UCLA Hoops Roundup: Maybe There Is A Positive Future
There is a bit of a different vibe today. Of course much of that good feeling was due to the women's volleyball championship, number 108 for UCLA in total. Congratulations to the ladies once again on an outstanding season. But, part of that vibe is due to the UCLA men's basketball team finally having a good game, and more importantly never letting up. The game was a thorough dismantling of a bad UC Davis team in which UCLA did everything that was expected of it at the beginning of the year.
Beating a bad UC Davis team does not mean that UCLA is once again a "contender." But the way the Bruins won does mean maybe this team can be a good team; for the Bruins did something that they had not done since the years of Ben Ball and the back-to-back-to-back Final Fours: they played for 40 minutes. Last year, Reeves would have quit, Tyler Honeycutt would have been THTO and cruising on defense. This year the team played hard for the whole game and only had one lull.
The game hit a lull at the beginning of the second half, when UC Davis went on a meager 6-0 run. Howland implored his players to "Play hard!" but called a timeout at the first sign of lax play. UCLA proceeded to go on a 20-0 run to make it 74-27.
Something tells me Reeves and Honeycutt would not have listened to CBH at that point and would have thought: "we got this one won, relax coach." They would have been right for that game but wrong for the season. The Bruins looked like a team for the first time this year. And as Josh Smith added (emphasis mine):
UCLA's first three games since the departure of Reeves Nelson have served as a textbook case of addition by subtraction.
The Bruins have won all three games since coach Ben Howland threw 6-foot-8 power forward Nelson off the team for a litany of transgressions regarding his conduct on and off the court.
"I'd say we're kind of getting our chemistry back," Smith said. "I mean, when you lose Reeves, you're losing a good player.
"He's not with us anymore, and I wish him the best of luck, honestly. But we're having better practices with the guys we have. And it's just going to get better when Trav gets back, because he adds depth to the team and we'll be that much better in the post."
Of course the reasons for the resurgence (in addition to the competition), are also the changes in style and lineup.
UCLA's obvious strength this season is size with four players at 6-10, but sometimes there are too many cooks in the kitchen. Howland has tried using lineups filled with trees, but early on that formula led to slow-footed performances and losses.
During UCLA's current three-game win streak, Howland has used a three-guard approach more often than not, putting Jerime Anderson, Lamb and Jones on the floor with Smith and David Wear. It's created more quickness, better ball handling and a better defensive team.
"I feel that us with three guards on the floor it gives us more options," Powell said. "When we get defensive stops, we can push. If we have three guards on the floor, it's harder to guard us because we can go inside out. Get the ball to Josh, space out, let him draw the double team and kick out for the open shots. It's easier with the three guards."
. . . "We're going to play big at times," Howland said. "There's going to be times definitely with Travis at the three and depending on the team we're playing against, it'll be a team we're zoning more when he's at the three."
A couple thoughts on this: first, if you are playing a Wear at small forward, zone is a must, not an option, glad CBH finally said that. Still I hope we play three guards almost exclusively here on out. Second, it was fun to watch UCLA run and it does seem three guards does give UCLA more quickness, better ball handling and a better defensive team. The last two games UCLA has held their opponents under 30% shooting.
However, playing small may even be the solution to UCLA rebounding problems. The Bruins may have uncovered a way to replace the lost defense rebounding of Honeycutt and Nelson: Tyler Lamb and Norman Powell. Against UC Davis, UCLA's rebounding woes were partially solved by Tyler Lamb and Norman Powell crashing the boards. Tyler Lamb had the best game of his career with 9 points, 9 rebounds, and 7 assists. CBH said:
"Tyler played very well today," Howland said. "He played outstanding defense and had a really well-rounded game."
Powell was at times spectacular with a dunk and reverse layup but at other times an over-eager freshman making a game high 4 turnovers. However, Norman really needs to play more now, he is a potential star in the making and ironically may be the solution to our rebounding woes:
Perhaps the biggest boost of all came from another reserve, freshman guard Norman Powell. He played 21 minutes, scored eight points and grabbed 10 rebounds, eight more than his previous best.
"I felt more comfortable out there tonight," Powell said. "I was really trying to make my presence known on defense, going in there and grabbing more rebounds.
"I took it upon myself to go in there and grab more rebounds and try to be the leading rebounder."
The other thing that Honeycutt gave UCLA last year and that UCLA showed against UC Davis was shot blocking. It was another reason that UCLA so dominated UC Davis:
Around the hoop, the shot-blocking abilities of Smith (three blocks) and 6-foot-10 Anthony Stover (five blocks) altered countless shots and forced the Aggies (1-9) to settle for contested jumpers.
As a team, UC Davis shot 23 percent from the field.
"Blocking shots helps us with our post defense because then guys think about what they do before they even go up," Smith said. "As bigs, we have to defend the middle. We can allow some points, but if we're around, we're going to block it."
Opponents with low FG%, sound familiar Bruins fans? In other words, maybe there is a reason for optimism. Really it is too early to say anything for sure. But it is nice that the UCLA men's basketball team is looking like a team. Hopefully they can continue to improve as Josh said:
"This is the same team before the season started that was ranked in the top 25," Smith said. "We have high expectations, we still do."
UCLA has two more chances to notch wins - whether they're gifted to them or earned - before Pac-12 play starts, Tuesday against UC Irvine and Friday against Richmond.
"These are two more opportunities for us to go out and play hard and hopefully get these wins and get ready for Cal and Stanford two games above .500," Smith said.
Go Bruins!
27 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Irvine & Richmond
Under normal circumstances, they will serve as tuneups for us, the bellwether to our team’s performance for the conference game.
But I will see it to believe it too. There are no pushovers in Pac 12, strictly speaking. Anytime when we let up, even bottom dwellers can give us the run for the money. We saw a few of those games the last two seasons already.
Interesting to hear the candid comments from big Josh about Reeves
My understanding was that they were best friends on the team.
by DoubleTroubleBruin on Dec 18, 2011 7:35 PM PST reply actions
They might be friends
but notice how much better Josh is playing now that he doesn’t have Reeves chirping in his ear at practice and during games. Josh isnt stupid. He knows Reeves was dragging things down.
Lamb playing well is good
Hopefully he can clear up any lingering injury issues and live up to the promise he showed glimpses of last year. I think he can really be a great player, but his career is taking a Cedric Bozeman-like trajectory; a quiet guy with small injuries stalling him out even with a lot of talent.
That picture showing Norman Powell smiling is like a cloud lifting off the program. If Powell transferred, I don’t know if Howland could have survived, but I doubt it. Now at least CBH has a fighting chance. If it took tossing Reeves to keep Powell, I’ll take that everyday.
I'm glad you posted that picture
Because to me it illustrates everything that’s currently wrong with our basketball program. What are they yucking it up about? Their 5-5 record? Their glorious victory over u.c. Davis? These guys should not be clowning it up. That’s just showing up a truly bad team that had no business playing us. I believe these smiles will be wiped from those faces when the conference schedule begins. Howland, get some control over your players, and show some class.
They were not clowning
This was at the end of the game when the benchwarmers were playing. They were cheering for the guys that play only during garbage time. They were being supportative of their teammates like Tyler Trapani and Matt DeMarcus who rarely see the court. Don MacLean also took note of this moment and thought it could be good for building team comradery.
by Gen2Bruin1987 on Dec 19, 2011 1:02 AM PST up reply actions
Precisely.
And MacLean’s comment was spot on.
by orlandobruin on Dec 19, 2011 2:28 AM PST up reply actions
+1000
I like the fact the guys cheer the walk ons. They work hard in practice and this may be one of the few times they get to play this year.
Didn't see the game
so I accept what you all say, and still pictures can distort the context. Still, it seems a little excessive, almost demeaning, to the less talented players at the end of the bench. And I still think it rubs it in to the other team. I know I wouldn’t appreciate it if I were on the UC Davis squad.
The crowd does it
So why is it different when the players do it? Think about how the crowd reacts every time Trapani has the ball in his hands. It’s not demeaning when it’s genuine excitement and perhaps the only way the rest of us can make those moments better for kids that, as DC has pointed out, work their asses off and toil in relative anonymity.
I also think the part about worrying about how Davis reacts to it doesn’t hold water. There is little our bench could do to “rub it in” that Howland’s substitution pattern wouldn’t do. He put Kenny Jones in in the first half. Isn’t that “rubbing it in”? The oversensitive among us would interpret that as Howland telling Davis that the game is over, take your regulars out.
A fan is not part of the team the way a player is
If I were coaching the team, I would ask the regulars to strongly cheer for the subs while they sit on the bench.
I believe they should be held to a higher standard. I just don’t ever remember a Coach Wooden team ever acting like that, even though they regularly won by huge margins.
I’m an older guy so I may have a different view of this than the younger crowd on BN. It just doesn’t feel good to me. I know I don’t appreciate it when U$C prances and preens when they beat us 50-0.
I was going to debate this
But F it, this stupid tangent isn’t worth my time. Following the Reeves dismissal, seeing these guys circling the wagons and support each other is great, and how it “feels” to other people is really the least of my concerns.
It isn't important
Except in my mind it shows the kind of program Howland is running. But it doesn’t make any sense for me to push this when I didn’t even see the game.
Just a few cautionary observations from UC Davis game
- At the end of the game, Howland had the team practice zone. It seemed to me that we got killed. I hope I’m wrong about that!
- Even against Davis, I still could see a lack of speed and quickness, especially on defense. The difference was the Davis guys could not convert.
- Can someone explain to me why Stover gets so few rebounds?
Agree with others that we’ll learn a lot as we ramp up via UCI & Richmond to 2 very tough Pac-12 road games, Stanford & Cal. At least we’ll be prepared to play the road games with very little crowd support!
Thoughts
- at the end of the game, it was all subs playing
- that’s not going to go away, gotta work around it
- Stover is a pogo stick, he’s awesome at timing and getting blocks, but he still can’t box out very well because he’s not quite strong enough yet.
But hey, what do I know. I’m just the 800 lbs bruin in the room.
Not so.
We went zone while startes and key subs were still in and these guys did not do well. Thanks for your thoughts on Stover. The guy has a lot of upside to go along with his incredible shot blocking.
Hmmm
I thought all the subs were in by the end of the game. Then again, I didn’t watch the game so I shouldn’t mouth off!
But hey, what do I know. I’m just the 800 lbs bruin in the room.
Both right on zone, agree with TAsser on Stover
We did play zone with the walk ons and briefly otherwise.
If you always go for the block you are out of position for a rebound which involves turning the other way and boxing out.
by DCBruins on Dec 19, 2011 2:55 PM PST via mobile up reply actions
Was going to make that very point about Stover
I’ve thought about what it would mean for Howland to try and tweak Stover’s priorities so that he doesn’t automatically go for the block every time, but I kind of like the idea of Stover developing a reputation as an eraser inside. That intimidation factor could have unforseen benefits for our overall defense whenever he’s in.
Right about Stover.
He’s so excited to block a shot, and the Wears are soooo excited about rebounds and block shots, that they’re all jumping out the darn gym, and right out of position! They need to Calm the hell down, and time the switch over, and time the jump! Thy’rer still young though, and Need more coaching.
Fear and Adrenaline, is what drives youth athletics, = and Managing that energy is the key! They need to work with Stover’s footwork and prepare him for the Tourney!
Yes and on a good team
The other players will know it. Thus if you have Stover always go for the block, it is up to the Wears at 4 to “stay home” (unless their man is shooting.) It was part of the way it worked last year. Reeves thought rebound on defense first.
Of course Honeycutt blows this theory up. Honeycutt was the athletic freak who could do both. Not many players do that and it was more impressive that he did so from the three position. Of course, some of Honeycutt’s blocks were when the other guy beat him off the dribble but it makes sense that he is in the pros on talent. Too bad the effort was not always there.
postscript on reeves
Hard to believe the guy with the all energy last year, who when he came in ran around after the ball like a whirling dervish and consistently sparked the team, made the same team better once he was off it. Of course this year’s Reeves was not last year’s Reeves. Reminds me of teams that sometimes blossom once the guy they’d depended on for years has moved on. The Bruins are jelling as a unit, no doubt about it.

by 




















