#SFatPauley: Dan Guerrero Is Feeling the Pressure; Shows Signs of Blinking
Big, BIG thanks go out to our own uclaluv for posting an email response she received from embattled athletic director Dan Guerrero. Perhaps for the first time, we see signs of a break in the Morgan Center party line. It is clear that the displeasure of hundreds of students and alums, consolidated by our own MexiBruin in his petition, both online and in person at the Spring football game, can no longer be ignored and dismissed. The full text of the response is below (again, H/T to uclaluv):
Last month, after extensive deliberation with student leadership, Athletics announced new plans for the student seating in renovated Pauley Pavilion. This week, the Undergraduate Student Association Council (USAC) decided to further explore the overall student body reaction to the seating adjustment by placing a question on the upcoming election ballot. I fully support USAC’s engagement in this process and look forward to working with them as we examine the results of the question. If ultimately, a return to the previously established student section is the desire, then that is what we will do.
A vibrant student body is an important part of any college campus. The same can be said when it comes to the importance of creating a home court advantage for a college basketball program. Engaged, supportive, and uproarious student sections can ignite the home team towards victory. Since its inception, Pauley Pavilion has been blessed to host generations of students, all of whom have played a pivotal role in earning Pauley its reverential status among college venues.
In step with the current renovation of Pauley Pavilion, the Athletic Department sought to improve the student attendee experience by surveying 7,800 student ticket holders and asking what changes could and should be made toward that end. Many positive outcomes derived from this effort including productive dialogue with student leaders regarding altering student seating to one continuous unified section. This idea was derived from many respondents who felt disconnected by not all being together.
As a result, we moved forward with efforts to provide an option to unify the sections. Athletics presented the concept to multiple student leadership groups on campus for their evaluation. These groups included the Undergraduate Student Association Council (USAC) and its president, The Wooden Board of Governors, the Rally Committee and Spirit Squad leaders as well as the leadership of The Student Den. All were shown ways to feasibly create a unified section which would be viable from the floor, adjacent to the visiting bench, behind the west basket, and continuing to the top of the Pavilion, representing 2,000 seats, an increase of about 350 seats from the current layout. If the concept was embraced by these groups, then we could act upon it prior to the seating process in renovated Pauley Pavilion this fall. If not, then the section would stay as previously planned.
In these meetings, along with several additional focus groups that were graciously organized by USAC, there was tremendous support for the concept. After reviewing the feedback, we announced the new student section plans in March with a press release that included the USAC President and others student leaders speaking about the entire process.
On a final note, I appreciate the passion surrounding this issue. As an alumnus of UCLA, I have joyous memories of cheering on my fellow student-athletes. There was nothing else like it. I can guarantee without any reservation that we are all committed to creating the best possible memories and environment for today’s team members and their fellow students.
Thank you very much and GO BRUINS!
Dan Guerrero
Now we have their attention. The over-whelming pressure being generated from BruinsNation's #SFatPauley campaign is having an impact on UCLA Athletics. The fight is clearly not over though.
Thanks to those that have already signed MexiBruin's petition, and voiced their displeasure on other outlets. For those that haven't yet, you can be what helps push this over the top. From all accounts, it appears that the more people know about the details of the plan, the less popular it gets, so the name of the game is publicity. Let's make a difference, Bruins, and return the students to where Coach wanted them.
24 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
From the first paragraph
it sounds like the results of the vote in the USAC election could be crucial. Any current students who are members of BN should spread the word and implore their fellow students to go vote on this.
What we need now
We need a current student to write a fanpost specifically asking other students to vote for the option that would return students to court side at Pauley.
We don’t need a huge post. It can be something that is about 3 to 5 grafs putting forth all the arguments presented here and then using it to convince students that they need to be on the sidelines.
Folks can use all the posts generated here to make the arguments.
Can anyone do this?
Bureacratic Dan
We did nothing wrong. We are awesome. The students are fickle and if they change their mind, I guess we will give them what they want.
This letter take bureacratic CYA speak to whole new level.
As I said was very possible a few weeks ago, the Morgan Center will now claim victory and say any additional criticism of this cluster F is unwarranted.
I am beginning to view Guerrero like I do McCourt.
by silverlakebruin on Apr 29, 2011 4:29 PM PDT reply actions
Absolutely.
They were listening all along. It’s just some kind of communication lapse or something. And now that they know the truth, of course they’ll do what’s right.
Go Bruins!
By the way
You should tell your buddies at BRO that DG backtracked because of the pressure generated from here. It has only come from here while other Bruin communities largely stood pat.
I did
I said that this and Veto Seto is because of the action of Bruinsnation.
by silverlakebruin on Apr 29, 2011 5:05 PM PDT up reply actions
You are right to single out Mexibruin!
If we ever meet, I for one owe him a beer. What a great job he did showing up in person and getting the online petition going as well.
by silverlakebruin on Apr 29, 2011 4:38 PM PDT reply actions
No beers yet, folks.
Not until the students are restored. Then I’ll buy a round for all of BN.
"Every day was a good day at UCLA." -Coach John Wooden
I'll match that
And, if the polling is truly cross-sectional and the vote includes Bruin Dad and Grad’s option of a unified sideline student section, I’ll buy another round. Wonder who’s going to drive us home?
But, something about not counting chickens. In the meantime, hearty thanks to MexiBruin, uclaluv, and all BNers for lending their passions and energies to this cause.
That so many of us are aging (alright, and aged) alumni who want nothing more than for current and future students to have the same, rich experience that we had as students speaks loudly to the selflessness of this cause.
Is anyone kinda surprised
that there’s only 7,800 Den ticket holders? Out of 25,000 undergrads? Bleh =\
What is not clear to me
Is this an election that will be in the form of a referendum among the entire student election or a special election within USAC council? Does anyone have a definitive answer?
Its added to the student election ballot
they added a question on this and a question on diversity requirements.
by silverlakebruin on Apr 29, 2011 5:06 PM PDT up reply actions
I was going to post this and you guys are ahead of me!
I would add that I declined to attend the “Invitation -2011 Orange County Celebration Dinner - June 4” telling them that I was not going to go (or increase my donation level as I said on the On-line petition) until:
1) the student section is moved back
or
2) there is a real vote that includes the option of the students having a unified section on the sidelines.
by Bruin Dad and Grad on Apr 29, 2011 5:09 PM PDT reply actions
New Daily Bruin seating article
The Bruin has now posted a follow-up article; including this pathetic quote:
“Den President Elan Bigknife said he is shocked that a vote to gauge student response to the change in seating was proposed, because students have not spoken up about their disappointment.”
Disturbing all around
Wang said students and other fans he talked to after Athletics announced the seating change were disappointed and angry, but he believes there was a muted student response because of a number of factors, including the buffer year before Pauley opens and the low number of die-hard Den members.
(emphasis mine)
Does this mean the students aren’t that upset because it’s not going to impact them? Based on this, they should probably weight alumni opinion more on this, as we’re more likely to take the long view.
So.... sounds like the student fanpost is in order as well
(Den President Elan Bigknife) added that he is concerned that students will be voting on the measure out of context, with the only information coming from the ballot.
Also, any good way of distributing materials to the students in another fashion? Can we get anybody on campus to campaign for this a bit?
What's with Elan Bigknife?
Why is he shilling for Morgan Center? Is it possible that he knows nothing about basketball? Does he think that students care more about better coordinated cheers than watching the games? Has he been sitting with his back to the court this whole time? Does he just socialize during games?
by Seth Chandler on Apr 30, 2011 12:57 AM PDT up reply actions
Who votes?
USAC? Or the students as a whole? I thought students only get to elect student officials.
the ballot will be online
im guessing it will contain a question regarding the student seating. All students would be able to vote on this.
Oh and thank god for Sean Wang. He has been at every UCLA game since I was a freshman in ’06, and I know he had been there many years before then. It sounds like there might be some dissension within the ranks of the Den student group.
Troy is burning
by bruinbasketball on Apr 29, 2011 7:31 PM PDT reply actions

by 


















