A Rocking Student Section Would Help With UCLA's Revenue Issues
Bumped. Great ideas below the fold here. If other folks have thoughts please share them in comment threads or offer up your own thoughts in a fanpost. - BN Eds.
Traffic in LA sucks. Traffic (and parking) around Westwood sucks. More and more people have huge flat-screen TVs. So given the inconvenience of going to the games and the constantly improving home experience, how are you going to pack the arena?
I think it's by offering something people cannot get at home or in their sports bar. And what could that be? What is the one thing Pauley Pavilion can offer that no flat screen can, even in a raucous sports bar?
A crowd that includes 2,000 UCLA students stomping, clapping, cheering, shaking the arena from floor to ceiling, that's what. I think a lot of alumni would want to relive some of their college experience in the company of students who are really making their presence seen, heard and felt. Because THAT is an EVENT. An experience. A pulse-pounding, joyful, unforgettable couple of hours.
A louder, more rocking Pauley would also increase the homecourt advantage, leading to a better record, leading to higher demand for tickets, leading to higher revenues. And it would also re-connect alumni (and potential donors) to the university through a shared, more emotional experience.
Putting the students behind the basket or dividing students into three sections - with one section in the nosebleeds behind the basket - is not going to create that. Those seats up in the rafters are not great for cheering from. You kind of get lost up there, ESPECIALLY when the nosebleed seats are separated from the courtside seats by a whole section of people sitting on their hands snoozing through the game and then leaving early to beat the traffic.
But there are alternatives.
Some ideas that come to mind:
- Moving the faculty/staff seats: I do not see why Morgan Center could not move the faculty/staff seats up to the rafters and extend the student section around the corner where the faculty/staff seats are now. After all, a) faculty/staff are not big donors, b) as more cerebral folks, faculty and staff are going to be less put out by being in a more tranquil environment (but with better sight lines) than lower down, on the corner and c) just as a matter of principal, students should be closer to the court to cheer on their classmates.
- Put students behind the visitor's bench: Alternatively, one part of the student section could be right behind the visitor's bench, for example, and another section directly across. Could be great for call-and-response cheers and leading waves.
- Make it easier for students to go to the games: Making it easier to go to the games would also help. For example, why even have season tickets for students? Why not make it first come, first served? Why not let students into any unoccupied nosebleed seats 15 minutes before tipoff? Ticket holders should be told that if they don't show up, their seats will be given away. Why not let alumni buy into the student section on a stand-by basis when the students don't fill it?
And so on. I'm not claiming to have the answers. But I do think it's time to put everything on the table and take a creative look at the whole issue of game attendance.
Let's face it: Dan Guerrero and his brain trust are not all that competent, bless their hearts. These are the guys who think a team in the second-biggest media market in the country should split TV revenue equally with a team in BOULDER!
So it's no surprise that their quick fix for their fund-raising incompetence was to try to sell donors better seats to a worse experience. If the atmosphere in Pauley were more electric, though, season ticket holders would pay more to be there. If Morgan Center's scheme had gone into effect, there'd have been more atmosphere in a good sports bar. Pauley would have become a mausoleum.
Time for Dan Guerrero to get out of bean-counter mode (especially since his math skills are suspect) and think big!
This is my first Fan Post. I put together some thoughts from some comments I made during the past few weeks. I hope that's OK.
This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of BruinsNation's (BN) editors. It does reflect the views of this particular fan though, which is as important as the views of BN's editors.
4 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
You have some great ideas.
If people don’t show up by a certain time, their seats should be sold out from under them to students. If you sold them to students at student prices, you bring in what the original seat owner paid for them and the student price on top of that. If you are selling an unsold seat, clearly you are losing value, but better to bring in a small amount than nothing at all.
I agree about the season tickets. And that is not just for students. It has become nothing but an inconvenience when CTO went this route. I really wanted to go to the Notre Dame game, but balked at buying season tickets. later when the season was underway, i figured I would pick them up for less, but by then they had been sold out. Another example is the USC game. You always want to go to that game, but having to buy season tickets is not worth it. (especially the way The Rick is running the team) Last time I bought season tickets just to pick up SC tickets, my seats were the same throughout the season except the SC game. They were worse. Much worse. What gives? No one at CTO has been able to explain that to me.
There is no solving traffic.
The best thing you can do for your children is to love their mother. John Wooden
by MexiBruin on May 7, 2011 7:41 AM PDT reply actions 1 recs
One other idea that would really help...
There is a ticket exchange system in place for alumni with season tickets (although it will only let you sell them for face value which is another thing that’s broken but not the focus here), there needs to be one for students as well.
When I was a student, I camped out for basketball games whenever possible but something came up Thursday evenings during the year so I had to miss half the home games. I would have gladly sold, or even given away my tickets to friends who were free so they could go.
Also this makes sense in terms of revenue – the tickets are already paid for, and more people = more concessions revenue and as highlighted above, a better fan experience.
I’m not necessarily advocating a return to the “printed” ticket system (which for environmental/cost reasons could be inefficient) but a simple online system to send/receive tickets on Bruincards for basketball/football would benefit the student body and the University as well.
Good idea
I wonder if technology is overrated here. I didn’t realize that UCLA had moved away from the printed ticket system. Sounds like a mistake from what you say. Plus, what do you put in your scrapbook?
It strikes me that Morgan Center is too dumb to learn. Oregon students don’t love their team more than we do. But the student section is always packed. Why doesn’t Morgan Center just cop whatever it is that Oregon does?
Morgan Center also has a mind-numbingly stupid way of looking at seat revenue. It’s as if they see the amount of money they can get per seat as completely divorced from the quality of the experience.
by Seth Chandler on May 8, 2011 3:05 PM PDT up reply actions
The students have spoken
Let there voice not only be heard but obeted. Student section on side facing benches period. If some “old time” Season ticket users do not like it then they should work to get a good seat and USE it on the other side. If no one listens to the students then maybe they shouldn’t go and let old Dan explain that to the powers that be.

by 



















