UCLA Basketball: A Better Team Without Its Best Player?
I have probably been reading too much Bleacher Report, which yesterday declared: "UCLA Basketball: 10 Reasons Bruins Can Still Make Tournament Despite Poor Start." But maybe this team can come the closest to playing to its potential of any team in the last four years. I think everybody left on the roster, to some extent, gets along and likes each other. Their practices recently have been great and there seems to be a renewed commitment to 40 minutes of defense. As the most athletic talented player says:
"We actually came together more as a team," Powell said. "Our chemistry is building. We all haven't played together. Travis and Dave sat out last year. I'm just coming in. We've been trying to feel each other's game out. And in practice, we're actually working hard and there's less attitude and more coming together as a team. Our chemistry is getting better on defense and the flow of or offense."
Here are 5 problems that are a big cause for the five losses and how they seemed to being addressed and give some reasons for hope.
Let's break them down after the jump.
5. As always when discussing a CBH team the first issue is defense:
The importance of playing good defense has become abundantly clear. In UCLA's five victories, opponents are averaging 51.6 points and shooting 31.1 percent. In their five losses, opponents are averaging 75 points and shooting 56.5 percent. . . .
"In the summer it's just keying on your man, not too much help," Jones said. "You're playing NBA rules and it's more spread out so it's hard to get there to help. In college everything is so help oriented. We've been playing with them so much all summer and I know my mindset wasn't that great about helpside defense, but now I'm trying to be the catalyst of that. Making sure I do that and get on the others for not doing it." . . .
"We're getting better in that respect," he [CBH] said. "Hopefully that's something that will continue to evolve."
The NBA problem is interesting. I disagree with Jones a bit in that the NBA does play help defense but the summer league pickup games do not. These games for the pros are about getting in shape not about learning with your teammates. That needs to be learned with your team be it in college or the pros. Playing summer league is great for players, bad for teams.
Also, this UCLA team does not have a Darren Collison/Russell Westbrook/Malcolm Lee lock-down type defender. But if it dedicates itself as a team to defense it could be much better as it has been recently. I hope Stover continues to play a lot as Smith's backup because I think he is a key to the defense.
4. This team has not played a single game with all the available scholarship players. None. This is bad luck but the team is overcoming it. Ironically depending on De'End Parker situation UCLA may have to play David Wear a little at small forward (with a zone) because they only have one backup for the wing (Norman Powell) right now. For tomorrow, only De'End Parker is out as Travis Wear will return.
3. Chanti Dan is really screwing the Bruins by making them play at the Sports Arena. It is a terrible symbol from an AD who seemingly doesn't care about the program, students, players, etc.
USC used to play there, but it considered the building an anchor to the program.
. . . "In a situation like this, we have this feeling like it's us against the world," Lamb says. "We certainly love the fans who come out and support us. I mean, we've had some pretty bad losses."
. . . "It's just not a homey environment," [the usual positive CBH] he says.
2. Addition by subtraction: when you read that you probably think about Reeves. Well that is coming but this is really about Josh. Josh's weight is the closest UCLA comes to a North Korea style secret. Only a few know and the simple answer is "too much."
"You get out of it what you put into it," Howland says. "He didn't put much into it in the offseason. I'm hopeful that as the season progresses he'll get better. Some of it is just how he takes care of himself when he's off the floor. We really don't have much control over that."
Smith is looking better each game. If he doesn't eat too much for Christmas, he should be getting better (and lighter) with each game.
1. Howland has admitted mistakes this year for those paying close attention. He is not going to play David Wear at the three without playing a zone. But of course the biggest was Reeves Nelson:
"It was frustrating," says Howland, in his ninth year at UCLA. "I tried really hard, probably to the detriment of the team. We're making up for some of that now, trying to pull it all together."
Reeves was UCLA's only returning all-conference player and let's face it, with Josh overweight probably the best player on the team. . . potentially. But Reeves blew it.
UCLA is a better team without its best player. That is becoming obvious. Will this new found team spirit help them be a good team? Ironically the players who are going to replace Reeves are, for obvious reasons, the closest on the team and feel lost without each other when Travis missed a UCLA game in the hospital:
But something was off, David said, and the 6-foot-10 sophomore played like it, scoring just seven points while missing six of eight shots.
"That was the first time, really, he wasn't there playing or on the sidelines in a game I was playing in," David said.
. . . "There's just an unspoken connection," said their father, David Sr.
Am I being too optimistic? Sure, but maybe this team can still make some noise. Hopefully Howland will be able to make this team work. It is the only way they can win.
Go Bruins.
35 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Possible
This could be an addition by subtraction type of situation. I always liked Reeves and the fans always enjoyed watching him play at Pauley. But honestly maybe the kid had some issues he had to work out, inner demons, I don’t know. I don’t know the kid and don’t want to speculate on his mental status. But I do know that I quite frankly could care less about anyone who was apathetic about playing for UCLA. This is the greatest basketball program in the country with the richest tradition. Kids would give their right arm just for the chance to wear the uniform. I wish Reeves the best, and thank him for two solid years of play. In the end I think this works out better for everyone.
Wrote this somewhere before
D Wear did some odd things in that first game with his twin brother hospitalized with an infection (fumbled a rebound out of bounds under zero pressure; threw a pass straight out of bounds missing his teammate by about 10 feet), and I speculated it was worry about his brother. Infections are nothing to be cavalier about; my nephew, a college freshman, was hospitalized for 16 days when a sore throat became an infected clot in his jugular vein.
Hopefully D & T Wear will continue to improve – they are only Sophomores (red-shirt sophs), so we can expect them to grow more comfortable in competition (note, they didn’t play that many minutes at UNC).
Yeah you did
David has had some issue other times as well but interesting point on how twins are connected.
Thanks for "a bit of optimism"
I don’t tune out criticism of our program, but I am tired of so much piling onto the negatives without some balance. Yes, the Sports Arena is a dump – but it’s because we’re getting a renovated Pauley. Yes, this team lacks talent – but how many of us predicted that both 1) Josh would do nothing off-season to get in better shape and 2) Reeves would implode and be off the team, taking our leading scorer and rebounder from the year before and 3) who would have predicted the totally horrendous start by Zeke, a big key to this year’s team.
Even if Josh came back better and Reeves stayed, I’m not sure how far this team would have gone with a relatively mediocre backcourt and un-proven Wear twins. So it’s not as if a FF4 or even sweet-16 guaranteed team has imploded in front of our eyes.
At this point, I’m looking at the following before I get excited about a deep run in March:
- will Josh Smith improve this year at all
- how will the Wears perform once they are used to actual D1 game experience
- will Norman Powell be given significant opportunities to develop and contribute
- what can we project for Tyler Lamb’s performance
- will Howland get the Shabazz commit that, once so promising,that is now looking iffy
Lot of this stuff may require some patience this year before we really know the answer. All of it will impact next year’s program where yet another year of Bruin irrelevance in NCAA hoops could not possibly be tolerated by any Bruin fan.
I think we are going to know in our fist Pac-12 series ...
How much patience we can show with the current coaching regime. I hear you about the negativity around the program but we didn’t bring it. The buck really stops with the guy who is supposed to be in charge.
If by series, you mean the first weekend.. that will be a tough one for us
Guttieriz (how the hell do you spell his name?) is a real stud who seems to have our number. I could see him dominating zeke and jerime on his homecourt. And their guy Kemp is tough frontcourt player – something I’ve yet to see from either of the Wears. I don’t know about Stanford except they have done pretty well W-L wise (may be their schedule was soft). For me, I will concentrate more on how well we compete, effort wise and execution wise, not so much the W-L. Hoping for 1-1, 2-0 would be awesome.
For tonight, given that Irvine is only slightly better than Davis, I’m looking for continued effort and discipline. I want to see them feed the big guy down low; I want to see them practice their zone; and I want to see 20 minutes at least again for Powell.
If this team gets sloppy executing on O & D, starts gunning it from the outside, it can lose to any team no matter how bad.
Not going to be in the mood to hear excuses
If this team doesn’t content for the conference and get to the Dance.
IMHO there's no dancin' if
Josh and at least one of the Wears don’t show solid improvement. That’s almost half our lineup and there’s no stars (at least ready to deliver this year) in the remainder of the lineup. But if we can that progress, we should contend and dance with a weak PAC-12 this year.
Sometimes
it’s better if there are no stars…
But hey, what do I know. I’m just the 800 lbs bruin in the room.
We will see how it works out
Either way an NIT bid will be an unacceptable. Up to Howland to get it done.
by Nestor on Dec 20, 2011 3:21 PM PST via mobile up reply actions
I think both your points are valid
Negativity deserved and earned by the administration and the results on the field/court.
Negativity sucks as a user experience. Both as a fan and as a reader on BN.
We all hope that the team plays up to its potential more than anything. If we had lost at Utah or Arizona like we did at Oregon, the negativity would have been less hostile. But we did not and the negativity was earned.
I really HOPE the b-ball team continues to improve. It is an interesting, unforeseen test for the model many were arguing that CBH might be better served by players that were willing to play their role than “stars” that were prima donnas. Hopefully the players buy in and improve as a team.
If the B-Ball team does not continue to improve I expect 2 things: 1) deserved negativity and 2) pressure on the current coaching regime.
Next series may not be 2 wins but significant improvement is required.
by Bruin Dad and Grad on Dec 20, 2011 11:15 AM PST up reply actions
I agree
This team is coming together against the cuppiest of cupcakes. I am not so sure what’s going to happen against decent squads but, as is my usual Bruin downfall lately, I have the highest of hopes.
As to Reeves and addition by subtraction, that’s really a statement on Reeves and not a flattering one at that. I am really disappointed as he was may favorite player the past 2 years. Ever since as freshman he played well against #1 Kansas, not backing down even when he got smacked in the eye. He was tough and a strong inside finisher. Too bad he was such a freakin immature headcase. [sigh]
by RealisticBruinFan on Dec 20, 2011 12:02 PM PST up reply actions
I actually think that we won't have to wait for PAC-12 play to get a good sense of the team
Irvine will be a good test, I can’t remember the last time the Bruins blew out 2 opponents in a row, but I wouldn’t be surprised if it has been 3 years. If Irvine is beaten by more than 20, we have reason to be optomistic that the Bruins are at least beginning to play up to their talent. If it is close, then I would bet on a losing season.
A very important part of this is that CBH has to prove that UCLA doesn’t have a dysfunctional program. If he can’t do that, then I can’t see how he can recruit the players needed to get out of this mess at all.
To Me Blowing out UCI
Would mean we are coming closer to playing 40 minutes and not letting up. This team needs that to have a chance to be good.
.
android in the hizzy!
this test was brought to you by the emergency broadcast network. had this been a real emergency dubious dan would have done nothing
by charnaw on Dec 20, 2011 10:59 AM PST via Android app reply actions
testing out the android app
you know in that picture, lamb looks suspiciously like lame…don’t falter bruins
by BruinEngy on Dec 20, 2011 11:08 AM PST via Android app reply actions
Should CBH have been watching
Josh Smith more closely over the summer? OK, Josh Smith is a big fat baby, but Howland knows that. And who put out the stories that Smith lost 5 lbs over the summer?
I knew that playing at the Sports Arena would be a disaster in the best of circumstances. Was the better alternative…to speed up Pauley renovation?
I am not sure how much contact college coaches can have with players over the summer
Maybe someone else could enlighten, I never knew anyone who played major college basketball. I do know for a good friend of mine who play D-1 O-line that college conditioning was a challenge for him because the number of contact hours is limited in college but virtually unlimited in HS. He had to become a self starter.
Josh went home to Washington for the Summer
No one was watching him.
And there you have it
My buddy stayed in Utah and refused to come home to SoCal every summer except for about a week. Two time all-conference.
I was on campus for De Neve's construction
if it is anything like that, I am guessing about 5 years until BBall returns to Pauley.
Overly pessimistic?
It’s not a total rebuild after a demolition. Stuff like the outer shell seems pretty cosmetic – an improvement but cosmetic nevertheless.
Alternative to SA
Really we are drawing 600-1000 people to each game. Why not play at a packed Wooden Center which fits up to 2000. This would not work for the USC, AZ or bigger games but for LMU, MTSU it would have been much more helpful.
We should have had
a Tauley Pavilion, much like our Towell Library. A temporary stadium. Wasn’t there talk of using Arthur Ashe Stadium?
But hey, what do I know. I’m just the 800 lbs bruin in the room.
In another thread,
I saw and commented on the fact that the team was practicing in the Men’s Gym on high school size courts. Howland said that was part of their conditioning problem. When you’re UCLA Basketball, I think you either take over the Wooden Center or draw new lines in the Men’s Gym across the courts.
No kidding,
That’d be like the football team practicing on an 80-yard field! No major college athletic program would allow that!
by haywood nighttrain on Dec 20, 2011 5:52 PM PST reply actions
Actually far worse
more closely analogous to a 40 yard wide football field

by 






















