Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Veterans Share Their Favorite Sports Memories

Spaulding Roundup: Bruins Fought Hunger, Prepare For Mora

Where the Bruins should be fighting hunger this December.

The Bruins have finished up their finals, and now can start working toward their New Year's Eve date to San Francisco with a collectively clear mind. The team did practice yesterday afternoon, and while specific news on the session has been slow to come out, Jon Gold is reporting that with the coaching position temporarily vacated with Rick Neuheisel's departure, Marques Tuiasosopo has taken a full staff position and has been named the team's QB coach - at least through the bowl game and new coach Jim Mora's review of the coaching staff. Brett Hundley spoke of his respect and admiration of Tui. Speaking of the new coach, Jim Mora's introductory press conference will be held today at 2:30pm PST. We will have an open thread for the event.

As N noted last night, and various local media writers have covered, the momentary fiasco that saw many members of the football team temporarally denied their bowl-per diem checks has now been settled. While there does still appear to be some question as to whether the finals-week practice sessions in question were mandatory or voluntary, Jill Painter raised a good point in asking why the per-diem was ever at issue, as a motivational tool or punishment.

But UCLA should have never dangled the money in front of players as motivation to do anything. John Wooden never had to motivate players like that, and he won 10 national basketball championships. He has a ton of books UCLA might want to check out for better motivational ideas.

Jill also noted the uncertainty that many players felt about the workout and practice expectations for them during finals week, while finding that the strongest pressure for the workouts and 'punishment' for not participating sufficiently was not from the coaches, but from administrators.

What hurts UCLA is not the players using social media to expose an egregious error. The real problem is someone at UCLA saw fit to threaten players with money players say they use to eat. The training table consists of only lunch when the campus is shut down.

... Said Carroll: "Most of the guys felt like it not even the coaches who were pressuring us. It was like our player personnel people, William Peddie (director of player development). That's a bigger problem. We felt like it wasn't the coaches who (were) withholding the checks."

While the team has now successfully fought hunger, and is getting ready for the Fight Hunger Bowl, Rick Neuheisel has landed his first post-gig. He will appear on the CBS Sports Network this week as an analyst on the network's 'Inside College Football' program, looking back at the season and breaking down the upcoming bowl matchups.

Neuheisel, fired after leading the Bruins to a 21-29 record over four seasons, will join host Adam Zucker and analysts Aaron Taylor, Brian Jones and Randy Cross to discuss the 2011 college football season and preview this year’s bowl games.

Rick's appearance will debut on Tuesday evening, from 5-7 pm. Neu and Randy Cross might have a few words to share about Chianti Dan and Morgan Center's incompetence and lack of commitment to the UCLA Football program.

Star-divide

As Tasser noted yesterday afternoon, the now-completed coaching search and overall incompetence of Chianti Dan's administration in Westwood has gone national. Ivan Maisel was the latest to raise the matter of Morgan Center's mindset, while discussing Kevin Sumlin's move to Texas A&M for ESPN.com.

Sumlin showed little interest in Arizona and rebuffed Arizona State. Having coached against UCLA this season and last, Sumlin knew what kind of players the Bruins had. But UCLA's facilities need updating, and so does the mindset of its athletic department, which combines the efficiency of a publicly funded bureaucracy with the spending habits of a have-not. As Chris Dufresne of the Los Angeles Times wrote Wednesday, "UCLA is an enigma wrapped in a riddle wrapped in a months-old requisition order for new goalposts."

Now the Mora hire is done and I don't want to go back too much to re-litigate it, but according to a post by Ted Miller on ESPN's Pac-12 blog yesterday morning, ASU may be taking a different path in hiring its new coach.

Is Arizona State trying to poach a fellow Pac-12 coach -- as in Utah's Kyle Whittingham? Maybe. The Sun Devils certainly could do worse. Whittingham, in our mind, is a top-20 coach without question.

... The larger point is the new TV contract continues to impact coaching salaries in the Pac-12. Arizona State is trying to find a coach, and Whittingham -- whatever conference he coaches in -- offers potentially good value if he can be lured to town.

... What's becoming clear though is there is money to spend and schools are having to spend it to lure top coaches.

The takeaway is that ASU's Athletic Director may be taking one of the approaches that some of us at BN - myself included - called for our administration to consider when conducting the coaching search. That is, looking at coaches that have track records of success leading significant programs, but are being paid at a rate lower than their status justifies. For us, Mark Dantonio from Michigan State was one of these coaches that might have been felt out, while it seems that ASU's AD at least contacted Kyle Wittingham - who since the first report of interest came out has been offered a $300k/year raise.

Making a run at coaches like these is far from a sure thing; while the new media money entering the conference means that schools like UCLA and ASU can offer larger salaries to these established coaches, they do not have the same push to move up to greater heights - and are not seen as being on the coaching carousel in the same way that, say Hugh Freeze or Kevin Sumlin were before their moves to SEC schools. But for an ASU fan, I imagine that the sign that their athletic administration is kicking the tires on at least one head coach with success in major collegiate ranks is encouraging.

Comment 54 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Coach Wooden and Motivation

I remember reading that if the players were not responding, Coach would tell the players the practice was over. That was enough to motivate his players.

by BC_Bruin on Dec 13, 2011 6:28 AM PST reply actions  

Slightly OT

Have we heard if we have gotten our coaching staff waiver from the NCAA…so that Jr can go to work?

I’ve not seen anything about it in the tradmed.

by GemCityBruin on Dec 13, 2011 6:35 AM PST reply actions  

Not sure if we have gotten it yet

But we have applied for it. Gold blogged about it. I fanshotted it but haven’t seen any updates yet.

by Nestor on Dec 13, 2011 6:48 AM PST up reply actions  

They're expecting it today

according to the OC Register. Mora will be here today and catch a bit of the morning practice as well as meet with coaches.

Go Bruins!

by King J77 on Dec 13, 2011 7:42 AM PST up reply actions  

Fighting hunger

witholding food checks is reprehensible. Whoever came up with that idea should be fired, zero tolerance.

by Strathmore&Gayley on Dec 13, 2011 8:15 AM PST reply actions   2 recs

It's all about money

for the tightwads at the Moran Center. I detest them.

But hey, what do I know. I’m just the 800 lbs bruin in the room.

by tasser10 on Dec 13, 2011 8:35 AM PST up reply actions  

Sure

I just mean, they think people only get motivated with money. That’s why Chianti Dan thought he had a slam dunk with Petersen.

But hey, what do I know. I’m just the 800 lbs bruin in the room.

by tasser10 on Dec 13, 2011 1:11 PM PST up reply actions  

I can't believe this story.

They get paid that money because they are preparing for a bowl game. There is no reason why these fine scholars can’t step away from their studies to get a 45 minute workout in. Its too bad Carroll wan’t concerned about his university then. And if Maiava can’t afford to buy his groceries with the scholarship money that school is giving him, but has enough money for pot, we should continually withhold this guys checks.

by beeru on Dec 13, 2011 8:27 AM PST reply actions  

What's not to believe?

You can’t have mandatory practice like that while trying to pass it off as voluntary, and you certainly can’t withhold checks the way they did. The issue of merit is irrelevant.

But hey, what do I know. I’m just the 800 lbs bruin in the room.

by tasser10 on Dec 13, 2011 8:37 AM PST up reply actions  

So in this statement..

‘All of our players were advised that they would need to complete three of five workouts and submit academic exit forms prior to Sunday’s practice in order to receive their bowl checks," UCLA spokesman Nick Ammazzalorso said in a statement.’

Where do you see anything about it being voluntary?

by beeru on Dec 13, 2011 8:45 AM PST via mobile up reply actions  

I'm not going to argue about it anymore,

but please tell me you see the irony in a kid who has been busted for marijuana three times, now complaining he doesn’t have enough money for McDonalds! Voluntary or mandatory, it all just shows the sad state of affairs that is UCLA Athletics.

by beeru on Dec 13, 2011 8:57 AM PST up reply actions  

That's a whole other issue

and you’d better believe it’s not just Kai.

I’m not arguing with you. I’m telling you that there was a communication problem, where some players thought it was voluntary and others thought it was mandatory.

But hey, what do I know. I’m just the 800 lbs bruin in the room.

by tasser10 on Dec 13, 2011 9:04 AM PST up reply actions  

Irony

like calling them amateurs when you’re holding their Paychecks until they show up to practice and/or play.

Go Bruins!

by King J77 on Dec 13, 2011 9:40 AM PST up reply actions  

Diseased culture does need to change, part of the reason CRN was let go.

Problem, the Morgan center’s failure still continues on an epic level. These kids need strong leaders, right now they have nothing.

by Bruin'96 on Dec 13, 2011 11:40 AM PST up reply actions  

Does everyone who played regular season get this check? Or do only players going to the bowl game get a check?

Perhaps having academic forms turned in has something to do with whether or not they can play in the bowl game, and if they can’t play because of academic issues, the don’t get a check. I don’t know. I’m just asking. It’s hard for me to believe anyone in administration associated with the team would oblivious to their hunger issues.

by bluetoo on Dec 13, 2011 10:04 AM PST up reply actions  

I would think it's everybody on the team on scholarship

Specially since even scout team players on scholarship are needed for practices.

Go Bruins!

by King J77 on Dec 13, 2011 10:11 AM PST up reply actions  

Its every player going to the bowl game

Not just scholarship. Even team managers get a paycheck for food in Westwood (if the dorms are closed), etc.

Dump Dan!

by bruinclassof10 on Dec 13, 2011 1:12 PM PST up reply actions  

just read the latimes article on the checks situation

I am glad carroll and maiava put the administration on blast. It is totally unacceptable for players to not know the rules regarding mandatory and voluntary practices and then be penalized for a “miscommunication” (those are Mike Johnsons words). In addition, fuck Mike Johnson for not clearly stating in the media whether those workouts were mandatory or voluntary. That is not leadership, thats weaselship. I hope he takes that job in Akron and gets the fuck out of Westwood. Try run-run-pass in Ohio. This fiasco falls squarely at the feet of our Athletic Misdirector. There seems to be no leadership in our Athletic Department, I am hoping in my heart of hearts that this is because idiot Guerrero is a lame duck. Our school just looks so bad right now. RB coach fired, idiotic new coach hire, an interim coach who is a complete tool, players being penalized for studying for finals. Unbelievable.

by Strathmore&Gayley on Dec 13, 2011 8:28 AM PST reply actions  

Again guys

Easy with the profanity. Thanks.

by Nestor on Dec 13, 2011 8:30 AM PST up reply actions  

but still +1

for “Athletic Misdirector.”

Roses are red, violets are blue...f*** $C.

by KSBruin on Dec 13, 2011 10:36 AM PST up reply actions  

While taking a wait and see attitude regarding Mora(though not DanG),

to put it in perspective, the current coaching staff selected Harkey and Westgate as the most outstanding seniors…any question why the staff needed to be replaced…

by Gary72 on Dec 13, 2011 8:28 AM PST reply actions  

I can understand Westgate

That dude does the best he can with limited physical tools.

But Harkey got way too much playing time, imo.

by impaulv on Dec 13, 2011 9:20 AM PST via mobile up reply actions  

Harkey

was a good blocking TE and was a big reason the run game worked so well (almost like an extra OL).

Westgate has the biggest heart on the team. Plus, isn’t he one of the only seniors on D?

Go Bruins!

by King J77 on Dec 13, 2011 9:42 AM PST up reply actions  

Harkey was needed in the pistol

when we were going to pound the rock. A new O I’d like to see, is a 2-tight end set like the Pats run w/ Gronks and Hernandez. Can’t you see Fauria being Gronks and Barr being Hernandez? Unstoppable. I e-mailed this idea to Neuheisel but didn’t hear from him.

Dump Dan!

by bruinclassof10 on Dec 13, 2011 1:15 PM PST up reply actions  

Fauria and Barr All day Baby

Allllll dayyyyyyyy. Fauria will have a TD a game

Dump Dan!

by bruinclassof10 on Dec 13, 2011 2:50 PM PST up reply actions  

Wayne Moses?

Where is he going?

Go Bruins!

by King J77 on Dec 13, 2011 9:43 AM PST up reply actions  

He means our TE/F-Back coach I believe

You probably saw Mastro to WSU already

by VeniceBruin on Dec 13, 2011 9:51 AM PST via mobile up reply actions  

Ah,

yeah allready knew about him. Seems like he’s not really coming back. Wasn’t he supposed to come back yesterday and remain with the team through the bowl game? will suck if we keep losing coaches during prep for the bowl game.

Go Bruins!

by King J77 on Dec 13, 2011 10:12 AM PST up reply actions  

Mastro's leaving, is that an indicator of an anticipated change in the offense we will run?

I know it’s OT and has probably been discussed in other posts. (I’m a little overwhelmed at this point.) But is his departure more about a perceived change Mora will bring in, or was it just a much better offer coming from WSU?

by bluetoo on Dec 13, 2011 10:09 AM PST reply actions  

think it was a better offer at WSU to work with Leach, they go way back. Leach was a grad assistant at Cal Poly when Maestro was a player there and when he got into coaching as well.

by jtthirtyfour on Dec 13, 2011 10:13 AM PST up reply actions  

right

and I doubt Leach is going to run the pistol as his primary set…. though it would be an even more supreme eff you to UCLA if he ran it next year with immediate success.

by VeniceBruin on Dec 13, 2011 10:24 AM PST up reply actions  

I also

wish to be referred to as “Maestro”.

"Make each day your masterpiece."--JRW

by Give me a B... on Dec 13, 2011 12:20 PM PST via mobile up reply actions  

Well she did get me a poster of my favorite tenor

Along with those two other guys.

"Make each day your masterpiece."--JRW

by Give me a B... on Dec 13, 2011 1:38 PM PST via mobile up reply actions  

If that's the case

I have a house for rent in Tuscany that might interest you…

But hey, what do I know. I’m just the 800 lbs bruin in the room.

by tasser10 on Dec 13, 2011 1:43 PM PST up reply actions  

No

I wouldn’t mind seeing the Pistol remain as a formation within the offense. I don’t think it’s necessary to have a Pistol specialist unless the plan is to run it 100% of the time like Neu did. many colleges around the country use parts of the Pistol in their gameplan…no reason we couldn’t do the same. A smart and effective OC will probably want to use various fomations/looks to throw D’s off.

Go Bruins!

by King J77 on Dec 13, 2011 10:14 AM PST up reply actions  

See Alabama and TCU

Both incorporate pistol formation in their overall offensive schemes.

by Nestor on Dec 13, 2011 10:15 AM PST up reply actions  

yep

A lot of teams do it when they want to add a formation that combines shotgun and power running. (Which is why it was always questionable why RN decided he needed to commit to it so much, but that’s all water under the bridge)

by Odysseus on Dec 13, 2011 10:20 AM PST up reply actions  

Off-topic here

But I really want to design an offense based around various firearm names for the formations. Pistol, shotgun, bazooka, sniper, etc.

I keep thinking of Leach’s book, where he talks about having a small number of plays and a large number of formations to run them from. As he said, it’s easier to teach a kid a new place to stand than it is to teach a new thing to do.

Same plays, different formations, all named after firearms, all meant to rack up points like nobody else’s business. That’s the offense I want to run!

by JeremyD on Dec 13, 2011 1:34 PM PST up reply actions  

That's a good idea

The bazooka moniker was the home run hitting offense I was hoping for. The pistol was ridiculed when we’d go for 3-4 yds (at most) and writers had a field day saying the pistol shot blanks. I’d like to see them mock the bazooka, Desert Eagle or the sniper.

Dump Dan!

by bruinclassof10 on Dec 13, 2011 1:46 PM PST up reply actions  

Pistol

One thing I don’t get, we ran the pistol for two years but we never (at least that I saw) ran the fly sweep. You’ve got someone in motion across the formation on almost every play, and never hand the ball to him? Seems to be that the deceptive nature of the pistol is handcuffed if you never hand the ball off to the motion reciever (F back?)
The niners have run the fly sweep on occasion with some success, and Harbaugh has talked about it opening up the middle because the LBs have to respect the possibility of a quick hitting outside play like the fly sweep. No matter I suppose, we’ll hopefully be running either a spread or pro set next year (hoping for the former).

by Bruins Pride on Dec 13, 2011 10:58 AM PST reply actions  

we ran fly/jet sweep

on occasion, it didn’t seem like that part of the package was fully implemented

by Odysseus on Dec 13, 2011 11:09 AM PST up reply actions  

Why do that

when you can run up the middle?!

But hey, what do I know. I’m just the 800 lbs bruin in the room.

by tasser10 on Dec 13, 2011 1:12 PM PST up reply actions  

There were a lot of parts that never saw gameday

Hell we never saw the tripple option part of the offense where KP has the option to hand off, keep or throw to the flat until the championship game. It oppened up some more run room because now it added another offensive weapon the D had to respect.

The fly sweep appeared a few times. I never really liked the way we used it though. Our guys would just run straight for the sideline and never really looked to cut upfield and get the yards available.

Go Bruins!

by King J77 on Dec 13, 2011 11:45 AM PST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Bruins Nation, an unofficial daily online scrap book covering the greatest collegiate athletic program in the nation. Established June 16, 2005. GO BRUINS.

Managers

Uclabear1_small Nestor

Arron_afflalo1_small Tydides

Brad_pitt_as_achilles_small Achilles

377011_2642084725867_1068030137_32302525_1166539782_n_small Ryan Rosenblatt

Telemachus_small Telemachus

Licenseplate_small gbruin

2761_small tasser10

Blue_bellerophon_small Bellerophon

Img_0052_2_small Patroclus

Small DCBruins

Of Counsels

094_small Ajax

Menelaus2_small Menelaus

Small Meriones

Small Odysseus

Associates

Eee_small freesia39

Uclabruins_small AHMB