An Inside Look at UCLA Basketball
As an avid reader of BN, I felt like giving back and relating my recent experience at two UCLA basketball practices. I got lucky - the team practices at SAC and my buddies and I had just started a pick-up game. Knowing that the students have no access to bball facilities (Wooden is now used for volleyball, ect.), they let us stay on and use the last court for a little while. Afterwards, we all stopped playing and watched the practice. We had a former player, which probably helped. We saw over an hour total of scrimmage time, and lots of conditioning work. It has definitely given me better perspective on our team's current problems, and as a triple bruin, I feel everyone's pain with the state of our revenue sports. A couple points:
Who is Ben Howland? This has been one of my biggest concerns over the past few years. On one hand, we have a guy who the media consistently notes as a top-10 collegiate basketball coach and took us to three straight final fours. On the other, we have the ridiculous demise of a number one recruiting class and the wonderful experience of Mr. Dragovic's three-ball. I don't know Howland, but I can say this -- he works and coaches HARD during practice.
Ben Howland is your hard-nosed boss. He has been in the business forever, knows what he wants, and doesn't spend a lot of time consoling you when he tells you to do something different. He doesn't coddle you when you mess up -- he points it out in front of everyone and says let's get back to work. When someone messes up, he blows the whistle, tells the player what he did wrong, and gets back to it. This happens a lot. I don't think he's malacious, he's just, for lack of a better phrase, a hardcore perfectionist. As many of you know from your jobs, this type of boss is generally okay for the secure and usually requires pretty thick skin. His coaching style is not for the weak hearted player.
Josh Smith and Reaves Nelson: The first practice occurred early in the year - right before RN's first suspension. First, RN does not engage well with BH. The kid is a beast, but as the practice wore on and he made several defensive mistakes, his aggression dwindled. Every time BH pointed him out, you could tell he was legitimately peeved. BH approaches basketball in a very specific way, and RN pretty much discounted anything he had to say with his body language and effort. I have friends who pout when they do not get there way, but RN's disregard was pretty apparent. Honestly, it made me feel uncomfortable. I love the kid - maybe it was one bad practice -- but, man, it was passive aggression in its purest form. At one point, BH got on RN for missing the same defensive switch twice. The offensive ran the same play again and RN missed the switch again -- same exact play after just receiving instruction. BH looked visibly perturbed and had the team continue playing. It was awkward in that gym after this.
As for JS, he was the best player on the floor for the first fifteen minutes of a scrimmage. Then, he becomes the worst player. This kid cannot be stopped in the low post. His conditioning issue is obvious, but he is also a very emotional player. At one point during the second practice, he missed two defensive assignments that led to dunks for TW. BH stopped play and got on him pretty hard -- UCLA hedges on screens, and the weak side player has to come over and help the hedging big man, or else dunks happen and we lose. JS totally lost confidence after this experience. You could just look at his face and tell he just wasn't into it. In this instance, I can't necessarily blame BH for the way he went about things. I'm not going to speculate on an answer to the problem -- maybe BH needs to be less harsh, maybe JS needs to grow thicker skin. All I know is that JS doesn't seem to be getting better. This leads me to the next point.
Conditioning: Playing BenBall requires ridiculous conditioning. I've played basketball competively, and although not a big man, the hedging approach he employs on defense is completely draining. First, Josh Smith cannot last ten minutes in this defensive set. If he is forced to hedge three times in a row, he is winded and out for the count. When I say out, I mean he can't run down the floor. As for the team . . .
If there is one thing my buddies and I all agreed on - this is not a team that can last 40 minutes with that type of defensive pressure. I don't know why they aren't conditioned. At practice, these kids run hard for long periods of time. BH and his coaches work them, and at one point, I thought JS was literally going to pass out. Is it non-practice conditioning that's the issue here? I mean: DC, RW, KL, AA, The Prince, Alfred -- these kids looked ready to play hardcore defense for 40 minutes. AA actually got stronger in the last minutes of a game. Our current team just doesn't have that extra level -- many players were dragging after an hour or two of practice. Something is wrong, although I'm not in the finger pointing business. My friend who played on two of the final-four teams (practice squad) was bewildered by the conditioning level at the end of practice. The Texas game exemplifies this -- definitely a tale of two halves.
The Wear Twins: Besides JS for the first 15 minutes of a scrimmage, these two guys are the best players on the practice court. They shoot lights out and move pretty well on the defensive end of the floor. Obviously, this hasn't translated perfectly to our games, but I think they are improving. LJ comes in second here -- he had one great practice where he made a ton of buckets during the scrimmage breaking people down off the dribble. I think the Wears are still getting accustomed to the intensity of D-1, as they sat out a year, but they looked awesome during these practices. Hopefully that will start transitioning on the floor more. The key is learning BH defensive system, which requires a ton out of the big men, and being in top notch shape.
Powell: Super athletic, pretty good shooter, NOT in defensive shape yet (but he'll get there). The best of all is that he cares. He practices hard. I'm excited about this kid, although he is mistake prone when he has the ball in his hands -- had 2 pretty terrible back-to-back turnovers and looked a bit out of control sometimes. He's DC fast -- and in basketball, there is such a thing as too fast. He'll figure it out, and realize that explosive speed is only required in certain situations. Reminds me of a DC/RW combination. If he hits the weight room over the summer, watch out.
Hopefully that gives everyone a little perspective. I cannot believe RN is gone - he was my favorite player on the team at the start of the year. I'm not justifying the decision, but his attitude during that practice made me (a bystander) feel uncomfortable, so I can see why BH finally pulled the trigger. Obviously, criticisms/critiques about my post, as well as your insightful comments, are appreciated. Hopefully this adds some perspective our current troubles.
This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of BruinsNation's (BN) editors. It does reflect the views of this particular fan though, which is as important as the views of BN's editors.
34 comments
|
10 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Thanks for the post JB
This sheds a little light on what’s going on with the most puzzling mystery of what is UCLA basketball universe.
Really helpful insight
one question – any insight into Brendan Lane?
I like Lane, but . . .
Hustle kid — great motor, but have never saw him do anything inspring, like say Powell. He did hit a three-pointer during one of the practices, but I wasn’t knocked-out by anything he did.
I always thought BL was JK 2.0 — highly recruited, but not a huge talent. Maybe he could have been better with more playing time. In these practices, he was clearly inferior to the Wears. I’ve always liked him though . .
thanks
just trying to get a read on the rotation. From limited action and based on previous years, he strikes me as being in the Wear mold – face-to-the-basket big with some nice touch but not elite strength or quickness. Was curious as to what he looked like in practice vs those guys. Seems like a good kid, but there’s been a lot of debate here as to his talent level and how he has been developed.
I have the exact same sentiments
When BL plays, I feel like he’s holding back. Maybe that’s his nature or maybe it’s because he’s scared to make a mistake. I’m not sure. At those two practices, BL did not look awesome. To me, he looked like a bench player who is good for a basket or two, some personal fouls, and overall hustle in a time of need. When compared to Stover, he’s a lot worse defensively and only a little better offensively.
As to the question as to his potential — is he just not talented enough or is it a development failuret? I just don’t know. He tries hard though.
Exactly
UCLA has 10 basketball courts. PP can turn into 4 (for IMs and such); JWC has three; and SAC has three. That’s a lot for one campus, but the JWC and SAC have courts that are not full-size. It’s fine for me, but when you get 6 people who are over 6-7, it gets crowded for sure.
Apparently that’s why everyone has been getting concussed this season.
If its me, and I coach the best program in the history of basketball,
I’m repainting the lines in the SAC to get one goddam offical length court. Am I wrong?
Great Insights, Thanks for sharing.
Having seen what you saw in practice and what you’ve seen in games; care to make any guesses where we’re headed this year?
Because it feels like another year without a dance right now.
Winning is not a sometime thing; it's an all the time thing. You don't win once in a while; you don't do things right once in a while; you do them right all the time. Winning is a habit. Unfortunately, so is losing. ~ Vince Lombardi
Predictions
First, I believe TW is going to become one our best players. He’s already improving defensively, and as long as his jump shot goes down, he’s going to be good. I like him better than DW, but I actually believe in these guys, despite the fact that they were awful earlier in the the year.
There are just to many questions for this team for me to believe in a great turn-around. Can LJ calm down and hit open shots? Can the team actually play BenBall for 40 mins?
My prediction is that we get A LOT better throughout the season, we finish over 500, but we miss the tournament. If the kids come around and we are able to make a run through conference play, we do have a shot — the pac-12 is bad this year. We know JA is not going to get better (he’ll play at his same level) and it appears that JS has decided to spend this year on the bench. That leaves us with a JC transfer and two soph twins as our playmakers – which doesn’t look good.
So it does make more sense now that the Wears were playing so much early in the season
even when they didn’t look good.
Howland's biggest problem IMO
Is the kids that he has recruited. He got hard nosed defensive players when he first got here, but the last few classes have been offensive players who are softer, or head cases like Nelson and Gordon. Hopefully he goes back to his roots in these next few. You don’t just become a bad coach over night. With the bad blood out (Neslon) everyone on the team should step up and play better together. Even one guy with a bad attitude can kill a team. Also I wonder if the players as individuals aren’t doing what they should in the off season. Conditioning is a problem; my guess is the team showed up in bad shape. Lets hope we hit our stride in Pac-12 play and finish strong.
I couldn't agree more.
Howland has never had the 5-star talent that he gets at UCLA. Think Jrue Holiday and that terrible season — he’s not used to giving someone “star treatment” because he’s never had to before.
Josh Smith: #2 rated center in the nation who has been so physically dominant his entire career he has never had to put extra work in. Things are different when you get to the next level, and work ethic matters a lot more. Howland’s gotta connect with these guys and make sure they understand this, right?
Or maybe Howland needs to adjust
The great coaches adjust their styles to fit their teams. Yes, those first four years were remarkable, as he managed to put together groups who not only fit into his style but were willing to give everything.
Seems to me the change came with the so called #1 class. Suddenly it wasn’t Mata-Real or the Prince or AA2, players who worked their tails off, or KL, a top-rated freshman who went to Westwood to learn the Howland system.
Not so Jrue or Drew. Maybe Lee, maybe Jerime. Could it have been worse for Nelson to be on the SI cover? These guys are entitled. They came to show off, not learn.
But Josh just doesn’t fit into that hedging defense. Play to his skills, for goodness sakes. Don’t force him to be something he’s not. Take advantage of his skills and help him hone them.
Howland is a great coach—if he has the right players. Though I’ll never understand his fascination with Drago and his disinterest in Mike Moser. We know he plays favorites. He likes guys who practice well.
We have five winnable games ahead before Stanford. We’d better win them.
By the way, Duke plays some great defense without hedging. It is possible.
It's not the hedging necessarily that's the issue? You hedge to help guards against the pick and roll.
It’s just that UCLA has been pathetically bad at defending the pick and roll, both on the hedging bigs and the guards working around screens. Plenty of teams hedge up top, but the key is on rotating help side defense over to protect the hedger and for the hedger to rotate back quickly after hedging, not to mention the wings working around screens. But as noted by just about everyone, UCLA’s guards are very weak at working around screens.
You still need to move in a zone defense.
What Howland needs to do is have whoever is at PF/high post run the hedge and have Smith plug on the weak side. Smith simply cannot recover from moving from the low post to the top of the key and back.
Is that because Smith is out of condition?
Can Smith (or can anyone) get into condition during the season?
It doesn’t do any good now to talk about how Coach used to do it, but our guys were always in condition. On the first championship team, Fred Slaughter and Gail Goodrich were at the endline challenging the in-bounds pass. Slaughter was the biggest guy on the team (6’5, 235) but he could run the court. He ran the 100 yard dash in 9.9. All our guys were in condition. I can’t imagine a UCLA basketball team not being able to play all out for 40 minutes. Back then, it was all running, all the time. Now, our offense is one guy walking the ball up and the rest of the guys standing around. It’s hard to see how they could get winded executing this offense.
I think the original poster made the point -- Smith can go all out for just a few possessions and then he's done
Crazily enough though I do believe he has the footspeed and lateral quickness to run Howland’s traditional defense. He just doesn’t have the stamina to do so for very long.
Look at Hollins, Mata-Real, Aboya, Mbah a Moute, or even Stover and Love. All of them managed to get outside of the paint to hedge ball handlers, and make it back to the low post. They also had competent high post partners who would cover their weaksides.
But you do bring up a good point about strength & conditioning and general. I’ve long suspected that department is lacking at UCLA.
That team also executed the full court press more than half of the games. They were in incredible condition.
Slaughter was also one of the greatest interior passers the game had seen (up to that point).
by BrendonBruin on Dec 9, 2011 10:33 PM PST up reply actions
The first two championship teams did the full court zone press all the time, as I recall, Brendon.
Natrually, every intramural team tried that. It generally worked because no one could dribble. But once the turnover happened, it didn’t really help because no one could shoot, either. But like the 63-64 team, one way or another, one of the intramural teams would pull of a 4-0 run, and that would be the game.
JS tired out by the "hedge"? Please.
Isn’t this obvious? The dude is at least 30 lb overweight. Let’s start with some weight loss, and THEN consider BH’s defensive schemes. Josh: put the pizza down and go for a walk.
Mix of Zone D worked vs. Penn.
Was excited to see the new Bruins (first game post-RN debacle) @ OC Honda Ctr vs. a motivated and guard-dominant Penn team. Bruins could have done a second-half collapse (see Texas) and the one guard reminded me of that kid from Wazzu who just went off in the waning days of Pac-10 play a couple years back @ Pauley. But, there is good chemistry with this team, and the Wears, LazJones, Powell and the support staff did what they needed to on both ends to grind out the ‘W.’ Most of all, the periodic switch to Zone gave our bigs some needed rest (JS) — and kept the game tempo in our favor. Go Bruins – I think this team can surprise folks! Best wishes to all Bruins!
by MonCheri-Josephina on Dec 12, 2011 7:58 PM PST reply actions

by 




















