Spaulding Roundup: Brehaut's Progression And Neuheisel's Philosophy
The Bruins held a less-physically demanding practice than usual on Thursday, working out in shorts and shoulder pads in working on their final preparation for the trip up to the Farm on Saturday. A balance of practicing for a physical opponent with the rash of injuries in recent days, I suppose. There was a heightened focus on special teams and also on the red zone offense during the session, though not all the drills went as hoped:
The two-minute drill at the end of practice wasn't exactly smooth. On the first play, safety Stan McKay intercepted a Brehaut pass. They started over and Johnathan Franklin got stuffed for no gain follwed by consecutive dropped passes by Shaquelle Evans and Franklin. Brehaut then connected with Taylor Embree for 30 yards on fourth and 10, setting up a 35-yard field goal by Jeff Locke, which he made.
If nothing else, Richard Brehaut was able to complete a long pass, and Locke did hit the field goal. Speaking of Richard, Coach Neuheisel spoke of how much he had progressed over the past few weeks at running the offense, and how Brehaut has the ability to become a top Quarterback.
"He’s come a long way," Neuheisel said. "There are some things that we discover all the time that are in his head that aren’t exactly correct, so we got to get those weeded out. But as long as we have open lines of communication, which has been the case, we’re going to get those things discovered and I think he’s going to be terrific."
Richard talked to the media a bit as well, discussing the growth in his game as well as his areas of improvement.
"I’ve always believed I’m a great quarterback," he said. "From training camp until now, I think I’ve made tremendous growth in terms of recognizing defenses and how that parlays into coverages, being able to be that quarterback that’s able to see things before they happen. I have to do that on an every down basis. That’s something I can get extremely better at.
"I’ve always been blessed physically. I don’t think that’s ever been my problem. I think it’s always been the mental aspect. That’s what I’m putting all my effort in. everything I’m concentrating on is that aspect of my game."
On injury news, Sheldon Price, Dalton Hilliard and Alec Mascarenas are questionable for Saturday, currently considered game-time decisions. Andrew Abbott is expected to return to action, and Jamie Graham should be ready to make his UCLA debut after having returned to practice earlier in the week.
Tasser write a post earlier in the week looking at the shift to a power-running offensive philosophy that Coach Neuheisel has implemented over the past two seasons. The LA Times contrasted the new philosophy with that of one of his earlier teams at the University of Washington that was a pure-air it out team. Neu was quoted as saying that the struggles of that UW team demonstrated to him the need for a balanced offense. With that said, he feels less of a concern with leaning on the running game when it is the focus of the offense than when the team relies on throwing the ball.
"When you're leaning heavily on the run, it becomes obvious that you need to throw by the situation," Neuheisel said. "If you're able to continue to stay on the field with the run, you can control games."
There certainly is a valid point here; if the running game is working well enough, you don't need to throw the ball very much - just enough to keep the defense honest and/or try for a few longer gains per game. The question is whether UCLA's running game is that effective. Paul Johnson's offense at Georgia Tech (and at the Naval Academy prior to that) has been successful using that basic model, as have a few other teams in D-1, but as Jon Gold noted in his Daily News blog Q&A, UCLA's implementation of the pistol has not reached that level of effectiveness.
Forget that UCLA ranks 28th nationally in rushing yards. The Bruins rank 59th in total offense and 74th in scoring offense. Teams with dominant running games - Georgia Tech, Air Force, Nevada, etc. - average more than 260 rushing yards. UCLA averages 214 and has scratched and clawed for each of them.
One thing to keep in mind with the above figures is that the scoring offense rating is affected by the pace of the game, or the number of possessions that each team has. Part of this season's offensive strategy is based on the goal of reducing the total number of possessions in order to protect the defense, and as a result is going to depress the number of scores, no matter how well the team executes. Nevertheless, the other teams cited have not have problems racking up yards and points with their option and run-focused attacks. The Bruins have a quite good running game, with a couple of running backs that will make it to the next level. But, at this point it is not good enough to leave aside the passing attack as a rarely used diversion. Neu told the Times that he is concerned with becoming too one-dimensional, and has the team working on more play-action sets, but after the play distribution that accompanied Oregon State's near-comeback last weekend,
Peter Yoon wrote a piece on Jeff Baca's faster than expected return to action, and into the starting lineup. The impending matchup against Andrew Luck was a popular subject of discussion for the beat writers, with Peter Yoon, Adam Maya and Jon Gold all taking the topic on yesterday. Short version - Luck is a great quarterback with solid mobility who elevates the play of his teammates, and will be difficult for the UCLA defense to contain. Gold noted some improvement in the play of the Defensive Line in the Oregon State game, having accumulated 6 TFL's and helping to hold the Beavers to 88 yards rushing. He notes the emergence of Iuta Tepa in the defensive end rotation, but also the need for players to better follow their fundamentals and take advantage of opportunities.
21 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
"...the goal of reducing the total number of possessions in order to protect the defense, .... "
Did anyone expect this to be a goal this year?
I thought that with the talent we have on D and the new DC that the D would be the foundation of this team. That it would be solid. And, that the success of the team would be measured by how fast the O could get to the level of the D.
It wasn’t until we rolled our our soft scheme against Houston AND did not abandon it that I realized that our D was not going to be the key to a successful season.
So, now, we manipulate our O to keep our D off the field — which, if you buy into the rhetoric, means not using some very fast and talented receivers or taking the “risks” of throwing the ball.
sjh
We ranked 59th in Running Offense
Our running game is actually better than what the ranking shows because our defense is so bad and the defense spent a lot of time on the field which directly affect the total running yardage.
On Brehaut's progression
"When I was a boy of fourteen, my father was so ignorant I could hardly stand to have the old man around. But when I got to be twenty-one, I was astonished by how much he’d learned in seven years. —Mark Twain"
Maybe some of the learning has taken place in the teacher, as well as in the student?
But, this quote is intended for levity, not criticism. If Coach Neuheisel thinks that RB needs to be sharper in the mental aspects of QBing, a point to which RB agrees, then I’m all for the emphasis.
OSU game
I finally had the chance to watch that game, though I limited myself to the first half.
If you want to know what is wrong with this team, watch that half and focus on no. 42 on defense and special teams. He is often out of position and gets pushed around and pushed aside without so much of a protest. Then you go and see that 42 is in fact Patrick Larimore, our middle linebacker. I don’t know if his injury last year took something away from him…but as the “QB” of the defense, it doesn’t bode well…really, when was the last time you heard his name called on a play? I’m not trying to single him out, and perhaps it was just this game, but I don’t like what I’m seeing at all.
But hey, what do I know. I’m just the 800 lbs bruin in the room.
agreed #42 Larimore was struggling out there
most memorable play to me was the screen down the middle of the field where Larimore was completely off-balance the whole play and ended up falling over himself after the OSU receiver gave him a soft shove. There were other plays where both he and Westgate had trouble shedding blocks, took the wrong angle, or were repeatedly confused in coverage (that Westgate pick was as much a terrible QB decision as it was a nice play).
Hopefully it’s just a matter of conditioning and getting comfortable with the scheme. Right now our LB corps is a mess…
Larimore
He was horrible against Stanford last year. Stanford had him out of position all game long. Hopefully, that doesn’t happen again.
by bornagainbruin on Sep 30, 2011 6:16 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions
I agree with you
Larimore was looking like a beast before his injury last year; but along with Datone Jones, it seems he is one of the players from whom we were expecting much more. In fact, our linebacking corps as a whole has been pretty underwhelming in positioning and tackling; hope Coach Lea gets them playing up to their talent level presently.
by VeniceBruin on Sep 30, 2011 11:22 AM PDT up reply actions
"Huge Opportunty" "All hands on deck" "We're aiming to win" "We're looking forward"
“We’ve got a few surprises” “We have a lot of pride” “It’s gonna be a battle” “It’ll be our best game”
Sadly, I didn’t see a lot (any) of that outta the Bruin camp this week. C’mon.
We can’t just can’t be lambs going to slaughter. If that’s the case, why even play? Why watch? Please help me find some of the positive quotes that came from Rick and/or some of the players this week. It’s feeling like a massacre to me, and I don’t like it. Rick has no Steve Lavin spirit, and won’t get up for at least the biggest games on the schedule? (Umm, I know we have some injuries. But I also know we have 100 guys on this squad, and every position is at least 2 deep, if not more. Surely, there are 50 guys who can travel that are mentally ready to do something).
U-C-L-A Fight, Fight, Fight! Go Bruins!
Go Lakers! Go Dodgers! Go Angels!
I don't care much about what RN says
I care about how the team plays.
Unlike most people, I think we can win this game IF our coaches put the players in a position to win AND the players leave it all on the field.
I’m less concerned with the players; I think they will be up for the game and will deliver. My concern, all season, has been with the coaches. I wonder who gives them pep talks and fires them up.
sjh
by Class of 66 on Sep 30, 2011 10:13 AM PDT up reply actions
You Never Know - That's For Sure
If they come out FOCUSED and play a relatively mistake-free game stranger things have happened.
Los Angeles Rams and the UCLA Bruins!!!!!
by Minnesota Bruinfan on Sep 30, 2011 10:48 AM PDT up reply actions
we would need a 13-9 type of day
…on the road. Not happening.
by Strathmore&Gayley on Sep 30, 2011 5:07 PM PDT up reply actions
The only thing
I hate about this power run philosophy, is that it’s becoming to predictable. It’s almost always two runs and then a pass. Almost every series starts like that, and it worries me because if I’m able to see it, I’m sure as hell the opposing teams DC could see it too.
Well, everything Neuheisel said
makes perfect sense to me, and is worthy of greater respect than a lot of smack that can only end up on the other team’s bulletin board. As for “pulling out the stops,” and other such dicta, read what Patroclus reported about the two-minute drill. Of course, we need variety, a surprise or two or three, some long balls, some slants, etc., etc. But coach is right to say the situation dictates. Stanford runs a balanced attack, based on the running game, but when they pass, they execute. And that is the pattern we should be developing, and the one I believe we are trying to develop. But no coach can execute any play or sequence of plays. Forgive me for not excoriating our staff as a bunch of spineless, unimaginative, incompetent fools. I can’t argue that their record is impressive, because it isn’t, but my God, consider last year’s injuries, if nothing else. And now the secondary is banged up. That will almost certainly be a factor. In fact, there is no logical reason to be found in any data to believe that we can beat Stanford even if we play our best. But as fans, we have to believe and urge the team to put up a fight. I believe they will. They, and we, must believe that an upset is possible and go for it. If we do win, it will be first because the running game was successful, and secondly because we executed the passing game at the right times.
Neuheisel's philosophy appears to be . . .
keep the game plan as simple as possible so the guys won’t screw up. Bend, don’t break. Punt outside the 35. Field goals make it appear we are succeeding, even when we are losing, so go for them whenever it is 4th down and we’re close.
In other words, Neuheisel doesn’t trust his players and that lack of trust is reciprocated by players who don’t trust Neuheisel or the game plan.
WYSIWYG
I suddenly got so inspired by that style of play
that I sat in a chair and stared at the wall for five minutes.
But hey, what do I know. I’m just the 800 lbs bruin in the room.
what RN says
“There are some things that we discover all the time that are in his head that aren’t exactly correct, so we got to get those weeded out.
Weed in his head? Was RB that poorly coached in the past? But then again, we haven’t hired a legendary football coach in a long time either.
OT -- BN Very Slow to Load
I’ve tried on three browsers and all of the other sites I visit load normally. BN has been very slow for at least a week.
Anyone else have the same problem? Is it a way to get us to focus on the background ads?
sjh
Two minute offense drills....
….wouldn’t get too excited about this, except the dropped passes….remember the defense KNOWS the plays that are likely coming, and even though they are coached to try and play it straight up, often defensive players will jump in and make a play to get the coaches attention…..can’t blame them, they are fighting for jobs as well…..
…..I’m more interested in whether the plays got in cleanly without any timeouts or delay of game penalties, did the right players for the called formation get on the field, did everyone get the play call and did they snap the ball without any false starts or illegal formation penalties ? The most frustrating part of watching UCLA is not the lack of execution, but how the team robs itself of even the chance to make plays through a lack of focus and discipline…….






















