Pac-12 Commissioner Larry Scott Defends Unprecedented, Rampant Cheating By Southern Cal
Two steps forward, one step back.
While Pac 12 commissioner Larry Scott has been, or will soon be, a boon for the bottom lines of athletic departments up and down the west coast, it's sad to hear that while he may be both penny and pound wise, he is morally bankrupt.
Today, Scott issued a pathetic statement defending the rampant, blatant, unprecedented level of cheating Southern Cal engaged in over the past decade plus, expressing his disappointment in the results of Southern Cal's rejected appeal on behalf of the conference:
"We join the fans, alumni, staff and leadership of USC in being extremely disappointed with today’s decision. I want to state emphatically that our conference is committed to adhering to the highest ethical standards and compliance with NCAA rules. USC’s new leadership has certainly demonstrated this with its handling of the sanctions and by establishing a new culture of compliance for its athletic programs with its win-by-the-rules approach.
"I respect USC’s decision to take the high ground and not pursue any further recourse to the NCAA ruling. At the same time, I fully expect that every NCAA member institution be held to the same high standards. These sanctions, notably the postseason ban, have a devastating effect on current student-athletes, most of whom were in elementary and junior high school at the time of the alleged violations."To me, that is a source of great frustration and disappointment. Going forward, we can and need to do better in terms of the enforcement process."
First of all, Larry, let's drop the word "we". The remaining Pac 10 schools that played by the rules have no reason to be disappointed in justice having played out. You do not speak for the law abiding among us, you only speak for those who you have brought in to run things who let their bank accounts do their thinking for them.
It's so nice that Larry is so impressed with Southern Cal's change of heart on matters of cheating and paying players. I'd like to state emphatically that none of what Scott characterizes as "new leadership" has anything to do with this appeal being upheld. Just because you find religion in prison doesn't make your sins or your accountability for them disappear. But Larry knows that. He's only afraid of what this is going to do to weaken his hand in negotiating terms for the Pac 12 network.
Morally. Bankrupt.
I do, however, respect Larry's ability to bury his head in the sand and lie through his teeth. I mean it takes a certain kind of person to characterize dragging your feet during an investigation, trying to settle things out of court in order to silence key witnesses, blatantly obstructing all attempts to obtain information, and appealing a decision that had little to no chance of being overturned, as "the high ground". Maybe that's the high ground where Larry comes from. If only we could all get undue credit for things we have no choice but to accept.
Unfortunately, with this statement, Larry revealed something about himself that he didn't intend. He made it clear that "we" as a conference, under his leadership, value our financial position over our integrity. That we're willing to be morally bankrupt as long as we get a payday in the end.
That's what prostitutes do, Larry.
26 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
What an asshat!
“alleged violations”???? WTF man, they’re not alleged after it’s been documented and the NCAA makes a decision.
Asshole
is way to kind. I know he had a rv background was he just another jerk from ESPN the employer of Shilly Smith the lapdog for everything Trogan -they would need a very big lap
the most relevant point
is that he’s pushing to make sure that other major violators (Ohio St, Auburn, UNC, etc.) get held to harsh standards as well. It’ll be interesting to see how that plays out. If at the end of the day Ohio St walks away with just their self-imposed penalties and maybe a small added wristslap (something like -5 scholarships for 1-2 years) there’s going to be a big fallout I think.
Well that's a new level of pathetic
I thought Larry’s disgusting groveling here at the feet of these cheaters was bad, but this horribly mangled excuse for his spineless statement may well be worse.
The most relevant point is that Larry whored out our conference’s integrity to protect an institution that deserves no protection. Don’t try and come on here and act like we, as a member of the conference, should be included in protecting those SCumbags.
No chance in hell.
That’s complete BS, and Scott just sunk in my book. Get all the money you please, but don’t defend someone after they cheat, get caught, get punished, appeal, and lose. That is the textbook definition of “Guilty.” This is the same thing I get from people telling me I should root for U$C in their bowl game because they’re pac 10. Fat. Chance.
"Every day was a good day at UCLA." -Coach John Wooden
playing devil's advocate here
but what is Scott’s job? If his job is to advocate for his conference and members of his conference in outside negotiations, maximize tv revenue, etc etc then this is part of his job. Part of his job is representing $c. These violations did not occur on his watch; $c getting punished is damaging Scott’s position vis a vis other conferences, for reasons beyond his control.
A lot of what he says above is: stuff happened years ago; the players and athletic department leadership are different now; the people being punished are not the people who committed the crimes.
He also seems particularly pissed at the postseason ban, and this is something that affects the whole conference for a couple of reasons:
1) it could screw up the first ever Pac-12 championship game if (say) an unbeaten $c team cannot play in the game against an unbeaten team from the North.
2) the chances of getting two teams into BCS bowls – and the attendant windfall of additional money to be divided across the whole conference – takes a hit if $c is not able to play in the postseason.
Obviously from our perspective, late justice is better than no justice, and I cry no tears for players who decided to join that sleazy program; and, any sanctions on $c are particularly beneficial to us as the school whose recruiting is most impacted by competing with $c. And the point about Bruins never wishing any good thing (or mitigation of punishment) to happen to $c is well taken. However, how many of Larry Scott’s bosses – the university presidents – do you think would be angry at his stance here? Not arguing that this means it’s right, or that he isn’t a spineless morally bankrupt prostitute – just that perhaps the Pac-12 presidents as a whole are happy with having a spineless morally bankrupt prostitute.
by VeniceBruin on May 27, 2011 2:01 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
Blah blah blah
If the violations didn’t occur on his watch, then he has the option to do what he should have done in the first place, and that’s nothing. He has no standing to be the arbiter of what was fair or not regarding the rejection of the appeal. If it makes his job harder, then tough fucking shit. Make sure your member schools aren’t cheating if you don’t want to have to deal with this crap. But this was the hand he was dealt when he signed on as commish, and he doesn’t get to bitch about it now.
And cry me a river over which people are getting punished for what. The old people are gone because they F’d up, but the school itself bears responsibility for allowing it to happen. That’s why it’s lack of INSTITUTIONAL control. The school has not served its punishment, in part because they were too busy dragging their feet on the investigation and then delaying things further by appealing. If they didn’t want “innocent” people to get caught up in this, they should have done what they could to resolve the case as quickly as possible. But they didn’t. Boo fucking hoo.
As far as this affecting the championship game. Again, tough shit. If you’re not eligible, you’re not eligible. Nothing is “screwed up” if we have at least one member school in each division eligible to play.
The point about the university presidents is also one I don’t particularly give a damn about. Scott is the one that issued the statement, so he’s the one that takes the hit. If he didn’t want that, he had the choice to say nothing. He’s the commissioner. He doesn’t get to use the “just following orders” excuse.
I doubt this assclown feels any remorse for selling out, but that doesn’t mean we’re going to stop hammering him every time he fucks up.
totally agree on much of this
particularly your point on lack of institutional control (not to mention the tactical way they decided to let the postseason ban take immediate effect in a down year but delayed the imposition of the scholarship ban, dragging out the situation and, as you point out, dragging ‘innocent’ people into it; I personally think the NCAA should also allow all incoming $c frosh to transfer if they believe they’ve been sold a false bill of goods by Lamey).
I also agree a better course for Scott might have been to just stay out of it.
One more point on the postseason ban, though – I think you underestimate how embarrassing it is going to be for the league (and Scott personally) if the championship game – the first big showcase event, the reason we expanded the conference, etc – ends up overshadowed by $c being left out of it with a better record than the teams in it (obviously something that doesn’t happen in the best case scenario). Further, postseason revenue is shared among teams, so $c not going to a bowl game if eligible by record hurts every member of the conference.
I would guess that the ADs and presidents around the league would be happy enough with stiff scholarship penalties (and perhaps a hefty fine in addition) without the postseason ban. Yeah, it represents dollars over morals, but that is apparently what they go for. Not an exoneration of Scott but an explanation of how he is probably behaving pretty much as his bosses want him to – and, if so, why we should also be angry with the Presidents/ADs etc, for placing revenue ahead of integrity and tradition.
See, I don't know that anyone other than Scott has signed off on this atrocity
So it’s not fair for me to single them out, and “probably” isn’t good enough. I already know what Larry said, and what his motivations are.
And I don’t care how embarrassing it may be for the league. In fact, I’d argue it’s made more embarrassing by the fact that Larry is sticking up for the Trogans, because he’s calling them out and making noise when he has no way of changing the outcome. If the Trogans are left out when they otherwise shouldn’t be, he can’t even fall back to the high ground, because he already gave that up by essentially saying that they’re in the right. If he took a hard line that the rules are to be followed, which would have been the responsible thing to do, or even if he had said nothing, then the embarrassment is less, because he would have at least been consistent in his position “that our conference is committed to adhering to the highest ethical standards and compliance with NCAA rules”. Now, if he tries to do that, it only highlights the inconsistency of his position and the logical disconnect found throughout the statement he made.
Larry needs to keep his mouth shut until a real problem comes along. Speaking up on this was a Grade A Moron move from all angles.
maybe we're reading his statement differently
from what I’ve heard/read in various places, I understood he was saying ‘we think the punishment is too harsh, and we think they should have a less severe punishment’. Are you reading it as ‘they didn’t do anything wrong’? If he meant the latter, I disgustedly retract all the above.
by VeniceBruin on May 27, 2011 10:06 PM PDT up reply actions
For what it's worth
the people on SBNation’s u$c page are ripping Scott for not having done more to help them, not making these kinds of statements until after it was too late to help, etc.
If the sign of a good compromise is leaving everyone somewhat unhappy, score one for Larry Scott…
If the sign of a spineless, morally bankrupt prostitute is appeasement and capitulation
Score one for Larry Scott.
Isn't it Scott's job to be a prostitute?
Seriously, he’s running around trying to raise the conference’s
profile and bring in more cash. He’s a whore. Just like a
politician or a PR flack.
I’m not happy that he’s got his nose so far $C’s alimentary canal
that he can taste their breakfast but I’m not surprised.
What would piss me off is if UCLA were to suffer some sort of
embarrassment and he failed to back us completely.
by KnudsenRockne on May 27, 2011 3:33 PM PDT up reply actions
Well said Ty
And thank you for saying what we(BN’ers) are all thinking
First of all, Larry, let’s drop the word “we”. The remaining Pac 10 schools that played by the rules have no reason to be disappointed in justice having played out. You do not speak for the law abiding among us, you only speak for those who you have brought in to run things who let their bank accounts do their thinking for them.
I'm glad Ty added this too
I came across the “we” part of that statement and was like “WTF.”
I’m sure Scott has to throw them a bone being that they are already asking for his head for not defending them more vigorously but come on, they had it coming. So does Ohio St. and whomever else.
I’m sure they will make the argument that their all time greatest thing in the history of the world football team has made some money for all the now Pac-12, but if you ask UCLA, Cal, and most of the other schools, we could have done without the cheating.
EGO TROIORUM MALLEUS SUM
Great Post, Tydides!
Simply well said.
Los Angeles Rams and the UCLA Bruins!!!!!
by Minnesota Bruinfan on May 27, 2011 4:26 AM PDT reply actions
Where is Dan Guerrero?
Why isn’t he saying that he Scott isn’t speaking for UCLA in this?
by silverlakebruin on May 27, 2011 11:45 AM PDT reply actions
Remember
the DG rules of the road:
1) Don’t cost UCLA any money.
2) Don’t step on any toes.
"Every day was a good day at UCLA." -Coach John Wooden
by OswegoBruin on May 27, 2011 12:54 PM PDT up reply actions
while hardly a scientific approach the Pac 10ers I know are uniformly happy SC has been caught and punished.
And not as they (troylets) would have you believe because of jealousy. They are simply very aware of the rampant cheating that went on over there. (and is most likely still going on)
The best thing you can do for your children is to love their mother. John Wooden
Scott protecting "FIGUEROA TECH"
Well SAID Sir….
This is EXACTLY what he was hired for… he’s a cold hearted business man who cares ONLY about the “bottom line”. It’s MORE than likely the man’s never held a baseball bat, worn cleats, or played anything that resembled organized sports in his entire life. The ONLY REASON he cares about $UC’s bowl ban and sanctions is because his conference loses $$$ when “FIGUEROA TECH” watches the bowl season from their couches. High powered business men know nothing of ethics nor have a moral compass because they serve the Almighty Dollar. Larry Scott is here to make BIG MONEY and eventually expand the conference to 16 teams, NOT to honor Pac10 tradition.

by 


















