Pregame Guesses: Stanford Cardinal Edition
Does anyone else think it's funny that Bruins Nation is brought to you today by Old Spice Swagger?
Maybe if we sprayed it all of the team right before they take the field in Palo Alto tomorrow, they'll at least smell like Swagger, since they don't play with any.
Anyway ...
Last season, I killed the Pregame Guesses column going into the Stanford game. I wrote the post -- then read it -- and it read more like a suicide note than a fun little game to pass the time the evening before kickoff. Then we went out and lost 35-0 at home. This year, I'm not even despondent. I'm not even worrying about the game tomorrow. This feels more like a bye week than a match-up with a Top 5 team. When I read that Sheldon Price might not play against the Cardinal, I didn't even blink. My first thought wasn't "Oh man, that's too bad. We're really going to need Sheldon against Andrew Luck." No, my first thought was "If Sheldon was going to miss a game, it might as well be Stanford, because it isn't going to make much difference one way or the other."
The reality is, we're three touchdown dogs against Stanford. I saw a funny post on Tracy Pierson's BRO message board the other day that said something like "Hey, I just dropped in from the 80s, does Stanford have any shot against us tomorrow?" That made me chuckle a little (or, as we say in 2011 -- it made me LOL). Because if you had interrupted me while I was mocking Iowa fans as we were walking out of the Rose Bowl on January 1, 1986 I would have assumed you were more wasted than I was. Three score dogs to Stanford? In what century.
Well, this century.
Give Stanford all the credit. They draw worse than we do (though 45,000 fans in their 50,000 seat stadium looks a lot better than 45,000 fans look in the Rose Bowl). They went out and hired the right coach (JIm Harbaugh, now with the San Francisco 49ers) and he changed the whole Cardinal football paradigm. He didn't do it with a tricky, fast break offense (they basically play a pro-set) and he didn't jump start the program with a bunch of JC transfers (Stanford is the one team in the nation we can't accuse of taking the players we can't admit).
No, he did it by instilling an attitude of toughness and determination. He did it by changing the atmosphere and approach of Stanford football.
What Harbaugh did was give the Cardinal some swagger.
(See how I did that?)
Of course, he also did it by recruiting Andrew Luck, the son of an ex-NFL quarterback who loves school so much he passed up a chance to play for the Carolina Panthers to earn his degree in architecture. Having Andrew Luck makes a big difference. But don't forget (if you're even old enough to remember in the first place) when Stanford had John Elway and we had Tom Ramsey, we were the better team. It surely does help to have a great quarterback, but it also takes more than just Luck.
Bruins Nation laid out our expectations for the rest of the season earlier in the week. It was one of the rare times we posted under our collective by-line, which means we all bought in to the articulated criteria. One of the expectations was "At least 1 road victory out of the match-ups v. Stanford, Arizona, and Utah." And while I agree with that criteria, I might have worded it a bit differently. I might have written it as "At least 1 road victory out of the matchups v. Stanford, Arizona, and Utah," because -- as much as I hate to admit it -- nothing about the 2011 Bruins football team has shown me they're ready to upset a Top Five team on the road.
Here's hoping I'm wrong.
With that, here are your Pregame Guesses for Stanford:
- True or False: Richard Brehaut will attempt more than 11 passes this week against Stanford? (That's really a gimme -- but I forgot to mention the fact that Bre only attempted 11 passes last week against Oregon State. I feel like I'm rooting for Navy, except Navy is fun to watch.)
- Who will lead the Bruins in rushing this week?
- Another True or False: Joseph Fauria will catch three or more passes this week? (I'm glad Fauria is alive on Twitter. Based on the games, I didn't realize he was still on the team).
- Bonus question. I'm setting the line at UCLA +21.5. Will the Bruins cover?
57 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
True, yes (barely), Coleman, yes
See my post in the Stanford Defense preview thread why I think we have a chance tomorrow.
by RWCBruin on Sep 30, 2011 11:38 AM PDT via mobile reply actions
Frick--got my answers in the wrong order
So I meant to say “true, Coleman, yes (barely), true”
by RWCBruin on Sep 30, 2011 11:40 AM PDT via mobile up reply actions
True, Franklin, Yes, Yes
and not only are we covering the spread, the guys are finally going to play to their talent and the coaches are going to figure out what needs to get done and we’re winning on a last minute field goal from Locke.
True. Coleman, No. Yes.
I wonder how much of Stanford’s momentum was started by the “Biggest Upset Ever” game against USC in `07… IIRC: They were 6TD underdogs.
Play with so much passion nothing else matters
40.5 point dogs
It was actually larger earlier in the week, but for some reason, it went down. And questionable as to how much of a momentum builder that was. The following week we went home and laid an egg against TCU for Alumni weekend in the final five minutes of the game, and we still had a 4-7 record that year.
More likely it was a confluence of that game and winning Big Game for the first time since 2001 that built up momentum, although Stanford still had a losing record (5-7) the following season.
Yes, Coleman, Yes, Yes
Historically, these questions and these odds are absurd. But frankly, the 35-0 drubbing by Stanford at the Rose Bowl early last year told me, after so many other blowouts, that PNTL had to go.
But I still believe in these kids. I think they get it. They just have to get playing time, just like RB should have had plenty of playing time starting last year. At least he’s getting it now, finally, and doing very well if not exceptional yet.
Stanford is not as good as advertised. We are not as bad. And maybe, maybe, finally, the coaches will get it and let the players play. The offense can be very good, and the defense just has to tackle.
We can win this thing, really.
GO BRUINS!
True, Coleman, False, No.
Sorry, I wish it were otherwise.
True, Coleman, True, Yes
"The entire world that bleeds blue and gold ... they have been dying for this." - Coach Rick Neuheisel
True, Brehaut, False, No
I sure hope I’m wrong but I’m as pessimistic as I’ve been before a game in a very long time…
That being said, I’ll be there in Blue and Gold cheering on our guys!
by DoubleTroubleBruin on Sep 30, 2011 12:46 PM PDT reply actions
True, Franklin, True (but not more than 3), True
Very well written post, by the way. Sadly, I feel the same way. The contrast in execution between the teams last year was excruciating. I’ll be there Saturday night relying on the power of negative thinking: fear the worst, and if the worst doesn’t happen, be plesantly surprised.
True, Franklin, True, No
Has anybody else heard all the coverage about how hard we’ve been practicing in the weeks before we have massive upsets? Has anyone heard that this week?
I think Stanford’s just too good. My heart says we can win the game, but my head says that Stanford’s going to roll over us.
Seeing the line on the Bruins...
makes me want to bet on them this week. We cover. Sheldon Price being out is going to hurt though….
True, Franklin, True, No
We cover in the first half…not the second. Oh wait, do you mean the whole game?
But hey, what do I know. I’m just the 800 lbs bruin in the room.
True, Franklin, True, Yes
Tasser is a traitor!
Librado Barocio
is gonna come through for us in the secondary!
By the way
what is your record on Bruins Nation Pick ’Em?
by captainqtp on Sep 30, 2011 2:48 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
I like that reply
(mostly because there are so few I can talk down to there)
greg in denver, U.C.L.A. guy for life - BruinsNation.com
True, Coleman, No, Yes
The thing that gives me hope is that as poorly as our team may play over the course of a season, we always have 2 or 3 really good games against good teams. (See past years vs Texas, USC, etc.) As such, anytime we play a top tier team, I always have hope that this will be the game that our team really shows up.
Texas
Unfortunately the Longhorns turned out to be a bad team last season.
by Nestor on Sep 30, 2011 3:33 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions
totally disagree with your take
CRN’s teams the last 3 years have notably never beaten a good team, and have rarely lost to an abject team.
True, Coleman, True, True
Here’s hoping: Coleman and Jones come up big. Fauria comes up big. Brehaut plays big. We pull off the head-scratching upset win in a shootout.
U-C-L-A Fight, Fight, Fight! Go Bruins!
Go Lakers! Go Dodgers! Go Angels!
True,DC,False,No
RB-11 of 24, 148 yds,2 pics;
DC-78 yds on 24 carries (3.2 yds/carry)
Fauria-2 catches, 2 drops
Stanford 37 UCLA 14 (game won’t seem even that close)
doing something
UCLA coach Rick Neuheisel implores his team to do something. We’re just not sure what. (AP Photo/Dave Einsel)
Letting them know no one’s status is secure? Reprimanding players for using initiative or innovative thinking? Imploring them to save his job?
True, Coleman, False, respectfully...who cares
greg in denver, U.C.L.A. guy for life - BruinsNation.com
True, Coleman, True, No.
The best thing you can do for your children is to love their mother. John Wooden
True, Coleman, False, Yes
Let’s go guys, time for a breakout game!
"Make each day your masterpiece."--JRW
by Give me a B... on Oct 1, 2011 8:47 AM PDT via mobile reply actions

by 



















