does Blue know/ We just watch unwatchable basketball, and watch our Coach doing the same thing game in and game out, and watching the same results on the scoreboard.

by Fox 71 on Nov 23, 2011 3:13 PM PST up reply actions  

Bruin Blitzes

Another thing that’s particularly strange is Howland’s use of timeouts. Every time we get a chance to go on a run, he pre-empts that momentum by using a timeout. I believe he did it last night to get Reeves in the game. But, when you’ve got momentum, you keep it. You don’t compromise the team’s aggressive mindset by essentially doing the opposing coach a favor and saving him a timeout. I will never understand this tactic.

And let the players play. So what if they miss a 3 early in the shot clock. As long as it’s not an egregiously selfish play, let them gain confidence by playing through it….not by giving them the hook, a dirty look and a seat on the bench for the remainder of the half.

The players appear frustrated and I don’t know the source. I gotta think, though, that some of it has to do with the micromanagement of every facet of the game. If you wanna stop practice to make a point after an ill-advised shot, that’s commendable. If you wanna stop the game to make a point, you’re going to end up with a team full of players that think way too much. Let them play the damn game and adjust on the fly. Otherwise, move aside and make room for someone with a little more flexibility in their strategy.

by Blue29 on Nov 23, 2011 3:32 PM PST up reply actions  

Coach K loves winning. So do I. Ben: Re-focus, man!

Heard Coach K on Jim Rome. He still loves to got to work to prepare to win. He still loves pre-game stuff because it’s catered to win. He loves game time because he loves to go out to win. That man aims to win. And guess what. He has more wins than anybody. Why? Because winning is his focus. The word win, drips from Coach K’s lips. No wonder why the Dukies, Kobe, and NBA players love that man.

Contrast with Ben Howland. Ben’s focus is on, what exactly? What does Ben talk about these last 3+ seasons? Winning? Does that W word slip out his mouth? No. Ben talks problems. Ben talks challenges. Ben talks defense. Ben waxes eloquent on the opponent. We’re getting what Ben focuses on. We’re getting what Ben talks about the most.

Our fortunes will turn around instantly, as soon as Ben starts talking like a winner, instead of a loser. Example:

Don’t say: “I was really happy the way the guys fought back in the second half”.
Say: I told the players that to win, we must play 40 minutes like we did in the second half.

Don’t say: “We ran out of gas”
Say: To win, we must be in top physical condition.

Ben: Don’t let the team fall woefully behind in any game.
Instead, use the power of the bench and tell the press that you will find the combination of guys who came to win on any given night.

Let us rise up and start playing to win.
Let our coach rise up and start coaching to win.
Let’s Win or Die Trying.

U-C-L-A Fight, Fight, Fight! Go Bruins!
NBA: Where Greed Happens. RIP 10/10/11.

by Bruins78 on Nov 23, 2011 3:16 PM PST reply actions  

Of all the things that are wrong with this team

You think the way the coach talks is one of them?

by Tydides on Nov 23, 2011 3:18 PM PST up reply actions  

Right actions come from right mindset. What's on a man's mind is what he talks about.

Yes. Focus on winning. Talk winning. All the time. Winning actions will take place. Actions like… gotta go to zone because we are not winning. Gotta sub that guy out because we are not winning. Yes. Absolutly. We adjust our actions to the things we think about. We all do. Just as you just did with me. See winning. See hope. See positives.

U-C-L-A Fight, Fight, Fight! Go Bruins!
NBA: Where Greed Happens. RIP 10/10/11.

by Bruins78 on Nov 23, 2011 3:22 PM PST up reply actions  

I'm not going to zone defense because they gotta learn how to play man to man.

I’m not going to zone defense because I am not a zone kinda guy.
No, Ben. Think winning. Adjust to win. Adjust to what they can do, and do well.

U-C-L-A Fight, Fight, Fight! Go Bruins!
NBA: Where Greed Happens. RIP 10/10/11.

by Bruins78 on Nov 23, 2011 3:27 PM PST up reply actions  

Which is an action

It has nothing to do with how he talks. Talk is cheap. This is exactly like you getting caught up in his comments to the media, when anyone who has even paid a little attention to Howland throughout his tenure here knows that his comments to the media, especially about an opponent, are boilerplate and reveal very little, but there you go getting spun up on another irrelevant matter.

Changing our defensive strategies is an action.
Improving our substitution patterns is an action.
Yanking players who jack up terrible shots, fail to box out, and don’t take care of the ball are actions.
I’d like to see a change in all of that, because that contributes to winning games. “Talking about winning” doesn’t do diddly squat.

by Tydides on Nov 23, 2011 3:32 PM PST up reply actions  

Please forgive me if I'm misunderstanding your posts, Tydides...

because I’m always very appreciative of your insightful comments…

but words are important, as is the mindset of the players. This is one reason Coach was so great! How many of us have been touched by his words, his Pyramid of Success, etc.? His players fully listened to his words and bought into his Pyramid, and look what happened :-)

I totally agree with your desire for actions and not just talk, but our players would do well to play with a new, more Coach-oriented mindset, don’t you think?

I agree this would be far better than our Rebecca of Sunnybrook Farm lounge lizard fake positivity…

by BruinBaller88 on Nov 25, 2011 10:07 AM PST reply actions  

I Don't understand the infatuation with the old "Ben Ball."

As an alum who grew up watching Alcindor, Wicks, Rowe and was at every single game that Walton played at Pauley, and I’ve never particularly liked “Ben Ball.” Yes, everyone likes to win and the 3 Final 4’s were fun, but we were fortunate to get to a couple of those 4’s and only managed to win 1 game there, in spite of teams loaded with future NBA talent. As pointed out already recently by someone else, the last F4 team had 4 NBA starters including 2 All Stars and Howland couldn’t put together an offense to win. Yes, defense is important, but you have to make the other team play defense too and Ben’s teams just don’t seem to have any coherent offensive plan.

I’ve always wondered why, with all his emphasis on defense, Howland never seems to use a full court press except in the last few desperate moments of a losing effort. We have certainly had the athletic talent on several occasions and he had Coach for advice on how to implement it.

Comments by some parents of former players who transferred/left early that seemed like sour grapes previously, now largely ring true. Kids don’t buy into Howland’s style of play any more and want to play a more up tempo game. Look at UNLV who just beat UNC 90-80 a couple of days ago. Chace Stanback led all scorers with 28 pts and 10 RBs and Mike Moser had 16 pts. 18 RBs and 6 Assts. But those 2 couldn’t get any minutes from Ben. When you look at the recruits who are bailing on us and then look at Josh Smith who was already a big tub of jello when he was recruited and hasn’t changed much it makes me question his recruiting. If Howland thought he could get Smith to shape up in the off season, then he failed miserably.

The good BALANCED teams in the NCAA don’t score only 55 or 56 points and win consistently. In this day of the shot clock, games in the 40s or 50s are ugly basketball to me. I’m not saying we need to be Tarkanian’s Runnin Rebels and try to score 125 pts. a game. Coach’s 10 Natl. Champions won the final by the average score of 84.6 to 71.2 against good teams. The Harrick ‘95 team won 89 to 78. That’s what I’m talkin about. Coach made the observation that Ben’s teams probably played stronger defense than his old teams. What was politely left unsaid was that Ben’s teams couldn’t hold a candle offensively to Coach’s teams.

by HCWHunter on Nov 28, 2011 7:35 PM PST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Bruins Nation, an unofficial daily online scrap book covering the greatest collegiate athletic program in the nation. Established June 16, 2005. GO BRUINS.

Managers

Uclabear1_small Nestor

Arron_afflalo1_small Tydides

Brad_pitt_as_achilles_small Achilles

377011_2642084725867_1068030137_32302525_1166539782_n_small Ryan Rosenblatt

Telemachus_small Telemachus

Licenseplate_small gbruin

2761_small tasser10

Blue_bellerophon_small Bellerophon

Img_0052_2_small Patroclus

Small DCBruins

Of Counsels

094_small Ajax

Menelaus2_small Menelaus

Small Meriones

Small Odysseus

Associates

Eee_small freesia39

Uclabruins_small AHMB