Chianti Dan and His Last Crusade
Great stories make you feel things, right?
Are you angry? Upset? Confused? Hopeful? Excited ... but braced for a letdown?
All of the above?
Are you watching a replay of any random UCLA football game from the last decade?
Or are you following Chianti Dan and His Last Crusade, the third installment of what we can only hope is just a trilogy.
Of course, you remember volume one, Receivers of the Lost Ark, the one where a bold, new athletic director fired Bob Toledo, flirted with Mike Riley, then settled on the always engaging and gregarious Karl Dorrell to be UCLA's newest football coach. That one opened so strong, with Chianti Dan cracking his whip and announcing we would "Fire Out" and compete for championships. Of course, the plot of that one took a turn for the absurd right around the time Dorrell "forgot" about Manuel White and told the press he didn't know where to stand on the sidelines. Other than one great scene, the 13-9 scene, that version slowly withered until Dan yelled "Cut."
And no one can forget Chianti Dan and the Temple of Neu, the one where our star maneuvered to bring back the down on his luck, oft-fired, prodigal son back into the fold. It was, in some ways, the inevitable sequel but in retrospect one that should never have been made. We knew the story was over long before our hero did, hoping he'd make one last dramatic move after the Debacle in the Desert -- alas Chianti Dan let the whole thing run on too long, damaging Part III even before it began.
Now, we're watching Chianti Dan On His Last Crusade, which we can only hope is the last installment of the "Chianti Dan Tries to Get It Right When Hiring a Football Coach" series.
This has to be it, right?
Either Dan gets it right or he gets fired.
It's not in the realm of possibility that someone lets him star in Part IV of the series, is it?
Let's see where we are so far in the story:
After blowing the ending of Temple of Neu by not ending it after the Arizona game, our hero waited until after a 0-50 point performance against USC before finally announcing the Rick Neuheisel era was over. (This was a marked contrast to Receivers of the Lost Ark, where we actually beat USC in the fourth meeting -- a move that allowed that episode to run a full season longer than "Neu." As an aside, it's actually quite amazing how much better the whole Dorrell era is going to look than the Rick Neuheisel era does, when future historians look back at the dark days of UCLA football. Let's put it this way: If Karl Dorrell had compiled the exact same record he had at UCLA at Washington, we'd be putting him on the current list to replace Rick Neuheisel. That's how bad the Neuheisel era looks on paper. Now, back to our story ... )
At this point, Last Crusade is more confusing than the first half hour of Godfather III (a film, btw, made by a UCLA alumnus and while GFIII does not live up to the first two films in that series, did get an Academy Award nomination for best picture and is considered by some critics a flawed masterpiece. We can only hope Chianti Dan's third version does this well.) So far, we've been given hope by the news that UCLA has suddenly realized it's 2011 and has cobbled together a rumored 4 million dollars to throw at the next coach. Then, we had those hopes dashed when we found out that Chris Petersen isn't moving to Los Angeles for any amount of money.
At this point, the coaching search has become a full on David Lynch film -- except that David Lynch films are cool. All we have rumors and the rumors aren't that exciting. We either rejected or were rejected by Houston's Kevin Sumlin. We're looking hard at Jim Mora's son (because he once met Terry Donahue in San Francisco) and maybe Jon Gruden's brother (because Chianti Dan once watched Monday Night Football after How I Met Your Mother was over). We might end up with Oregon's coach -- no, not the one who blows us out every year, the one who has been out of coaching for four years and who snubbed us a couple of times before.
Meanwhile, we're all just left wondering: Exactly how bad are things where there isn't one really solid college football coach with a good coaching record willing to move to Bel Air and coach UCLA's football team, a team whose campus sits right in the middle of one of the best recruiting areas in the nation.
Of course, the blame falls on the shoulders of our star, Chianti Dan. It seems he has no idea who to ask and those he relies on for advice aren't all that imaginative. He's also at fault for allowing our facilities to fall into neglect, the few improvements made faring poorly in comparison to those made at peer schools. In fairness to The Sommelier, it's not all his fault. The entire UCLA culture is to blame, as it's come late to a party that demands significant attention, commitment and investment in football to be competitive and is only now reluctantly walking through that door kicking and screaming.
I have to say, one of the most amazing things about UCLA football is this: Despite the fact that it's been poorly run for a decade (some would say a quarter century) we're still 6-7 and headed for a winnable bowl game. Cal and Stanford had to go through epically bad seasons to shake things up and change their approach to football. But we've never gone 1-11 or anything like that. That should tell you something: Even when we're not trying, we recruit enough talent to get to six wins. Even at our worst, our very worst, we win four. Karl Dorrell had a 10 win season. Just think, just imagine how we'd do if a good coach with the right resources was running things.
That's why this coaching search is so, so frustrating. Dan Mullen, just to throw out an example, coaches Mississippi State in the SEC West. He's got LSU, Alabama and Arkansas on his schedule and he still won six game after getting to nine last year. Imagine how he'd do at UCLA, where he'd have Colorado and Utah on his schedule. (No offense Utah, I know you blew us out, still, we somehow managed to finish higher than you in the standings).
At this point, the ending isn't written yet. Though it looks like we're looking at possible moustache giveaways at the Rose Bowl to honor our newest head coach Mike Bellotti, it's still possible Chianti Dan will write a surprise ending and deliver us a great football coach. Indiana Jones battled Nazis and brought home the Ark of the Covenant. All we're asking is that you battle your own worst instincts and deliver us Art Briles.
53 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
according to Houston Chronicle
Art Briles just reupped at Baylor .
Are they kidding? "UCLA's general fund for Intercollegiate Athletics, is kicking off a movement to acquire 1,500 new members, the Athletics development team announced today."
http://www.uclabruins.com/genrel/120911aaa.html?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter
Dec. 9, 2011
The Wooden Athletic Fund, UCLA’s general fund for Intercollegiate Athletics, is kicking off a movement to acquire 1,500 new members, the Athletics development team announced today. The 2011 giving year ends on December 31, and, with that in mind, the fund is asking alumni, fans and friends of UCLA Athletics to consider joining for 2012 for as little as $100 a year. Since there are 15 blocks in legendary UCLA coach John Wooden’s Pyramid of Success, each of the 100 new members will help to “fill” one block in the pyramid on the way to the goal of 1,500 new members.
“The Wooden Athletic Fund, so fittingly named for Coach and his wife Nell, plays such an important role in providing our student-athletes the resources they need to not only succeed in competition, but in the classroom and in the community,” UCLA Associate Athletic Director, Development Josh Rebholz said. “With the ever-changing landscape of intercollegiate athletics and the need for more and more financial support, we truly believe this movement for 1,500 new annual fund members will play an integral part in our ability to provide our student-athletes the best resources possible, both academically and athletically.”
Members of the Wooden Athletic Fund not only receive a tax deduction for their charitable contribution, but they also receive great benefits, including priority seating, priority parking, recognition and exclusive access to special events and receptions. Membership levels begin at $100 and increase to more than $25,000 annually. All donations made to the Wooden Athletic Fund go directly to supporting the student athletes at UCLA, including their academic scholarship costs. Scholarship costs for 700 student-athletes, which UCLA Athletics paid $11.1 million to the university in 2011, continue to escalate, and the need for philanthropy is greater than ever.
Additionally, all new Wooden Athletic Fund members in 2012 will receive an exclusive limited-edition “Wooden Athletic Fund Member” adidas hat.
If you are interested in becoming a member of the Wooden Athletic Fund or to learn more, please call (310) 206-3302 or visit www.WoodenAthleticFund.com.
I just called to express my interest in joining.
I informed them that I was a former Wooden Athletic Fund donor, and was very interested in re-enlisting. I gave my name and my phone number, and asked them to call me for a donation— as soon as they fired Dan Guerrero.
The phone rep was quite pleasant and did not flinch at my request; probably not the first time she’s heard it.
...
I’m not donating anything to UCLA until they hire a top-notch head football coach and/or replace Dan Guerreror.
The analogy to Indiana Jones was hilarious!
Thank you A! I really did need that.
I’m trying to forget that there ever was a 4th movie. I’m praying there isn’t a 4th for UCLA.
Folks - a warning
Watch your language in the comment threads. We have said it before. These are rough times but hold it together. Also, be respectful when you are disagreeing with each other and especially to moderators. The rules are clear for this community and given the volume of traffic here is exploding we are not going to tolerate nonsense from people just looking to engage in flame wars and attacking the community. Thanks.
I saw Dan already....
In “The Days and Wine and No Roses.”
by 1970 on Dec 9, 2011 2:47 PM PST reply actions 1 recs
Bruins Nation shouldn't slam every coaching candidate
I’ve been poking around the web to read BN every once in a while for the latest news on the coaching search. I’m a UCLA graduate, and I really miss the days like the 90s when we beat USC many years in a row. I was upset that Dan Guerrero fired Bob Toledo because he had us on the verge of a national championship. I share some of the BN disappointment in the athletic director, though I must admit I didn’t bother to figure out what “Chianti” means and I think name calling is childish (like four years ago when BN bloggers wouldn’t bother to learn to spell Neuheisel and kept using various nicknames).
Anyway, the main point I want to make is that BN should not slam every coaching candidate. For example I personally think Jim Mora Jr could end up being a good selection. If he does become the next UCLA coach, BN will already have slammed the guy in the public image before even giving him a chance. I think that instead of talking so negatively about every coaching possibility, BN should instead put forward who YOU think should be the best candidate! Try to keep it on the positive side. I learned long time ago in life that it’s easy to complain, but you’re only helpful if you’ve got a solution to offer to go along with the complaining.
And lastly, I hope that the next coach has ZERO connections to USC. I think it was good timing that Dan Guerrero fired Neuheisel immediately after the 50-0 loss to USC… because Toejams are extremely annoying and we must strive to beat them. We must never concede anything to our crosstown rivals. AND we must not be contaminated by any coaches/assistants who have connections over there.
What do you mean we wouldn't bother to learn how to spell Neuheisel
That is just false. Also Chianti Dan is based on Chianti Dan’s wine trip to Italy. Do a little research before you come in here here throwing this nonsense around.
Don’t come in here making false accusations without any proof. You’re new here. You’ve been warned.
Just offering suggestions to make your articles better
C’mon Bruins Nation also liked using nicknames 4 years ago. I’m just stating my opinion, I think the blogger articles would come across better if the various nicknames were dropped and everyone’s names were spelled out correctly. I don’t want to feel like I’m in 4th grade when I’m reading the articles. I agree with a lot of what you’re saying, I think Dan Guerrero bungled things up.. I just have a suggestion about the style of how the bloggers approach people’s names.
Allow me then to suggest ways to make your posting better
Based on what I’ve seen, the best option for you is to not post. But barring that, you can try not misrepresenting what we say and actually read the posts, because it’s clear that you don’t. At least not carefully. Frankly the only thing 4th grade around here seems to be your reading comprehension.
I've been at almost every home game since '91
Look buster, I’ve been at just about every UCLA home game for 20 years (longtime season ticket holder). My degree is from UCLA. I should have just as much clout as a “true Bruin” as some of the bloggers making headline posts on here.
You're skating on thin ice
All of this nonsense you’re trying to pull now, going on the offensive to cover up your ignorance and pulling out the age card and the “Bruin loyalty” card and whatever the hell else you can; I’ve seen it all before. People like you usually end up banned. So you have a choice here. You can either educate yourself on our posts so that you do not misrepresent our point of view as you’ve been doing, or you can do like so many others have done, petulantly stomp your feet and whine at me, and I press the “ban” button. Your choice.
Furry, you have as much right to state your opinions as any one else.
If your opinion is that two plus two is four, your opinion will be respected. If your opinion is that two plus two is five, then your opinion will be branded as stupid.
So far, the main opinion I have seen is that you think it is childish to call our athletic director “Chianti Dan,” even though you admit you did not bother to find out why or how he got that nickname. Sorry, furry, but when your opinion is based on information you refuse to obtain, then it falls into the two plus two is five category.
That, of course, is just my opinion. Maybe I’m wrong. Maybe it’s a good idea to drive through a blog, take some potshots without basis, and then try to defend your position still without knowing the facts. Good luck with that. I’ve never seen it work anywhere, but again, maybe that’s just me.
It's not just about Chianti
It wasn’t just about DG’s nickname, which initially confused me. Doesn’t BN want the entire general public to understand who they’re talking about, or only insiders who happen to follow the history of the Chianti tag? BN has this thing about using alternative names for many others as well. 4 years ago there was a lot of “Slick Rick” in the blogs, and then after he became the coach that turned into “CRN” but I rarely saw his name spelled out as Neuheisel. I just have a pet peeve about people using alternative names for people, maybe it is just my personal irritation. I didn’t like it in elementary school and I don’t like it now.
It's difficult to write out the first 20 chapters of the story every time, just to make a comment about chapter 21.
I make it a point to use the entier name. I also use the honorific (my first boss drilled that into me.) And I don’t do initials because it doesn’t take any significant incremental time to write out the whole name. That said, there are exceptions. The first was the guy who succeeded Coach Toledo. I could not use his name and the word “coach” in the same sentence, so I chose “Coach Toledo’s successor,” and that stuck. I went with Coach Toledo’s Successor’s Successor, but that became mean to others and eventually to me.
Chianti Dan also lost his right to be addressed with an honorific. He earned the monicker Chianti Dan (as well as several others.) Again, though, that’s many chapters ago, and I think if you have a bone to pick with that name it’s really up to you to find out its genesis. You can’t legitimately expect hundreds of people to change their writing habits and their ways of addressing people simply to make you happy or to make your life easier. For that matter, you’re treated in a much more civilized manner here, because we (or at least I) assume you’re UCLA family and you’re entitled to it. Try going to one of the pro-sports blogs on SBN and telling the regulars there that you don’t like the way they’re addressing people. (If you really want to be insulted, go to DRays Bay and say that you don’t think modern Sabremetrics are good predictors of anything, and 20 guys living in their parents’ basements will quit their Dungeons and Dragons game and chop you to bits. (Just kidding, DRays guys – just kidding.))
(Actually not kidding about that one.)
Anyway, we all have our pet peeves, and it’s hard to get people to come around to your way of thinking all the time. My pet peeve is guys griping about how bad the announcers are, when all they have to do is turn down the volume. I have made maybe one convert in several years of trying. Good luck at getting guys to give up initials.
Can someone kick this guy in his peas, please?
That’s the culture of the blog. this is a blog, not the freaking LA Times. Have fun with it, you douche.
I have the Sons of Westwood on my iPod in my "favorites" playlist ...
http://sonsofwestwood.wordpress.com
You have few things wrong
Chianti Dan didn’t fire Neuheisel immediately after 0-50. Chianti Dan tried to hold on to Neuheisel after 0-50. He was forced to fire Neuheisel.
As for Mora, we have detailed with facts, comments from former fans’ teams why Mora would be a terrible hire. Lastly, you are wrong when you write BN is slamming every coaching candidate. We are slamming every dreg/terrible reject candidates.
We includes links to numerous posts in our previous one on candidates we like. Furthermore, we indicated we’d be open to Sark if it means firing of Chianti Dan.
So please get your facts right about what we blog here before offering your thoughts. Thanks.
by Nestor on Dec 9, 2011 3:01 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
How was he "forced"?
1. Someone explain, how was Guerrero “forced” to fire Neuheisel. I thought he was the only one with firing authority
2. Sarkisian has too much USC history/baggage. I don’t want to see a former Trojan as the next UCLA coach.
This is what I mean
Go back and read the posts from when he was fired. They aren’t going away. We aren’t here to spoonfeed you.
Sark is not a Trojan
Yes, he was on Petey’s staff, and we can always hold that against him. But by that standard Norm Chow and Walker are also Trojans…why aren’t they Bruins? There are people from U$C or associated with them that I wouldn’t let near campus. He’s not one of them.
But hey, what do I know. I’m just the 800 lbs bruin in the room.
Tas, you are my brother, and I love you. But I think you're wrong here.
Sark worked for Cheatie He should be disqualified for that reason alone.
Chow worked for Cheatie, and he should have been disqualified. I accept the blame for that. I was blinded by his credentials. We deserved to such with him on our coaching staff. Football karma made that inevitable.
Walker was a trogan, but frankly I can’t remember if he worked for Cheatie. I thought he should go from day one, so I won’t take the blame for that.
What’s the difference between Sark, Chow and Walker on the one hand, and Rocky Seto on the other? I think none.
I feel as if I had failed you if I can’t persuade you to abandone this “some trogans are okay” concept. It’s just not right.
Rocky Seto was a Trogan evangelist
He breathes and eats all things Trogan. From what I have heard, Chow apparently also constantly brought up his Trogan days when he was at UCLA, and in hindsight he obviously was not a good choice. Lane Kiffin is a known cheater. I put Sark in the “employee” category, and not a convert. He’s not my top choice, not even close, but my only reason for supporting him is that it would very likely get Chianti Dan fired. That’s worth hiring a marginal Trogan for.
But hey, what do I know. I’m just the 800 lbs bruin in the room.
That sort of trade to get rid of Chianti Dan is very tempting. VERY tempting.
But no. I can’t go for it. I still assert that Block has to be aware that Chianti Dan is truly this horrible. (For example, the Fred Rogan story discussed elsewhere.) Chianti Dan will go soon enough, and we don’t have willingly accept Sark. In fact, hiring Sark might be the thing that pushes the button on the ejection seat.
BN has not slammed every coaching possibility
http://www.bruinsnation.com/2011/12/4/2611896/why-we-should-hire-dan-mullen
was bumped
http://www.bruinsnation.com/2011/11/28/2594595/15-candidates-to-consider-for-the-hc-vacancy
positive mod reaction
http://www.bruinsnation.com/2011/11/30/2601069/why-are-we-not-even-talking-about-calhoun
also positive reactions
In http://www.bruinsnation.com/2011/12/6/2615297/UCLA-football-coach-search-Dan-Guerrero
a mod says
As has been discussed in recent days there are plenty of talented coaches who could potentially be options for UCLA and may be interested given the Bruins have resources to spend this time around. It is stunning to see Bruins not even bothering considering someone like Dan Mullen or letting guys like Larry Fedora seriously pursued by someone else.
It sure feels negative around here, though, I’ll give you that. I can understand why.
We're like the people trapped in the building
after an earthquake for days and you guys at BN are entertaining us.
Wooden Althletic Fund
I just called their number said I would donate under one condition: if, DG is fired. The guy that answered said they have been getting a lot of these requests. Keep it up Bruins. Pressure will solve this problem.
Hope this doesn't mean in a couple of decades, we will be watching
Chianti Dan and his Kingdom of Crystal Shills
". . . and the Last Crusade?"
Are you trying to say that Sean Connery has the inside track to the job, now?
The Mad Bruin
At least Sir Sean knows not to bring a knife to a gun fight.
"It's not who you are underneath. It's what you DO that defines you."
Dan, if you are reading….(and trust me, you SHOULD be!)
Dan, I don’t know who you listen to. As the coaching search has progressed it has become a salient question. Who does Dan listen to for advice. What does he know? What does he think?
I have a suggestion Dan, get educated. A place to start? Right here. There is simply an overwhelming amount of fact-based opinion and information here on BN about who the viable coaching candidates are.
I watch you and the decisions we think you are making and I shake my head in wonder. Like my teenage kids sometimes I want to just shake you and say sternly, "just do it my way"
Dan, why can’t you just do it our way? A passionate group of fans and alumni have in short order created a well reasoned list of candidates, debated the merits of each and has winnowed down the prospects to a workable number of preferential opportunities. BN has done all the work for you. We’ve written you the Cliff Notes version and so now, just like old times, plagiarize it…it’s so simple.
Let me explain why this is the perfect solution; a) we’ve been busy so you didn’t have to be. Allowed you to finalize your cruise details and catch a show in New York. b) it’ll shut us up. Heck, we might even stop calling every five minutes asking for your head on a platter (nah, just kidding about that. We’re probably not stopping) c) if it doesn’t work, you can pretend to be shocked and then blame us. It’s guilt free for you. d) it doesn’t really look like you abdicated your responsibilities, it looks like you listened to the fan base and gave them exactly what they wanted. e) looks good on an NCAA application. Yep, that’s right. You watched out for the interests of the university, the alumni and fans and met the expectations of the fans of the second largest media buy area in the country. Smart move.
Dan, admit it…you know we are right. Stop fighting it…you know you want it. Here…take it…that’s right.
Men's Track and Field
You can add this once proud and outstanding UCLA program (8 NCs) to the Bruin list of teams languishing in mediocrity under this athletics administration’s management. 1 conference championship since 2000 compared to 7 conference championships and 2 2nd place finishes from 1990-2000.
Think what a dynamic and supportive AD could have done with the UCLA vs USC meet – that’s a seriously under-valued asset if ever there was one. Talk about a vicious and storied rivalry!
Time for DG to go.
Hail to the Hills of Westwood.
Petros...
This afternoon, Petros highlighted how the UCLA coach selection process is being recognized as a national joke. Until this last month, I can only remember UCLA being a punch line once- with the handicap parking fiasco. Now it’s a daily occurrence. Ouch!
Still proud to be a Bruin and even more committed to regime change.
Go Bruins
TRM
OK I admit it. I voted for Tressel.
Only in the first poll, and I was half joking. The way I would with my friends at a bar. And then I changed my vote in the second poll when I realized how serious everyone was taking it. The truth is have been so frustrated with UCLA football since I graduated that I can’t even take this coaching “search” seriously. When you poll me on who we should hire, I feel like I’m in a room with a bunch of Pittsburgh Pirates fans voting on if they should sign Prince Fielder or Albert Pujols. I’ve seen this movie before, and it never ends well. We haven’t won the Rose Bowl in twenty five years. The Cotton Bowl win was fourteen years ago. I’m tired of being emotionally invested in it because I’m tired of being let down. I guess my vote for Tressel shows that I’m so frustrated I’ve become in a troll in our own blog. I know it would be idiotic to hire him, and I have zero desire to see Jim Tressel in Westwood. But considering the way things are going, my pathetic being momentarily thought that even if the NCAA shut us down for five years after wining a Rose Bowl, it still might be the only chance I have to see a Rose Bowl victory before my unborn children graduate from UCLA and I have to be pushed into the Rose Bowl in a wheelchair. At least I would still get to see it once. I’ve never made a lot of money, but for a while I donated to the Wooden fund what I could. And then they used my money to move the students away from the court in Pauley, exactly the opposite of what I was hoping the renovations would accomplish. That was the last straw. Luckily I had no more straws to give up at the end of this football season, because one last straw is all I can take per decade. I miss my seat at the Rose Bowl, but if they keep Dan around I wouldn’t be surprised if he moved me behind the uprights for the $C game so he could sell more tickets to Trogans to pay his overinflated salary. I never heard him address his concern with the football practice facility until CRN lost his job and DG suddenly thought he might lose his own. I don’t understand how he can pay himself that much money while one of the main revenue centers can’t even afford a modern weight room. I sacrificed my trip to Tuscany to support the team, meanwhile he enjoys his Chianti on my dime. No more. I can’t wait until the Morgan Center calls me this year.
How about Gary Patterson?
He is doing a great job. Why isn’t he on the radar?
Illinois hires Toledo's Tim Beckman
Dan Guerrero!
U-C-L-A Fight, Fight, Fight! Go Bruins!
(Fire Ben Howland, Dan Guererro, and Gene Block)
Go Lakers! Dodgers vs. Angels World Series!
Sorry if this is old news.
U-C-L-A Fight, Fight, Fight! Go Bruins!
(Fire Ben Howland, Dan Guererro, and Gene Block)
Go Lakers! Dodgers vs. Angels World Series!
Sadly, all the news about UCLA is old news nowadays.
It’s always “so and so, who was on UCLA’s short list of head coaching candidates, just signed as head coach at U of XYZ.”
In the new PAC 12
we won’t be able to squeak out 4 wins. Within a few season Wazzu will be on the list of “probably not gonna win games” and few after that it will be on the list of “gonna lose in a blowout” games. Its happened with almost every other team in the PAC since 1998. We have lost ground every year since that year. I am furious with guerrero.
by Strathmore&Gayley on Dec 9, 2011 8:13 PM PST reply actions
ESPN saying it's Mora
http://espn.go.com/los-angeles/ncf/story/_/id/7337808/ucla-bruins-hire-jim-l-mora-coach-football
Way to go Dan – you conclude your national joke of a head coaching search by hiring another dose of mediocrity (or worse).
by McNown to Farmer on Dec 10, 2011 12:39 AM PST reply actions

by 



















