CRN: A Coach With A Losing Record (For Now) But Man of Real Honor
This following was my lengthy comment in response to gbruin's excellent post "What Price To Win? Integrity, Hypocrisy, and The Gray Area" which raised the issue of the costs of CRN's decision to bar Josh Shirley, Paul Richardson and Shaquille Richardson from playing last year after they stole a coed's laptop. All three of the ex-Bruins are now impact players at their respective schools. Nestor suggested I Fanpost my views. They follow:
I have enormous respect for CRN.
And the biggest reason is he has clearly learned from his mistakes. He acted poorly at Colorado and UWub. Poorly. He was not "Slick Rick" nor "Tricky Rick." He was a cheat who spoke and acted out of both sides of his mouth. When DG hired him, my heart (True Blue in color) was troubled. I was hopeful he would win (he has not), but I feared a coach whose ethical guru seemed to be the likes of Bugsy Malone would only dishonor UCLA. I was clearly wrong on this latter count. He has in fact honored our school with his teaching and leadership. And a woman or man who learns from her or his mistakes, well, they are special folks in my book.
Three last points, the first for which I will receive unmitigated heat from some worshipers at this beloved site. The first final point, Dan Guerrero gets much of the credit for the ethical side of the CRN hiring decision. DG must accept responsibility for: bureaucrats who try to foist weak minded misleading press releases ala, the students preferred to sit in lousy seats rather than the best ones in the house, on some of the smartest fans on the face of the Earth; the loss of a top of the line women’s hoops coach to Baton Rouge, the ultimate backwoods vacation destination for swamp aficionados (Nikki, what were you thinking?); and hiring Karl Dorrell, who it turns out could not recruit at all. But one thing is clear—since the December 2002 hiring of Coach Dorrell by Dan Guerrero, unlike southern cal, Miami, Ohio State, Auburn, Ole Miss, Tennessee, and Oregon, to name but a few, UCLA has run a by the book ethical football program and the athletic director must get some of the credit. (I am pleased to take the heat on this point. A kid down the street just got back from Afghanistan, and he is willing to let me wear his Kevlar, so fire away.)
Next final point. It takes a lot of Courage to admit you have behaved unethically. That’s right, Courage, with a capital C. CRN obviously possesses that kind of Courage; it has become part of his character. I admire him for many reasons and one of them is his willingness to address the fans after the games; even ones where we have performed poorly. It takes a lot of guts to stand up and speak your piece when you know you will be booed. CRN is willing to take the heat. The Courage to admit you are wrong and to change on one hand, and, on the other hand, to step up after that southern cal disaster last fall and admit failure involve different issues, character traits and fears, but they are related—they a born of Courage.
Last final point. The people who rag on CRN for what happened in what amounts to another life, well, they: are more morally flawed than most of us; lack the motivation to get the facts, that is learn the truth; or they are consumed by partisan fan driven myopia.
Rick, let’s fight the fight and win. Go Bruins!
This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of BruinsNation's (BN) editors. It does reflect the views of this particular fan though, which is as important as the views of BN's editors.
8 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
great points all
But it’s not impossible to win with honor. This, imo, is CRN’s last season to prove he can do that…
gotta say I lost a little respect
when I heard he wanted the university to create easier majors to make it easier for football players to remain eligible. I am as proud of the academic standards – and no ballroom dancing classes for 5th year seniors as their only credit etc – as the ethical standards. Neither should be compromised in search of success.
Knock off these troll like comments.
Neuheisel did not suggest “easier” majors. His point was that UCLA should be open to having academic curriculum that would be useful to our athletes in real life. For ie it would make sense to develop a sports business oriented majors for our athletes so they can thrive in this industry after college. This is not calling for “easier” majors per se.
Getting tired of your trolling in the comment threads which are often nothing but backdoor attacks on the coaching staff. If you are not going to add anything more to this community than these kinds of contributions then knock it off and find some message board to troll around in. No one will miss you. Thanks.
maybe we're talking about different things?
I was referring to this BN fanpost
http://www.bruinsnation.com/2011/7/11/2269867/a-major-problem-with-athletics-at-ucla
The bigger challenge according to CRN, was once kids got to UCLA. The academic rigors at UCLA made it extremely unfair on our athletes compared to what athletes experience at other schools. The time spent keeping kids on track academically who were part of the football program negatively impact the time spent, lifting, studying the playbook, working improving their football skills both formally (during the season) and informally (during the off season).
In particular, CRN pointed to Michigan. He indicated that when Lloyd Carr negotiated his contract with Michigan he asked for, and the university implemented, a major in Education. Many of the elite athletes that attend Michigan now select this major, which isn’t very rigorous and apparently gives them the time needed to succeed on the field while not worrying about failing in the classroom. According to CRN, this was something he hoped to try and start while he was at UCLA.
I haven’t read about CRN looking to create an academic curriculum that would be more useful to our athletes in real life – could you post the link? I am strongly in favor of UCLA using academics as an advantage in recruiting (rather than just seeing it as a disadvantage for getting people in), and if CRN is looking to do this I think it’s a great idea. The Anderson school is one of the jewels in the crown, so this is certainly something to leverage.
Even better – imagine 5 year guys pushing through their undergrad requirements in 3 years (like PAA) and then getting their MBA! That would be an incredible opportunity for anyone.
Whoa. "Easier" doesn't mean mean low standards
E.g. there’s a perception that physical science majors are harder than other majors. A lot of this stems from scientists often being poor communicators & teachers so science students have to teach themselves (which may be a good thing if they want to become scientists). Most science classes also seem to have the problem of homework: the biggest hurdle is figuring out what you’re supposed to be doing. Also, science majors tend to have time-consuming lab classes – which sometimes change schedule during the term. So few athletes major in the physical sciences.
So having majors which have teachers who know how to teach, let the students know what is expected (ie. remove all the head-games) and have few classes which suck up 20+ hrs in a week would serve athletes well. Now, certainly, you could say “Well, there’s nothing stopping the English dept from providing that service.” but the English dept is here already – they are entrenched in their ways and are not going to change to accomodate athlete’s schedules. If you want to have a major which teaches without wasting student’s time with “wild goose chases” you’ll have to create it from scratch.
by KnudsenRockne on Aug 22, 2011 10:27 AM PDT up reply actions
Senora Ross and her Trade Tech colleagues have solved this entire problem
By allowing less intellectually talented football players to take classes at the Trade Tech feeder campus located on Figueroa.
by peggysue69 on Aug 22, 2011 11:05 AM PDT via mobile up reply actions
just going on the report from BaldEagle (quoted above)
and, if the problem is bad teaching at UCLA, then that’s a UCLA academic problem, not a UCLA athletics problem.
Further – athletes get much more significant academic guidance than other students, which can include (but is not limited to) steering people towards those classes which have “teachers who know how to teach, let the students know what is expected (ie. remove all the head-games) and have few classes which suck up 20+ hrs in a week”. But that isn’t what I was referring to in any case.
by VeniceBruin on Aug 22, 2011 12:24 PM PDT up reply actions

by 


















