Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Veterans Share Their Favorite Sports Memories

Status of UCLA Football

Often lost amid the swirl of transfer-ous rumermongering swirling about the Arsenal camp this offseason, where nearly each player currently under contract has been linked with a move to another team, is the future of manager Arsene Wenger.

Before I get charged with inciting conjecture and fueling chatroom message board vitriol as the British tabloids have seen fit to do this summer, let me say that I don't see Wenger leaving Arsenal this season--in fact, I see him staying on for at least two more years.

What got me thinking, however, was a quote by Wenger last summer. When asked about his future--the Alsace-born Frenchman is 61, and has been at Arsenal since 1996--moved quickly to pledge his commitment to Arsenal, yet tossed about a potential move to Paris in the future.

Now, it's hard to fault Wenger for his Parisien dream: it seems like everyone has at one point dreamed about living there: the city even got a shoutout from Kanye from his newest album in his song 'Dark Fantasy'.

Yet Wenger wouldn't be moving to Paris to enjoy the leisurely lifestyle of a retiree. He would want to take an executive position at Paris Saint-Germain, the club founded in 1971 to give Paris a taste of top-flight football. PSG thrived in the mid-1990's when it boasted some of the premier talent in the world: remember, this is a team that had Ronaldinho before he became...well, you get the 'picture'.

PSG, who once considered participation in the Champions League as something of a birthright, have not played in the competition since 2004. A dearth that no doubt perplexes M. Wenger, who alluded to the considerable funds PSG possesses, and its location in one of the biggest cosmopolitan centers in the world, believes that the club has the capacity to be a world beater.

Even Real Madrid coach Jose Mourinho wondered aloud at the lack of recent success in the French capital's side during a May interview with L'Equipe, in which he was quoted about the current predicament of PSG, "It’s an unbelievable situation for a city that loves football so much and has so many immigrants, from Portugal and elsewhere."

Like the powerful sequence in Lawrence of Arabia, when Prince Feisal hearkens back to the stretches of public lighting of Cordoba, whose technological prowess made it the envy of Europe. Yet Cordoba, like so many former greats, was bypassed, and slunk into insignificance.

But there's no reason why something that was once great can't be great again: as T.E. Lawrence (played by Peter O'Toole) responds to the nostalgic Feisal, "Time to be great again."

PSG are now under the ownership of a Middle Eastern group with considerable financial resources. After finishing fourth in Ligue 1 last season, it is only a matter of time before they reawaken and reassert themselves as a force to be reckoned with both in France and in continental Europe. As Wenger and Mourinho noted, there's just too much in the way of resources and backing for them not to succeed.

What got the cylinders firing in my head this week was reading about Trevor Bauer, the right-handed flamethrower UCLA baseball player, who decimated opposition during the 2011 season to the tune of a 13-2 record in 16 starts, 1.25 E.R.A., and 203 strikeouts. Stats gaudy enough to earn the junior the coveted Golden Spikes Award--given to the best player in Division 1, and make Bauer the No. 3 selection in this year's MLB Amateur draft.

I'm all for excellence in any aspect of UCLA athletics. My hat goes off to Bauer for his superb UCLA career, which saw him become the darling of Major League Baseball scouts, who have compared him favorably to San Francisco Giants hurler Tim Lincecum.

No, my problem doesn't arise from Bauer's success. Well, actually it does. I love baseball, but the fact that it is currently the more successful program when compared to Bruin basketball and football is simply infuriating.

Star-divide

I can't remember the last time that a preseason poll listed UCLA higher than 7th in preseason conference rankings. Now that the conference has been broken up into two divisions, each with six teams, UCLA now hovers around 5th. Spectacular, that the only reason UCLA jumps up in the polls is because of conference restructuring.

Just like PSG, there is no excuse for UCLA football to be mired in mediocrity. That's good enough for lesser programs: but for a school that boasts top-notch athletic facilities, competitive funding, and a recruiting area that is one of the most fertile in the nation, there is no legitimate argument for why UCLA should not be in the top 25 year-in, year-out.

Like anything in sports, I believe it comes down to coaching. Look at USC before they got Pete Carroll. UCLA had spanked the Trojans around in the Victory Bell rivalry in the ten years before Petey's 2001 arrival, maintaining an 8-2 record from 1991-2000. During Carroll's reign from 2001 to 2009, UCLA won one game.

Carroll galvanized USC, turning it into the premier destination for recruits nationwide. It didn't matter if a prospect was from California or Florida. If USC came calling, there was a very good chance they were going to nab him. That kind of power comes as a byproduct of success. Success which coincided with Carroll's arrival.

Look at Alabama before Nick Saban's arrival. They were a middle-of-the-road team in the incredibly competitive Southeastern Conference, still reeling from crippling NCAA sanctions. 2007 was Saban's first year at the helm. By 2009, Alabama were national champions.

Look at Stanford before Jim Harbaugh; the East Dillon Panthers before Eric Taylor...even if the last one is a grasp at fiction, there is no denying the correlation between good coaching and success.

Rick Neuheisel has been at UCLA since 2008. His arrival was widely greeted with optimism, even though UCLA's first choice had been Boise State coach Chris Petersen. Neuheisel was a proven winner--former stints at Colorado and Washington had been largely successful.

But Neuheisel had also proven he could break NCAA rules, as those two programs had both been bunkered down by sanctions imposed after the discovery of violations committed during Neuheisel's tenure.

Optimism reigned nonetheless. UCLA had been practically irrelevant on the collegiate landscape since a near-run to the inaugural BCS Championship game in the 1998 season, where a perfect season was derailed by the Edgerrin James-led Miami Hurricanes in the last game of the regular season (UCLA would go on to lose to Ron Dayne and the Wisconsin Badgers in the Rose Bowl).

Neuheisel's predecessor, the unfailingly polite but questionable-head-coach-material Karl Dorrell, had run the UCLA program into the ground by the team he left after the 2007 season. Dorrell had enjoyed one phenomenal season--in 2005, the Bruins were once more in the running for the national championship, making stirring fourth-quarter comebacks something of a regularity.

Then came the last two games of the season, when an undefeated Bruin team saw its title hopes come crashing down in the last two games of the season, when blowouts delivered by Arizona and USC effectively ended any chance at a national title.

That '05 season, however impressive, seemed far too similar to University of Illinois basketball coach Bruce Weber's 2004-05 season, when Weber had taken a team largely composed of former Illini coach Bill Self's recruits. Weber is a good coach, and he brought those kids to the National Championship. But what has Illinois done since then?

I'm sure Dorrell is a great guy, and his time spent in the NFL testifies to his proficiency as an X's and O's kind of coach. He knows his stuff. But the fact remains (shoutout to Nestor) that he recruited woefully for the majority of his time at the helm of UCLA.

To his testament, he did bring in Maurice Drew (now Maurice Jones-Drew), who would provide a huge impact during his three years in Westwood. But when he declared for the NFL draft following his junior season--which happened to be 2005--it marked the last time UCLA would achieve anything of note under Dorrell.

When Neuheisel arrived in Westwood, the cupboard was about as bare as Colin Cowherd's brain. It was only natural that he would be given a grace period to rebuild UCLA into the power that he declared he could deliver. His time started off with a bang--UCLA won his first game as head coach in a rollicking grind-it-out affair against Tennessee at the Rose Bowl. A signature win, but one that lost some of its luster when it turned out that Tennessee, well, sucked that year.

Nestor rightly acknowledged that Neuheisel lost the first two choices on his depth chart (Ben Olson and Patrick Cowan) during the offseason, thrusting junior college transfer Kevin Craft into the fire. Craft would struggle throughout the season, but to the man's credit, he never quit fighting.

That 2008 edition of UCLA ended 4-8. Inauspicious beginnings, but the UCLA fandom had its endorphins kicking into overdrive on 2009's National Signing Day--the first day that recruits can sign letters of intent--when Neuheisel pulled a stinging recruiting coup, nabbing recruits Randall Carroll and Morrell Presley, who had been USC commitments.

The good vibrations emanating from February's signing day seemed reinforced in the first few games of the 2009 season, during which UCLA traveled to Tennessee and beat the Vols once more, this time at Neyland Stadium.

UCLA was showing signs of progress: sure, they sputtered to a 7-6 record, but this was only Neuheisel's second season, and he'd posted a winning record. Sure, they only earned the the rights to play Temple in the Las Vegas Bowl after Navy blew their chance by losing in their last game of the season, but UCLA beat Temple--a very good team.

Things seemed to be pointing the right direction. Neuheisel amassed another impressive crop of recruits in his 2010 class, one that included the Gatorade High School Player of the Year--running back Malcolm Jones out of Westlake Village, California.

2010 was supposed to be the season that everything came together for UCLA. It was Neuheisel's third year as head coach--the year widely regarded as the litmus test for a coach; ie. he's had three years to recruit and build a program, and should be able to give a good sense of the direction he'll take the program. Case in point: by Pete Carroll's third year, he had USC going anywhere in the nation to play anyone--they spanked national title contender Auburn on the road and finished the regular season 11-1 before defeating Michigan in the Rose Bowl 28-14, earning a share of the national title with LSU.

That same level of success wasn't expected of Neuheisel, but an invite to a top bowl game didn't seem out of the question. Instead, Neuheisel's third season at UCLA began would have made former Bruins basketball coach Steve Lavin proud. The Bruins regressed, instead of progressed.

Doing his best impersonation of the man who once made himself the darling of hair gel companies nationwide, Neuheisel's Bruins defeated Houston (the defensive intensity was rampant--Cougars QB and Heisman contender  Case Keenum was knocked out of the game, effectively derailing his season), and stomped Texas in Austin, 34-6.

The latter result sent shockwaves throughout the country. Any time the ESPN Gameday crew is made to look like fools is a good day--to my knowledge, they have never picked UCLA to win any game. The day of the Texas match-up, they once more gave UCLA no chance, but UCLA went out and did just that, running the ball right down Texas's throat.

At one point during that season, UCLA was 3-2, with two signature victories. UCLA would...not continue their momentum, however, finishing the season once more at 4-8, during which they became an embarrassment to anyone who calls him or herself a Bruin fan. The game against national-title contender Oregon in Eugene was a nightmare typifying the current state of the program.

It wasn't the fact that UCLA lost that game 60-13. It was the fact that the ESPN announcers covering that game referred to UCLA like some tiny school up against an insurmountable opponent. Any time UCLA managed a first down, it was a remarkable achievement. Any time embattled quarterback Richard Brehaut completed a 5-yard pass, it merited praise.

That game encapsulated everything that is wrong with UCLA. The football program is now at the point where mediocrity is the working title. If UCLA football has reached a point where success is an unexpected surprise, rather than the standard, it is time to change.

They are not expected to be able to compete with the top teams in the nation. Top recruits in Southern California don't list UCLA as a school of interest. It's the same downward spiral that previously engulfed Lavin's UCLA tenure. Lavin, who began his time at UCLA bringing in top recruiting classes year-in, year-out, was struggling to nab mid-level prospects by the end of his time in Westwood. Neuheisel's 2011 recruiting class was middling at best. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to realize that his program is now firmly planted on a downslope.

This is unacceptable, and, to my mind, inexplicable. I approach the current predicament of UCLA football much in the same way that Mourinho regards PSG. There is no reason for the program not to thrive.

As Harbaugh proved at Stanford, which has some of the most stringent academic expectations in the nation, success can be managed anywhere. Stanford's unequivocal domination of Virginia Tech in the 2011 Orange Bowl is a fitting testament.

Stanford began its reclamation process with a core of very good players who bought in to the since-departed Harbaugh's vision for Stanford. They weren't deterred by the extent of Stanford's plight before their arrival: players like Andrew Luck came to Stanford hungry to establish it as a national contender. And they have done just that.

UCLA, during the same time, has recruited players like Presley who, while immensely talented, have questionable character. Presley has since left the program after violating team rules.

I could go on for ages--I realize I practically already have--about why I think Neuheisel should be given the boot.  But I'll finish by reinforcing the notion I began with: like PSG, UCLA has too many resources, and too dedicated a fan base, not to succeed.

It's time to find a coach who can lead them back to prominence. After all, if I can lead UCLA to a national title in my first year at the helm in NCAA Football 11, they can certainly manage it in real life. It is too frustrating to see other programs turn themselves around by making the right coaching hires.

I don't think UCLA has done itself justice with the Neuheisel hiring. Hey, if they hired Slick Rick, why not go after Jim Tressel? I heard he's looking for a job.

This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of BruinsNation's (BN) editors. It does reflect the views of this particular fan though, which is as important as the views of BN's editors.

Comment 20 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Nice effort but

Your post is off because it misses a lot of big picture points. You write this:

Dorrell had recruited well to start his tenure, when he brought Maurice Drew (now Maurice Jones-Drew) to Westwood.

Dorrell “recruited wel” to start his tenure? Really? You can look through the extensive archive on this blog and read about how Dorrell’s recruiting was atrocious in his early years and it had a huge role in UCLA football cratering under him. Just getting MJD doesn’t mitigate those facts. His last recruiting class – triggered by “13-9” – was somewhat decent but it didn’t make up for the diastrous recruiting of his first 4-5 years. It played a huge role in Rick inheriting a program in total mess.

You then went on to completely disregard the fact that how Neuheisel lost his starting QB 1a and 1b in his very first spring practice and had to make do with a QB who was supposed to be his insurance plan in his first season.

So, nice effort but it is totally incomplete and this kind of analysis without context is only adding to the toxicity around the program.

I agree that UCLA alums and fans have lot reasons to be concerned. They should be. But over here folks should keep all data points in mind … not just the ones … so one can thread their conveinent personal narratives.

PS: You should edit your post a bit, because it looks like cut and paste from some another blog. Especially when you write this:

So where am I going with this. Well, if you didn’t know, I’m a bit of a UCLA fan. And while I have addressed my views on UCLA basketball with considerable vehemence during the near-six-month run of this blog, I have yet to talk about the current state…er…predicament…of UCLA football.

That’s just sloppy and also tacky.

by Nestor on Jul 24, 2011 8:37 AM PDT reply actions  

Also.

Most of the good recruits under Dorrell were really b/c of Dwayne Walker, our D was decent but our offense really had nothing… How do you not recruit O-Line.

by Bruin'96 on Jul 24, 2011 9:04 PM PDT up reply actions  

Recruiting

By referencing Dorrell’s first official year of recruiting, when he brought in MJD, I was just trying to note how things had started well for him, but, as you correctly put, by the time he was on the way out and Neuheisel on the way in, the cupboard was pretty bare.

I remember UCLA’s QB troubles during that ‘08 year. KC shouldn’t have had to be thrust into a starting role like that, and I will always commend the kid that, no matter how badly things went, he kept his head held high and kept battling.

I don’t judge Neuheisel for that first year. Or his second year. Those are seasons in which he should have been given the reign to build.

I’m upset because of some of the pieces he’s gotten—ie. Presley, and Carroll looks doomed to become the next Terrence Austin—speedy, but lacking the strength to make an impact at the D-I level.

Going into Neuheisel’s fourth season, the program is looking a shambles again. There is talent, yes—I really hope guys like Malcolm Jones see more PT this year. Maybe Brehaut can step up—after all, he was Chow’s pick of the ‘09 QB crop, and he hasn’t shown he can hang as a QB against big-time schools. So I’m worried that, when we once looked to the promise of Brehaut when Craft or Prince was messing up (although Prince’s gritty wins at Rocky Top and in Austin are a testament to his competitiveness), we’re now looking at Hundley. Hopefully he’ll show some promise this year.

I’m basically fed up with another season that seems like irrelevance.

by truebluebruin19 on Jul 24, 2011 9:00 AM PDT reply actions  

So you have given up on this upcoming season?

Is that what you are saying when you end with this line:

I’m basically fed up with another season that seems like irrelevance.

If that is the case dude, then probably not worth for you to hang out here this pre-season. We don’t like quitters here on BN. Try the defeatist shtick somewhere else.

by Nestor on Jul 24, 2011 9:05 AM PDT up reply actions  

Your frustration is not a reason to give up on this season

It is a reason to set reasonable levels of expectations for a U.C.L.A. football program, and then hold those accountable (CRN, DG) to that level. If they fail at that point, then we can give up on them and look in another direction.

greg in denver, U.C.L.A. guy for life - BruinsNation.com

by gbruin on Jul 24, 2011 9:35 AM PDT up reply actions  

That comment

You both are right. That comment was vented out of frustration, and I shouldn’t have put it. I in no way mean to disregard the coming season, and, when it starts, I’ll be ready to root on the Bruins.

These are my first few posts on this site, and I want to make clear that I don’t mean to be one of those negative posters. That’s not my intent. So, I’ll work harder on my posts and try and make them better.

by truebluebruin19 on Jul 24, 2011 9:40 AM PDT up reply actions  

We're all frustrated with what has happened the last few years

and we all turn to the dark side from time to time. We all see many of the same issues as you, but we’re just trying to put things in context here. Our coaching staff and roster are set for this season, and now all we can do is support them going forward. We’ll definitely evaluate things as we go along, but we will always be rooting for Bruin success.

greg in denver, U.C.L.A. guy for life - BruinsNation.com

by gbruin on Jul 24, 2011 9:48 AM PDT up reply actions  

Sounds good to me trueblue

One thing to note – and this is not just for you. When folks post here we often challenge them to look at the big picture and argue with facts. It is often difficult to convey the “right tone” on the internets. Emoticons can only help so much. So it’s easy to read comments often as abrasive even though that’s not the intent.

I was just challenging you to be more polished in your thinking out process. You clearly love writing about UCLA sports, which is really cool. So I hope the back and forth will encourage you to keep working on your writing.

Thanks for engaging this way. Keep it up.

by Nestor on Jul 24, 2011 9:57 AM PDT up reply actions  

+1

90% of the post was really good…. I wouldn’t call the one good Dorrell year spectacular either.

by Bruin'96 on Jul 24, 2011 9:07 PM PDT up reply actions  

There are so many factors involved to simply look at the 3 year mark.

As Nestor mentioned, we had to go to Craft for CRN’s first season, a QB that was only supposed to provide depth. Ridiculous amounts of injuries on an already talent-depleted O-line (as a result of Dorrell’s wonderful recruiting that you mentioned-btw, if you look back at his recruiting just based on stars and location, he pulled in mostly 2-stars, a few 3, and most were outside of the LA area- that’s bad recruiting any day of the week). Add to this, he was saddled with a coaching staff that he didn’t choose. This is a pretty difficult situation. Now this doesn’t excuse him, because some of these things were under his control (although maybe he had to hire Bullough because Dan G wouldn’t shell out any $$ for at least a JV coach who knew what he was doing).

I think the frustration lies in the fact that most of us have no idea what to expect from our team this year. I don’t think any of the previous 3 years have anything to do with the product that we will see this year, good or bad. It seems that, because of the all of the strangeness that has surrounded this program the last 3 years, we have no real data points to go off of. But I can’t wait to see what our boys and CRN have to offer this year. It should be interesting.

formerly Westwood78

by PhoenixBruin on Jul 24, 2011 9:03 AM PDT reply actions  

Good Point

I’m right with Phoenix when he says that we don’t really know what to expect from the Bruins this year. And Nestor, I’m not going to sit here and root against UCLA, I’m just upset at how things are going. I do realize that writing off a season before it begins is stupid, and that’s not what I’m trying to do.

I am excited to see what some of the young kids can do this year—to his credit, Neuheisel’s first two recruiting classes (discounting ‘08, when he had to play management with most of Dorrell’s recruits) were among the best in the nation.

I’m no quitter. I just want to see the Bruins succeed. And, to be honest, that Oregon thrashing is still a bitter taste for me. So, I will definitely try to be more positive, but I’m coming from frustration. So, yeah, some of those points in my article may seem defeatist, but that’s not my intent. I merely want to see the Bruins succeed.

by truebluebruin19 on Jul 24, 2011 9:16 AM PDT reply actions  

Thanks for the post

I echo Nestor’s comments in terms of the substance, but it’s good that people are engaging and discussing. Keep posting and keep coming back to BN.

P.S. You realize you’re facing a long road ahead in terms of credibility with Nestor and I by putting up points re: Arsenal. Especially since we’re both big fans of United, SAF, and, of course, Wazza and Vida. After all, he’s Serbian: he’ll f**king murder you (especially you Cesc). ;)

by Bellerophon on Jul 24, 2011 2:47 PM PDT reply actions  

United fans?

Yeesh. Go Blues.

"Every day was a good day at UCLA." -Coach John Wooden

by OswegoBruin on Jul 25, 2011 12:23 PM PDT up reply actions  

Hahaha

As that guy in the IRS building from the Simpsons would say, “Oh boo yourself.”

"Every day was a good day at UCLA." -Coach John Wooden

by OswegoBruin on Jul 25, 2011 1:03 PM PDT up reply actions  

And your last paragraph

is really quite unnecessary. CRN has never done anything remotely close to what Tressel did at OSU.

But hey, what do I know. I’m just the 800 lbs bruin in the room.

by tasser10 on Jul 25, 2011 10:24 AM PDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Bruins Nation, an unofficial daily online scrap book covering the greatest collegiate athletic program in the nation. Established June 16, 2005. GO BRUINS.

Managers

Uclabear1_small Nestor

Arron_afflalo1_small Tydides

Brad_pitt_as_achilles_small Achilles

377011_2642084725867_1068030137_32302525_1166539782_n_small Ryan Rosenblatt

Telemachus_small Telemachus

Licenseplate_small gbruin

2761_small tasser10

Blue_bellerophon_small Bellerophon

Img_0052_2_small Patroclus

Small DCBruins

Of Counsels

094_small Ajax

Menelaus2_small Menelaus

Small Meriones

Small Odysseus

Associates

Eee_small freesia39

Uclabruins_small AHMB