Neuheisel's To Do List: Off-Season Check-In
At the conclusion to last year's debacle against Lame Kiffin and the Southern Cal Cheaters, BlueReign wrote up an absolute "To Do List" for Neuheisel for the following season. In short, his list is absolutely spot on. There are five major areas Rick must succeed at or show significant improvement from the last three seasons to get a passing grade for this season. As BlueReign broke those down, they are:
- UCLA football's identity
- An improved offense with fresh blood at offensive coordinator
- A staff of coaches that can get the job done, recruit well, and inspire confidence in the fan base
- The development and progression of the talent on the roster rather than the stagnation we've seen (such as in the WR corps), and;
- Stability and intelligent play at the QB position
I think everyone can agree that last year was a major disappointment. For me, this season is either put-up or shut-up: if Rick can't get it done this year, as much as I want Rick to stay in Westwood and succeed, it's time we start looking for another head coach.
Or, as BlueReign put it at the end of last season:
[Neuheisel] has [one] more year to fix things. We’ve all been pointing to 2011 as the year we break through. I don’t want to hear anymore excuses or rah-rah stuff. Get it done. If [Neuheisel] doesn’t deliver, it’s time for a new [head coach].
Spot on. Now that spring practice is over, now is a good time to check-in on the program and see how Rick has done on this list of things that he must do to keep his job in Westwood.
Let's break each one down after the jump.
1. UCLA's Football Identity - Grade: IncompleteOne of the biggest problems surrounding UCLA football is our lack of identity as a program. Well, that's not entirely accurate: we're seen as a bunch of soft, West Coast, pot-smoking laid-back hippie chumps who don't like to hit hard, don't want to get dirty, and aren't willing to play tough, smash-mouth "reach down and find a pair" football for the full 60 minutes. That has to change. Only when we start playing football like men will we get any respect from the rest of the college football universe, and as long as we're seen as a teddy-bear soft program, we're always going to be second-fiddle in recruiting.
Unfortunately, our identity issues aren't even limited to a general concept: we have no identity on either side of the ball. On offense, we tried the West Coast offense under Karl, which failed, we then tried Chow's stock offense, which also failed, then we went to Nevada's Pistol offense, which failed (absent the rushing game). Typically, keeping other team's guessing as to what you'll do on offense is a good thing; it's not such a good thing when you're keeping yourself guessing as well. On defense, our identity was "bend a lot, break sometimes, but pretend you're bend-but-don't-break" under Chuck "Base D" Bullough. There's more than enough posts on our defensive failures that I don't need to re-hash them here. Suffice to say, it's been pathetic.
All that being said, it's still too early to say whether Neuheisel has made any progress on this front. With only spring practice behind us, we still don't know if this team will show up to every game, play tough, hit hard, play smart football, maintain discipline on both sides of the ball, and show the fire and passion to win.
2. Improved Offense with Fresh Ideas - Grade: B
So far Rick gets a decent grade. Yes, Norm Chow was a legend, but for whatever reason Norm just was not working out in Westwood. Whether the game has passed him by at this stage of his career, he needs more elite talent to make his system work, or he was just apathetic working for Rick, the Chow era was a failure. Realizing that the F-back was extremely neglected last season, Rick brought in Jim Mastro from Nevada to specifically coach that position, which should hopefully lead to an increased role and productivity for super-talented (if we can get him the ball) sophomore Anthony Barr. With anemic being a generous description of last year's passing attack, Rick brought in Mike Johnson, an offensive coordinator with NFL experience running a passing offensive attack, who will also focus on developing our WR corps, a group of players who have been totally stagnant the last few seasons.
Most importantly, the early indicators is that our offense has a much more aggressive philosophy than in year's past. It was no secret that the last few seasons were marked by a soft, pathetic, conservative offensive philosophy. As we've noted before, Mike Johnson is bringing in a more aggressive, attacking philosophy, which has the players excited. However, despite the excitement, it still appears that executing that aggressive, attacking philosophy is still a problem, as Patroclus noted following the spring scrimmage. At least the mindset is finally there. For that, Rick gets a solid, but not spectacular B.
3. Improved Coaching Staff Able to Win, Recruit, and Inspire Confidence - Grade: C+
This off-season saw some major changes to the UCLA coaching staff. Obviously, Mike Johnson is Norm Chow's replacement at the offensive coordinator spot. The big move, albeit it one that dragged out in dramatic (and frustrating) fashion, was Joe Tresey replacing Chuck Bullough. Sure, Neuheisel and the lackeys at Morgan Center tried to sneak Seto by us, but in the end, we got a coordinator with a reputation of attacking, hard hitting defenses. In addition, Inoke Breckterfield (defensive line) and Jim Mastro (F-backs and tight ends) have also joined the program. All of these moves are solid and bring in fresh perspective into the coaching staff. Breckterfield has, thus far, been a relentless recruiter for the Bruins (a major plus, especially with Polynesian football players). That being said, we don't know yet if Johnson can call an offense that will actually put points on the board and/or if Tresey can call a defense that plays hard, plays disciplined, and keeps us in the game. Breckterfield's recruiting ability is a plus. On the flip side, Rick tried to hire complete failure candidate Rocky Seto and the process for replacing Bullough was a long, painful, unnecessarily dramatic search. We'll see how they do this year, but even considering Seto makes me question Rick's judgment, a bit. We'll see how it shapes up: for now, a C+ is all Rick gets here. He's on the right track, but we'll need to see a lot more of the same.
4. Player Development and Coaching Talent Improvement - Grade: Incomplete
One of the keys to watch as the season progresses is whether the players are getting better. As we've seen in the past and often noted here at BN, talent development has been minimal under Neuheisel's reign. The most glaring example is at WR, where we've seen promising talent (Carroll, Smith, Rosario, Embree) stagnant. In fact, in some cases (Embree), the talent has regressed. That has to stop. Bringing in 4 and 5 star recruits doesn't mean anything if they stay at the same development level their junior or senior year as they were when they arrived on campus.
In fact, only one position has seen players come into the program and develop into better players: the offensive line. Ryan Taylor developed nicely during his relatively short stay in Westwood. Jeff Baca and Chris Ward have both come along nicely. So far, it appears that only Bob Palcic knows how to take young men and improve their skill level. This year we'll see if Mike Johnson, Jim Mastro, Inoke Breckterfield, and Jim Tresey can develop our talent. The WR corps will be key: by the end of the season, players should be dropping the ball less, running crisp routes, and make a play with the ball in space (esp. Carroll). It's still early and the team is getting adjusted to our new offensive and defensive schemes, so for now, Rick gets an incomplete.
5. Stability and Intelligent Play at Quarterback - Grade: D-
This might be the most important key and one that Rick is doing the worst in. What our offense needs to maintain any kind of rhythm and remain effective is stability and intelligent play at QB. We don't need the second coming of Troy Aikman, Gary Beban, or Cade. We need someone who can go out every week, play smart, play within the offense, minimize interceptions, and have the ability to throw the deep ball every so often to stretch the defense. Kevin Prince showed some of that ability as a redshirt freshman, before injury after injury set his UCLA career off the rails. Richard Brehaut has, at times, shown the same ability. The problem is that with Prince being injury-prone, UCLA has gone back-and-forth between the two, destroying any sense of continuity at QB.
Rick needs to pick one QB, one that will stay healthy and can stay at the helm the entire season. Is Kevin Prince the best QB on the roster, right now? Probably. Is he the answer? Probably not. The smart move would be to spend fall camp developing Brehaut and grooming him as the starter. He has the ability and, unlike Kevin, has shown the uncanny knack for being able to finish a game without landing on the trainer's table. Don't get me wrong, I appreciate Kevin sacrificing his body for UCLA and I think that makes him a great Bruin and he deserves all of our praise and appreciation. That being said, he's a kid who has been injury-prone, ever since his senior year in high school.
Another quick note for the fanboys: Brett Hundley is not the answer this year. He's a freshman who is still getting used to the speed of the college game. He's shown the talent and the ability that will one day lead him to be UCLA's starting QB during spring camp, but that day isn't this season. With Crissman emerging as a viable third option back-up, Rick needs to redshirt Hundley, start Brehaut, and use Prince and Crissman as his back-ups.
That being said, Rick has instead decided to say the QB competition is wide open and that Prince is will be tough to beat once healthy. Maybe he's trying to light a fire under Brehaut, but so far, all he's done is put our QB situation in doubt and without any stability at QB, this Bruin offense will go nowhere this season. We'll see how it goes early in the season, but for now, Rick gets a D-.
With that, fire away with your thoughts.
GO BRUINS
32 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
That's a sweet shirt CRN's wearing
Where can I get one!
by TheNewBruinPrototype on Jun 12, 2011 10:38 AM PDT reply actions
Maybe you can have that one at the end of the Season
If things don’t dramatically improve.
That;s exactly what I was thinking!
I expect to see that shirt on ebay if we don’t do better than 8-4!
by PasadenaBruin on Jun 12, 2011 3:35 PM PDT up reply actions
Totally off topic...
When did the football schedule change?! I was looking at it today trying to remember the other Pac-12 games we’re playing this year, and they moved the UCLA at Stanford game to October 1st!
Argggggggghhhhhhhh. I can’t go the 1st! I’ll actually be in LA that weekend for a wedding. (Hell, I was trying to see what time that WSU game was going to kick off, to see if there was a chance of even catching like a half.)
Even more OT
but UCI just tied it up 3-3 in the 7th inning vs #1 Virginia… on ESPNU now.
What exact is "injury prone"?
We (well, I) have often commented on how UCLA QB’s seem to be injury prone.
Ben Olson, Pat Cowan, Kevin Prince – there seems to be a pattern … of getting
injured in practice as well as in the game. I wonder “What’s causing the UCLA QB
injury plague?” To answer that we should examine what we mean when we call
these guys ‘injury prone’. When we finally have a good diagnosis then we can
proscribe a cure. I’ll toss out two possibilities:
When we say he is “injury prone” do we mean he’s clumsy or doesn’t know
how to protect himself during contact so he is more apt to get injured? If so,
can’t the coaches teach him techniques to better protect his body? E.g. judo
instructors teach students how to get hit, kicked, flipped or taken down without
injury – can’t somebody do the same for our QB? Some athletes get more
body contact than our QB’s do – what do they know that our QB’s don’t?
Or maybe we mean he is ‘fragile’ – his ligaments and bones cannot handle
the impact of college football. If so, can we remedy this weakness or at least
better identify ‘fragile’ athletes so we don’t recruit them in the future? E.g. KP
had a potential warning sign: he missed his senior HS year due to injury. But
is that ‘just one of those things’ or is it a sign?
Maybe a BN’er has another suggestion (maybe KPs parents are yet another couple
who sent their son to UCLA after they pissed off a gypsy).
Olson, Cowan, and Prince are unrelated, IMO.
Their injuries had nothing to do with each other, really.
Football is a very rough sport. Guys get hurt and injured. Sometimes there is a pattern, but most of the time, it is just the game. At the end of the day, everyone is “injury prone”. You can lessen the injury risk, but you can never take it away. You can also enhance the risk.
KP really has had a trifecta of risk enhancers; he plays recklessly, he has missed a lot of practice, and he has been playing behind a poor offensive line. While KP’s injuries from his RS FR season were entirely unrelated to last season’s injuries, they are perfect examples of his penchant for reckless play. He forgets mouthpieces, doesn’t slide, and generally plays for contact. He’s a big, strong kid, who isn’t quite as big or strong as most D1 defenders. Once you get hurt and miss practice, you start slowing down. When you are playing slower than the guys hitting you, you are going to get hurt. KP was playing catch up all year last year, and we all saw how it turned out. He fought injuries all season until he was finally knocked out completely. KP’s other problem has been the offensive line. This is really a two part problem. The line has been pretty poor at pass blocking, especially when it comes to picking up blitzes. KP takes way too many shots. Furthermore, because KP has missed so much practice time, he hasn’t recognized blitzes properly and doesn’t seem to be able to direct pass protection.
The problem with KP is that he’s likely to put himself in the same situation again. He plays football hard, and while it makes him a good player, it exposes him to too many hits. It’s easy to envision KP winning the QB battle again, only to start fighting nagging injuries all season long.
by AllHailMightyBruins on Jun 13, 2011 8:08 AM PDT up reply actions
I don't think
any of KP’s injuries came during a sack. If I remember correctly almost all them came when he was scrambling down the field. Now, maybe you can make a case he was weakened by the punishment he was taking behind the LOS, and therefore the O-line takes the blame for that…
Broken Jaw = Tennessee
Was a coverage sack. He tried to scramble left to get some air, was speared by whats-his-face right up under the facemask… He probably saw he wasn’t wearing his mouthguard and wanted to take him out of the game.
"Every day was a good day at UCLA." -Coach John Wooden
by OswegoBruin on Jun 13, 2011 11:36 AM PDT up reply actions
Yes, my point that he takes more hits.
I believe he was injured against Washington on a scramble as well, although that may have been a designed run. The point is, he takes to many hits, both because of the weak line and his unwillingness to avoid contact.
by AllHailMightyBruins on Jun 13, 2011 1:23 PM PDT up reply actions
Regarding the QBs and WRs
Maybe I’m totally off-base, but I feel like part of the issue with both of these issues last year went hand-in-hand.
What frustrated me (and I think confused the players or at least made it harder on them) was that it seemed like we played 2 totally different offenses when KP vs RB were QB. With KP, we played much more of the pistol option and threw very little. With RB, it was the opposite, throw more and pistol less. So, not only did other teams figure us out easy, but it was like running 2 completely different offenses (which goes back to point #1 listed above).
Hopefully, this year, we will have an offense which won’t change that much depending on the QB so that there can be some consistency for the players… that may lead to a little better player development as well (see #4 above).
Want Neuheisal to succeed
He is one of us. He bleeds blue and gold. I hope he does give Crissman a chance this year. Crissman is a tough kid and a good QB. Hope we win many games this coming year. GO BRUINS!
by Forever a Bruin on Jun 12, 2011 9:31 PM PDT reply actions
Hey, maybe he has a point
Perhaps Crissman is poised to become one of the best 20-30 QB’s on the Bruins roster.
Either way, if Crissman wants to win the job, lead the team to success, and get consideration for the Heisman, I’m all for it.
greg in denver, UCLA guy for life - BruinsNation.com
With the end of the NBA
Nothing to do but count down the seconds til football (now less than 7 million!). Hope this year it’s a team we can be proud of.
At this point all five 'classes' are incompletes
Before we judge we must wait until at least the middle of the 2011 season.
We can’t tell if the coaches are developing players and improving the offense
(particularly the QB) play in the middle of summer. The Fall scrimmage will
(hopefully) be a better indicator than Spring was b/c many starting linemen
didn’t play then – and if they don’t play in the Fall scrimmage we’re sunk.
Anyway, a scrimmage is not a game, QB’s play differently when they know
they aren’t supposed to get hit by the D. Although I’ll withhold judgement
for a few games, I expect we’ll get a good idea about the grades by the
second game. [I hope we re-examine these grades after each game.]
Also, item #1 (giving an identity to Bruin Football) is a multi-year project -
maybe we can give an interim grade at the season’s end. Our identity of
being soft and (not even gutty) little Bruins has its roots back in Donahue’s
last years – before some of our current players were born. (I’m not saying
anything new, some BN’ers have said that they want a HC with no ties to
Donahue for this reason.) It’s been festering for decades and it will take
years – maybe even decades – to stomp out the last bit of softness. Rick
has his work cut out for him … do I need to mention the sterling job our
AD has been doing in supporting our ‘commitment to excellence’?
All I am saying is: Keep your expectations realistic in redefining UCLA
football’s identity. It won’t happen until we’re consistently in the hunt for
Pac12 championships. So we need to get ’A’s in the other four subjects
before getting a passing grade in team identity.
Coaching grades
To me, this is our biggest question mark.
Neuheisel absolutely did the right thing in identifying underperforming coaches, and gets an A for insight, but barely a D for execution. He gets an B for mostly gracefully replacing Chow. He gets an A for simply replacing Bullough at all, but he gets a D- for how he handled the DC position search and nearly got an F and expulsion for Seto. The new DC Tresey looks to be at least a C+ and has potential to move up to an A. I doubt he’ll fall below a D this year. OC Johnson seems to have a better foundation, maybe a B- to B coming in, but seems to have a lower ceiling due to QB and scheme limitations, and I’d be pleased if he can be a B+ to A-. He also gets a half grade bonus for simply replacing the WR coach. Breckterfield looks like a solid B+ now and may be a star A+ if recruiting pans out. Mastro is an incomplete, as too much depends on the rest of the offense. Palcic remains an A-, limited only by his roster and bad luck, injuries, suspensions, ineligibility, bad luck, The Book of Mormon, crossed stars, and more bad luck.
So, when this boils down, I have an A and a D, a B, D-, C+, maybe an A, not a D, a B- to A- with extra credit, a possible A+, an incomplete, and an unlucky A-. All of which spells…absolute gibberish.
The coaching staff looks to be an upgrade in all cases. Will it be enough? I guess time will only tell.
greg in denver, UCLA guy for life - BruinsNation.com
Picture caption
Will it be:
A. “We were this close to winning the Pac-12 in 2011”.
or
B. “When I’m out on my fishing boat in 2012, I expect to catch fish this big”
Nice post B.
But hey, what do I know. I’m just the 800 lbs bruin in the room.
MISSING CATEGORY... STRENGTH & CONDITIONING
It’s no secret this program is annually riddled my MASSIVE and catastrophic injuries that drastically affect the season… particularly at QB and OL. I believe there are 2 reasons for this.
#1. STRENGTH & DURABILITY in a bruising game like football begins with your strength coach and your workout programs. Why does no one ever ask why these injuries are happening??? If your going to fire Off. coord, Def. coord., WR coaches for not getting results… why is Mike Linn’s head not on the chopping block as well? Bring in someone who will have these kids durable enough to finish an entire season! When’s the last time you saw another BCS school with this kind of “bad luck” with ACROSS THE BOARD INJURIES???
#2. The SYNTHETIC GRASS practice field. How long do we have to listen to the players complain about how this fake turf @ Spaulding is contributing to fluke injuries?? Are we seriously to believe that with all the $$$ UCLA puts into it’s beautiful campus and programs, that they have to save a few pennies by not maintaining real grass on their football practice field????
Am I the ONLY FAN who notices these things???
We've discussed it before
and it’s hard to come to a definitive conclusion.
On another note, are you having trouble controlling THE VOLUME OF YOUR VOICE?
But hey, what do I know. I’m just the 800 lbs bruin in the room.
Isn't half of Spaulding real grass?
I thought the point was to have both surfaces available so they can practice on whatever surface the game will be played on that Saturday.
As for #1 or #2’s contribution to injuries…what tasser said.
It is
But, because we’re UCLA football and we’re not really serious, we have two fields that aren’t even 100 yards, necessitating the use of both of them during every practice. Awful, awful decision-making is rampant at our beloved university.
"Every day was a good day at UCLA." -Coach John Wooden
by OswegoBruin on Jun 13, 2011 11:38 AM PDT up reply actions
Is there any real evidence than fake turf increases injuries?
It seems the BN’ers have gone ’round and round on this one before.
by KnudsenRockne on Jun 13, 2011 11:00 PM PDT up reply actions
None.
But nobody’s bothered to collect any, and nobody will. So in the meanwhile, we’ll keep playing the guessing game, and for whatever reason, major foot injuries will keep happening on the artificial stuff.
"Every day was a good day at UCLA." -Coach John Wooden
Hmm
How long has the artificial turf been there? What were the injuries before and after it was installed? What were the injuries under each trainer we’ve had? Plenty of other teams seem to practice on artificial turf without these injuries…
But hey, what do I know. I’m just the 800 lbs bruin in the room.
The turf
was installed in the summer offseason of 2006, after a major overhaul of Spaulding field. This, in my opinon, was an utter disaster. For the record, both Pat Cowan and Ben Olson suffered injuries in spring practice of 2008.
"Every day was a good day at UCLA." -Coach John Wooden
by OswegoBruin on Jun 14, 2011 12:28 PM PDT up reply actions
OK
so there may be something to that, but Cowan and Olson injured their foot on real grass.
But hey, what do I know. I’m just the 800 lbs bruin in the room.
This article is pretty comprehensive.
I can’t get anything sourced saying exactly where Pat and Ben hurt themselves, but this article lists: Datone Jones, Brandon Sermons, Micah Kia, Raymond Carter etc. all blame their injuries on the turf. If that’s not enough to completely overhaul your practice area i don’t know what is. If nothing else, it is a terrible practice area.
"Every day was a good day at UCLA." -Coach John Wooden
Apologies... forgot the link.
http://articles.latimes.com/2010/aug/12/sports/la-sp-0812-ucla-football-20100812
"Every day was a good day at UCLA." -Coach John Wooden






















