[UPDATE x3] The Pac-12 Network Is Born - Time Warner/Comcast/Cox Partnering With The Pac
Never let it be said that Larry Scott does not know how to leverage the marketing opportunities of his conference. While the Pac-12 coaches were hanging out at ESPN's Bristol, CT headquarters for day 2 of their media tour, Scott was in New York finalizing the deal for the creation and programming of the Pac-12 network. Commissioner Scott is set to make the official announcement in just a moment, but Jon Wilner has broken some of the key details via his Twitter. Some of the early key details:
- Pac-12 announcing creation of six regional networks and one national network.
- The network will debut in August 2012 to a nationwide audience (Wilner shares an estimate that the national Pac-12 network will reach 40 million households at its time of launch).
- The Pac-12 Cable partners are Time Warner Cable, Comcast, Cox and Bright House.
- Pac-12 Networks available "on any device so long as fans authenticated".
- As Wilner noted in one of his Twitter posts, the conference will retain full equity rights to the networks. This is a really big deal for the long-term financials for UCLA and the other schools of the conference.
Wilner has been all over the conference network since it's intended creation came out of last year's conference expansion talks. After hearing during yesterday's media event that details on the network-to-be were likely to be firmed up in August, he broke the news of this afternoon's announcement earlier this morning on his Mercury News blog, even making the correct guess of Time Warner as the conference's key media partner, despite Scott's public meetings with Fox Sports brass. We'll be updating as more information on the deal comes to light.
UPDATE (N): One of the cool things about Pac 12 owning and controlling the network is that it is potentially really good news all the Pac 12 non-revenue programs that have been so successful for the conference over the years.
UPDATE II (P): Today's announcement deals only with the cable television rights to Pac-12 sports and the network. Satellite TV operators were not part of this round of negotiations, but during the Q&A following the announcement, Scott did say that he looks forward to conversations with satellite operators to add to the conference's cable partnerships.
The New York Times has published a story with details on the seven (yes, seven!) new Pac-12 networks:
There will be a network for each of the six regions that have two schools: Washington, Oregon, Northern and Southern California, Arizona and Mountain. All will carry national programming, including 35 football games, more than 100 men’s basketball games and 40 women’s basketball games, as well as the Olympic sports at each school that traditionally have gotten little or no television exposure.
The regional networks will be carried locally, within their geographically proscribed areas, on basic and digital cable, and the national network will be shown on sports tiers that require an extra fee.
As it stands now, the Pac-12 will have networks for each region/traditional rivalry pair of the conference that will be carried in their respective home markets, as well as a main Pac-12 network that will be carried nationwide by Brighthouse, Comcast, Cox, and Time Warner Cable, albeit as part of their added sports package, such as (presumably) Comcast's Sports Entertainment Pack. And as I wrote that, Wilner just tweeted that Comcast will carry the Pac-12 network in Northern California as part of its basic digital cable package.
Scott's remark bulleted above stating that the network will be available on any authenticated device looks to point to the network being available as part of the streaming packages that the cable operators are beginning to offer, and/or presented by other streaming services in the future.
UPDATE III (N): As noted by P in the comment threads, Wilner tweeted about the possibility of the Pac-12 network looking into Spanish a version of the network, at least for LA/SoCal. Just awesome.
21 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
For those of us who have Direct TV ...
I assume DTV will have to make a deal with TW/Comcast to carry the network — the way they do the Fox and Prime Ticket channels.
I can’t imagine it will be exclusively for TW and Comcast subscribers.
It looks like these six partners
are just so ensure that the network is in a lot of homes. Now the conference has leverage to negotiate with the rest of the cable and satellite companies. I’d be shocked if it wasn’t on the rest of the carriers.
Two roads diverged in a wood and I – I tweeted my followers to ask which I should take
by Ryan Rosenblatt on Jul 27, 2011 2:27 PM PDT up reply actions
That seems like a reasonable speculation
Good news for us who live in Comcast territory in the East. :-)
Scott just addressed that in the Q&A
DTV etc were not part of this negotiation, but he is open to working with them to carry the networks – does not seem like a cable exclusive, at least medium-long term
formerly bruinhoo
My only concern here
is whether or not these regional networks will be available outside of their region. What if you’re up in Seattle or the Bay Area. Will you be able to get Pac-12 Southern California or will you have to go online and see it there? How about those who live outside the Pac-12 footprint? Will they have the opportunity to watch these regional networks too or will they only get the national one?
Two roads diverged in a wood and I – I tweeted my followers to ask which I should take
by Ryan Rosenblatt on Jul 27, 2011 2:29 PM PDT reply actions
It looks as if it'll be the same as the Fox Sports Channels.
If you are in the bay area, you will only get the Northern CA Pac 12 channel with basic cable. If you want all of the rest or are outside of the Pac 12 footprint, you will step up to the $12ish Sports tier package to get all of the networks.
formerly Westwood78
by PhoenixBruin on Jul 27, 2011 3:52 PM PDT up reply actions
Could see high school sports on the network too
“”http://espn.go.com/blog/big12/post/_/id/31007/texas-can-rule-out-future-pac-12-membership" target="new">Scott also said he’s watching the Longhorn Network’s progress with the prospect of televising high school games, saying that if it’s officially given permission by the NCAA, the Pac-12 Network will broadcast high school games as soon as the network goes live."
Two roads diverged in a wood and I – I tweeted my followers to ask which I should take
by Ryan Rosenblatt on Jul 27, 2011 2:34 PM PDT reply actions
That didn't go well. Try again
“Scott also said he’s watching the Longhorn Network’s progress with the prospect of televising high school games, saying that if it’s officially given permission by the NCAA, the Pac-12 Network will broadcast high school games as soon as the network goes live.”
http://espn.go.com/blog/big12/post/_/id/31007/texas-can-rule-out-future-pac-12-membership
Two roads diverged in a wood and I – I tweeted my followers to ask which I should take
by Ryan Rosenblatt on Jul 27, 2011 2:35 PM PDT up reply actions
So, if I am a part of the Southern California network
I have to still have a bunch of crappy U$C games? I’d rather watch the Kardashians or Mob Wives.
"Every day was a good day at UCLA." -Coach John Wooden
The national network will have all the football games not carried by ABC/ESPN, it seems
and most, if not all of the remaining men’s BBall games at least. As far as the non-revenue sports, yeah, it seems you are screwed with that…
formerly bruinhoo
It's hard to really quantify how I feel about those shows
The Kardashians are just utter fame whores, and the only “successful” one is Kim, who is famous for having a sextape. I just don’t understand that. 3 rich sisters and a rich mom, all trying to “make it”, but they’re already rich, and the only reason anyone… whatever, that show makes me want to jump off a bridge.
"Every day was a good day at UCLA." -Coach John Wooden
Scoot over. Leave room for me.
I agree with you 100%. When people care more about Chloe than about our national debt, health care reform, global warming, famine and genocide in Africa, terrorism, Norway, the European economic crisis, and Japan’s disaster put together, it tells you where we are headed.
Those 3 are a marker for the decline of society. And I don’t blame the seller (the K’s) as much as I blame the user (the viewers).
greg in denver, U.C.L.A. guy for life - BruinsNation.com
I blame both.
If it weren’t so profitable to be a fame whore, there would be fewer fame whores. I believe the relentless marketing of said famewhores, in a world of 24/7 news, AKA 23.5 hours of gossip per day, means that no matter how many people hate them, Sheen, the Kardashians, Basketball wives, all these people will keep showing up. Artificially-created hype is still hype.
"Every day was a good day at UCLA." -Coach John Wooden
Nothing like marketing telling us what we should be staring at.
How come only the Morgan Center is exempt from this sort of thinking?
greg in denver, U.C.L.A. guy for life - BruinsNation.com
Don't ask me.
It’s like the Morgan Center is the Island from Lost.
"Every day was a good day at UCLA." -Coach John Wooden
by OswegoBruin on Jul 28, 2011 10:39 PM PDT up reply actions
Wilner now tweeting the possibility of a spanish-language Pac-12 channel
at least for LA
formerly bruinhoo
This is really great
Again kudos to Scott for this. I have reservations on his leadership wrt to handling ethical transgressions in our conference. But in this area, so far so really really good.
I know you guys answered it before
But I never saw a clear answer. But is it going to be available for Direct TV
dunno if this was added after you read it...
UPDATE II (P): Today’s announcement deals only with the Cable Television rights to Pac-12 sports and the network. Satellite TV operators were not part of this round of negotiations, but during the Q&A following the announcement, Scott did say that he looks forward to conversations with satellite operators to add to the conference’s cable partnerships.
Roses are red, violets are blue...f*** $C.




















