Something UCLA shares with Notre Dame and USC
A tiny fraternity of college football teams will dwindle to three next fall, as Washington lines up to play, for the first time, a program in the Football Championship Subdivision.
Notre Dame, UCLA and USC still never have soiled their schedules with a team in The Division Formerly Known as I-AA. But hordes of the nation's 120 Football Bowl Subdivision teams have made such matchups as common as texting in traffic, with the nation's most prominent conferences leading the way.
Games between FBS and FCS teams have spiked 70 percent since a 2005 NCAA rule change made the games more attractive, according to analysis by The Oregonian. The matchups have increased nearly 600 percent in the Pacific-10 Conference and 358 percent in the Big Ten, even adjusting for conference expansion.
FBS schools are choosing the often lopsided games for their combination of a home game, wide profit margin and likely victory. Demand has made the games more attractive to FCS teams, too, pushing prices to as much as double what they were 10 years ago, school officials say.
"I believe there's a reason why schools are scheduling those games," UCLA athletic director Dan Guerrero said. "Obviously every once in a while you'll have an upset. But for the most part, you're scheduling wins."
UCLA deserves props for not being desperate enough to schedule FCS programs but I still have issues with the athletic department scheduling "nationally televised" games, putting our team tough situation on the road. One of many things DG is not doing right at UCLA.
This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of BruinsNation's (BN) editors. It does reflect the views of this particular fan though, which is as important as the views of BN's editors.
26 comments
|
Do you like this story?
Comments
I knew we'd never scheduled one
didn’t know we were 1 of only 3 teams though. I’d say it’s an awesome club to be in, but the company isn’t exactly stellar.
to be honest
$C and Notre Dame are upper echelon football programs. For all of USC’s faults, being bad at football is not one of them.
by Captain Leebeard on Apr 13, 2011 1:04 PM PDT up reply actions
Doesn't change the fact
that all of their other faults make me cringe at having anything in common with them
by Chris09 on Apr 13, 2011 1:13 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
Lets not be too nice to the trojies
They may be good at football, but their recent rise is a result of questionable actions including benefits to their “student-athletes”
Agreed.
They’ve shown nothing but tolerance for crimes, cheating, and classlessness at every turn. They deserve no respect in football.
"Every day was a good day at UCLA." -Coach John Wooden
what they've done on the field deserves respect.
what their program has done deserves 5-10 years.
"I have one word for you...Be careful."
-Jose Guillen
Nothing done on the field since the day Pete Carroll set foot on that campus
deserves an ounce of respect. Respecting that would be worse than electing Barry Bonds to the hall of fame next year.
Agreed, Chris.
I’m sick of the respect the game, hate the cheating attitude that so many people have. People should not have respect for McGwire (another trojan, shocking), Sosa, Bonds, etc. or any doper in the MLB. Just like they should not respect any doping or cheating biker, runner, football player etc. Cheating is cheating, no matter how you slice it. It gives you an unfair advantage and an unlevel playing field. They get ZERO respect for their on field performance.
"Every day was a good day at UCLA." -Coach John Wooden
By contrast
check out what our friends at Kal are scheduling.
But hey, what do I know. I’m just the 800 lbs bruin in the room.
Man
I don’t think they would ever live down the embarassment of losing to the Blue Hose. HAHA
"The entire world that bleeds blue and gold ... they have been dying for this." - Coach Rick Neuheisel
They accidentally thought
they’d be playing against promiscuous smurfettes…
But hey, what do I know. I’m just the 800 lbs bruin in the room.
by tasser10 on Apr 16, 2011 11:26 AM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
But but
If we get on TV, that means exposure, and exposure is always good. It’s just common sense.
"Every day was a good day at UCLA." -Coach John Wooden
agreed+1
any and all PR is good, whether we win or loose, those kids want to be on national tv, and it is a selling tool for recruiting…no high school football stud wants to play in a vacum!…just my opinion…
GO BRUINS!
by BRUINCLASSOF72 on Apr 14, 2011 9:35 AM PDT up reply actions
Don't mean to be rude
but I was being sarcastic. Getting demolished on national television is just about the worst recruiting tactic known to man.
"Every day was a good day at UCLA." -Coach John Wooden
Call me whatever you want
In my view, the BcS is a sick, demented system that should never be in place. That said, it rewards teams that are willing to swallow their pride and schedule a pop-warner team as a guaranteed win (unless you foolishly play Appalachian State).
I want to take pride in being one of only three teams not to succumb to this system. But I can’t truly blame other teams for shrugging their shoulders and taking free candy when they can get it. Heck, if ASU had their way last year, they might have opened the floodgates to allow two middle-school teams. Ultimately bowls do matter, and getting an automatic win, if it for some stupid reason counts with the NCAA, makes logical (albeit cowardly) sense to me.
I think it's a nice point of pride.
I don’t mind that USC is on the list. It’s a singular point of pride, wherein you don’t care what the other guy is doing, you just know you’re not going down that route. Here’s to hoping we stay on this list.
The best thing you can do for your children is to love their mother. John Wooden
I wouldn't mind
playing one cupcake, as the first game of the year. But it should never count as a win, for anyone.
But hey, what do I know. I’m just the 800 lbs bruin in the room.
absolutely agreed 100%
If a team wants a preseason scrimmage against a pop-warner team, so be it. Should not count as a W.
That would make an interesting list
who has played them and lost?
Here you go...
Appalachian St > Michigan and Wake Forest
New Hampshire > Army
Montana St. > Colorado
Portland St. > UNLV
UC Davis > Stanford
Maine > Mississippi St
Stephen F. Ausiton > UL Monroe
Delaware > Navy
Cal Poly SLO > UTEP
Villanova > Rutgers
Northern Iowa > Ball St.
Portland St. > Hawaii
Western Illinois > Northern Illinois
There's a lot more than that
Jacksonville St. beat Ole Miss in Oxford last year. J-State is coached by Jack Crowe who was ran out of Arkansas for losing to The Citadel. North Dakota St also spoiled Turner Gill’s debut at Kansas, and they have also beaten Ball St., Central Michigan and Minnesota. James Madison, of course, beat VT when the Hokies were 13th in the nation.
There are quite a few others: http://sportsdelve.wordpress.com/2011/01/28/fcs-schools-defeating-major-fbs-schools/

by 


















