Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Following UFC 146 Loss, Jason 'Mayhem' Miller 'Done' in UFC

An Early Look at the UCLA Football 2011 Schedule

A man on an island...CRN is on the spot this year  (Photo by Jed Jacobsohn/Getty Images)

Here comes the nuclear winter of college sports.  Well, at least for UCLA this year, as we no longer have any teams in contention.  So let's look at the football schedule for 2011 and see how things will shape up for our Bruins and CRN who by many accounts seems to be on the hot seat.  It remains to be seen what Dan Guerrero's expectations are.

There are a couple of ways of approaching this.  I recently came across a new web site called College Football Matrix, which provides "Recruiting Based Team Predictor & Trend Modeling".   I have to say, it is rather interesting.  You can see the analysis they have done on UCLA here, where they show our 4-year recruiting rank to be #15.  Sadly, the flip side of that is the fact that UCLA has been terrible at getting players to the NFL based on that recruiting rank. 

Anyway, the point they make is that CRN has done a great job of recruiting.  However, recruiting is only part of their prediction model, which also includes something they call "coaching effect".  And based on that coaching effect, CRN and his staff have cost the team an average of 4 games per season.  You can look through their methodology.  The UCLA analysis is not yet complete, however it shows that based purely on recruiting, UCLA should finish 10-2, as only U$C and Texas have done a better job of recruiting over the past 4 years.  There is a "home/away" adjustment that brings this down to a 9-3 record.  The coaching effect has not yet been taken into account, but if the 4-game cost is applied, this would lead to an expected 5-7 record.

Making predictions for this year's team is very hard considering the new coaching staff and new additions to the league, so take this with a grain of salt (and please assume no injuries!).  Now, let's take a rudimentary look at each game and I will share with you my predictions (NOT expectation).

Star-divide

9/3/11 @ Houston

UCLA demolished Houston at the Rose Bowl last year.  The Cougars were thoroughly unprepared for UCLA's running game, but surprisingly their offense was abysmal.  Part of that had to do with the injury to Case Keenum.  Even if he is back as the starter this would be his first game back, with only two returning offensive linemen.  Akeem Ayers was incredibly disruptive in that game, but he moved on to greener pastures.  With Datone Jones back, however, I expect more pressure on their QB, and our DBs should have a good game as well.  Just like the rest of us, Houston won't know what to expect from the offense, but they'll be in the second year of a 3-4 scheme that could cause trouble.  I think UCLA will win this game in a close one...don't we always win in Texas?  24-20 W. 

9/10/11 vs. San Jose State

SJSU lost to Stanford last year 42-17 and only won one game the whole season.  There are rumors that Tate Forcier might join the team after spurning Miami but he would not be eligible until the next year.  At the Rose Bowl, the Bruins should win handily (but of course never take an opponent lightly).  37-13 W.

9/17/11 vs. Texas

UCLA shocked the nation last year by manhandling the Longhorns in Austin.  Turns out the shock was two-sided, with UCLA being a lot worse than that win reflected and a Texas team that was unthinkably bad.  Texas will not be that bad again, but neither will UCLA.  Texas comes in with a whole new coaching staff except for the head coach, uncertainties at QB, an offensive line with little depth, and young DBs, but a front seven on defense that is quite good.  And lest we forget, they have athletes everywhere with highly touted recruits.  Revenge will be on their mind, but sometimes that works against you, especially on a high-pressure team like Texas.  UCLA wins a squeaker.  20-17 W.

9/24/11 @ Oregon State

I really have no clue on this game.  UCLA almost beat the Beavers in 2009 in Corvallis, and beat them last year at the Rose Bowl.  OSU loses many starters on defense and the offensive line is suspect, but nearly the whole offense will be back...except for Jacquizz Rodgers.  His brother James is expected to play but his rehab from last season's injury seems to be going slowly.  This is definitely a winnable game for UCLA, but never underestimate Mike Riley's coaching.  It is UCLA's first Pac-12 game, away, potentially after a big win...not one of CRN's fortes.  UCLA loses a close one, 27-21 L.

10/1/11 @ Stanford

Let's not relive last year's misery at the Rose Bowl, shall we?  Oops, I think we just did.  The fact is, the turnover within the Stanford football program has been colossal. Harbaugh and Fangio are gone and half of last year's starters will not return. Stanford has been stockpiling some incredible talent, but many of these former prep stars lack game experience.  Still, there will be continuity on offense since Shaw (previously the OC) was promoted to coach the team and Stanford will continue to steamroll opponents with Andrew Luck & Co. even if their defense isn't as good with Fangio gone.  We lose big but at least we score!  42-21 L.

10/8/11 vs. Washington State

The Cougars have to play in the Rose Bowl again.  They nearly got us last year, and their young QB will only be better this year.  This is potentially a coach in desperado mode and UCLA will only win if they have improved from last year, which I believe will be the case.  31-17 W.

10/20/11 @ Arizona

A team we could/should have beaten the last two years.  It's infuriating, really.  Arizona returns two senior QBs, both of whom have beaten UCLA.  They will have some attrition on the offensive line where they lose all the starters from 2010. On paper this should be a competitive game and a win here would really set up the Bruins for a pretty good season.  But none of these things seem to matter when we play this team.  UCLA finds a way to lose, and they will again.  24-10 L.

10/27/11 vs. California

UCLA has to win this game.  No ifs and buts about it.  Cal loses their QB and a great RB.  For all the talk about Tedford being a QB guru, the only stud he ever had was Aaron Rodgers and he found him by accident while scouting another player.  Their defense will be excellent, the best in the Pac-12, but by this game UCLA should have it together.  Playing at home, UCLA will play its best game of the year.  20-10 W.

11/5/11 vs. Arizona State

Four starters on the offensive line return, as do a stable of talented running backs for the Sun Devils and their 6'8" QB Osweiler.  9 starters return on defense (even though they lost two of their best defenders) including LB Vontaze Burfict who is an animal.  Playing at home won't be good enough for the Bruins.  This is a crucial stretch in the season and the Bruins play well, but come up short and are overpowered.  27-20 L.

11/12/11 @ Utah

The Utes went 10-3 last year, while playing in the Mountain West Conference.  We'll see whether the tougher conference schedule will take a toll on them by the time this game rolls around.  Still, they are a disciplined team with a good returning QB (even though he missed spring training with a shoulder injury).  Norm Chow will only have had one spring to install his offense but this late in the season, they will be further along and will take care of the Bruins at home easily.  28-13 L.

11/19/11 vs. Colorado

UCLA must win this game to become bowl-eligible, which is really the bare minimum for CRN to save his job.  UCLA should have the edge in talent, but Colorado's new coach may be able to inject new life into the once mighty program. Their offense has a lot of experience and will likely have a number a seniors.  Luckily this game is at the Rose Bowl so there won't be as much heckling or focus on CRN's tenure at Colorado, unless the season has already gone to the toilet. Bruins will take care of business but not before Colorado gives everyone a big scare.  34-27 W.

11/26/11 @ U$C

Sigh.  1-11 against the Trogans in the last 12 games.  Will the 13th game be the charm?  U$C returns a decent offense, though possibly without Marc "Trogan all the way" Tyler who was their leading rusher.  Only two starters remain on their offensive line, but never a shortage of talent there. The defensive line remains solid but there are questions at other spots.  Even though the troylets will play uninspired and are coached by college football's version of Paris Hilton, they will show up for this game, which they will treat as their bowl game.  Somehow, the Trogans get five conference home games and seven overall. Playing at the Crapiseum, UCLA just can't get its offense going, and while the game remains close into the 4th quarter, the trojies pull away and break our hearts once again.  27-20 L.

Random Bowl Game vs. random team

See Armed Forces Bowl vs. Temple, with the same result except the subsequent 2012 UCLA Bruins will be a very good team.

Final Record:  7-6 (3-6)

Comment 62 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I am encouraged by what CFB Matrix is doing, but it needs to account for injuries, recruits who actually make it into the program, etc.

'11: Minimum Goal: Win 10 games again
'10: 7th in offense, 41st in defense. Division Champions. 10-4. (6-3)
'09: 3rd in offense, 107th in defense. 7-6 (4-4)

Tomahawk Nation Nole-Holds-Barred Analysis of FSU Sports!
Follow Tomahawk Nation's Twitter feed!

by Bud Elliott on Jun 13, 2011 12:45 PM PDT reply actions  

i think

that injuries are definitely a very big deal. It’d be nice if there was a good database that had a few years’ worth of injury information in an easy to read format. Might get lucky and have someone send me something useful on that end, but we’ll see…

Mr Pac Ten's Blog - 2007 2008 2009 2010

by MrPacTen on Jun 18, 2011 11:17 AM PDT up reply actions  

Favorable factors

We catch the Beavs the week after they visit the Honeybadgers, and we get Texas @ home a week after they play BYU. Both could be coming off a loss….maybe a big one.
If we can start 4-0………..?

by Bluecaper on Jun 13, 2011 12:58 PM PDT reply actions  

OSU and Arizona

are my toss-up games. Winning either of those games would be a step forward (how sad…).

Honeybadgers? They’re badass.

But hey, what do I know. I’m just the 800 lbs bruin in the room.

by tasser10 on Jun 13, 2011 1:03 PM PDT up reply actions  

The animal?

Yes they are.

"Every day was a good day at UCLA." -Coach John Wooden

by OswegoBruin on Jun 13, 2011 1:23 PM PDT up reply actions  

It's an inside joke

Just go on you tube and search for honey badger…

But hey, what do I know. I’m just the 800 lbs bruin in the room.

by tasser10 on Jun 14, 2011 8:47 AM PDT up reply actions  

Hopefully...

We can beat ASU at home. That would be HUGE

by bruinfan94 on Jun 13, 2011 1:04 PM PDT reply actions  

Wow, I'm starting to get depressed already...

Especially reading about losing to Norm Chow at Utah… hope that doesn’t happen.

by Go Bruinz on Jun 13, 2011 1:19 PM PDT reply actions  

Not

gonna happen. However, I think I’d want a change at the top if we don’t have a winning conference record. I’m happy that we’ve been able to beat Tenn and Texas but I care about our Pac-10/12 record. We can’t afford to have another season with a losing conference record and expect recruiting not to go down the toilet.

by King J77 on Jun 13, 2011 1:23 PM PDT up reply actions  

If we play that way next season

Neu is fired. 7-6 after a bowl win is unacceptable. I need 9 regular season wins. 8 would be a palatable finish with a good bowl showing to follow, but absolutely not 6.

by sponkey21 on Jun 13, 2011 1:52 PM PDT reply actions  

Are you serious?

I really don’t see how you can expect 9 regular season wins from a team like this. Show me where the 9 wins would come from. We just came off a historic crappy season.

7-6 earns CRN another year, you can bet on that.

But hey, what do I know. I’m just the 800 lbs bruin in the room.

by tasser10 on Jun 13, 2011 3:53 PM PDT up reply actions  

Depends on who the 7 are.

"Every day was a good day at UCLA." -Coach John Wooden

by OswegoBruin on Jun 13, 2011 4:47 PM PDT up reply actions  

The bar is that low?

KD was running the ship better and was shown the door for average. CRN has a cupboard full of 4-5 star players. Its time he brings this program better then average.

Unless 7 wins includes a win over the University of Second Chances then he needs to go. Four years is plenty of time to fix a program.

by Seahawcla on Jun 13, 2011 5:50 PM PDT up reply actions  

AGREED

The best thing you can do for your children is to love their mother. John Wooden

by MexiBruin on Jun 18, 2011 10:25 AM PDT up reply actions  

Doesn't matter

I won’t search the archives, but before last year we all seemed to be on the same page of looking for 7 wins. I felt we should have been there or even 8. Due to injuries and extremely poor coaching we clearly underperformed. We were not that bad talent wise last year.
I think this year we are deeper, more experienced, and overall more talented this year. On top of that our schedule is easier this year. I also hope our coaching will not lose 4 games for us this year. (which last year would have put us at 8 wins or so)
you put that with the analysis that we have roughly 14th best recruited talent (which is in line with how I feel about our talent as well) and we SHOULD be at 8-9 wins before the bowl game. Neu has had several years and performed worse than his predecessor. I like him, think he can do very well, and want him to succeed, but going .500 in this regular season schedule in his 4th year with top 15 level talent is grounds for the walking papers. You can’t fail to break .500 in the regular season 4 years in a row at UCLA without even giving suc a tough game and expect to keep your job.
Thinking 7-6 is acceptable based on the unacceptable implosion that was last year is the kind of thinking that has led to Morgan Center allowing the program to flounder for the last 12 years. I can go down game by game and show where I expect 8 or 9 wins to come from, but that is not the point. The point is we have waited, we have the talent, we have a workable schedule, and this is where we should be.

by sponkey21 on Jun 13, 2011 8:01 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions  

Sorry on my phone and a bit scatterbrained. Didn’t realize I was so redundant in my freeform blab til after I posted.

by sponkey21 on Jun 13, 2011 8:05 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions  

Who said acceptable?

All I said was that 7 wins earns CRN another year, but those aren’t my standards, that’s what I expect will happen. I don’t think DG fires CRN if he gets to a bowl game, not after having just hired a new staff. That doesn’t mean I agree with that.

This post is not a discussion of what we expect next year, it’s just a game by game prediction. I will not, for the fourth year in a row, explain to people the definition between expectations and predictions.

But hey, what do I know. I’m just the 800 lbs bruin in the room.

by tasser10 on Jun 13, 2011 9:31 PM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

Question the other Way

What gets CRN fired? Any losing record? How about a blowout bowl loss and another ugly SUC loss but a 7-6 record (Your above but beating ASU and losing the bowl game)?

by DCBruins on Jun 13, 2011 9:40 PM PDT up reply actions  

Not sure

In my opinion, a “winning” season could earn CRN just enough slack to be back next year, in the eyes of DG, no matter what the formula is. However an ugly loss to U$C could be the last straw in your scenario above. Winning the bowl game is more important to the coach than to his boss…DG just wants to get there for the dough (especially in a minor bowl).

I can’t really guess what DG would or wouldn’t do, but I’m not sure if I want him to head another coaching search either.

I think we need another thread to establish BN’s expectations for the year in terms of the record. There are also “eye test” expectations as laid out in an earlier post.

But hey, what do I know. I’m just the 800 lbs bruin in the room.

by tasser10 on Jun 14, 2011 8:56 AM PDT up reply actions  

DG's gonna read the tea leaves

and make a decision solely based on fan and booster reaction to the season. He will (I pray) make a splash hire to save his job with our newfound budgetary happiness. However, he may do the expected thing, and hire Mike Johnson, which is the type of decision UCLA has made for the last decade plus. To sum up: stupid.

"Every day was a good day at UCLA." -Coach John Wooden

by OswegoBruin on Jun 14, 2011 9:28 AM PDT up reply actions  

stupid = cheap

The new found TV money will not erase old habits which is to play it cheap is what I think you mean.

Also, I think if DG is going to promote, Tresey would be promoted first, no? Better track record and overall time in the game.

The best thing you can do for your children is to love their mother. John Wooden

by MexiBruin on Jun 18, 2011 10:34 AM PDT up reply actions  

I don't think that CRN would deserve another year

but yes, he would probably get one from the morons at Morgan Center in the above scenario. I see that this is your prediction and not your expectation/desire, I just think that your prediction is absurdly conservative, and unsound based on the talent level of the team. I maintain that this team should be winning 8-9 games by this season, and I will match my predictions based on that. Anything short is a failure, again, on Rick’s part, and is too much for me, as a fan and supporter of this team to take.

by sponkey21 on Jun 14, 2011 10:49 AM PDT up reply actions  

Sadly

I am going by historical (under)performance. UCLA has not met expectations in the last decade in football, except in 2005 (and even then). 2009 was a step forward but it still included games we should have won. I don’t think my prediction is conservative at all considering that nearly every prognosticator and preview magazine has us no better than 5th in our division.

The talent level of the team has been irrelevant. Again, feel free to put up a post that breaks down each game and why you think we would win or lose each game. If you think CRN can double last year’s win total, with a new staff, explain yourself. It’s not unreasonable but you need to justify that beyond your own standards.

As the first part of my post notes, this team apparently has the talent to win 9-10 games in the regular season, so clearly there are things working against that, at least so far.

But hey, what do I know. I’m just the 800 lbs bruin in the room.

by tasser10 on Jun 14, 2011 11:03 AM PDT up reply actions  

Good point

We don’t have a track record of meeting expectations, I just feel it is where we should be regardless. And I fully get that is where you draw the distinction between prediction and expectation.
I feel we win all the home games (Arizona State being toughest, but I feel we gave them quite a run last year, so what the heck. Texas at home should be a great game, but another we should have a leg up in.), and we win at Houston, and only drop three away games. I feel Stanford will be one of the toughest. Utah I don’t feel will hold up to a full schedule of Pac-12, so I think we can nab that one, though the state has not been kind to us. u$c has major depth issues, and I think we can pull that one off. We have faired poorly in Arizona, but I feel Oregon St. is winnable.
All said, I could see us losing three of our away games (other than Houston), and maybe losing to Arizona State. That puts us at 9 or perhaps 8 wins. Optimistic given track record – yup. Outside our talent level – nope. I like that the new staff focuses on the basics. That is the thing this team needs most, and it is the most controllable, fixable parts of the game. If we shore up the fundamentals this team should shock the Pac. Should may not = will, but I still expect, and predict. If they fall short it will be a failure to me. I currently am lukewarm on Rick (no longer a supporter, but not a detractor yet), I think that Norm and Chuck screwed a lot up last year. This year is the year the scale will tip up or down for me.

by sponkey21 on Jun 14, 2011 5:38 PM PDT up reply actions  

However...

We don’t actually get to call the shots, and the people who do seem to be quite content with a range between mediocre and kind-of-almost-decent. 7-6 after a bowl win is unacceptable to probably a substantial majority of fans – myself included – but I’d be amazed if 7-6 led him to the unemployment line.

Roses are red, violets are blue...f*** $C.

by KSBruin on Jun 13, 2011 7:55 PM PDT up reply actions  

True

He would get another year from Morgan Center with 7-6, but I feel that is a byproduct of the apathetic/complacent fanbase that is content with those results.
I understood (but obviously didn’t enjoy) 4-8 and was in good spirits after 7-6 in Neu’s first two years. I expected 8-5 or possibly 7-6 with last years schedule, and have looked to this year as the one where it all will come together for a few years. I still feel that way.

by sponkey21 on Jun 13, 2011 8:15 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions  

So, Danny G's handle is sponkey21?

Thanks for tipping your hand, Dan.
We no longer have to rely on ‘Three Wealthy and Influential Donors’ now that
we have you

;)

by KnudsenRockne on Jun 13, 2011 10:21 PM PDT up reply actions  

7-6 and (3-6)...i'm depressed already...

i think we beat Oregon State, so i see UCLA going 7-5 before the bowl game…if wishes were dreams and dreams came true…:)

by BRUINCLASSOF72 on Jun 13, 2011 2:12 PM PDT reply actions  

Well

as I say above, that’s one of my toss-up games.

But hey, what do I know. I’m just the 800 lbs bruin in the room.

by tasser10 on Jun 13, 2011 3:54 PM PDT up reply actions  

Too many ???s about OL and QB...

to expect anything other than what we have seen so far. BUT here’s hoping!!!

by GogetemBruins on Jun 13, 2011 2:19 PM PDT reply actions  

It all starts & ends with the QB & the offense!!

I only want to touch up on 2 things here. 1, With this schedule there is absolutely no reason to believe that we can win a minimum of 8 games! Anything lower than that is just not acceptable with all the talent on this team. 2, If our QB ( whoever that may be ) play improves over last year, we will win the 8 games that I touched on in point # 1. With everything beginning & ending with the QB position, our team and any team will go as the way the QB goes. GO BRUINS!!

by Splat Shot Sal on Jun 13, 2011 2:50 PM PDT reply actions  

You mean

there is no reason to believe that we can’t win a minimum of 8 games, right? I have a reason: the last 3 years.

But hey, what do I know. I’m just the 800 lbs bruin in the room.

by tasser10 on Jun 13, 2011 3:55 PM PDT up reply actions  

You got my vote!

The best thing you can do for your children is to love their mother. John Wooden

by MexiBruin on Jun 18, 2011 10:36 AM PDT up reply actions  

I'm not seeing any Losses in this schedule...

…our only potential loss will be in the BCS championship game against a very tough Alabama Crimson Tide.

…. well someone had to play the role of psychotically delusional optimist.

by rich87 on Jun 13, 2011 6:32 PM PDT reply actions  

You win the Academy Award.

"Every day was a good day at UCLA." -Coach John Wooden

by OswegoBruin on Jun 13, 2011 8:40 PM PDT up reply actions  

I disagree

with the psychotically delusional optimist part. The minute Brett Hundley signed with UCLA, I immediately withdrew my life savings and put on my money on UCLA football winning the BCS title this upcoming season.

by notaznguy on Jun 13, 2011 8:47 PM PDT up reply actions  

So what was it like working for Goldman Sachs?

Dreaming of Westwood while in permanent exile in Virginia

by VABruin on Jun 13, 2011 8:51 PM PDT up reply actions  

Re Texas

Remember when we played Texas last year, we had all of our best players healthy (Prince, Ayers, Larimore?) and performing at a high level in that game. I still think we are improved over last season’s team, even at the peak, but still Texas will be a toughy. We’ll need our QB, Datone Jones, Larimore, and Johnathan Franklin to be healthy.

by captainqtp on Jun 13, 2011 10:08 PM PDT reply actions  

Let's take a breath and think ...

Rick Neuheisel has, like, zero influence on the performance of our opponents.
Really. It is a fact… really …

Firing our coaches based on performance vis-a-vis out opponents is a bit rash.
Our coaches should and must be judged on how they get our payers to perform.
That is it. Simple.

If we have really bad luck (e.g. say our 1st & 2nd string QB’s get injured on back-to
back plays – not that that’d ever happen ;) we ought not fire our coaches. If U$C is
favored by god (or satan) and every bounce goes their way it is no reason to fire our
coach. Frankly, firing our coach just ‘cuz we lose N games is a sign of panic and
that is bad. Very bad. We’ll never keep a good coach if we fire coaches out of panic.

On The Friggin’ Other Hand…

Rick Neuheisel is 100% accountable for the preparation and training of our players. He
is 100% accountable for the preparation and performance of each and every coach. The
buck stops with Ricky N and that is fairer than fair. That’s why he gets the big bucks.

So, instead of worrying about W’s & L’s, we should be setting standards like:
1) Is our defense prepared for each and every team we play?
2) Do we call offensive plays to catch our opponents off guard?
3) Do our players look like they know what they should be doing at all times?
4) Do our players play for 60 G-D minutes every game?
5) Do our players execute?
6) Do we have leaders on the field?

Frankly, if we luck out and get 10 wins but fail all of the above, I still want to see CRN go.
Just because 10 other teams f-up doesn’t excuse our failures. Likewise, I’ll tolerate a
losing season if we play like champs – like real champs.

Really. When was the last time our Bruin FB team played like real champions?

by KnudsenRockne on Jun 13, 2011 10:51 PM PDT reply actions  

Excellent points

I agree with your 6 standards 100%. The play of the team is more important than the record (though if the play is there, the record should mostly take care of itself)

That’s why Dorrell’s 10 win season didn’t fool Nestor and the mods running this place back then, and they kept calling for his head. Time proved the BN staff right and that KD, while a nice guy, was no better than a mediocre and uninspiring leader who was in over his head with a D-1 team.

Neuheisel’s stints at CU and UW would suggest he is more qualified for a D-1 job, And to your point – last year, I thought we could have our best team and our worst W-L record at the same time. Turns out we still had a poorly prepared and poorly executing team. Sadly, I got the record part right. The fallout is that Neu has lost a lot of wiggle room as far as the play great and damn the records theory goes. I think the fan base just wants wins now.

But I agree with you – it’s time our Bruins played like winners. If Neu can’t do it with this bunch, I don’t see him doing it in Westwood at all, and it will be time for a change (both at head coach and AD)

greg in denver, UCLA guy for life - BruinsNation.com

by gbruin on Jun 14, 2011 8:49 AM PDT up reply actions  

That's the Eye Test

and I tend to rely on that as well, more so than on the record.

Could we PLEASE just look like a D-1 team again, at the minimum?

But hey, what do I know. I’m just the 800 lbs bruin in the room.

by tasser10 on Jun 14, 2011 9:00 AM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

+1.0/0.0

The eye test is a good term for it but you summed up my points perfectly with your
line about just looking like a D-1 team again.

by KnudsenRockne on Jun 14, 2011 3:09 PM PDT up reply actions  

Great breakdown!!!

Can’t achieve the impossible, but he does need to get the basics all down this year. Last years team was very poor fundamentally. With that, the wins will come.

by Bruin'96 on Jun 15, 2011 9:27 AM PDT up reply actions  

Pretty Much On Track Here, IMHO

I think the real key games for CRN to turn a 6-6 mark into 7-5 or 8-4 rest on beating Oregon St. and Arizona St. Texas, I fear, may be a bridge too far this year but hope I’m wrong.

Los Angeles Rams and the UCLA Bruins!!!!!

by Minnesota Bruinfan on Jun 14, 2011 4:29 AM PDT reply actions  

I really think we can get Texas

They have a lot of talent but major issues. A whole new coaching staff, an unsure QB, a lot of pressure, and we play at the Rose Bowl. CRN seems to get it done for these types of games.

I think Arizona St. wins the South. The teams we should beat are Oregon St., Arizona, Cal, Colorado and Wazzu. We do that and it could be a pretty good season, a winning conference record.

But hey, what do I know. I’m just the 800 lbs bruin in the room.

by tasser10 on Jun 14, 2011 9:08 AM PDT up reply actions  

I think CRN needs to look at every game this season as a 'key game'

I mean look at last season’s victories over the Texas teams… you could call those key games
but we self-destructed after that.

by KnudsenRockne on Jun 14, 2011 3:11 PM PDT up reply actions  

Good point

Sadly the Texas game turned out to be a classic Pyrrhic victory with the injuries we suffered.

Dreaming of Westwood while in permanent exile in Virginia

by VABruin on Jun 14, 2011 4:00 PM PDT up reply actions  

True

Both Prince and Ayers were never the same after that game.

by captainqtp on Jun 14, 2011 9:49 PM PDT up reply actions  

BTW

I linked this post over at Burnt Orange Nation :)

by captainqtp on Jun 14, 2011 9:50 PM PDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Bruins Nation, an unofficial daily online scrap book covering the greatest collegiate athletic program in the nation. Established June 16, 2005. GO BRUINS.

Managers

Uclabear1_small Nestor

Arron_afflalo1_small Tydides

Brad_pitt_as_achilles_small Achilles

377011_2642084725867_1068030137_32302525_1166539782_n_small Ryan Rosenblatt

Telemachus_small Telemachus

Licenseplate_small gbruin

2761_small tasser10

Blue_bellerophon_small Bellerophon

Img_0052_2_small Patroclus

Small DCBruins

Of Counsels

094_small Ajax

Menelaus2_small Menelaus

Small Meriones

Small Odysseus

Associates

Eee_small freesia39

Uclabruins_small AHMB