Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: L'Equipe Claims He's Coming To Chelsea On Five Year Deal

UCLA Basketball Momentum, Jerime Anderson and the Wear Twin Three

Changing subjects from our football teams disappointing start there is this from twwl, Howland on UCLA: 'We have momentum' .  We are leading in the recruiting of a dream class and it seems every day new good players come up. 

But the momentum is much more than that, we have the happy problem of having too many good "bigs":

The reason is that the Bruins have their deepest and best frontcourt of the past three years, certainly since Kevin Love left for the NBA.

Potentially dominating low-post threat Josh Smith returns as a sophomore, and he'll have plenty of help inside with North Carolina transfers David and Travis Wear (a gritty pair of forwards), joining Reeves Nelson and Anthony Stover. Nelson doesn't mind hurling his body around, while Stover is more of a defensive presence.

Howland said he might play one of the Wear twins at the 3 to have a taller and even more frontcourt-oriented starting lineup.

"We will put the best five players on the floor and four of the best players [may be forwards]," Howland said. "[The Wears] are really good passers, good shooters, and Josh can really manage a lot of the attention and open up a lot of opportunities for the other players. The Wears are really improved, physically and athletically. They're going to be really good."

Reeves Nelson as a 2?!?  No, more after the jump.

Star-divide

 

Losing Malcolm Lee was tough.  He should have stayed (especially with the strike).  Lee may have been the best defender under CBH which is very impressive title to hold.  However, ironically Lee may not be the hardest to replace.  Tyler Lamb and Norman Powell seemingly will be ready to step in to that spot by the time the PAC 12 starts. 

Tyler Honeycutt may be the harder player to replace.  While Tyler was so frustrating and never seemed to put out the effort to be all that he could be (as he showed in flashes of his potential like the Kansas game); Tyler did do some overlooked things very well that led to his all Pac-10 selection.  Tyler led the conference in shot blocks, was top 10 in rebounding, and led UCLA in 3 point makes.  There is no one on paper who can replace Tyler for UCLA at the 3 position and do all those things.  Tyler, for all his issues, was a true small forward. 

Now CBH is seemingly acknowledging the fact UCLA does not have a logical candidate for the 3 spot.  De'End Parker, a do everything type in JC who played the PG spot may not be the solution at 3.  Also who can blame CBH for wanting to get his best players on the court? 

I have always been dubious of the Wear talk at 3 because I think Reeves is likely a better Defensive 3 and previously it was always David Wear being mention as a 3.  Travis is the better of the two Wear twins not David and I assume you would want the best on the court of these similar players.  Now CBH is saying the Wear Twins on the court, which to me means more Travis.  CBH needs to find a way to get his top players on the court and the fifth best player is likely a Wear twin. Also keep in mind, unlike Parker, the Wears have practiced with CBH for a year and know the UCLA system (Hat tip to BritishBruin for this point.)

Of course a front line of a Wear Twin, Reeves Nelson and Josh Smith seems to scream zone because of lack of quickness.   Zone would also have the side benefit of giving Josh Smith some extra rest as well.  But CBH has always been reluctant to play zone, going to it once last year and only in desperation in 2009-10 for a team with a lot of lesser athletes.

While on defense the lineup of three bigs makes us slow, on offense it could, contradictorily, help by giving space down low.  The simple reason is the Wears can hit the open three (as CBH says they are good shooters) and open the space for Smith down low.  Lamb/Powell are not known for being great outside shooters, so it would really help to have a Wear at three. 

Also, in a last piece of news which I don't know what to think of, Anderson may only be suspended for a few games.  Diamond Leung writes a piece about the great infamous recruiting class of 2008 of which Anderson is the last man kid standing. Will Anderson take advantage of yet another chance?

UCLA coach Ben Howland told Andy Katz that guard Jerime Anderson will miss a few games after being arrested in July in connection with the theft of a laptop. While that means Anderson is expected to be sidelined for more than the team's regular-season opener, as had been previously announced, it also puts the senior on track for possible reinstatement by the time the Bruins leave for Hawaii to play in the championship round of the Maui Invitational and open with Chaminade. . . .

Now it will be left up to Anderson, who after serving his suspension will get one final chance at achieving what the group originally set out to do.   

Regardless of Anderson, UCLA basketball has reasons to be excited for 2011-12 and beyond. Go Bruins. 

Comment 34 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

If Reeves could defend a 3

If Reeves has matured enough mentally to stay focused on the defensive end, I think he could conceivably defend some small forwards which would allow a Wear to guard a 4 on D. I like the idea of a Wear on one wing and Tyler Lamb on the other, feeding Josh and Reeves the ball.

Btw DC, feel free to delete my Fanshot.

by LVBruin on Sep 7, 2011 5:31 AM PDT reply actions  

With Smith on the roster, the season seems like a tale of 2 teams

I see Josh playing max 25-30 minutes a game if we’re lucky, due to foul trouble/conditioning.

During these minutes we have a half court set team of: 1. LJ 2. TL 3. TW 4.RN 5.JS (or some other derivation with Powell/Parker at the 2/3)

Of course everything changes for the 10-15 minutes he is on the bench. Likely CBH will press defensively during this time, possibly putting in Stover on the defensive end, along with our (underrated) guards: Lamb, Powell, Parker. This team will have a complete different personality than the JS team, possibly with a quicker pace and heavy man D. I’m not sure how RN and the Wears will share the 4-5 spot. I just wonder whether this ‘other’ team will be coached into a weapon, or if they will be our sloppy second team.

by ArchiBruin on Sep 7, 2011 7:08 AM PDT reply actions  

hmm I got a little confused reading this

Not used to seeing Tyler Lamb or the Wears addressed by their initials.

Here’s hoping that Anthony Stover has found a little bit of offensive skills, just so all our bigs can be considered threats.

by BruinEngy on Sep 7, 2011 8:21 AM PDT up reply actions  

Stover is looking like a monster on Defense

He just needs to not be a liability on offense. Not sure he is there yet but he will be interesting to watch this season.

by DCBruins on Sep 7, 2011 8:25 AM PDT via mobile up reply actions  

I'm basing this comment off of twitter

so I might be way off here. Based on RN’s and Stovers twitter feeds, I think Reeves will have polished his game up while Stover still won’t have any offense.

It seems like Reeves is constantly in the gym working on his game…taking advantage of playing against the NBA players who come through during the summer.

Stover seems to have spent his summer hitting up parties and lovin the ladies (nothing wrong with that). I might be off on him, but again, just basing it off of his tweets. haven’t seen any, hitting the gym to work on my game tweets.

by King J77 on Sep 7, 2011 9:29 AM PDT up reply actions  

Well...

Reeves doesn’t strike me as a guy who’s out chasing the ladies. It all depends what each thinks is twitter-worthy. I wouldn’t sell Stover short, but I do think that bodes well for Reeves.

But hey, what do I know. I’m just the 800 lbs bruin in the room.

by tasser10 on Sep 7, 2011 9:35 AM PDT up reply actions  

true

Stover might thinks it’s more interesting to tweet about last nights party than his session at the gym. I hope he has worked on his offense because he has a lot of potential.

by King J77 on Sep 7, 2011 9:40 AM PDT up reply actions  

From my experience as an out of shape grad student at the SAC/Wooden

Lazeric is a very common sight. Second to him seems to be Reeves and the Wear twins (never together), and third are Lamb, Jerime, and Josh.

I spotted Stover just once when the whole team was messing around playing pick up.

I’m not saying that some are not working, (who knows where they work out) I am just saying that some are visibly working quite hard. LJ stands out in my mind because of the frequency of his workouts and their intensity.

by ArchiBruin on Sep 7, 2011 9:54 AM PDT up reply actions  

No worries

We kid and then not kid about this stuff. The whole initials thing started as me being lazy on the frontpage and then it became a fun thing for the community. Now it is actually kind of cool because it does help us signal to players whose effort we appreciate as a true “Ben Ball Warrior.”

by Nestor on Sep 7, 2011 9:35 AM PDT up reply actions  

None of this bodes well for Brendan Lane

Unless I missed something, and I wouldn’t be surprised if I did, he is still on the team. Showed alot of progress defensively last year and if he continues his improvement he could be a factor as well. With his two years in the system he would be valuable at spelling some of the bigs, especially when we are ahead and need to protect a lead.

by 84 on Sep 7, 2011 7:42 AM PDT reply actions  

In a Sense this is better for Lane

If we are playing a big lineup, he may have a chance to get a few minutes. But the fact remains that he seems likely to be the sixth best big man on the team. You can take that as a positive that our front court is that deep.

by DCBruins on Sep 7, 2011 8:03 AM PDT via mobile up reply actions  

I think Lane will want to transfer

I don’t know if it’s too late in preseason to do that or what. But I just think that he might have expected to get more of the time that Howland is talking about giving to the Wear twins. I really like Lane, but I’m not sure there’s really a way for him to contribute meaningfully to this team anymore… There are only so many minutes.

by salmonfan on Sep 7, 2011 8:38 AM PDT up reply actions  

Not every player

is looking to get minutes and showcase themselves. Some are happy to play for a good coach, be on a great team, at a great school getting a great education. Brendan is a good kid, I’m sure he’d love to play more but that doesn’t mean he’s not happy with his situation.

But hey, what do I know. I’m just the 800 lbs bruin in the room.

by tasser10 on Sep 7, 2011 8:43 AM PDT up reply actions  

Uh, I doubt it

Lane is very happy at UCLA.

by Nestor on Sep 7, 2011 8:46 AM PDT up reply actions  

Also

This is the second time I have seen this in last few days. Just days ago someone came in here and baselesly speculated that Brehaut will want to transfer if he didn’t get the starting job against Houston. That was an ill advised premature speculation without any basis.

So is this one. If you know anything as a fact, then share. But don’t throw up baseless speculations and rumor mongering. Thanks.

by Nestor on Sep 7, 2011 8:48 AM PDT up reply actions  

personally

I’d like to see Brendan redshirt. He’s not going to play professionally, and I think it would make sense for him to get five years of UCLA education (potentially including a masters degree), and get some more minutes as a RS senior when other guys have departed. Clearly a great kid, but this year we have an unusual glut of players playing his position.

by VeniceBruin on Sep 7, 2011 9:19 AM PDT up reply actions  

Yeah

That actually may not be a bad idea. I think Lane is going to be a solid player before all said and one.

by Nestor on Sep 7, 2011 9:24 AM PDT up reply actions  

Would love to see this type of lineup

completely dominate in the front court! With the way CBH coaches defense every game could be a huge one and down for the opposing teams offense. Go Bruins…

"Success is never final, Failure is never fatal. It's Courage that counts" - John Wooden.

by TheUclan on Sep 7, 2011 7:44 AM PDT reply actions  

DC, you've got it wrong

not Reeves as the 2, it’s Reeves as the Point-Forward that gets our best guys on the court; our best guard can play the 2 on offense and the 1 on defense. Problem solved!

by VeniceBruin on Sep 7, 2011 9:23 AM PDT reply actions  

Lol

The scary part is Reeves would probably like it.

by DCBruins on Sep 7, 2011 1:16 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions  

I hope Lane redshirts too

It doesn’t seem like he’ll see much of the court this year. Stover has already redshirted, so that is not an option. Most likely ther will be some big man departures after this year (Nelson?Smith?) So he could be very valuable for the next two years. Imagine after this year having two more years of the Wears, Lane and Stover. Sweet.

by chirobruin on Sep 7, 2011 10:34 AM PDT via mobile reply actions  

The biggest risk of playing 3 bigs - transition D

The Lakers almost never play Gasol, Odom, and Bynum all at once. It wasn’t until Artest’s suspension vs Dallas in the playoffs that they were forced to start with that lineup, and during that game they gave up a lot of easy buckets in transition. You have to be really careful about the shots you take, because a long rebound means your bigs won’t be able to get back in time to set up.

by Objection Penguin on Sep 7, 2011 11:53 AM PDT reply actions  

let's hope our strong offensive rebounding can slightly compensate this

Otherwise you are very a right, it is a valid concern. I think we’re either going for the 3 (mainly Zeek now that Honeycutt and Lee are gone), or pounding it inside with Reeves or Smith. We didn’t really play at midrange, maybe that’ll change if Reeves has been working on his jumpshot.

by BruinEngy on Sep 7, 2011 12:51 PM PDT up reply actions  

Perhaps the Bruins not having Pauley this year will be a blessing in disguise..

I’m just thinking that if all breaks in our direction, having to play in so many uncomfortable settings will bode well for us tourney time. Perhaps playing on neutral sites in the PAC 10 and NCAA tourneys won’t be as much of a factor as for other schools who will have the comfort of home to account for a percentage of their victory total.

by BPD on Sep 7, 2011 3:03 PM PDT reply actions  

One possibility I haven't heard thrown around...

Does Zeek have any 2 guard capability, and are there any capable 1s in his absence (please don’t say Anderson). I’m just wondering if he might fill a wing void if there were a serviceable 1 who could step in. In hindsight, JH at the one and DC at the two may have been worthwhile a few years ago.

by BPD on Sep 7, 2011 3:05 PM PDT reply actions  

Although it has been argued that Lazeric doesn't have elite speed, he is a true 1

There is no easy alternative on the roster at 1.

We have a choice of Lamb/Powell/Parker at the wing, and although their shooting is in question, I think at least one of them will emerge as the go to 2. And if all else fails, Jordan Adams can step in as a pure shooter in 2012.

by ArchiBruin on Sep 7, 2011 3:34 PM PDT up reply actions  

The problem is 3

I think Powell who looks impressive and Lamb will be fine at 2. Also, IMO Anderson is better at 2. In any case we are fine at 2, 3 is the issue.

by DCBruins on Sep 7, 2011 4:24 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions  

On recruiting news

it seems Baron Davis had a chance to talk with our 2012 recruit, Kyle Anderson

http://www.zagsblog.com/2011/09/07/kyle-anderson-chats-with-baron-davis-on-sju-visit/

Please tell me he advised him to stay away from Lavin….

by BruinEngy on Sep 7, 2011 5:00 PM PDT reply actions  

Wait . . .

Davis was at St. John’s to help Lavin recruit Anderson? Why would Baron Davis help Lavin in any way? Isn’t he the player who criticized Lavin the most?

Also, isn’t this a recruiting violation? Maybe not, since he was on campus for an official visit?

by Karl II on Sep 7, 2011 6:03 PM PDT up reply actions  

Baron allegedly criticized Lavin as a coach

but I think he actually likes Lavin the dude. People in this community always seem to assume that good athletes and bad athletes and/or coaches can’t get along as people. I’m not taking a shot you Karl, it’s just a recurring theme in BN threads.

by LVBruin on Sep 7, 2011 6:11 PM PDT up reply actions  

I get that

Lavin is a good guy. Hell, even I like Lavin.

But if I previously went out of my way to publicly criticize Lavin’s coaching ability, I certainly would not show up and convince a recruit, especially one who also has my alma mater as one of his final 5 schools, to commit to Lavin. Great guy; yeah. Terrible coach; definitely.

I would think telling that kid that Lavin is a good coach is only doing a disservice to his well being.

by Karl II on Sep 7, 2011 6:18 PM PDT up reply actions  

flag'd

not sure whether claiming to like Lavin is ‘inappropriate’ or ‘troll’, probably not spam though.

by VeniceBruin on Sep 7, 2011 10:52 PM PDT up reply actions  

B. Lane should get run at the #3 spot! And Parker at the #1 and #3 spot.

Remember, D’End Parker can play the three spot. More importantly “BPD” Parker can also play the #1 spot, to spell LJ, or even move him and Anderson to the two-spot sometimes. So: the #3 dilemma should be solved by, Lane, Parker and Wear, for now! We can go big or small, but, the #3 spot WILL be key at times….

by look closer on Sep 7, 2011 5:11 PM PDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Bruins Nation, an unofficial daily online scrap book covering the greatest collegiate athletic program in the nation. Established June 16, 2005. GO BRUINS.

Managers

Uclabear1_small Nestor

Arron_afflalo1_small Tydides

Brad_pitt_as_achilles_small Achilles

377011_2642084725867_1068030137_32302525_1166539782_n_small Ryan Rosenblatt

Telemachus_small Telemachus

Licenseplate_small gbruin

2761_small tasser10

Blue_bellerophon_small Bellerophon

Img_0052_2_small Patroclus

Small DCBruins

Of Counsels

094_small Ajax

Menelaus2_small Menelaus

Small Meriones

Small Odysseus

Associates

Eee_small freesia39

Uclabruins_small AHMB