Dan Guerrero Cannot Be Allowed to Make Another Bad Hire for UCLA Football
Dan Guerrero took over as UCLA Athletic Director in 2002. How have the Bruins done in that time period?
2002 8-5
2003 6-7
2004 6-6
2005 10-2
2006 7-6
2007 6-7
2008 4-8
2009 7-6
2010 4-8
In the 9 completed years of Dan Guerrero's reign of error, (not including the 1-2 record through the first three games of 2011), UCLA football is 55-55, a .500 winning percentage. UCLA Football has not won a conference championship during this period. During this period, UCLA has not played in any BCS-level bowls and bowl results are Las Vegas Bowl (W), Silicon Valley Bowl (L), Las Vegas Bowl (L), Sun Bowl (W), Emerald Bowl (L), Las Vegas Bowl (L), Eagle Bank Bowl (W).
The much-maligned Peter Dalis was the AD for 19 years, from 1983 to 2002. UCLA won 1 NCAA Mens's Basketball championship. The football team was 170-97-4 (.634) and won or shared conference championships in 1982, 1983, 1985, 1987, 1993, 1997 and 1998, and played in numerous bowls, including 5 Rose Bowls and the Fiesta Bowl.
J.D. Morgan was the AD from 1963-1979. UCLA won 10 NCAA Men's Basketball championships during that period and the football team was 103-69-9 (.632). During this time, the team won or shared conference championships in 1965, 1975 and played in 2 Rose Bowls and the Fiesta Bowl.
For comparison, UCLA Football's all-time record is 542-379-37 (.588). Dan Guerrero's winning percentage is clearly significantly below the UCLA historical baseline. With no football conference championships, no BCS-level bowl appearances and declining attendance, it seems clear that Dan Guerrero has significantly mismanaged the UCLA football program.
We have detailed repeatedly that football is the lifeblood of any large athletic department. Continuing decline in the football program is simply not an option. Dan Guerrero has already fired two football coaches. He has hired two football coaches. It seems obvious that he cannot be allowed to hire another football coach because if history is any indication, he simply cannot do a competent job of hiring football coaches.
This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of BruinsNation's (BN) editors. It does reflect the views of this particular fan though, which is as important as the views of BN's editors.
10 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Anyone have connections
to create an NCAA job for him? Now??
Roses are red, violets are blue...f*** $C.
does the overall FB record
include the record under DG? If so, that is bringing down the average…it would be best to look at the overall average before him and look at how he’s brought that down.
487-322-37
or .602, before Guerrero.
But hey, what do I know. I’m just the 800 lbs bruin in the room.
The worst part of that .500 record
is that it includes an over-achieving 10-win team from 2005. But for that he would be looking at a losing football record over the last 9 seasons. Unacceptable.
Agree DG needs to go before CRN
Can’t have him pick another gem.
Guerrerror was brought in to fire Toledo.
He replaced Toledo with Dorrell. He then fired Dorrell for not getting the job done. He hired Neuheisel to replace Dorrell. Neuheisel has done worse than Dorrell. He is clearly not qualified to lead this Athletic Director.
Gene Block, it is time to bring in a new AD to fire Neuheisel and hire the right man for the job.
The best thing you can do for your children is to love their mother. John Wooden
*Department
not Director
The best thing you can do for your children is to love their mother. John Wooden
Just remember this
He’s overwatched the worst 4 year stretch of UCLA football in history.
"A legend is an old man with a cane known for what he used to do. I'm still doing it." Miles Davis

by 


















