Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: The MMA Hour Is Back

#SFatPauley -Dan Guerrero Returns Home to his Burning House

I hope Dan Guerrero had a nice weekend.  I hear he got to spend some time in Houston, where the Men's Basketball Championship was being played.  No, U.C.L.A. wasn't in it, but he took the time to make the trip anyway.  He probably got to rub elbows with some of his favorite bigwigs from the NCAA.  Hopefully enjoyed some of the fantastic restaurants there.  Undoubtedly, he watched some top college basketball programs.  I'm sure it was a great time.  I lived in Houston for 4 years and it's a nice place, with great food, great people, and great fun.  I met my wife in Houston.  If it weren't for humidity and fire ants, they'd really have something there.

Unfortunately, while Dan was gone, his house back home in Westwood continued to burn to the ground.  Our lovely and talented women's basketball coach moved out, and took her entire staff with her.  And spring football started, but the fans are understandably afraid to be optimistic.  And the students and alums are furious at the reseating plans at the new Pauley. 

And this was all just in the last week.

I do not enjoy being critical.  All I want is for U.C.L.A. to be successful in the way Coach would have had it. Like the women's basketball team this year.   Or the baseball team last year.   But the opposite is happening far too often, and, unlike some, we at Bruins Nation are not going to stick our head in the sand and refuse to face the truth.  We are going to call out those people who are letting down the Bruin family, and are compromising the legacy of the Four Letters

Just a few months ago, I told TE193  I'd destroy his 1,000 reasons for wanting Guerrero fired, but now it looks like he was just way ahead of the curve.  There is no question.  Dan Guerrero is letting us down.

I had high hopes when Guerrero arrived in Westwood in 2002.  The Morgan Center had settled into a culture of mediocrity under the tenure of AD Pete Dalis, and I was hopeful the new blood would breathe life into a stagnating athletic department.  While most of our non-revenue sports maintained their traditional high level of success, the major sports of basketball and football were struggling to retain national relevance. 

The recent debacle with student seating in Pauley is just the latest in a long list of missteps taken by Guerrero and the Morgan Center, which has led to the further weakening of our major sports, a blemish on the face of one of the proudest athletic traditions in the country, and a loss of faith and support from the alumni and fan base.  An occasional hiccup in a college athletic program is understandable, and probably unavoidable.  No one hits a home run every time.  But the breadth and severity of the flames leaping from Morgan Center during Guerrero's reign are alarming. 

Some of Dan Guerrero's lowlights, and sadly, there are a lot, after the jump:

Star-divide

Pauley Renovation.  Overall, this is the most glaring failure.  While coaching hires by nature have a deal of subjectivity, the opportunity to design and build a state of the art facility for our school should be much less so.  However, instead of committing to the best solution for the University and building a new facility that maximizes both fan experience and revenue opportunities, the administration settled for an only slightly cheaper option that fails to correct many existing problems.   A substandard facility will hurt recruiting and subsequent performance, which will further undermine support from the fan base in terms of attendance and donations.  Communication about the project has been awful.  Oh, and there's that little issue of where they are going to put the students.

Football's decade of misery.  Since U.C.L.A. last won the Pac-10 in 1998, Stanford, UW, Oregon, OSU, WSU, Cal, ASU, and *$c have won or shared the conference title.  Only UofA has a longer drought than the Bruins.   During Guerrero's tenure, our football team is 57-55, including 3-4 in a handful of minor bowls.  The winning percentage in Guerrero's 9 years is 51%.  To find a 9 year span that bad, you have to go back nearly 70 years to 1936-1944 (42%).  While we have given Guerrero a pass on the hire of the unqualified Karl Dorrell, the favorite of then Chancellor Carnesale, Guerrero nevertheless failed to stand up for what was rightfully his hire.  When the Dorrell era came to its predictable end, we then took the cheap but sellable choice of Rick Neuheisel.  Most of us bought in at the start, and 4 years later we are still waiting for that payoff.  If it does not come this year, we will need a new football coach.  Does anyone trust Guerrero with this?

Losing Coach Nikki Caldwell.  While finding and hiring an unproven Nikki Caldwell is certainly to Guerrero's credit, losing a very well proven Caldwell is devastating.  Caldwell turned a struggling women's basketball program to national prominence and appeared poised for greater things.  While it's doubtful U.C.L.A. could have matched the reported $700K contract LSU offered, until we learn what Guerrero offered Coach Caldwell to stay, we are left only with the brutal truth that U.C.L.A. wasn't enough for her.  This should be a very sobering thought.   Now, the future of our women's program is a question mark again, especially since Nikki's entire staff is leaving Westwood, too.  Seems staying with the Bruins wasn't a viable option for any of them, either.  Good luck, ladies, and sincere thanks for your time here.

Women's basketball 2011 seeding.  U.C.L.A. was 28-5 this season, with 3 of those losses to #2 Stanford.  Somehow this only got the Bruins a #3 seed.  Far worse was their location in a bracket with a deliberately underseeded #11 Gonzaga, who nevertheless got to play the first two rounds on home floors.  Coach Caldwell took the high road, calling the placement "interesting".   My word for it was BS.  Guerrero's word for it was...well, we're still waiting.  I doubt that respected women's powers like Stanford or UConn or Notre Dame or Tennessee would have sat idly by while their teams were scarificed to the NCAA's quest for the dollar.  We can only guess how Guerrero's shameful lack of support  for Coach Caldwell played into her decision to leave Westwood 2 weeks later. 

Jackie Robinson Stadium.  Our baseball stadium has the greatest name and the worst facilities for any major college program in the country.  Check out the photo.  My Pony League field had more seats.  As a baseball guy, you'd expect Guerrero to make improving the facility a priority.  Not so.   An inadequate press box, too few bathrooms and concession stands, paltry seating, and inadequate facilities for the players are just some of the problems.  The failure of Guerrero to address this, the very sport he played during his U.C.L.A. days, shows his absolute lack of commitment to the program and ineffectiveness as the athletic director.  Compare our aged and obsolete facility to Oregon's brand new one.  How's this photo?  Any coincidence that Oregon, which hasn't been nationally relevant for about 50 years, and which has been a club team the last 30, just had the #3 recruiting class in the country?  See?  if you build it, they really will come.  Sadly, Morgan hasn't.  How do you suppose Manager John Savage feels about that kind of support?  Reread the two paragraphs on Coach Caldwell above...

Poor fundraising.  As silvelakebruin pointed out, U.C.L.A. ranks 9th in the Pac 10 in fundraising, finishing just ahead of that finanical juggernaut WSU.   How's that Campaign of Champions going?  Financial stability is the key to any successful enterprise, from the corner lemonade stand to "securing" recruits in the SEC.  And while Guerrero should be applauded for keeping the athletic departments in the black during difficult economic times, it has come at the cost of minimal reinvestment in our programs.  More importantly, the poor financial backing reflects many problems: failure to inspire donors, failure to reach potential new donors, failure to fill up venues, failure to appropriately market your products, failure to maximize the quality of your products.  The lack of income is reflected in poor facilities (see Pauley and JRS above) and the inability to recruit and maintain the best coaching staff (see Caldwell and football above).  These shortcomings make U.C.L.A. less attractive to recruits, and talent suffers and programs decline.  This makes donors uninspired, fans don't fill up venues...  See the pattern here?  A gorgeous campus only goes so far.  It's more than balancing the books.  Guerrero must be a more effective recruiter of financial support to improve the health of the entire athletic department.

Rocky Seto and the DC Search.  While Rick Neuheisel made the tough but necessary choice of releasing his defensive coordinator this off-season, the meandering journey to replace him made our football program look like a bunch of buffoons.  Our notoriously cheap proceedings likely cost us any shot at Neuheisel's top choices of  Vic Fangio (Stanford) and Rocky Long (SDSU).  But the disgruntlement of Bruin fans reached riot proportions when Seto tweeted that he was getting the job.  Luckilly, this information seeped out and Bruin fans got wind of it before a contract was signed.   Only the collective protests of Bruins fans, including many at Bruins Nation, in a well coordinated effort vetoed the hire.  How Seto was ever considered a reasonable candidate is almost too painful to imagine, as only the total misunderstanding of the U.C.L.A. fan base could have permitted this.  This fiasco cost many of us what little faith we maintained in our football leadership.

I could go on.  The failure to secure a venue for our basketball team to play in 2011-12. 

The poorly conceived and managed student ticketing policies

The failure to recover Pauley's center court

The disappearance of the BenBall Warrior and decline of the basketball program. 

The disaster that is the marketing of U.C.L.A. Athletics.  

Discounted and ineffective assistant coaches in football and basketball

The archaic and feeble attempts by Morgan to reach and engage the fan base. 

And the most recent and offensive and disrespectful of all, the travesty of the student seating plan in the new Pauley

For every positive accomplishment, there are double the negatives.  Obviously, the blame for each of these issues cannot be placed on Guerrero alone.  He has had help from the coaches, players, administration, marketing, and the even the fans.  But Dan Guerrero is the one constant among all of these problems.  He is the Athletic Director at U.C.L.A., and every issue in every program is his responsibility.  And while he does ads for UPS, our programs are burning.  The fact that there are so many different fires burning in so many different places forces us to question his ability to maintain the highest standards and performance within our athletic department. 

U.C.L.A. fans want and expect and deserve excellence.  And excellence does not mean championships in every sport.  It means clean programs that compete hard.  Student-athletes who do themselves and the school proud.   Programs that are managed in a way that contribute to the overall good of the department.  Performances that inspire the fans and create memories for the students and alumni that last them through the rest of their lives.  It means doing things in the way that Coach would approve of.

Dan tells us he gets it

I'm sure he does get it. We all get it. 

What we need is someone who will do it.   Is Dan Guerrero that person?   Because I smell smoke...you guys should keep stoking the fire.

Comment 58 comments  |  9 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Guerrero's people disrespect students and alumni.

Look no further to see why fundraising is off. And it’s only going to get worse when the students they disrespected with things like Pauley Pavilion seating become the alumni they want to hit for donations.

by Seth Chandler on Apr 6, 2011 9:57 AM PDT reply actions  

Dan is on the hottestof hot seats to me

Even before the seating fiasco, he had made the decision to stick with CRN and CBH in the two most important spots in the department. I hope that decision works out for him because I want those coaches to succeed. But, and it is a big but, keeping coaches to see if they can turn it around is a strategy that seldom works. Because the coaches are on the hot seat, the recruits do not want to come, which leads to the coaches eventual firing. Again, I hope the coaches get it done.

The lousy Pauley plan and the complete screw up around securing an alternative location are serious mistakes. The inability to get people to show up to the revenue sports undermines the financial health of the program.

But worst of all is the relationship with the alumni. Why does Oregon have such nice facilities? Alumni. I suspect that UCLA alumi are some of the most affluent in the world and yet we dont have a strong relationship with them at all. A few years ago ESPN, I think, wrote an article about how UCLA had the worst relationship with its alumni of any major university in the country. Dont think Guerrero created the problem but he sure has not done anything to rectify the problem.

by Bruin Dad and Grad on Apr 6, 2011 10:00 AM PDT reply actions  

I agree with 99.9% of what you wrote

The one quip is that Oregon has such nice facilities because of one (a singular) donor. I’d be willing to guess that Phil Knight donates more to that school’s athletic department than any donor in the nation. I saw the numbers somewhere and it was mindboggling. While we can’t assume that UCLA will get a donor quite like that, we should certainly expect that our athletic department make the right moves to position itself better than dead-last in the entire nation in terms of university-alumni relationships.

by BruinMW on Apr 6, 2011 10:11 AM PDT up reply actions  

That singular donor

happens to be one of the wealthiest people on the planet. And an Oregon Alum. Sigh.

"Every day was a good day at UCLA." -Coach John Wooden

by OswegoBruin on Apr 6, 2011 10:20 AM PDT up reply actions  

Too true about Knight

So maybe Oregon (or Oklahoma State with their sugar daddy) is not a reasonable comparison but UCLA has a long way to go.

That falls on Guerrero and the Chancellor.

by Bruin Dad and Grad on Apr 6, 2011 11:37 AM PDT up reply actions  

Agreed

But I was commenting on the comparison to the Oregon baseball field noted above.

by Bruin Dad and Grad on Apr 6, 2011 11:37 AM PDT up reply actions  

We do have Mr James Easton,

, as in Easton Bell sports, maker of bats and hockey sticks, as an alumna and one of top donors for the athletics dept . Unfortunately for us, Easton Bell sports is nowhere near the neighborhood of Nike.
I am surprise to see we are ninth in the Pac -10 as part of fundraising. There is a list of Wooden Fund donors in the back of the football programs every game with their donation level. It looks impressive. But I guess it would not if I compare it with another Pac 10 school.

by Bruin15 on Apr 6, 2011 2:36 PM PDT up reply actions  

This post is Magnificent

An absolute skewering of a dark, dark period in UCLA history. But lets give credit where it’s due: He found Ben Howland. Other than that? Not much else, Danny.

Everyone who’s read my posts on this board knows my distaste for the UCLA administration and athletics department. This brings me to my main point: IF we fire Dan, who are we going to get? Chancellor Blcok is as apathetic to sports as is possible in a human being. He will likely hire another empty suit who is willing to bend to his every whim, just as Guerrero has. Just as football and basketball hires have been made on the cheap, the new AD position will be made on the cheap. There is no administrative commitment to athletic excellence. There is only an administrative commitment to academics (very admirable) and the almighty dollar, keeping athletics in the black, and not much else.

"Every day was a good day at UCLA." -Coach John Wooden

by OswegoBruin on Apr 6, 2011 10:23 AM PDT reply actions  

Forgive me for the vernacular.

This is not a board, but a blog.

"Every day was a good day at UCLA." -Coach John Wooden

by OswegoBruin on Apr 6, 2011 10:24 AM PDT up reply actions  

Agree completely

Thanks, gbruin.

It’s one thing to digest these failures week to week, as they occur. It’s quite another to see them listed, one after another after another…

Pretty damning, I’d say.

by Bruinut on Apr 7, 2011 10:12 AM PDT up reply actions  

I am no longer willing to give DG the benefit of the doubt on the Dorrell hire.

UCLA is not a place where you can come and learn your job. UCLA should be a national front runner for any desirable coach. The fact that it is not is a direct result of ineptitude among it’s leadership.

The best thing you can do for your children is to love their mother. John Wooden

by MexiBruin on Apr 6, 2011 10:30 AM PDT reply actions  

Thank you for a great post

I’m wondering if Dan Guerrero is just another symptom of the apathy the university’s administration feels toward athletics. It seems to me that Guerrero has viewed his AD post as a launching point toward a position with the NCAA.

by ishXdavid on Apr 6, 2011 10:40 AM PDT reply actions  

Make a Donation

It should not be an issue. UCLA graduates 5,000+ students a year. There is no reason why every single one of us should not donate annually. We basically stole an education that is ranked with the likes of Harvard and Stanford for a fraction of the cost. $11-$12 grand a year vs $40-$50 grand. We all owe UCLA a debt of gratitude. Granted, some of us can donate more, but every bit helps. If every one of those 5000 undergrads donates $20 per month UCLA would benefit by $1.2 million now multiply that by X number of classes doing the same and we could fix up all the facilities on par with others in the PAC 12. A minor $20/month can make a huge difference, but we all need to contribute. If you have not donated you cannot complain. Make the donation and take pride in your school.

Bruin 1986

by Crummies on Apr 6, 2011 10:42 AM PDT reply actions  

Sorry buddy, I didn't steal anything.

I paid $40 grand a year out-of-state tuition, and I know many others who did as well. I don’t owe UCLA squat. I will contribute as much as I can once I am financially stable, because I love my university to death.

"Every day was a good day at UCLA." -Coach John Wooden

by OswegoBruin on Apr 6, 2011 10:50 AM PDT up reply actions  

Nice

Let’s hope that will be soon.

Bruin 1986

by Crummies on Apr 6, 2011 11:20 AM PDT up reply actions  

And

some of us already donate regularly. We just choose to take a break when things like this happen.

But hey, what do I know. I’m just the 800 lbs bruin in the room.

by tasser10 on Apr 6, 2011 11:24 AM PDT up reply actions  

As someone who donates, I think this is exactly why we need to speak up

Successful sports programs breeds school pride and community, which in turn lead to greater donations as alumni. Personally speaking, I was a huge sports fan during my time at UCLA, and as opposed to my non sports fan friends from UCLA and friends from other schools without large sports programs, I feel so much more connected to the school as an alumni. Furthermore, alumni are more apt to donate when they feel that their money is being handled by competent administrators and going to a use that they feel is worthwhile.

by kevdude on Apr 6, 2011 3:26 PM PDT up reply actions  

Exactly
Furthermore, alumni are more apt to donate when they feel that their money is being handled by competent administrators and going to a use that they feel is worthwhile.

Which is why I’m willing to donate to academics at UCLA, but not the Athletic Department. Morgan Center is full of out-of-touch dumbasses who I wouldn’t trust with a child’s piggy bank, let alone a multi-million dollar budget.

Why would I donate money to a dysfunctional department run by incompetent idiots who will inevitably squander it?

by Bellerophon on Apr 6, 2011 10:46 PM PDT up reply actions  

morgan off-center refuses to acknowledge that anyone is asking this question

“Why would I donate money to a dysfunctional department run by incompetent idiots who will inevitably squander it?”

Exactly right.

by Fox 71 on Apr 7, 2011 5:00 AM PDT up reply actions  

What?

Donate to what? People donate to things they believe in, not just because they feel like they owe something. Right now, I don’t believe in UCLA Athletics.

They don’t seem to be having problems getting $100M+ donations for buildings on campus…where are those donors for athletics? Yeah that’s right, no one wants to make that kind of donation without any say into what the funds are to be used for, especially when those funds will be used by the Moron Center.

Donate? No. Protest!

But hey, what do I know. I’m just the 800 lbs bruin in the room.

by tasser10 on Apr 6, 2011 11:13 AM PDT up reply actions  

that's exactly right

I for one was able and willing to make a five figure (I know, not a huge amount) to a new Pauley, but when they unveiled the plans for the refurbishment, I just said let whomever it is you are trying to appeal to with this plan fund it because I think it is a travesty.

by silverlakebruin on Apr 6, 2011 11:38 AM PDT up reply actions  

so appropriate...

…considering April 15th is right around the corner.

by ishXdavid on Apr 6, 2011 4:33 PM PDT up reply actions  

Agreed!

If we don’t believe in UCLA Athletics, we must get rid of the moron that runs it. FIRE DAN GUERRERO!!! NO MERCY!!!

FIRE RICK NEUHEISEL!!! NO MERCY!!!

by TE193 on Apr 7, 2011 12:15 PM PDT up reply actions  

Debt of gratitude?

This is a highly arrogant position to take. I’m going to be paying back a REAL debt for years after my UCLA education. And this is without housing costs, because I was an RA for 3 of my years there. Many other graduates are in far worse shape, and many don’t have jobs now, despite this “stolen” education.

And if you had read this post, or any of the recent posts, or even one I wrote long ago about the apathy of the administration, you would know that there is not much going on that makes me want to donate $20/month for athletics.

I’ve been involved in lots of the bureaucratic nonsense that goes on in various departments, from my involvement in ORL, Housing & Hospitality, Dining Services, etc. – nothing they have done is worth my further investment either.

Academically, they might get some – assuming they ever actually process my degree. But since it took 4 months just to convince them that I had indeed finished my course requirements, and it’s been another 2 since, with still no word on my degree, it’s hard to know when that would be.

Not that it would change my position, but there has been ZERO outreach to me as a young alumni about remaining involved with the school, despite the fact that I live 5 minutes from campus.

So no, I do not owe them anything, nor will they get anything, until there is some reason for me to believe that my money will further greatness, rather than ineptitude.

by JeremyD on Apr 6, 2011 11:44 AM PDT up reply actions  

Just to echo a little of what JeremyD stated:

I also felt that UCLA could have done a much better job keeping myself and my Film School classmates within the fold. If anything, when a good number of us reunited 10 years later, the lack of professional support was a key topic among us.

The only feeling of belonging that I have maintained over the years has been my love of UCLA Football first and UCLA Basketball second. In the last 10 years, and in particular the last 5 it has felt like UCLA feels we are more of a burden than a family.

In the last 2 years a recurring thought has been, “If they don’t care enough to field a quality product, why should I care enough to remain invested?”

The best thing you can do for your children is to love their mother. John Wooden

by MexiBruin on Apr 6, 2011 4:32 PM PDT up reply actions  

You'd think our AD would use that simple mentality to raise funds

But instead he’s interested in making $$ for the NCAA by adding 96 teams to the basketball tourney.

FIRE RICK NEUHEISEL!!! NO MERCY!!!

by TE193 on Apr 7, 2011 12:10 PM PDT up reply actions  

Good Post GBruin

I think you laid it all out there pretty well. My fear is that it’s only going to get worse…

Interestingly enough, I liked your thoughts on the seeding situation for UCLA in the womens NCAA Tournament. Ironically, my alma mater, Iowa, got the shaft on this one as well as they had to play the ‘Zags first before the Bruins did. I have to think that DG’s lack of support (or seeming lack of support) for Caldwell’s situation ultimately played a huge role in her decision to bolt for Baton Rouge.

Los Angeles Rams and the UCLA Bruins!!!!!

by Minnesota Bruinfan on Apr 6, 2011 11:01 AM PDT reply actions  

He didn't complain

because he’s going to be a future employee of the NCAA…or its next president. His resume in this post makes him a great candidate!

But hey, what do I know. I’m just the 800 lbs bruin in the room.

by tasser10 on Apr 6, 2011 11:09 AM PDT up reply actions  

Right on!!!

No one should use UCLA as a steppingstone… yet Dan is doing so with us. Not cool.

FIRE RICK NEUHEISEL!!! NO MERCY!!!

by TE193 on Apr 7, 2011 12:17 PM PDT up reply actions  

Surprisingly -- 12 of 22 Morgan Admin Posts Are Filled With Bruins

For a while, I’ve felt that Morgan was totally out of touch with our expectations and culture.

No one seemed more in a fog than Mark Harlan who is from Arizona. So, when he justified the land grab as making our student section more like Arizona’s, I thought “That’s what you get when you hire people who don’t understand UCLA.”

Before starting this post, I visited the Morgan site to see how many people like Harlan, people who don’t get us, are on staff.

It’s less than half.

That makes it even more difficult to figure out why Morgan lacks the passion and vision that has defined UCLA for the 50 or more years of students that post here.

Therein lies much of the problem.

For however out of touch Block is, he is probably counting on Morgan to get it right. When they don’t, we get Seto and Seato.

We need people who understand and care about who we are and who we are destined to be. Dan and his minions don’t.

It is time to replace them.

sjh

by Class of 66 on Apr 6, 2011 11:17 AM PDT reply actions  

In Morgan-speak

Passionate = Troublemaker.

Don’t rock the boat! That’s how you keep your job…for decades.

We always complain that UCLA is a cheapskate when it comes to hiring talented coaches…who’s to say, that’s not exactly what’s happening at the Moron Center? Any talented marketer would probably not take that salary…

But hey, what do I know. I’m just the 800 lbs bruin in the room.

by tasser10 on Apr 6, 2011 11:23 AM PDT up reply actions  

66, I have to disagree with your Block thoughts...

He’s counting on the Morgan center not a) costing him any money, b) getting his name (negatively) in the newspapers, and c) upsetting anybody that could harm his reputation. That’s not leading. That’s the definition of an empty suit.

"Every day was a good day at UCLA." -Coach John Wooden

by OswegoBruin on Apr 6, 2011 11:26 AM PDT up reply actions  

+1

Starts at the very top. Can’t have your leader asleep at the wheel.

by Bruin'96 on Apr 6, 2011 11:59 AM PDT up reply actions  

I don't think the problem is necessarily non-ucla types

to the contrary, I think its the 20 year plus employees who are still acting like its 1985.

by silverlakebruin on Apr 6, 2011 11:42 AM PDT up reply actions  

True

Except for Dan, the rest of the UCLA alumni are in administrative positions and dont make the decisions or offer suggestions.

by Bruin15 on Apr 6, 2011 2:43 PM PDT up reply actions  

Hey, if you are handing out credit for wanting Dan gone early,

I want mine!

I am wrong about so many other things, I need to take credit for being right about something lol

by silverlakebruin on Apr 6, 2011 11:33 AM PDT reply actions  

The UCLA Athletics Facebook page is ridiculous

And I mean that in a good way. Outraged students and alums united? It’s amazing.

And the responses from the UCLA Athletics page? I’m getting dizzy from all the spin they’re putting out there.

by Aces-UCLA on Apr 6, 2011 11:33 AM PDT reply actions  

On a serious note, great post

and thanks for doing the work of putting that all together.

Don’t forget in total revenue Dan has “led” ucla to 4th place in Calfornia, behind Stanford, SC, and Cal.

by silverlakebruin on Apr 6, 2011 11:40 AM PDT reply actions  

Question

So, I know its been brought up before, but I haven’t heard much since the question was originally proposed… What’s going on in Westwood?

Meaning, now that its midweek, besides westsidebruin’s meeting with Mark Harlan yesterday (which I’m anxiously awaiting word from), and the multitude of posts on the UCLA Athletics FB page (which have all been taken down), I haven’t heard of anything going down on campus.

Apparently, at least thus far, the Daily Bruin has been unwilling to cover this story and support the students.

Have any students been able to drum up support on campus, especially on Bruin Walk?

by Go Bruinz on Apr 6, 2011 3:12 PM PDT reply actions  

wow, you're absolutely right about the FB page

I just looked and noticed that somebody is spending university-paid hours to read through their facebook page and manually delete all undesirable messages. Kind of sad.

Let’s keep at it! The Morgan Center clearly doesn’t represent the interests of the students, so we all should!

by BruinMW on Apr 6, 2011 4:50 PM PDT up reply actions  

Not quite

they haven’t deleted the posts. They changed the layout of the page so the default is that only their posts are shown.

Two things to do:
1. At the top right of the page below the strip of photos, click on “most recent”. This will reveal all the posts.

2. Keep hammering them on that page. They will still see everything posted, by virtue of being the owner of the page. And as everyone learns how to turn the posts back on, your posts will be there for everyone to see.

greg in denver, UCLA guy for life - BruinsNation.com

by gbruin on Apr 6, 2011 6:50 PM PDT up reply actions  

Daily Bruin

I am amazed by the Daily Bruin silence on the seating issue.

Freedom of the press means freedom of the press. And I am uncomfortable attacking or belittling students. (Faculty, coaches, or administrators are all fair game.). But my opinion (freedom of speech means freedom of speech) is that the Daily Bruin is making an extraordinary error in editorial judgment by ignoring this story. To ignore the story gets an F. If the reporters and editors disagree with my view, fine. I could be dead wrong.

But acting like there is no story—-geeez!

by peggysue69 on Apr 6, 2011 6:35 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions  

Nice Job!!!

I f-ing love this article, love it. You can’t be more right gbruin. Just for example, you want to bring money to UCLA, then put a football program out there that wins. Fill up the Rose Bowl for pete sake. Think of all the revenue that is out there, it’s So. Cal. You put a winning program out there people will pay to see a team win, not to lose. All in all Dan G. needs to go and needs to go now. Give me someone that’s actually going to fight for our sports program not just talk about how he get its, but actually shows how he gets it.

by Trojanswearskirts on Apr 6, 2011 5:35 PM PDT reply actions  

I am completely behind the #SFatPauley movement

but, I always read it as #S Fat Pauley, who some of you might remember from Family Guy’s earlier days.

We're havin' too much fun today. We ain't thinkin' 'bout tomorrow.

by Steve Bruin on Apr 6, 2011 6:24 PM PDT reply actions  

Also Students First is a political party at UCLA right now

May not be the best designation… elections are coming up.

by Aces-UCLA on Apr 6, 2011 8:17 PM PDT up reply actions  

We don't have time to over think this

Instead of worrying about what this is named, it’d be nice if we saw the students step up … beyond comment threads. Based on the pickup we have seen in other social media channels, we can confidently say the hashtag is working. Instead of worrying about hashtag, I’d suggest brainstorm on bigger issues on how to move the story on campus.

We have seen lot of passionate thoughts from alums here on BN. They are driving the conversation. We have seen students speak up on Facebook. We’d like to see more leadership from students to get awareness of this up on campus.

That is where the focus should be for current students, not nitpicking over a hashtag which has already helped light up an online storm.

by Achilles on Apr 6, 2011 8:26 PM PDT up reply actions  

Ironically

DG looks like Fat Pauley. Sort of.

by Bellerophon on Apr 6, 2011 11:43 PM PDT up reply actions  

Why cant a school like UCLA

pay their rising star of a coach to stay? Does LSU want to win more than we do? Pathetic! CNC could have built a nice program that I’m sure would have eventually lead to more butts in the seats. That’s how its done Dan.

Dan has to go!

"Success is never final, Failure is never fatal. It's Courage that count's" - John Wooden.

by TheUclan on Apr 6, 2011 9:35 PM PDT reply actions  

+"1000" to GBruin AND...

FIRE DAN GUERRERO!!! NO MERCY!!!

Wow, thank you for the props GBruin… I’m glad to see the issue here isn’t who’s right and who’s wrong amongst our fanbase, but where has our beloved school gone wrong, why GUERRERO MUST GO!!!

I’ve stated it on here before, and I’ll say it again. UCLA is NOT a mid-major school. This kind of thinking & leadership is embarrassing & not a way to run a major university or athletics program, & that’s what Dan is doing. UCLA should be mentioned in the same breath athletically as the Kentucky’s, Florida’s, Texas’, UNC, OSU’s, etc. Instead, we can’t even compete at this time with our biggest rival… the Turd-jans. Since when should a rival school (especially those bastards) be outshining us in facilities, ticket sales, merchandise, recruiting, etc. the list could go on and on. And for anyone who thinks that because SC is a private school they can automatically generate more funding, just look at the schools I mentioned above: They’re all public.

While I’m not going to provide “1000 reasons” DG should be fired (that would be a novel), I’ll give some glaring ones, and ones I’ve brought up before. Together, they add up to approximately 10,000.

1. We hired a guy who was previously the AD @ UC Irvine. What experience did Dan have running a major university athletic program? NONE. Hiring an AD with his background makes about as much sense as us hiring a guy to coach basketball here from D2 Buttmunch St.

2. Obviously, Pauley Pavilion renovation. I’m not even touching the ticket thing, because way, way, way before then there were problems. First off, way to take 10 years too long to actually get this renovation done. This should have been a priority as not only ‘SC, but other P10 schools like Oregon were building nice, new modern arenas. Having been to both new arenas mentioned above, I can honestly say that these two schools having a better arena than us with far, far, less history pisses me off beyond belief. And even then, our renovation is a joke. Have you actually seen the plans? Other than a new scoreboard and some courtside seats, it looks exactly the same!!! I guess I’ll be thankful for more than one damn toilet on the floor seats/courtside section (now there’s two), but come on, $100 million on this? And yeah, hindsight is 20/20, but we all know Coach Wooden wouldn’t be standing with us forever. It would have been monumental to have Wooden bless the new arena and grace us with his presence when it opened. A big F.U. to Dan on that one. How we didn’t have this built IMMEDIATELY after one of our Final Fours is beyond me.

3. Hiring… Do we really need to go there? I’m not gonna beat his hiring practices to death, because most of you know how I feel on this one: “FIRE RICK NEUHEISEL!!! NO MERCY!!!” And although I have been a Howland fan, NO MERCY is creeping on you Coach Howland. Keep getting us UNC rejects and 2-star recruits… We know you can coach, but recruiting is 50% of the game now.

4. Marketing / Business / TV… probably the worst of any major program. Just go to any sports retail outlet / store, especially the westside. Take a look at the clothes you can buy. ALL ‘SC. Even in Westwood!!! The lack of any decent looking UCLA gear is all because of Guerrero’s dumbass decision to sign with Addias and stay with them. Have you noticed the biggest schools are Nike? And they look awesome, they sell, and that means REVENUE!!! You couldn’t sell an Adidas UCLA tshirt on ebay for 99 cents, because of how ugly they are. I hate to see the actual figures of how ’SC merchandise outsells ours in this town and across the nation.

And we should NEVER have to watch Bruin football / basketball games on delay… are you serious? How in the world do we not have a TV deal with FSN as a major school to broadcast our major sports exclusively? Especially after the FF appearances. ‘SC bball should never be on the same amount of times as us in a year, or even have as many national games as us. And no Dan, ESPN3 online does not count. We can’t even get on there!

5. Personal Agenda – Guerrero has to be rubbing himself dry after seeing VCU make a FF. Why? It was his idea to expand the tourney (68 teams) and although it was an ok move and I agree with it, it was also Guerrero who pitched the 96 team idea which was beyond stupid. I feel that Guerrero is using his contributions to the Tourney committee as a way to propel himself up the NCAA ladder… and eventually become the NCAA President. I feel he’s using UCLA as a steppingstone to greater heights, and UCLA ain’t a steppingstone for anyone. But hey, if it means he leaves, then go for it Dan. We’ll all be better off with you gone!!!

The list could go on and on and be more comprehensive, but it’s getting long. But, this is GBruin’s post, and I’m just adding my two cents. I’m not happy with UCLA Athletics, and neither should you. Don’t settle to be a mid-major, our return to glory depends on us as fans. Speak your voice… not just online, but everywhere. FANS UNITED TOGETHER can make a difference. Just look at coaches who have been vaporized over the last couple years: Rich Rod, Billy Gillispie, Charlie Weis, etc. The fans were a big part of making that happen. If you’re unhappy with the product, speak it. We all support the program, but that doesn’t mean we have to support the person running it, especially when they’re doing a shitty job of it.

Thank you GBruin, and I look forward to sharing more passion and thoughts in the future. Because we’re all going to need to band together to overcome this shit.

FIRE DAN GUERRERO!!! NO MERCY!!!

FIRE RICK NEUHEISEL!!! NO MERCY!!!

by TE193 on Apr 7, 2011 11:31 AM PDT reply actions   1 recs

Great additions TE

If you have more stuff, please add it and fanpost it

I’ve been wrong before. The key is to get it right before the end. (did you hear that, Moron Center?)

greg in denver, UCLA guy for life - BruinsNation.com

by gbruin on Apr 7, 2011 2:30 PM PDT up reply actions  

Thx G...

If I can escape work, I will definitely add more and fanpost if I can. I got so riled up writing this on no sleep this morning that I’m now super angry and think I need to sleep (while @ work).

FIRE RICK NEUHEISEL!!! NO MERCY!!!

by TE193 on Apr 7, 2011 3:22 PM PDT up reply actions  

Keeping gbruin's post on the frontpage

This excellent post has 9 rec’s at this point in time, but it’s not listed among the “Recommended Fanposts” at the top right of the frontpage. How can we keep this from getting bumped to the second page?

by truebluebruin on Apr 7, 2011 3:20 PM PDT reply actions  

The front page just rolls over as new pieces go up or fanposts/fanshots get bumped.

Since it was on the front page to begin with, it won’t appear in the recommended fanposts lists, which is just for fanposts.

greg in denver, UCLA guy for life - BruinsNation.com

by gbruin on Apr 7, 2011 4:08 PM PDT up reply actions  

That really bites

Its a real shame this post will lose the visibility it deserves once it’s bumped—this topic is far too important to the Bruin community. Maybe the SBN team has a reason for not having the ability to have frontpage topics to remain “stickied,” but it seems more like a flaw in their setup. Thanks for the explanation anyhow (and the brilliant post too!).

by truebluebruin on Apr 7, 2011 5:12 PM PDT up reply actions  

It will most definitely

be linked in other front page posts, so don’t worry.

"Every day was a good day at UCLA." -Coach John Wooden

by OswegoBruin on Apr 8, 2011 1:01 PM PDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Bruins Nation, an unofficial daily online scrap book covering the greatest collegiate athletic program in the nation. Established June 16, 2005. GO BRUINS.

Managers

Uclabear1_small Nestor

Arron_afflalo1_small Tydides

Brad_pitt_as_achilles_small Achilles

377011_2642084725867_1068030137_32302525_1166539782_n_small Ryan Rosenblatt

Telemachus_small Telemachus

Licenseplate_small gbruin

2761_small tasser10

Blue_bellerophon_small Bellerophon

Img_0052_2_small Patroclus

Small DCBruins

Of Counsels

094_small Ajax

Menelaus2_small Menelaus

Small Meriones

Small Odysseus

Associates

Eee_small freesia39

Uclabruins_small AHMB