Bruin Bites: Mora Recruiting Firepower for UCLA, Football Notes, Women's Volleyball Previews, NorCal Bruins Rejoice
It's Wednesday, so we're half-way to the weekend, which for the last few months, meant we were half-way to a UCLA football game where we'd have absolutely no clue what to expect from the vespa clown show that resulted from Chianti Dan and Rick's mismanagement of our football program. And although it's abundantly clear that Chianti Dan is a clueless failure (who runs a dysfunctional, incompetent athletic director that will literally withhold money for food to its student-athletes) who must be fired, with the fluid situation surrounding Coach Jim Mora's assembly of his staff (which so far, has gotten off to a good start), we'll be on our toes to see if he can land Mazzone or another top-notch college offensive coordinator.
So, with that said, I'll keep this brief and get right into the Bruin Bites for the middle of the week. Here's your bits and pieces of news from around the UCLA-iverse:
- ESPN's Greg Biggins tweeted this morning that Washington Huskies' ace recruiter DB coach Demetrice Martin may be headed to UCLA. Martin is considered to be one of the best recruiters in the Pac-12 conference. Brandon Huffman agrees. Adding him to the staff in addition to the hiring of Adrian Klemm and Steven Broussard should set up Mora well. It shows encouraging signs that Mora "gets it" in terms of the need to establish deep roots in the local recruiting scene. The only concern here is the Husky defense hasn't performed during Martin's tenure but maybe that has more to do with Nick Holt than Marin.
- Speaking of defensive coaches, Huffman tweeted that "there is a very good chance UCLA defensive line coach Inoke Breckterfield will be retained on Jim Mora's staff." This move will be puzzling to say the least given the performance (or lack thereof) of the DL this past season. The DL this past season was one of the most disappointing units of the team. The personnel decision was baffling and the technique was poor. Maybe Breckterfield brings something to the table in recruiting or that he was held back by the previous staff. This is the only coaching move in last 48 hours (if the report is true) that will pose some questions.
- Sticking with football news, Bill Connelly at SBN's Coaching Carousel 2011, evaluated the coaching hires at various programs in major conferences, including our own hiring of Jim Mora to replace Rick Neuheisel. In Connelly's rating criteria, the programs that fared the best were the ones who hired coaches that appeared on wish lists on BN: Washington State (Mike Leach), Ohio State (Urban Meyer), Arizona (Rich Rodriguez), and North Carolina (Larry Fedora). The bottom end? Of course, given Chianti Dan's propensity to fail, UCLA finished near the bottom with the Mora hire (which way work out fantastically for UCLA, but it's a huge risk/gamble) and Kansas (which hired failed former Notre Dame coach Charlie Weis).
- Speaking of CJM, he hasn't won a lot of fans over in Atlanta, where he was the head coach of the Falcons for a few years: Mark Bradley at the Atlanta Journal-Constitution writes about being torn between which college football coach in Los Angeles he hates more: Jim Mora, who had a tenure in Atlanta that was not exactly well-received, or Lane Kiffin, who Bradley calls "a smug little weasel who thinks the football world owes him a living because his daddy was a coach." LOL at the dig at Hello Kiffin. Ultimately, Bradley predicts Mora will flame out of Westwood in only two years. Oh, how optimistic these out-of-town journalists are: they totally forget Chianti Dan will predictably fiddle and remain idle and refuse to take action if a coach isn't meeting expectations (i.e. keeping Neuheisel after the Arizona and U$C losses, until his hand was forced).
- Oh, and in case you missed it, there is an ultimate must-read post from former UCLA offensive lineman Nick Ekbatani, in which he discusses life at UCLA, the hiring of Jim Mora, and ultimately, the need for change in administrative and financial support of the football program (read: Chianti Dan needs to stop trying to do it on the cheap).
- One last football note: WR Nelson Rosario and MLB Patrick Larimore were named the team MVPs. Personally, I would have picked Derrick Coleman and Tevin McDonald, but that's just me. Disagree? Fire away with your picks in the comment thread.
- Former UCLA tennis player Allen Fox is currently recovering from heart bypass surgery. Fox was a three-time All-American for the Bruins from 1959 through 1961, bringing national titles back to Westwood in 1960 and 1961. Let's all hope for and wish Dr. Fox a speedy and complete recovery.
- This Thursday, our women's volleyball team takes on Florida State in the NCAA tournament semi-finals. To get you geared up, check out ESPN's list of five things to look for in the semi-final round (and BTW, ESPN, if you're reading this, Tabi Love was clearly the better transfer). Finally, former Bruin volleyball player and member of UCLA's 1990 national title team, Holly McPeak, chimed in with her thoughts on the NCAA semi-final round, breaking down UCLA's ball-control style and solid defense, among other things.
- Finally, in a note that is sure to launch an internal BN NorCal vs. SoCal civil war, UCLA senior economist Jerry Nickelsburg has indicated that it is the Bay Area (mostly Silicon Valley) that is leading the state economy, and in all likelihood, the national economy. Interesting read. And folks, let's keep the NorCal vs. SoCal flame-baiting to a minimum.
Alright folks, that is your Bruin Bites round-up for the middle of this week. We're going to keep it short and sweet as we anticipate another hectic few days as we keep our focus on the on-going assistant coach situation with CJM's newly forming staff.
Fire away with your thoughts, comments, additions, etc. in the thread.
GO BRUINS
45 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I'm cool with Inoke getting another shot.
The D-line has improved more than any other group on the defense (not saying much).
And, IMO, the hideous play of the LB core really held the D-line (and team) back throughout the season. You can’t fully commit to pass rushing or stopping the run if you have no confidence in your LB’s making plays and plugging gaps behind you. And most of the flaws in the run game can be attributed to LB play as well.
As long as there is a new DC, LB coach and ST coach. I’m good.
"I have one word for you...Be careful."
-Jose Guillen
Agree with the MVP picks
I liked Derrick Coleman on offense, but I feel like Rosario’s been just as consistent. I’d take either.
I have the Sons of Westwood on my iPod in my "favorites" playlist ...
http://sonsofwestwood.wordpress.com
Rosario took plays off
DC never did. Ever.
But hey, what do I know. I’m just the 800 lbs bruin in the room.
Absolutely right.
DC was consistent; Nelson was not.
Simple as that..
Well
you could argue that Rosario counters that with over 1k yards of offense, almost half our passing game, and a number of game saving clutch catches, that he actually had more overall impact.
It's debatable
I’m not saying he doesn’t deserve it, after all I think it’s the players who pick. I just think DC had the better attitude and was more reliable. Rosario had too much Poli-Dixon in him.
But hey, what do I know. I’m just the 800 lbs bruin in the room.
And as T explains later
Nelson dropped too many passes he should have caught. Granted that catch at Houston is one for the ages.
Over 1 thousand yards of offense...
and what 2 or 3 touch downs??? If that isn’t under acheiving …i don’t know what is. Rosario was soft and very undependable. He has no buisiness being mvp.If you wil…he was spectactularly unspectactular. For Me…DC heands down MVP!
by GogetemBruins on Dec 14, 2011 2:05 PM PST up reply actions
I'll never forget
Tui ripping into him after his wimpy attempt at catching a pass. Can’t remember if it was Houston or SJSU.
But hey, what do I know. I’m just the 800 lbs bruin in the room.
Here are the links
https://twitter.com/#!/BFeldmanCBS/status/147034516853239808
http://arizonasports.com/44/1478287/Noel-Mazzone-leaves-Arizona-State-for-UCLA
by NorCalBruin on Dec 14, 2011 12:32 PM PST up reply actions
Jim Mora Jr is a brilliant hire
Mora is the perfect hire because he will get the Bruins “back to basics” focused on core skills and toughness. In the years after Bob Toledo I definitely noticed that players kept getting worse with the basics.. like otherwise talented receivers dropping catchable passes, messed up snaps, fumbles, dumb penalties, and so on. I think that Mora will be relentless in pursuing the core skills.
I doubt that Chianti Dan will be fired anytime soon because 1. he made a good hire this time around, and 2. the chancellor will evaluate him on the entire UCLA NCAA athletics progress, not just on football. However if Mora were to do poorly then maybe the football program alone would be enough to get him fired. However as the Bruin family we cannot be negative and wish for Mora to fail just so that Chianti Dan would get fired, instead we must put all our support behind Mora and aim for the national championship.
I don't know
..but I read some national news stories that mentioned that this blog is saying that Jim Mora was an awful hire. I don’t why the reporters are attributing that to Bruins Nation. Just goes to show how reporters distort things.
Read here - the source.....
….then make your call.
Mora will be supported. Guerrero is the cancer that needs to be removed as AD.
Btw – call volumes are down at the Chancellor’s office – as they expected. Need to keep the pressure on.
Would also call Vice Chancellor Turteltaub as she is acting head in Block’s absence.
Right now, the honeymoon is going full blast
Before the hire was made, the new guy was a bad choice because he was not even a candidate worth considering for fundamentally three reasons: (1) He was an NFL coach (a disqualifier to me and to many others), (2) He had a lifetiime losing record, demonstrating that he has no particular coaching aptitude, and (3) He hasn’t coached at an college at any level in any capacity for more than a quarter of a century. Each of those reasons should have been enough to render him a non-candidate, but that didn’t stop our athletic director from hiring him. But the bottom line is that he was the wrong guy to hire. There were and still are far better candidates.
But now, he did well in his first presser, and the champagne glasses are being clinked, the rice has been thrown, and the honeymoon has just started.
The honeymoon will end at some point, and we will be left with the realization that this guy was the wrong choice.
The fact of the matter is that he is our football coach, so we all hope the team goes undefeated next year. Reality suggests that’s not likely, but reality doesn’t dictate what we fervently want to happen next season. All that said, the wrong guy was hired, but we’ll root for him until it becomes impossible.
Who was it that said...
…an alum’s idea of a perfect season is for the team to go undefeated and then fire the coach! :)
He started well making excellent assistant hires
So Fox 71, what do you think about the assistants whom Mora just hired? From what I’m reading, these new additions to Mora’s staff are top notch recruiters and among the best possible. Mora acted so fast with these quality hires – he seems ready for the college game, not just stuck in the NFL world, don’t you think?
The game is played on Saturdays in the fall
We will reserve judgment until then. Great hires, for sure. Gotta produce, then we’ll talk.
But hey, what do I know. I’m just the 800 lbs bruin in the room.
This is our third "Honeymoon"...
each successive event gets just a little less"Special". Mora just MAY be “The one” but after 13 years of having my heart broken…i will have to be convinced by actions and by NOTHING else!
Good Luck to Coach Mora and his staff and too the Players as well.
by GogetemBruins on Dec 14, 2011 1:45 PM PST up reply actions
Actually it's not just this blog
Almost every college football observer not tied to UCLA (or Washington Husky fanbase) have questioned this hire and more importantly the hiring process. Pointing that out is not equivalent to wishing Mora will fail at UCLA.
So people suggesting that we wish Mora will fail are either being ignorant or are simply making things up.
Exactly.
At this point, the focus is really on DG to get lost not Mora.
+1
Also, living in Northern California, I want a football program where people don’t laugh at me when I walk into Stanford or Memorial Stadium wearing a UCLA jersey. Baby steps.
I think it is too early for concrete expectations- the eye test criterion is great. But who knows what happens in spring practice- injuries, etc. So a specific number now seems somewhat premature.
I simply want to be proud to be a Bruin. That hasn’t happened in football in a long long long time.
Although specific number may be premature, for sure we don’t need any bullshit about moving the needle. Playing in the Eagle Bank Bowl, the Fight Hunger Bowl, the Beef O’Grady Bowl, or some other bullshit bowl doesn’t work. We have had enough of those for a lifetime.
Frankly, the South Division really should be ours
for the taking. We’re not going to look kindly on excuses. Now if something changes the analysis (for example, Barkley and Khalil unexpectedly come back), that’s one thing, but things are really set up for Mora to succeed
+1
agree with your comment. I wasn’t looking for excuses, either. I was simply trying to suggest that what we need is a program which passes the eye test- as Coach said (paraphrase) do your best, and the results will take care of themselves.
But a specific number 9 months before the 1st game seems very speculative. If we play to our level (which hasn’t happened in a hell of a long time), then we can and should go far.
How the heck is DC NOT our offensive and overall team MVP?
DC never quit, even when inexplicably kept out of entire quarters or halves of play on offense.
DC was always the first or one of the first on cover units for special teams.
When it came down to it, who was the ONE guy on offense that you could rely on, no matter who the opponent, to not make dumb mistakes and to produce when you needed it.
Even if he didn’t always get the 1st down, who was the ONE player you could rely on every week, every quarter, every play.
M
"It's not who you are underneath. It's what you DO that defines you."
He is the team MPV
in my opinion, and I bet the whole community, if we did a poll.
But hey, what do I know. I’m just the 800 lbs bruin in the room.
Reference to JFK might be useful
I grew up with (guy saving us from WW3) JFK as president. I lived through the Cuban missile crisis. Scary stuff. It was any US pres’ finest hour. The ref here is this: He assembled one of the greatest staffs any pres ever has, and it made him better as a leader. So if Mora can put together a great staff (seems he is so far), it will serve him and UCLA well. He won’t need to keep us out of WW3, just beat SC. Like Red Sanders said, “Losing to SC is not the end of the world. It’s more important that that.”.
Inoke may be a recruiting keep
A lot of the current commits look to be from the islands or of islander descent. Wasn’t that supposed to be his recruiting pipeline?
Well
with the new ace recruiters coming in we might want to pass on a few of the guy who were comitted anyways. Plus, Coach Klemm was with June Jones at Hawaii so I’m sure he’s got great connections in Hawaii as well.
I hope it’s not true. I’d hoped the D staff Mora assembled would be top notch since it’s his side of the ball.
Go Bruins!
Football banquet awards
Worth noting that Derrick Coleman did receive the award for all-around excellence and shared the outstanding special teams player award with Jeff Locke!
OK, this makes me feel better.
I woudl LOVE to see DC catch on with a team and play on Sundays.
"It's not who you are underneath. It's what you DO that defines you."
The Ekbatani piece
Very interesting read.
Question about him though. He didn’t make it to the pros, did he? Thought he medically retired? I only ask because he has this blurb on his facebook page:
Having played offensive line my entire life, reaching collegiate and professional levels, I know a thing or two about what goes on in the trenches.
With the Rams
He did some preseason work with the Rams.
Thoughts on Mazzone?
Don’t know too much about him. My initial research tells me he’s a king of the spread and he had grassroots support at ASU to get the head coaching gig. Folks around here seem reasonably excited to have him on board. Anybody have some insight on this hire?





















