The Morning After, Part 12: Southern Cal
I didn't get any sleep last night. But it's not why you think.
I was going to write this:
Fifty to nothing. Not since 1930. Thank god we wore white. At least we didn't embarrass our colors.
Texas, Stanford, Arizona, Utah, *$c. And we play at Autzen next week.
No psychology, or physics, or lyrics today. Just the brutal truth. Sometimes, less is more.
Who among us would keep our job if we performed like Rick Neuheisel and Dan Guerrero?
Phone: 310-825-2151
Let him hear from you, because this is life until Chancellor Block replaces both Guerrero and Neuheisel.
E-mail: chancellor@ucla.edu
And that was going to be it. It was written, formatted, and scheduled for 8 am EST.
Sorry to wuss out, but it was after midnight here and I had to get up in 3 hours to go to my son's hockey game. He's 9. I know that's really early, but they are in the semis of a big tournament, and the games start pretty early. Wisely, all the family is staying in a hotel near the rink, but I stayed at home tonight to watch the football game. Yeah, bad choice. But I had to be leaving early to make sure I got to the game. Oh, and also to take him the socks he forgot. I mentioned he's 9, right?
Now I'm not one of those parents who is pushing his kid to be some super sports star. Trust me, he's pretty good for his age, but his hockey career is finite. I'll be paying for his college. But in the meantime, I have only 3 rules for him: Have fun, Try hard, and Listen to your coach. We repeat those things before every practice and game, then I give him a hug and he gets on the ice. As long as he is doing those 3 things, I'll keep driving him to all the practices and games and tournaments he wants. And if the day comes that he doesn't want to play anymore, I'll be fine with it, and I'll go take a nap.
So the short and not-so-sweet Morning After post was going to work out well. Besides, I was still so frustrated and angry and appalled by the state of our football team that there really didn't need to be anything more said, and I always try to write these Morning After pieces with a level head and not get caught up in the negative emotions. We have mentioned once or a hundred times lately that we need regime change in Westwood. I didn't need to recount the reasons, or make any more logical arguments, or throw out any more stats. Last night's game in the Coliseum did all the talking I could ever do. I wrote a few words, posted the Chancellor's phone and email, and was gong to bed for a few hours.
But then I read Freesia's post game before going to bed and she beat me to it.
Unfortunately, that tweet was followed by others which backed away from the claim and deferred to Dan's statement that Rick was coaching in Oregon next week. Buzzkill. I guess I shouldn't be too irritated with Sports by Brooks. He watched what we all watched. Maybe it seemed so obvious that he decided to just take the flyer up the rail and go for the win by tweeting it out first before it was official. But can you blame him? I mean, who in their right mind would keep Neuheisel after that game, and after the last 4 years? Anyway, N used Guerrerror's comments in his post, and I was still looking for something to go with. Anyone else I can copy from?
Here are some numbers that appeared on BRO last night. In 2008, the Bruins lost 3 games by 25 points or more (BYU, OSU, ASU). In 2010, with Rick's players, there were 3 more (Stanford, Cal, Oregon). This year, we have already had 5 (Texas, Stanford, Arizona, Utah, *$c), and there is a good chance at a 6th next week in Oregon. That's 11 losses by 25 points in 4 years. By comparison, Dorrell and Toledo combined for 10 blowouts total over 11 years.
But I'm not worried about Rick. Honestly, I think Rick's firing is a foregone conclusion. With each successive ass-kicking, more and more have gotten on board and recognized that he is not turning this program around. Hell, he just got completely owned by Lane Kiffin. If that doesn't disqualify you for a D-1 coaching job, then only pedophilia will.
My bigger concern, and has been for some time, is replacing Chianti Dan. The decline of U.C.L.A. football has happened under his watch. Basketball currently looks to be on the same path. The comments we are hearing from those close to the athletics program confirm what we all suspect - that Dan is a bureaucrat who is more concerned with maintaining the status quo and not making waves or doing anything progressive. Unfortunately, his attempts to not make waves are actually swamping the athletics programs. I am more afraid of him making another football hire, or basketball hire if we go that way, or women's basketball hire, or uniform decision, or construction project. Hell, look what happened when he was tasked to make something as simple as a seating chart.
Chiant Dan is the biggest failure and biggest flaw in our Athletic Department. He probably thinks that he can get out of this mess by throwing Neuheisel under the bus (where he indeed belongs). But we can't let him get out of this. The problems go far beyond football. I noticed this great comment by s.riley last night in the post game thread:
Dan Guerrero is the 16th highest paid public school AD.
UCLA FB under him: 64-61 (.512, 0 Rose Bowl appearances, 0 notable bowl wins).
The 20 yrs before: 149-79 (.654 - 3 Rose Bowl wins, 5 appearances)....and if you're interested in the BB #s:
UCLA BB under Dan: 200-102 (.662)
The 20 yrs before: 444-185 (.706, this includes the Lavin and Hazzard #s...as well as 2/3 of Larry Farmer!)
So for those who think this is just about Neuheisel, think again. See those basketball numbers? That storied program is on life support under Chianti's reign of error. The Bruins are now 1-17 during big hoops/basketball games for Thanksgiving week in last 4 years, with that one win coming over D II Chaminade last week. U.C.L.A. is considered to have the worst facilities in the Pac-12. Dan's impotence has already cost us a conversation with Bob Davies and Rich Rodriguez. Urban Meyer may already be gone. Petersen is talking with UNC. Leach is being courted by WSU. He'd elevate them from a 4th tier school for sure. Fundraising is down. Attendance at games is down. Fan faith is at an all-time low. And that's all on the boss of the athletic department.
Chianti Dan's incompetence and mismanagement have been well chronicled here on BN. He is making over $600K of California taxpayer's money. Is there anyone who thinks that he is worth this amount? It's time to take a page from the Ole Miss alumni playbook, and for the alums and donors and fans and students to stand together and demand that Chancellor Block bring in a new athletic director who will make U.C.L.A. a premier athletics program again.
Chancellor Block: Phone: 310-825-2151
E-mail: chancellor@ucla.edu
Nothing will happen if we sit by quietly and wait for something to happen, and for someone else to do it. Which is really what I was writing about in the first place. Last night, *$c dominated us in passing, running, defense, and attire. That's not acceptable, and it's time we got the Chancellor to do something about it. Hammer his office with calls and emails. Let him know exactly how Bruins fans feel about things.
So now where am I? Oh yeah. About 2 hours from leaving for hockey, and starting over right back where I began on this thing. Well, at least this is a little bit better than an all-nighter at work. But this is still a painful morning, indeed.
62 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Well Written Post G
One thing I had NEVER done in all my years of following UCLA is turn a game off at halftime. But that’s exactly what I did last night – and for the ’SC game no less. I honestly can take no more of this crap that DG and his minions are offering up. You can bet that Chancellor Block will be getting an e-mail (and a heated one, at that) from me.
This has gone on FAR, far too long.
Los Angeles Rams and the UCLA Bruins!!!!!
by Minnesota Bruinfan on Nov 27, 2011 5:28 AM PST reply actions
We almost did.
Instead we had an over/under bet to see if SC would drop 60 on us. We couldn’t take the game seriously after the first 5 minutes.
I lasted until the beginning of the fourth quarter
and that was with my son and fellow Bruin alumnus watching with me. I just couldn’t take any more futility and sadness.
The learned helplessness, as gbruin so aptly analogized, seemed indelibly etched into the Bruins’ psyches the moment we came up short on fourth and goal. Any drama in the outcome to be was over at that point. I figure I earned my loyal masochist’s stripes (the full stripes, not the truncated ones) by lasting as long as I did.
Agree, gbruin: Freesia's post was/is absolutely perfect for The Morning After
and I’d add that all those comments (just re-read ’em) still ring true – if not more. Sadly, our Football Program, (and now even Basketball) are Learned Helplessness, Mastered.
Rick Neuheisel: Go to Dan. Get your check worked out. Then make your This Is It announcement, today, or Monday morning. If you love the school as much as you say you do, you owe at least that bit of motivation to your kids for Friday. Give us a fighting chance to not get slaughtered back to back. C’mon, Rick. Do it.
U-C-L-A Fight, Fight, Fight! Go Bruins!
NBA: Where Greed Happens. RIP 10/10/11.
RN's $C record
You have to go back to William Spaulding, who coached the first 5 games in the UCLA-U$C rivalry to find a worse average result. Spaulding’s teams lost on average by a score of 39-5. The second worse until Dorrell was Spaulding’s successor from 1939-44, who lost games by an average score of 17-8 (spread of 9 points). Fast forward through every other coach with at least 4 years tenure. They were better against $C. Until Dorrell- his average score in his 5 years against $C was 35-17 (losing by 18 points on average). Now RN in his 4 years has the following average score- 34-7 (losing each game by an average of 27 points). So since 1938, the worst 2 coaches against $C in our history have been Chianti Dan’s hires. OUCH.
I sent my letter to Chancellor this morning.
Text of letter to Chancellor
Here is my letter-
subject line- Time to Clean House in the Athletic Department
Dear Chancellor Block-
I have been a Chancellor’s Associate for an extended period. I donate because of the opportunities which were afforded me by my undergraduate education at UCLA. This education was not simply in the classroom. It took place in Royce Hall, in the Dickson Art Gallery, in the Sculpture Garden, at Drake Field, in Pauley Pavilion, at the Coliseum, and in Rieber. Extracurriculars matter.
We deal with professionals from other universities in our daily lives. And we are now the laughing stock of major athletic programs. It doesn’t really work very well to provide rejoinders like “well, our anthropology department is better than yours, so there.”
You can certainly not be expected to vet every member of the coaching staff and administration within the athletic department. But you can take action at the top by removing Dan Guerrero as athletic director, and hiring somebody who can provide a dramatic turnaround in culture and results. The new hire would also advise Rick Neuheisel that his time is up as head football coach.
We should not and (to my knowledge) don’t settle for mediocrity (or worse) in our faculty, our medical center, or our arts programs. Why should we settle for less in athletics?
Please take action now.
[name]
BA 1971
Dump Rick and Dan
I’m sick to my stomach this morning. Made the mistake of DVRing the game, which I just finished watching—speeding through most of the carnage. As a lifelong Bruin fan, I’ve never seen a game against USC where UCLA lacked emotion, preparation, fight and heart. i had to laugh when one of the game announcers suggested the Bruins might be flat because they’re looking ahead to Oregon. This was USC. And anyone who thinks UCLA has a remote chance against Oregon is detached from reality. J.D. Morgan is spinning in his grave. The Bruins are (to use an old Sports Illustrated headline) in ruins. Rick and Dan must go due to incompetence. It’s going to take several years, at least, to rebuild the football program under a great coach. What is the chancellor waiting for?
Dear Chancellor Block,
You don’t have to work with Trojans.
Dan Guerrero doesn’t have to work with USC grads.
I DO.
Thanks for insuring another year of hell for those of us who live and work in the real world. Clearly the UCLA administration no longer understands the importance of beating USC. In fact, I don’t think this administration even understands how important it is to just not be humiliated by USC.
Thanks a lot.
A lost generation
What makes me really sad is that DG has lost nearly a generation of UCLA students who properly identify UCLA with excellence in both sports and academics. I’d be curious how many alums post here on BN who graduated in 2000 or later. DG has done an excellent job of dramatically lowering the expectations of these new alums…perhaps that’s the master plan…cruise through the rest of his life making $600k/year with no expectations.
I was a student from 1999-2004
So basically, FML.
I still care about UCLA, but I think that the fire and passion I had for UCLA dwindles every year. I’m so tired of getting abused by $C, it’s absurd. I hate that I can’t even go to the game anymore (even when it’s at the Rose Bowl) because it’s 50/50 whether I’ll be more disgusted with trOJans in attendance or our own coaching staff.
My first UCLA memory and what made me want to go to school at UCLA was when Ed O and the rest of the Bruin squad won the NCAA hoops championship. I was in junior high then and vowed I’d go to UCLA. I know UCLA can do better, but during my lifetime as a UCLA student and now alumna, I just haven’t seen it (other than some glimpses by the basketball team). Football has been a disgrace. Not sure how much more UCLA football I can take in my life.
by Ghost of Haines Hall on Nov 27, 2011 10:09 AM PST up reply actions
History was made last night
Just think about it; UCLA athletics will never sink this low again. This is as garbage of a product we shall ever see. We have officially reached the bottom. I do no watch the game last night and it was one of my best decisions. I still feel depressed and hopeless. It just seems unfair that the worst thing that can happen to Dan/RN is for them to get fired.
Don’t worry I am not advocating violence. But think what would happen if they worked for an SEC team
by cyberdbk on Nov 27, 2011 7:15 AM PST via mobile reply actions
don't underestimate dan guerrero's penchant for shittiness
I said the same thing during dorrell’s reign… “it can only get better”. well, maybe dan IS earning his $600k salary because he’s splitting open the history books year after year, and you can’t stop him now
It sounds like
You’re a dispirited Bruin, but a terrific dad. Take comfort, gb, in knowing that, even if last night’s blow out were reversed and we were on our way to a top-tier bowl, your presence at your son’s 9:00 am hockey game is far more meaningful.
May wholesale changes mean that you and your son can watch AND ENJOY replays of bruin contests when you get back from hockey games.
Thanks for your moving obituary. We share your misery.
by Bruinut on Nov 27, 2011 7:27 AM PST via mobile reply actions
Actually, it was 5:45 am
but I was there on time, and well caffeinated for it.
Thanks for all your kind thoughts this season. We’re all in this together. We’ll all come out of it together.
greg in denver, U.C.L.A. guy for life - BruinsNation.com
Can you believe this moron:
Said Neuheisel: “We can’t feel sorry for ourselves. We’ve got to get up and get back to work and see if we can play a much better game in the conference championship game.”
The only thing I want to hear from Rick
Is “I resign and Chianti Dan deserves to go out the door with me”.
I think the chancellor should immediately pull together an executive committee
of wise people (no one who works in Morgan Center) to hire a football coach — before Leach and Pertersen are gone. We cannot trust DG to do that.
At the same time, he should fire DG and bring in another executive committee to hire DG’s replacement.
We cannot waste time on either front. Firing RN without firing DG and allowing DG to make the replacement will fail.
Firing both at the same time without a committee in place to hire the new football coach will also fail.
And, he might want to put together an outside group to figure out what is going wrong in basketball — because even at his worst, and his teams’ worst, BenBall has never been like this.
I’m not a big fan of outsourcing, but in this case, even the guy in that credit card commercial — the over seas guy on the phone bank — would make better choices than DG has and is making.
sjh
by Class of 66 on Nov 27, 2011 7:40 AM PST reply actions 1 recs
Agree wholeheartedly
Our biggest challenge now is time, or lack thereof. Fiddling, Nero style, will allow all of the top coaching prospects to float away while our athletic department burns.
As you undoubtedly know, administrative endeavors move at glacial speed. Block needs to act now to get his search committees in line. He won’t be able to wait until a new AD is found to make a change for football HC. The new AD can make the decisions regarding basketball.
The question is, whom do you trust to be on the respective search committees? Randy Cross comes to mind. Kiki V? Any others?
"Make each day your masterpiece."--JRW
by Give me a B... on Nov 27, 2011 9:12 AM PST up reply actions
Choics to Head The Committee
There are many Bruins with the business skill to step up to head the committee — but my two favorites for the committee would also be my favorites for the AD job — Kiki V. and Andy Hill — both of whom have strong business bvackgrounds and track records of success.
I’d have them head the HC committee and include some at least one past coach like Vermiel and a great player like Cross.
Actually, I might put cross on the AD list, too, but both he and Hill would probably have to take major cuts in pay.
sjh
"... with the business skill ..."
I think this is a crucial element. As in, without it, we’re destined for continued futility.
As Franklin Murphy showed in selecting J. D. Morgan as AD, having a keen business sense is vital in building (or re-building) a top-tier athletic program. I would hope that a search committee recognizes and requires this quality.
The pathetic tragedy in this whole affair, in my humble opinion, is that the reclusive insularity practiced by the Morgan Center is not only unnecessary, but ultimately self-dooming. I would hope that both a search committee and a new AD would look at students, alumni, and fans as a resource to be tapped, and not as an irritant.
What I emailed this morning. Let's all do it.
Dear Chancellor Block:
Allow me to explain why you must fire Athletic Director Dan Guerrero immediately.
I am a 1970 graduate who bleeds Blue and Gold, just like my uncle who graduated from our wonderful school after World War II, my cousins who like me graduated in the 1960s and 1970s, my two sons who graduated from UCLA early this century and my daughter who is a sophomore right now majoring in Biological Sciences. We are all UCLA.
I am not a big donor, a mover or a shaker, but I love my school and its traditions. I am just one of many hundreds of thousands who have graduated and moved on to success and service in our large metropolitan community, always grateful and proud of the school that helped me, for example, to become a Los Angeles County Deputy District Attorney now going on 32 years.
Part and parcel of that school experience and lifelong connection to UCLA are our athletics, especially the two major revenue sports, football and basketball. They have been a part of the culture and joy of my life and family ever since I was a small boy, through adulthood and now into my maturity as I near retirement. My family and friends’ lifelong, mutual camaraderie over Bruin Basketball and Football have enriched our lives immeasurably. They are part of our essence at work and at play. My season tickets in football are but a small measure of the depth of our entire families’ love for UCLA sports.
As great as our academics are, it was my wider family’s love of Bruin football and basketball that made us all Bruins for life, that inspired us to matriculate to this great university, to walk the walk on Bruin Walk when our turn came. It is the connection that cements our love and loyalty to the school and even helps endear us to one another. The academics feed our brains, but it is these sports that nourish our hearts on a daily basis. (Which is why we need a campus stadium like our big “sister” Cal.)
Our passion as Bruins is palpable, a real and a major element in the joy and meaning of our lives, even our collective identity. Even now, whenever I talk to my children wherever they may be, the first thing we talk about is the state of our football and basketball programs. It is as basic as breathing.
I write to you now because that state is rotten and has been for over ten years under the bumbling and stumbling, lack of leadership of Athletic Director Dan Guerrero. Both our football and basketball programs have fallen off the cliff. We are now the laughingstock of both college football and basketball, at the same time! Morgan Center now symbolizes a decade long failure of judgment, mediocrity, bureaucratic meddling and fundamental marketing incompetence in almost every aspect. The UCLA brand has been systemically undermined. This has cost the university tens if not hundreds of millions of dollars over a decade. And now it will get worse.
The fault for this mess does not stop with just an isolated football or basketball coach. It is systemic. Its common denominator is an athletic director who has become a caricature, a poster boy of what is wrong about our public administrators, an out of touch, incompetent bureaucrat who has hugely enriched himself to the tune of over $700,000 a year, the highest paid athletic director in the PAC 12, inversely to the performance of his programs on the field and on the court. We are at the bottom, literally nationwide in both revenue sports.
There must be accountability, not just at the bottom, but at the top. As in all fields, the four letters of UCLA must stand for excellence. Instead Mr. Guerrero has created and fostered a culture of mediocrity, a tolerance for the unacceptable. If he were a student he would get an F. Yet as athletic director he still gets to make one failed decision after another without consequence.
Do not allow him to scapegoat the coaches by just firing one or two of them. Do not let him paper mâché the debacle of the Pauley renovation, or the lying about the student sections or his complete fail on marketing of all things UCLA. Hold him accountable for his indelible and incredible history of poor decision making and execution and his complete lack of vision.
He already fired a decent football coach, Mr. Toledo, only to replace him with and keep one year too long a mediocre coach in Mr. Dorrell, only to replace him with what has turned out to be the worst football coach in the history of modern football at UCLA by far. He cannot be entrusted, on this ten year track record alone, to make a fourth choice.
I live by my choices at work every day. I suffer the consequences. If UCLA means anything it is the demand for excellence and the accountability for our actions. By any measure, if UCLA is the place where Champions are made, it must be the place where accountability starts at the top.
The top is Mr. Guerrero. 50-0 in a rivalry game, an 0-4 record against Division 1 schools in basketball, an alumni that wants to occupy Morgan Center because of its repeated bungling throughout every aspect of the program, are each indictments of the alleged athletic director. The fault lines all run through him.
We need more than just a coaching change. We need regime change.
Until it comes, I and tens of thousands of other alumni, will not support my alma mater or its sports in any way financially. Its not what we want to do. We have no choice. We will not stand idly by and watch the destruction of what is so near and dear to our daily lives.
Yes, fire Coach Neuheisel. Yes, fire Coach Howland if he continues to preside over an imploding team. But first and foremost fire Dan Guerrero because he must be held accountable for UCLA revenue sports to even begin to recover. He has lost our trust completely. And accountability must start at the top, not the scapegoated bottom.
Thank you,
“uclahy”
by uclahy on Nov 27, 2011 7:53 AM PST reply actions 7 recs
I'm sure Ty will honor your comment
but , I’m not Ty.
I’m the original Geezer, here — at least, this morning I don’t think I’m ty.
sjh
I had to reread
Mr. Gurrerror, Mr. Dorrell and Mr. Toledo (a fine coach?)…..You are being way too polite for my tastes.
by iLOATHEscFOREVER on Nov 27, 2011 8:17 AM PST up reply actions
Compared to KD and CRN,
Toledo is Mount Rushmore material. Sorry if I’m too polite. Just me, sometimes.
Excellent points made..
He already fired a decent football coach, Mr. Toledo, only to replace him with and keep one year too long a mediocre coach in Mr. Dorrell, only to replace him with what has turned out to be the worst football coach in the history of modern football at UCLA by far. He cannot be entrusted, on this ten year track record alone, to make a fourth choice.
One wonders if Mr Toldedo and Mr Harrick might entertain returning to their old jobs?
..no, I am serious!
Block: Don't Act Like the Penn State Board of Trustees
Who hung each person (organizationally below them down through the athletic department) out to dry by firing them, in order to protect their jobs, reputation in order that the trustees looked more like the solution and not the cause of the problem.
by iLOATHEscFOREVER on Nov 27, 2011 8:13 AM PST reply actions
My Email to the Chancellor -- Entitled "Mediocrity Has No Place at UCLA"
I’ve written the Chancellor a few times, starting after last year’s sc game. Here is the one I just sent:
“Dear Chancellor Block,
I’ve written before asking that you replace the athletic director and football coach; so, I will make this note short.
I am a Professor Emeritus at the University of Wisconsin Law School and a UCLA graduate.
As an academic, I know that mediocrity has no place on the campus of a great university. We would not tolerate it in any department or classroom and we ought not tolerate it in any program on our campus.
Sports are a part of the university; they enrich the student experience and draw attention to the university in ways that a Nobel Prize winner cannot. It’s a shame but it’s true.
The “First to 100” glory is being lost, buried under the demise of the football program. The costs to the university are great — and not just financial. Our reputation as a first tier university is being damaged — maybe wrongfully, but damaged nevertheless.
I know that this is a time of great challenge for you. I have a daughter at UC xxxxxxxx and know the financial issues you face in trying to maintain, if not improve the University during these hard times.
However, just as we replace professors with hiring committees, we need to replace our athletic director and football coach. I suggest you form a blue ribbon committee of outside people to do an immediate search for both positions. In that way, you will not divert resources or time from your other duties.
Why immediately? Because, the best candidates for the football job are already “in play” and running a late and weak search process, as we’ve done in the past couple of years will result in another mediocre hire.
I’m afraid that you will have to face this issue in the immediate future. Please, deal with it now. Lead. Get ahead of it. Do it right and you will not have to focus on these issues again.
Sincerely,
UCLA Class of 1966"
My signature line and the reference to the UC are complete in the version sent. Why they are deleted here is a tale for another time.
sjh
Terrific letter, 66
Because your letter is short, the suggestions you make about forming a blue-ribbon search committee immediately, and about acting now stand tall. Well done.
I’m still in the process of working through my own inarticulate angst. Your succinct letter inspires and gives me hope that I can distill my thoughts and get my letter out this week.
Nut
The West County air is clearing my head. We are termporarily renting a house in Bodega Bay because we can’t fine one to buy in Sebastopol..
The ocean is trying its hardest to keep me centered.
sjh
Thanks for the update
I love Bodega Bay. Indeed, there is something very meditative and relaxing about the Pacific. Maybe you can offer to host the blue-ribbon search committee there. I’d like them to be clear-headed, too.
When a blanket of Pacific fog has refrigerated the July Bodega air down to a nice 70 degrees, and it’s 112 degrees everywhere else, you can call your Texas friends to gloat. If I see a sign along Highway One, next to a gaudy saltwater taffy stand, for “Class of 66’s Texas-style Barbequed Dungeness Crab,” I’ll know you made it permanent.
In the mean time, I have to believe that something great will open up in Sebastopol. It’s supposed to be a buyer’s market, isn’t it?
Just sent this to Chancellor Block
Chancellor Block,
If you give a damn about UCLA’s ability to convince future alums to donate to your athletic programs, you need to take the immediate actions demanded in the following:
http://www.bruinsnation.com/2011/11/27/2589164/the-morning-after-part-12-southern-cal#storyjump
I, like many others, live and die with the performance of our athletic programs – in particular the results against USC.
I, like many others, contribute pretty decent sums of money each year to UCLA athletics.
I cannot begin to imagine the drop-off in donations by the NEXT generation of donors if all they know is an athletic department that is committed to mediocrity, in-the-box thinking, and the idea of getting humiliated by our cross-town rival on a regular basis.
We are a national (and local, again, as of last night) punch line in football and basketball right now. You’ve got millions of dollars about to be coming in each year from the new Pac-12 Network contract. Use them. Wisely.
UCLA is the most admired, well-known, sought-after public university on the planet. Think about that. It’s true. And under your watch, our high profile athletic programs have spent the better part of this century debasing the UCLA brand.
What an embarrassment.
I am embarrassed.
You should be embarrassed. And ashamed.
Act now, but not just for the sake of acting. Be creative, and get people in place that will restore the proud traditions that made UCLA the most admired athletic institution in the land.
Otherwise, know that the concrete is settling on your own legacy. It ain’t pretty right now, but there’s still time for you to do something about it.
That time would be now.
Regime Change in Order..
Mine:
Chancellor Block,
As a UCLA graduate in 1968 and longtime fan of UCLA football, basketball, and her other sports, I would respectfully request that you and your administration relieve Rick Neuheisel of his responsibilities as head football coach, fire/disband his entire staff and – most importantly and in light of her decade-long downward trajectory of athletics – fire Dan Guerrero and replace him and his incompetent staff with those who know and appreciate how to successfully grow these programs.
Until such time, I really cannot see spending any of my entertainment money attending or supporting UCLA events. As you are no doubt discovering this morning, I am not alone ion this sentiment.
Regards,
WHP
UCLA ’68
Sadly..
..I believe we are stuck with him. It’s one thing to relieve a football coach for poor performance, but AD in more ingrained and — as someone pointed out above – CRN will be the sacrificial lamb that will preserve DG’s job for the next five years.
..after he’s selected a mediocre, “cost-effective” replacement for Neuheisel and this Dorrellesue Drama plays out yet again..yet again.
Letter to Block, subject: Dan Guerrero and Rick Neuheisel
Dear Chancellor Block
Had enough yet? While UCLA is a great university, a disproportionate amount of the support for it comes from alumni who are interested in the overall health of the entire university, including its sports programs.
Our sports programs are mired in mediocrity, and worse. We are about to be passed by Stanford in the number of national championships we have won. USC seems to own us. Our football program is a national joke. (Thank God we wore white uniforms last night. At least we didn’t disgrace the Blue and Gold.)
I’ve had enough.
No more support for UCLA until you fire Guerrero.
Brendon O’XXXXXXX, ’67
My email to the Blockhead:
in 24 pt type:
50 to 0. Happy?
Wrote to the Chancellor last night
Quite simply, what Dan has been doing is not even close to good enough. Sad sad sad.
I've written before but it is a waste of time
Our Chancellor does not read our letters or e-mails. He does not take our calls. He just ignores them because listening is not within his job description. It appears that his job performance just doesn’t matter because (like tenure) his job is not at risk if subordinates perform below standard.
Can any fellow Bruin explain to me why failure to meet performance standards are not grounds for termination in the UC system but a breach of moral turpitude, however slight or severe, is? Has California become that ignorantly PC?
by iLOATHEscFOREVER on Nov 27, 2011 9:04 AM PST reply actions
Can we go over Blocks head?
He reports to the UC Regents. Can we go to them? To have Block single handedly destroy the top brand in the UC system should warrant action on their part . . .
by orlandobruin on Nov 27, 2011 9:36 AM PST up reply actions
wrote another letter as well
again. as a former non rev bruin student athlete, who was passionate beyond belief about (bruin) bball and fball — i’m the type that would clear breakable objects from around me during games — this season has been a culmination of frustration. I’ve stopped my donations to the AD when Rick was hired because i saw thru the BS. it was even more clear when i sat down with him in an alumni dinner event shortly thereafter and he was already spewing his rah rah garbage. Thankfully i have my grad/professional programs at another university to consume me and it has been a great outlet to open up my wallet to support a place that on the one hand doesn’t remotely compare to the glory of ucla, but on the other is trying oh-so-hard. which i love. last night i turned on the game with my folks while visiting home like so many on here, and the texts from my mdwst friends started rolling thru ("go bruins!, ftt (fuck the trojans)!) and then i saw the game take shape as expected. the funny thing is i just laughed. i actually pulled for usc to show up the bruins to some degree. My parents asked if i was ok since they don’t really follow sports (and never had the chance to go to college). i’m usually the first to come to the support of the athletes we have, but i’m even so detached from them. Lazy. Uninspired. No passion. Entitled. I thought we had elite recruits? Our kids looked slow. I know its coaching, but where is the inner drive to not lose, let alone not get humiliated in front of family and friends? I don’t get it. All the attributes I’d expect to see in bruins i saw in the trojan athletes last night. they’re still annoying as hell of course. I can’t imagine the apathy that exists in being a student at ucla right now. for once i can say i’m thankful not to have to walk up bruin walk. how far we have fallen.
Watched until the game was officially over
because I had my brother (ex marine), sister, aunt, cousin, godson, nephew, niece, and friends watching the game with me. For the sake of the youngsters in the family, I told everyone we commited to watch the game and we will finish the game, unlike the team that showed up to play the hated suc.
My twelve year old nephew is of course impressionable and I was challenged all night to explain how UCLA could look so weak and uninterested in playing in the biggest game of the year. I asked him why he thought we were losing, and he said, “we can’t tackle, defend the pass, and finish a drive with a TD”, and he is twelve. In his world view it was the players that failed, but he has a vague notion that maybe the coaching had something to do with the slaughter. He hated the uniforms and wondered what happened to the blue and gold uniforms because that was the colors of the shirt he was wearing.
We watched the game at the American Legion and it was a festive night. Blue and gold, and the hated suc colors were everywhere. But did you guys know that maybe .005% of these veterans went to suc or UCLA? We are part of the UCLA universe that is sometimes overlooked. There are thousands of us fans that did not attend UCLA and live and die blue and gold. Needless to say the suc veterans were very happy last night while we Bruin vets were left holding our collective hearts in our hands and our faces the color of the hated scarlet of suc.
After the game, suc fans were wolfing on me and the only retort I could come up with was a weak: “Where will you be playing at next week?”.
GO BRUINS FOREVER! REGIME CHANGE NOW!
Arizona... this... the surreality of it all
Watching the insane “fight” before halftime in Tucson…. it was like a rabbit hole had opened in the known world and the beloved UCLA football program had fallen through into some lower ring of Hell (to mix literary analogies). It was almost like watching a horrible accident… that surreal distancing, the sense of doom, the chaos… it was unsettling to say the least.
Then the “value subtracted” by the basketball losses led us to last night. In the light of day the white uniforms, the astonishing failure of the players (coverage on the long passes), the crippled coaching (red zone play calling and execution), the smarmy frustration of Neuheisel’s face, the extra-smarmy douche-bagism of Barky’s face (who performed at the highest level you can ask of a college quarterback)…. in the light of day this is a sickening and surreal dream.
I’ve written the Chancellor before, I emailed last night. I feel powerless to alter the insane and surreal course of events. The Oregon game has huge potential to extend the nightmare. And (God bless him, he’s a Bruin and I am sure loves our University and its athletics) Neuheisel’s obsequious dissembling and “humble” promises to make it all better in the post-game comments… caught in a downward spiral. Like an abused spouse. Like cultists who have lost our will. It is a gap between what is real and what is surreal. It is a gap between what our student athletes deserve and what they get. It is a gap between the hopes and expectation of UCLA Fan and what we have. The gap…. increases.
New York Times today: “Mind the the gap UCLA.”
I didn't have such a cool head when emailing the Chancellor
Ineptitude has no place at UCLA. The heat will rise on you next if you don’t find a competent person to take over the Athletics Department. I’m sure you’re getting a flood of angry emails now – believe me, they only represent a tiny fraction of the sentiment of Bruins everywhere. Don’t blow it and stain your own legacy in the eyes of millions of UCLA fans and alumni.
Sent twice, one with my undergrad email address, the other with my Anderson address. Sorry UCLA, but I’m not giving you a penny until this …… is fixed. Perhaps I’ll bring it up with the Dean of the business school, maybe she can give me audience in front of this guy.
As a non-UCLA grad here is what I sent...
Thanks for the statistics for the records under Donut Dan and the 20 years before him.
Chancellor Block,
I am sure you are getting a flood of emails after the horrendous performance by the UCLA Bruins against Southern Cal last night, and you should be. The most important take-away from that performance is that you need to fire Athletic Director Dan Guerrero and Head Coach Rick Neuheisel.
I am not a UCLA graduate. If that causes you stop reading this email I understand. However, the fan base of all things Bruins is not only constructed of those who have graduated from the UCLA. No sir, there are hundreds of thousands of us who did not attend UCLA but bleed the blue and gold as if we did and we are just as frustrated.
I’m sure there are plenty of us who donate to the school. I know that we all buy UCLA gear to show our pride in a university we did not even attend. The money we spend on those items has a direct impact on the UCLA bottom line in terms of royalty fees and brand awareness.
Sadly, actively supporting UCLA is now a decision that large chunk of your fan-base has to consider due to the absolute failure of the athletic department. Non-revenue sports have had success, and continue to do so, but they exist only because of the revenue generated by the football and basketball programs. Two programs that are 1-17 in the last 4 years of basketball/football games in November with the one win against a division II basketball team this year.
As further evidence of the futility and mediocrity of the current leadership in the athletic department I offer you that Dan Guerrero, as the 16th highest paid public school Athletic Director, has managed to allow the following to happen on his watch:
UCLA Football under Athletic Director Guerrero:
64-61 (.512, 0 Rose Bowl appearances, 0 notable bowl wins).
The 20 yrs before Guerrero:
149-79 (.654 – 3 Rose Bowl wins, 5 appearances).
UCLA Basketball under Athletic Director Guerrero:
200-102 (.662)
The 20 yrs before Guerrero:
444-185 (.706)
Those records are atrocious for what is supposed to be the most successful athletic department in college athletics. Throw in the mind-boggling decisions to wear those white uniforms in the ONE game where the True Bruin Blue needs to be represented and you have nothing short of a complete failure of the athletic department.
Make no mistake, graduates and non-graduates alike will continue to love and adore UCLA, but their support, whether by donations, season ticket purchases, or purchasing apparel and other UCLA emblazoned items will, and should, be withheld due to a lack of success on the football field and basketball court.
I am not saying that football and basketball is the be-all-end-all of UCLA, but as the most readily accessible faces of UCLA they are what the vast majority of the country knows about UCLA in the here and now.
My group of 4 people is seriously considering not renewing our football season tickets next year due to the inexcusable and continued underachieving performance of the football team. While a loss of our 4 tickets is not going to be felt by UCLA there are thousands of others just like us. Help us avoid making that decision.
Please do the right thing for UCLA athletics and UCLA as a whole, replace athletic director Dan Guerrero and football coach Rick Neuheisel.
Respectfully,
XXXXX
XXX, CA
Football season ticket holder for 18 years
by seernst on Nov 27, 2011 10:20 AM PST reply actions 2 recs
Great letter
Doesn’t matter if you are not a grad, as a season ticket holder you are part of our family.
Great letter
as I fall into your poulation of fan. Rec’d
I should be working right now...
Wow! What a great cross section of letters
I love the depth of approach. This makes clear that this is not some automated “write the chancellor by clicking here” response.
sjh

by 




















