Return of UCLA Football: Linebackers Springing Into Focus
As Bellerophon wrote yesterday, we are in a period of transition among the biggies of Bruin sports (not meant to diminish our baseball of softball teams, gymnastics or any of the other spring sports). With the recent end of basketball's season, we are only days way from spring football practice, and the first hint of the upcoming season that holds so much importance in the path of this program. B led his opening preview by discussing the importance of this season and the changes that Coach Neuheisel has made in preparation for it.
Today, I will be picking up from yesterday's breakdown of the defensivel ine entering camp with a look at the Bruin linebacking squad. With all of the turmoil that the offseason has seen in regards to coaching, there is a semblance of consistency with the return of Clark Lea as linebackers coach. To preserve a level of consistency among our series of reviews, I am continuing with yesterday's assumption that the defense will continue to feature a 4-3 base set, and will write accordingly. UCLA is yet to publish a depth chart for the practices, but with the release of a spring outlook, and other media sources, here is an early look at how things can shake out.
| SLB | MLB | WLB |
| Jordan Zumwalt (6-4, 230, So) | Patrick Larimore (6-3, 253, So*) | Sean Westgate (5-11, 223, Sr) |
| Eric Kendricks (6-1, 226, Fr*) | Isaiah Bowens (6-1, 235, So*) | Glenn Love (6-4, 219, Sr*) |
| Ryan Hofmeister (6-2, 220, So) |
Todd Golper (6-0, 240, So*) | Aramide Olaniyan (6-2, 208, Fr*) |
| David Allen (6-2, 224, Jr*) | Aaron Wallace (6-3, 230, Fr) | Jared Koster (6-1, 208, Fr*) |
| Phillip Ruhl (6-0, 225, Fr*-Walk-on) |
Mike Orloff (6-2, 210, Fr) |
* denotes redshirt; Italics: incoming freshmen.
Notes: Patrick Larimore will not participate in Spring practices due to injury. Jared Koster will be limited to non-contact activities. Mike Orloff is listed to display overall depth of the unit, but is still enrolled in high school and therefore will not be present for spring practices.
The big change from last year's squad is, of course, the departure of Akeem Ayers for greener pastures. With his loss, the Bruins do retain a certain level of experience among the projected starters - all of whom started games last season - but with a severe drought of experience among the remaining rotation and reserves of the position. Let's start looking through the positions below the fold.
Strongside (Sam) LinebackerThe expected early departure of Ayers for the NFL draft opens the only hole among the starting LB positions. Thankfully, the Bruins have a promising young talent to slide into that gap in the person of true sophomore Jordan Zumwalt. One of several defensive 4-star prospects from the 2010 recruiting class, Zumwalt began to see playing time early last season, appearing in all but 1 game, and breaking into the starting lineup at middle linebacker late in the season after an injury to Patrick Larimore. He will shift over to the strong side in 2011.
After Zumwalt, the picture becomes a bit blurry at this stage. As a disclaimer, the depth listed at the strong-side (for all the positions, really) is an early guess as to how the particular positions will shake out. Isaiah Bowens may become the prime backup to Zumwalt once the season begins, but with Larimore not able to participate in spring practices, he is likely to take most of his spring reps in the middle. Eric Kendricks was named the outstanding defensive scout team player last season while taking his (freshman) redshirt year, and has a chance to earn some playing time at either outside linebacker spot. Ryan Hofmeister is a transfer from Riverside City College, where he was considered one of the top NCAA prospects among junior college players in 2010. He enrolled at UCLA for the past winter quarter, and unlike most transfers, came in as a sophomore. While he does have three years of eligibility (plus a redshirt) as a result, that also means that he is less advanced physically and in skill than the typical JC transfer player. David Allen transfered in from Tulane a couple of years ago, and is tasked primarily with a spacial teams role, and to give further depth on the strong side.
Middle (Mike) Linebacker
The Bruins feature a bit more consistency up the middle, but with all of the youth present on the strong side. While he will not be able to participate in spring football, Patrick Larimore will be coming back to start at middle linebacker this fall after missing the latter half of the 2010 season due to a shoulder injury. Larimore was named national defensive player of the week last September following his performance against Texas, and is already on some NFL draft boards for 2013.
While Larimore looks to have a lock on the starting inside spot, he will be out until the summer, giving Isaiah Bowens ample opportunity to make his case for an expanded role in the defense - possibly backing up both Larimore and Zumwalt - to coach Lea and the newly-hired defensive coordinator Joe Tresey. After being out of game action for much of the last two years - due to a 2009 redshirt and 2010 injury - Todd Golper will be looking to live up to his top-10 positional ranking entering UCLA by working his way back into game shape this spring. Aaron Wallace is one of two linebackers entering UCLA in this year's freshman class; having enrolled during the Winter quarter, he is able to participate in practice - given that he missed his last high school season with an ankle injury, the extra practice time on campus is a significant plus - but is highly likely to end up as a redshirt this fall. Phillip Ruhl is a freshman walk-on whose role in camp and on the team is to provide depth up the middle.
Weakside (Will) Linebacker
On the weak side, the Bruins see their only full-season returning starter - and one of only two returning seniors among linebackers - in Sean Westgate. Westgate finished second on the team in tackles in 2010 and was in the top-10 in tackles per game among Pac-10 players, but is not an ideal starter at linebacker. His effort and determination are absolute tops, and exactly what we should be looking for as a Bruin, but as one observer wrote at the end of last season, he is not physically a good match for the position. With that said, we can count on Westgate making the absolute most of his ability at the position, and we should never have to worry about him taking plays off or pouting.
After Westgate, there are several players looking to earn playing time in the rotation, or at least in special teams play. Glenn Love is the other returning senior, appearing in all 12 games last season after shifting from strong safety to outside linebacker to spell Westgate. He could also see time backing up Zumwalt on the strong side, in addition to giving Westgate a run for his money. A pair of redshirt freshmen are looking to leave their scout team responsibilities behind and earn playing time with the big boys in 2011. Aramide Olaniyan was one of UCLA's biggest gets in the loaded 2010 recruiting class, and after sitting out that season, looks to earn 2011 playing time begining with a strong showing this spring.
Jared Koster was actually a member of the 2009 incoming class, but his delayed enrollment (greyshirt) resulted in his eligibility clock not starting until the 2010 season. Koster saw special teams action early last season, until an injury against Houston ended his season, but allowed him to claim an injury redshirt year, preserving his freshman eligibility for 2011. That limited experience, plus the extra year of practices and physical maturity may help even O...'s projected talent edge this spring, and in their battle for playing time this season. Mike Orloff is not set to enroll at UCLA until the summer, and is likely going to redshirt in 2011.
33 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I'm sad
that Olaniyan hasn’t put on any weight. He looked very promising last pre season. I tended to think he would challenge Westgate and Love for that starting spot.
Player height/weights are based on the 2011 roster
posted on the official site. Have to admit that I too was disappointed to see that O has not been able to add much weight yet.
formerly bruinhoo
Thanks
looks like they have been updated, Owa up to 264!
+1
According to espn’s 2010 depthchart, Owa went from 240 to 264, and how about Morrell Presley going from 222 to 245? Damn. Those two are the most impressive gains I’ve noticed. Marsh and Barr each added 10 lbs.
what's even crazier
is that these guys aren’t done yet. They still have the summer to put on even more weight. I think this season will be very telling about what direction Owa’s career will go.
Troy is burning
by bruinbasketball on Mar 23, 2011 5:09 PM PDT up reply actions
Any students that see him on campus
should offer to buy him multiple cheeseburgers!
Just listened to CRN's conference call on spring ball with reporters
and they talked about Glenn Love now being listed as a SLB, with Hofmeister and Kendricks listed as WLBs. They didn’t explain how Hofmeister and Kendricks had the position determiend, but CRN said that Love’s move was due to him being a senior and them wanting to put him in the position he had the best chance of winning/playing.
I realize this is probably arbitrary at this point, and they’ll certainly all be listed as OLBs of some variety, but thought it would be of interest to some since it indicates who the coaches think each guy will be competing against at this point in time.
Did you get that on BRO?
I saw partial text of the call on insidesocal.
Nope
it’s up on the official site. Link to audio of call is on this page:
http://www.uclabruins.com/sports/m-footbl/spec-rel/032311aaa.html
Thanks for the heads up
I’ll try to listen to the audio later today and post an addendum to the relevant positions tonight.
formerly bruinhoo
i mentioned on the DL thread, that i wasn't too worried about the DL...
losing akeem (and of course rahim… but that’s a whole other thread…) is going to hurt. zumwalt seemed to be a great player in the making, but the other 2 are question marks.
i love westgate’s motor, but he is a bit undersized, and it was painfully obvious on a few plays last year. i actually also really dig larimore, but recovering after injury, especially with no spring practice gives me a bit of concern.
and, like has been mentioned before, i was hoping olaniyan would be able to step in. our LB corps have not had game-changing recruits the last few years -
2011 wallace, orloff, and hofmeister
2010 zumwalt, olaniyan, barr and kendricks
2009 golper, bowens, koster
i’d love to try barr at OLB, but i guess he would rather catch the ball block for a running play…
we’ve had several big time recruits at other positions – hundley, owa, malcolm jones… but again, LB hasn’t, and we’re losing akeem.
"Be more concerned with your character than your reputation, because your character is what you really are, while your reputation is merely what others think you are." --John Wooden
I'm different
The DL worries me most. Zumwalt and Larimore look like studs. Westgate is solid. Starting LBs can play most of the game, whereas on D. You need to have 8 to 10 guys every game. DL, we’re young and not deep. The loss of Willis hurts.
by GoldenGate93 on Mar 25, 2011 9:21 AM PDT up reply actions
I am really concerned about Westgate starting at the WLB position.
Let’s be honest, he is way too small to effectively play LB in the Pac-12. Don’t get me wrong, he has a motor that does not stop. However, he is barely 5’11 and dripping wet may be weigh 215lbs. He is, in reality, a safety (the position he was recruited for) playing LB. We do not have a deep DL and will rely heavily on our LBs to prevent RBs from getting into the secondary. Last season, we never saw Westgae stuff holes. He was in on tackles, but 4 to 6 yards after the line of scrimmage. Westgate is a special player that should be used in special packages, such as nickel blitzes, etc. If he remains atop of the depth chart, given the lack of depth of our DL, I expect a lot more runs to his side and big gains of 4 or more yards.
There is no certainty that he is starting
This is just a projection for now. I agree with you he is not exactly your prototypical LB. But he is reasonably smart and seasoned, and in the beginning at least he will help minimize mistakes compared to some of the younguns until they catch up, then he can be a good mentor and still contribute. If he had Glenn Love’s body, he’d be amazing. But Glenn was not able to beat him out (he is not a LB either), and the other guys are young. Time will tell.
But hey, what do I know. I’m just the 800 lbs bruin in the room.
I'm more extreme than even pUSCies up there.
I really dislike Westgate’s game. Sure he has a non-stop motor, but that doesn’t really help when you’re taken out of <50% of defensive plays by anyone, literally anyone. Lead blocker, lineman, running back, I’ve seen Westgate blown up by everyone. And the tackle stat so oft quoted by his supporters is complete and total bogus. Every team on we faced ran directly away from Akeem, and directly towards Westgate by design, precisely because he isn’t big enough to make a difference. He is great on special teams when size isn’t so much of a factor, and great in one or two blitzing sequences, but quite frankly he should not be starting, and it’s a testament to our loss of Josh Shirley that he still is.
"Every day was a good day at UCLA." -Coach John Wooden
"should not be starting"
if we had other better options. I’m sure if we did, he wouldn’t play as much…
But hey, what do I know. I’m just the 800 lbs bruin in the room.
That's the case with any player.
But his is a judgment call on behalf of our coaches, as his replacements must have issues as well. However, i seriously question either our recruiting or our coaching decisions if he’s still allowed to start.
"Every day was a good day at UCLA." -Coach John Wooden
I would not go that far (with regard to the coaching decision).
If Westgate starts we have to assume that the other players, although better on paper, are simply not playing well. They are either blowing thier assignments, not getting off the blocks, or too slow, or a combination thereof. IWestgate starting means simply that he is the best of a not-so-stellar group of LBs. I agree with you, however, if he starts and we don’t get consistent solid play from our DL throughout the entire game, we should expect, and will see, as we did last year, several long gains to Westgate’s side.
Hmmm
So i’ve read two reports, one from Blair Angulo and the other from Ted Miller stating that Love is the frontrunner to take Ayers’ OLB spot. Both articles make virtually no mention of Zumwalt….seems like a pretty massive oversight.
I think Zumwalt lacks the north-south quickness to really make an impact
at OLB. He’s got great straight line speed and good toughness, and I believe he’s being groomed for the MLB position. I really really hope he take’s Westgate’s spot, however.
"Every day was a good day at UCLA." -Coach John Wooden
That would be the best move
in my opinion, if Love can really bring something at that position.
But hey, what do I know. I’m just the 800 lbs bruin in the room.
Love looked lost
on the field last season. He has decent physical tools, but we’ll have to wait and see to determine if he’ll be an upgrade on Westgate on anything other than paper. Last year, he clearly wasn’t.
Just curious
how you think that would improve the LB corps? Seems like the knock on Westgate is his lack of size/physicality, yet he still has 4 lbs on Love while being 5 inches shorter. I can see people having the same complaints if Love were to ever be dragged for extra yards by an opposing RB.
I wasn't referring to Glen Love taking Westgate's spot
I believe Zumwalt should. I have never seen Love dragged for extra yards, but I’ve seen the same from Westgate and much worse.
"Every day was a good day at UCLA." -Coach John Wooden
What's up with Golper?
He was a 4 star recruit at MLB when coming out of high school. I have not seen him mentioned at all. Has he been injured?
Also, whether Love takes the OLB depends on the scheme Tresey runs. Love is ill suited for a 4-3 defense where he lines up behind the DL. He is simply to lanky and the o-line will be able to get underneath his pads and blow him back. He is better suited to play OLB in a 3 – 4 defense where he lines up, essentially, as a DE. However, I don’t think we have the depth at DL to stick with a 3-4 most of times. Besides, we have very solid DEs that would start ahead of Love at OLB in a 3-4. We need stout LBs in the middle which again leads to me ask where is Golper and why is he not in the mix for WLB!?!?!?
Re Golper
I believe he had back problems most of last year causing him to sit out, he redshirted the year before that.
Back to Love… I don’t understand how he is too lanky to play OLB in a 4-3 but is somehow suited to line up as a DE in a 3-4… seems pretty contradictory. Did you mean defensive back?
No, in a traditional 3-4...
Love is coming of the edge. His main responsiblities include rushing the passer, stuffing the run or otherwise keeping containment so RBs don’t get around him, and dropping into coverage. His taller frame makes him better suited for to perform these tasks. Addmittedly, unless he gets lower than pulling guard or RB coming his way, he may get blown back because he is so light.
In a 4-3, he is not playing on the line but behind it and has to deal with tackles and guards coming straight at him or from the side. To hit and shed these opposing players takes strength and the ablity to stay low. As we have discussed, he will have problems because he is lanky and light.
























