Bruin Bites: Chianti Dan's Shockingly Clueless, Delusional, and Tone-Deaf Comments Edition
Originally, I was going to write a more-or-less standard Bruin Bites post today. Wish everyone on BN a happy new year, throw in a few cliches about how with a new year comes the promise that 2012 won't be a painful embarrassment to UCLA fans like this past year has been under Chianti Dan's clueless, lazy, ineffective "leadership" and toss in a handful of stories from around the UCLA-iverse.
But then I woke up this morning and I read Chianti Dan Guerrero's comments following UCLA's embarrassing loss to an extremely mediocre Illinois team, that was coming in on a six-game losing streak. I was in such utter shock and disbelief at how complete tonedeaf and delusional, I simply had to re-write this entire post.
We've discussed time and time again how this chianti-swilling, lazy, hack bureaucrat is a complete and utter failure and we've watched his Morgan Center cave to the all-out pressure this community has brought time and time again (#SFatPauley, #VetoSeto, etc.), but apparently Chianti Dan, in his typical tone-deaf empty-headed manner has no clue, making some of his most asinine and laughably stupid comments yet, following our defeat to Illinois:
"I'm a Bruin," Guerrero said of his status. "This is my university. I love my university. I work hard. I can't worry about speculation. I have to look forward. We have a pretty darn good program. Our program is one of the best in the country, bar none. Now, we haven't done it on the football side, and that's obviously something we need to do."
Asked if he's talked to UCLA Chancellor Gene Block recently, Guerrero said: "I talk to Chancellor Block all the time about a number of things. I don't know what the (message) boards are saying or the blogs are saying, but I just know that I go to work, strapping it on every day.
"I feel I do a pretty darn good job running this program."
Wow. There is so much delusion and stupidity here, I don't even know where to begin. First, apparently Chianti Dan is too busy "strapping it on" (insert juvenile sex toy joke here), to read what the "boards or blogs are saying." Kind of amusing since we already know, directly from Murphy Hall, that Gene Block's right-hand woman, Vice Chancellor Rhea Turteltaub, reads BN. So, Chianti Dan's boss has the time and intelligence to read what the "boards and blogs" are saying, but Chianti Dan would rather put his head in the sand and pretend he doesn't hear the criticism. That's some quality "leadership" right there.
Amusingly, Chianti Dan's comments come after one of UCLA's biggest total fail weekends ever. First, Chianti Dan gave all the Bruins in the Bay Area a figurative middle finger, forcing them to choose between going to the Kraft Fight Hunger Bowl at AT&T Park at 12:30 p.m. or the UCLA basketball game at Cal at 1 p.m. The smart thing to do would have been to leverage UCLA's bargaining position, moving men's hoops back to the evening, and then marketing a total UCLA sports ticket package, so that fans could call up the CTO and get a ticket to the Kraft Fight Hunger Bowl, a ticket to the hoops game at Cal, and a BART ticket to get said fan from AT&T Park across the bay to Berkeley, all for a good, bit below market price, as part of a package deal. If we had competent leadership at Morgan Center, that would have happened. But instead, UCLA fans had to choose, diminishing support for the True Blue and Gold at both venues. Second, Morgan Center completely failed to get the fan base in the Bay Area fired up. Outside of Southern California, the Bay Area has the highest number of UCLA alums (kind of makes basic common sense right), so any Bay Area trip is a chance for UCLA to really get a large turnout and boost revenue for the Athletic Department. But, the Bay Area Bruins weren't interested in giving any more money to Chianti Dan's Reign of Error, completely ignoring the Kraft Fight Hunger Bowl, forcing UCLA to eat tickets it couldn't sell, which in turn projected images of an empty AT&T Park to a national audience, really hammering home how sad, pathetic, and irrelevant our football program has become. And of course, let's not forget that both the football program and Ben Howland's dumpster fire crew turned in laughably pathetic performances that are completely unacceptable at UCLA. All-in-all, a wonderful New Year's Eve present from Chianti Dan of complete and total failure. It really takes special talent to turn an amazing marketing opportunity (the chance to package a bowl game with a hoops game, throw in some pre-game festivity kind of stuff, etc.) to get a huge segment of the UCLA fan base fired up, and turn it into a pathetic, complete failure. But, that's Chianti Dan for you.
So, rather than going through the bits and pieces from around the UCLA-iverse, let's take a look at Dan's laughably stupid, delusional comments, and break them down, bullet-point Bruin Bites style after the jump.
- First, let's start with an interesting history lesson following UCLA's wonderful foray into the history books as a 6-8 bow game loser. Yes, Jim Mora, with his tough-talking, discipline-first attitude (and lack of college coaching experience) has replaced Rick Neuheisel's relentless optimism, inability to control his players, and failure to develop talent. But for Mora, celebrating his hire is no different than spiking the ball on your own 20 yard line: there's a long way to go before we can feel like our football program, the original top-ranked BCS program (let that sink in for a minute: when the first BCS ranking came out in 1998, the #1 team in the nation was UCLA), returning to relevance, let alone stop being a complete and total joke.
- Turning to Chianti Dan, the chianti-swilling moron claims that he "works hard" which, from what we hear in the backchannels, couldn't be further from the truth. Apparently, spending time putting together wine tasting trips to Italy rather than running a legitimate coaching search is considered "hard work" these days. For example, Chianti Dan and his minions in Morgan Center put together "coaching search" that was a complete joke, ending up falling to Jim Mora, who despite his good start, is still a huge gamble. I suppose this kind of bureaucratic stupidity is the kind of "hard work" Dan talks about.
- I particularly liked Chianti Dan's comment about how we have a "pretty darn good program" referring to our athletic department as a whole. First, "pretty good" isn't good enough at UCLA: this is UCLA, where the expectation is that our teams will be among the nation's elite, competing for, and winning national titles on a regular basis. Talk about tone-deaf. Second, the fact of the matter is that we don't even have a "pretty good" program right now. As discussed before, UCLA, as a whole is sliding into athletic obscurity under Chianti Dan's special brand of failed "leadership" which led us to figure out Chianti Dan's next big marketing slogan: "First to 100, Last to 200."
- Of course, this goes hand-in-hand with the simple fact that Dan Guerrero has allowed a diseased culture of mediocrity to take root in Morgan Center.
- Now that I've had time to think, perhaps these clueless, delusional comments aren't that shocking, as Chianti Dan has a long history of making tone-deaf stupid comments following embarrassing losses for UCLA, with the worst example being his idiotic remarks following the absolute and total beat-down given to the Bruins by U$C, telling Bruins that they should be excited for UCLA football falling into the Pac-12 title game after watching the Pac-12 South's real top team hammering Neuheisel's hapless Bruins 50-0.
- Although sometimes Chianti Dan's tone-deaf stupidity gives us some awesome total LOL moments, such as the advertisement asking for donations to the Wooden Athletic Fund, featuring "strength and conditioning" costs next to notoriously out-of-shape hoopster Joshua Smith. Talk about facepalm.
- Let's see: maybe Chianti Dan's "hard work" includes his Word from Westwood, you know, the newsletter that Morgan Center laughingly calls a "blog" (who runs Morgan Center's PR, Baghdad Bob?!), which is nothing more than a one-sided "dialogue" (often mocked) which hand-picks the softball questions to answer, in a manner that proves Dan and Morgan Center have zero understanding of how to engage with the fan base using "new media." Writing that blog must be a lot of "hard work."
- Maybe Chianti Dan's definition of "hard work" includes the complete destruction of UCLA football, which under Dan's watch, has gone from a conference power and nationally prominent program, with regular Rose Bowl appearances, into the laughing stock of the conference, causing UCLA football to slide into total irrelevancy. Remember the BCS history less I started with? Burns doesn't it?
- Under Dan's watch, UCLA football has managed to hit an all-time low, with sagging attendance at the Rose Bowl and embarrassing defeats at home on national television, playing undisciplined, lazy, conservative football.
- Wait, I finally figured out what the hard work was that Chianti Dan was talking about: the entire student seating debacle at the lame, over-priced Pauley Pavilion renovation (#SFatPauley), which involved shady UCLA athletic department officials flat-out lying to the UCLA community. It's a lot of "hard work" to get naive student "leaders" to buy into a sleazy plan to screw over generations of students, promote it as part of a "student survey" and try to defend said stupid decision when the wider Bruin Nation went into full furor.
- Or perhaps the "hard work" is Dan's meticulous planning of high-priced wine-tasting trips to Italy to boost Morgan Center revenues since, under his failed leadership, we've seen declining operating revenue and ticket sales due to total mismanagement of UCLA's main revenue program.
- Finally, at least for me, this Chianti Dan is a total failure special edition of Bruin Bites isn't even unusual anymore. From my quick perusal of the BN archives, this is at least the fifth time that Bruin Bites has had to take a timeout from the normal round-up of news to talk about how Chianti Dan is a complete and total joke (past Chianti Dan failure editions are here, here, here, and here).
Naturally, this kind of stupidity is why we called for WHOLESALE REGIME CHANGE following the Disaster in the Desert, calling for Gene Block to axe not just Rick Neuheisel, but to fire Dan Guerrero immediately. The fact the man has now hired his third head football coach (none coming from success leading to another job, a la Stanford and Harbaugh) in a decade is absolutely unacceptable. Even Jill Painter, who is typically out-of-touch, picked up on that:
Guerrero has enjoyed a relatively calm tenure as athletic director until he recently had the opportunity to hire his third football coach, a luxury seemingly unheard of in big-time Division I athletics these days.
When even Jill Painter sees that your athletic director is a complete tool, it kind of makes you wonder what the hell is going through Chancellor Gene Block's head. Apparently, this kind of "hard work" is worth an annual salary of $688,296. Congratulations folks: nearly $700K in taxpayer dollars pays the salary of the worst athletic director in America.
So, with that, those are your special "Fire Chianti Dan in 2012" edition of Bruin Bites. Fire away with your comments, thoughts, and reactions to Chianti Dan's clueless, tone-deaf comments in the open thread.
GO BRUINS
81 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Value of $$$$
I guess $688,296 doesn’t get you what it used to; what’s hilarious is that Chianti Dan thinks “pretty good” is the correct measure of success. If he wants to be at the helm of a “pretty good” athletic department, maybe he should earn a “pretty good” salary of $100,000 instead?
My only hope is that Chianti Dan’s most recent ludicrous statement reveals that he is finally feeling the pressure & senses the need to defend his terrible tenure. Now that football is over & a coaching change has already been made I hope everyone turns on the pressure to oust Chianti Dan, so that he is not allowed to make the next basketball hire because it looks more & more likely we’re witnessing Howland’s last stand.
by Nor-Cal Bruin on Jan 1, 2012 10:17 AM PST reply actions 1 recs
"a pretty good program . . ."
Would not be sufficient for UCLA. But even that is a lie.
Hey, you are being too negative. You missed all the "pretty good" things we did yesterday.
1. We held the Illini under 50, under 44 and even scored twice against a BCS team.
2. 6-8 was an improvement over 4-8.
3. Some of our juniors think they’re NFL material.
4. We had no brawl.
5. Both Illinois and UCLA wore home uniforms just like we used to with SUC.
6. Losing two games at the same time on TV in the same city minimized the damage, right?
7. We held Cal under 100.
8. We only lost by 1 to Stanford.
9. Mora got more TV time than what’s his name, the new Illini head coach.
10. You forgot that Cal football game!
11. UCLA: Pretty Good Things Strapped On Here!
Correction on 5.
We wore home uniforms on the road. Even better. Brilliant. Bet you missed that, too!
Yes. That's why I changed it to we just wore home uni's.
Good catch anyway. I appreciate the correction. Now if we could only correct our program by firing Guererror.
It is all a miscommunication
Remember, someone recently who had talked to either Block or his asst. and the comment about the Ad was, “We may have a communications issue there”….WTF? If the administration can’t see the obvious, page one LAT articles chronicling the demise of any semblance of competitive and nationally relevant series of programs, then things are worse then imagined. UCLA immediately must, with no reservations, replace DG with someone who has “been there, done that” as far a big time, relevant sports AD responsibilities (sorry RN, you won’t qualify for that job, but maybe with training someone else first). There is lots of $$ on the table, waiting to be claimed by either UCLA or other choices for the sports dollars in LA and nationally… Get with the program!!!! Please.
I promise I will renew my modest contributions and attendance to games, travel with teams to selected away games, and relearn what proud is when referring to my alma mater. Someone at UCLA needs to connect the dots between outstanding academics and outstanding athletics. This is not, IMO, rocket science.
Mensgym
that Guerroro even felt the need to defend himself means he's feeling the pressure
normally, I don’t think he’d need to mention that he’s a Bruin or that he doesn’t care about the message boards. let’s keep up the pressure for a happier 2012!
by Objection Penguin on Jan 1, 2012 10:42 AM PST reply actions
Yep
He wouldn’t feel the need to point out that he works hard if there were accomplishments he could point to instead.
He actually made a public statement
which means he’s feeling the heat and he’s reading message boards (also reiterating that he is a Bruin). Let’s turn up the heat and send him and his straps…walking.
Dump Dan!
by bruinclassof10 on Jan 1, 2012 6:11 PM PST up reply actions
interesting tone to CD's comments
He sounded defensive, for the first time. Usually all the chianti in his brain kept him defiant and aloof to the external hatred on the blogs and media. Maybe someone from inside UCLA is giving his “performance” a good hard look. I hope we are on the verge of pulling the plug on the guerrero regime.
on a side note, howland is done is westwood. he is getting hardcore dissed by color commentators. his players have tuned him out. no one wants to play D. howland could never coach offense. thanks for the final fours. we need a guy who fires up the players again.
by Strathmore&Gayley on Jan 1, 2012 10:44 AM PST reply actions
I'm sorry Howland is toast. He did some good things. And he means well.
But he apparently does not know what his weaknesses are.
by Seth Chandler on Jan 1, 2012 11:18 AM PST up reply actions
speaking of weaknesses
i just don’t understand why BH changes the team from zone to man when we are winning with zone. does he not understand the difference between this team playing zone and man is the W? i hate coaches who are so entrenched in THEIR way of doing things that they can’t adapt to the talent and resources that they already HAVE. if they don’t have the conditioning to do benball, work on their conditioning on the off-season to ensure that they can. if they still can’t, employ a system that WORKS. Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results. i’ve always thought that BH was a bad hire, and the fact that pitt has been consistently better than us in the post-season (granted, we outnumber the final 4 appearances, but they haven’t missed the NCAA tourney) proves that BH wasn’t the answer at pitt, and was never the answer here.
by ucla.mordsith on Jan 1, 2012 11:23 AM PST up reply actions
I agree that his defensive comment means he is feeling the heat.
He has to know that his seat is getting warmer by the week. If BH chokes again, we could see a change. We need to turn up the thermostat. That bowl game was a sick reality show of UCLA now. When I look at such a porcine oaf running the AD, it makes me feel ill.
frankly, i'm astonished...
…that DG is callous and arrogant enough to claim that he is doing a darn good job. it’s frankly unbelievable that he can say this with a straight face while our annual output of NC’s has ground to a mediocre 1.3 a year, compared to 3+/yr prior to 2004. When the only championships we have won under his watch since 2004 have been SoCal/good weather sports – I mean, when was the last time (besides women’s volleyball) that water polo, volleyball, softball, tennis (individual and team) championships were won by teams outside the pac-12/mpsf/pac-10? i mean come ON!!! water polo is pretty much guaranteed to be won by only USC/CAL/STANFORD/UCLA!!! oh well… happy new year everyone. hopefully with a new year comes a new AD – aka, one that does his/her job (and honestly, i think it’s about DAMN time we had a female AD!!!)
I just want the best.
Man, woman or child. I don’t care. Someone who has done it before and will do it again.
When he says he "is doing a darn good job"
As my good friend mentioned to our group when overhearing another nearby conversation and the comment “I know what I am doing”…. when someone says that, he usually doesn’t know what he is doing… Same applies to DG.
Mensgym
and another thing...
i wonder how Larry Scott feels now that we have ridiculously more exposure nationally to appallingly underwhelming teams. I mean, Utah is our standard-bearing in bowl games now. the amount of money lost by the pac-12 schools on these bowls must be insane. and the way UCLA has floundered in the director’s cup these past 5 years must be a head-scratcher to him. i wish Scott would just give Gene Block a call and be like, “dude. way to embarrass my conference. remember when DG was asking for a disproportionate amount of revenue sharing? this is why there will only ever be equal revenue sharing in the PAC-whatever conference.”
Hmmm, I think he has a typo
Shouldn’t that last line read “I feel I do a pretty darn good job ruining this program.” ?
Ugh...when will this end!
When will the Morgan Center get it?!?
The problem clearly is DG, but the solution has to be Block
It would be great to have a Bruin Bites edition which doesn’t focus on DG’s ineptitude. But Block has abided this ever since he got here. Too bad DG isn’t also the Dean of Medicine. He would have been shown the door long ago.
We need to put pressure on Block, above and beyond stopping our donations and our ticket purchases.
DG’s defensive tone may mean that he is finally getting the hint from his boss that things aren’t perfect. But his boss, Block, should have taken action before this, like having somebody in place who was competent to make the post-RN football hire.
I am worried that DG’s comments will allow Block to check the box next to “Make sure DG knows that I am fretting at least mildly about athletics”. He can then move athletics back to number 721 on his list of priorities.
That's my biggest fear too
that Block will simply say “ok so Dan publicly made a statement that he feels the pressure” now I can relax until the Chianti trip
Dump Dan!
by bruinclassof10 on Jan 1, 2012 6:14 PM PST up reply actions
It's 2012, Dan. Get a clue.
His statement “I don’t know what the (message) boards are saying or the blogs are saying” is just the worst, as if internet commenters are some fringe group and not money-donating, ticket-buying constituents of his. Add in that implication that he’s too busy to read the blogs because he’s working every day, and that’s a demonstration of a major misunderstanding of both the internet’s influence and the fact that, if he were doing an acceptable job, his online detractors would be his biggest boosters.
He's such a dumbass
Dan-oh apparently hasn’t noticed, but the lamestream media is saying pretty much the same thing about him — only less colorfully.
by wmm on Jan 2, 2012 9:44 AM PST via mobile up reply actions
There is a lot of chatter on BRO right now
that DG is going to get “promoted” out of the AD spot. I haven’t seen this info anywhere else yet though.
It's a damn shame....
…and a damning indictment of a lot of what is wrong with this country and this state. There used to be a time, where if you sucked at your job, you got fired. No severance package, no contract buyouts, just a boot in the ass toward the door.
Instead of firing Guerrero and making an example out of him (if I were chancellor, I’d use him to show every department head that mediocre performance will not be tolerated), Block will “promote” him and while he won’t be able to f**k up our athletic department anymore, he’ll still collect a nice big check at the expense of UCLA.
Yeah, thats so horrible....
It’s why slowly systems fail over time.
The final straw...
If the UCLA Administration tries to candy coat Dan Guerrero’s “removal” as AD, this will most likely be the final straw with me and many of our fellow Alums…
Brandon L
This AD is a thief.
Obviously our FB program has been pathetic, and Howland has run MBB into the ground and needs to go. Those are givens. To me the number one crime committed by CDG (well besides robbing taxpayers) is his apathy towards Nikki Caldwell. We finally had a top tier coach in place after years of Kathy Olivier. This idiot didn’t even have the foresight to realize she would be snatched away at a moments notice by another university if he made no effort to support her program (see our NCAA tourney draw at Gonzaga) or pay her a salary in the ballpark of what she could command. More likely he just didn’t give a crap. Now we are back to Olivier reincarnated I fear in CC. My God how is this man possibly still our AD? I swear it is beyond belief!
The Nikki Caldwell case was egregious
Both in Guerrero failure to support our team in the NCAA (Playing Gonzaga at Gonzaga? WTF?) and not having the foresight to lock Caldwell down into a longterm contract before LSU came knocking. Pac-10 Coach of the Year in 2010 and what does Guerrero do? Nada.
Guerrero can’t attract good people, can’t keep good people, doesn’t know how to recognize good people.
Caldwell is a star and with her charisma would have made a great frontwoman for UCLA athletics and an incredible representative of UCLA. Instead, she will create a dynasty at LSU.
by Seth Chandler on Jan 2, 2012 4:12 PM PST up reply actions
The UCLA Administration Better Patch the relationship with its Alumni, stat!
I pray that the Vice Chancellor Rhea Turteltaub reads BruinsNation. Besides, Dan Guerrerro being the worst thing that has ever happened to our school, UCLA Alumni I’ve talked to in Colorado and currently in Washington D.C. are pissed about the complete lack of communication between us and our current administration regarding the direction of our athletic program. Being that the adminstration appears to be oblivious to what I’m referring to, I’ll just lay out one point for the sake of time:
1. The Coaching Search: Most successful football programs actively engage their alumni throughout the process of a coaching search. Many of my friends who are Ohio State and Colorado Alums couldn’t believe their ears when I told them how Dan Guerrerro and our Administration (Morgan Center & Chancellor Block) completely disregarded us alumns throughout the process. If only they had read the “blogs” earlier would they have gotten the hint that most Alums were skeptical of a Jim Mora hire in the first place. Just showing us the courtesy of keeping us updated in process would’ve been nice.
I’m wondering if anyone else has anything to say regarding this lack of communication between the administration and us Alumns. It seems like the most basic concepts are being completely disregarded! And the Young Chancellor’s Alumni Circle has the gaul to ask me for more money?!? Sure…..
Brandon L
The only thing that Guererror straps on everyday is a feed bag...
I don’t give a crap if he thinks he works hard.
I don’t give a crap if he thinks that he does a pretty good job.
Everyone, including himself, knows that the football program, the most important sport for ANY athletic department (Ucla, Duke and UNC included), has been a complete failure.
This isn’t Care Youth League or AYSO. He is the highest paid athletic director in the conference… being “pretty good” and “working hard” do not cut it. You get fired or retained based upon the performance of the department.
His athletic department has failed in every performance metric. He needs to be let go and I don’t mean dancing the lemon to another role at the University (so he can make retirement and milk the system for millions).
Let him be some other university’s problem.
by beanandcheeseburrito on Jan 1, 2012 2:20 PM PST reply actions
Oh and one last thing...
I am moving my family back to the west coast in 2012.
Knowing my love for UCLA athletics, my wife’s x-mas present to me was UCLA season tickets for both fb and bb (she pledged a large donation to get good seats).
I love my wife and her thoughtfulness… but my first issue of business when Ucla’s campus reopens is to “return” that x-mas gift.
They will not receive a dime from me or my family while Guererror is AD at UCLA. Regardless of how much we make, we work hard and make sacrifices for every dime that comes in. I don’t give money to support incompetence. I’d rather give it to the homeless than to some bum, who is getting fat, to misuse and bumbling away my school’s reputation.
by beanandcheeseburrito on Jan 1, 2012 2:29 PM PST up reply actions 8 recs
Good For You Bean&Cheese
actions speak louder than words
"Players with fight never lose a game, they just run out of time"
~ John Wooden
We should turn this comment green
Let’s rec it.
by Nestor on Jan 1, 2012 6:31 PM PST via mobile up reply actions
Bears repeating
“His athletic department has failed in every performance metric. He needs to be let go and I don’t mean dancing the lemon to another role at the University (so he can make retirement and milk the system for millions). Let him be some other university’s problem.”
by Geronimo21 on Jan 2, 2012 11:58 AM PST via mobile up reply actions
Mediocrity and Failing Upward
We are not “mediocre”. We are worse than that. To say we are hovering around averagei is to overstate our status. We really need to start using a more accurate label for the rotten state we are in.
A few years back, DG was talked of as the heir apparent to a plush NCAA job. Many of us were concerned that he was more interested in feathering his NCAA nest than paying attention to UCLA’s needs. (Right Coach Caldwell?)
I offered to write a letter of rec for DG hoping that he would get the job and get away from Westwood. Many of you volunteered to join the campaign. Now, it seems that the rumors of him leaving are dead. Clearly, the NCAA has caught on to him. They don’t want him and neither do we.
My fear is that if he fails upward, he will be allowed to pick his own successor; it will certainly be an insideer like the lying sack of shit who dealt with us and the students on the seating issues.
The pressure has to be on Block.
DG is “working” just like KD was “sleeping”. Neither had a clue as to what the constituents were demanding and neither could give an appropriate response.
sjh
A Very Real Concern
Based on previous the history of insular cultural behavior…
“My fear is that if he fails upward, he will be allowed to pick his own successor; it will certainly be an insideer like the lying sack of shit who dealt with us and the students on the seating issues. The pressure has to be on Block.”
by Geronimo21 on Jan 2, 2012 12:06 PM PST via mobile up reply actions
Where is the Billboard? Where is the Ad in L.A.T.?
This was brought up in a post, how it was done during Dorrell era. IMO the mods need to bump it up to front page and actively push for a Ad or Billboard in L.A. calling for Donuts ouster. It should present a very succinct but rock hard explanation why he has to go.
Secondly, we should bombard Blockhead’s office with calls demanding No Promotion, as it will effectively kill Bruin Support
"Players with fight never lose a game, they just run out of time"
~ John Wooden
The mods could also say
they put a lot of work into what they do already, and ask you to take the lead for the ad/billboard idea. Just sayin’.
Roses are red, violets are blue...f*** $C.
If I could post on the Main Page, I would
The mods control what gets seen on the ‘front page’, so to speak. When the petition went up, there it was nice and prominent…why can’t we do the same and start collecting a fund to run the Ad or Billboard?
"Players with fight never lose a game, they just run out of time"
~ John Wooden
The article points out that skywriting is even better.
I wonder how much it would cost…
by Seth Chandler on Jan 2, 2012 4:17 PM PST up reply actions
Article said $1500
If we bump to the front page maybe we can dump funds into a PayPal account. Anybody know a pilot?? =)
Dump Dan!
by bruinclassof10 on Jan 2, 2012 10:03 PM PST up reply actions
Must be blackmail
Seriously does DG have pictures of Block chilling with bin Laden? Or did he catch Block having some sort of illicit affair? Short of that I cannot think of a single reason why Block has not fired this bumbling and delusional fool.
Maybe its the same, attractive goat that's been pictured with
1. CBH – that the Serbian bricklayer got a hold of
2. Rick Neuheisel – that Taylor Embree somehow got a hold of
Dump Dan!
by bruinclassof10 on Jan 1, 2012 6:18 PM PST up reply actions
Moving Chianti Dan Up is like ...
promoting the Captain of the Titanic to Admiral.
It is the Peter Principle cubed.
Just fire the bumbler, and now, and let him live on the money he has stolen already the past ten years.
Unbelievable.
Chianti Dan’s Legacy: pretty good “strapped on” here … Not!
Facepalm
On plans for renovating Spaulding Field
What’s wrong with Spaulding?
80-yard field, field goal posts are crooked/made with pipes, the turf tears knee ligaments, the grass is...sand
Its just not a good practice field
Dump Dan!
by bruinclassof10 on Jan 1, 2012 6:35 PM PST up reply actions
There are high schools in Southern California
with better practice fields
Dump Dan!
by bruinclassof10 on Jan 1, 2012 6:36 PM PST up reply actions
The middle school by my place
has a brand new state of the art, turf field with multipurpose markings for softball, soccer, and football. And it’s bigger than Spaulding.
Winning is not a sometime thing; it's an all the time thing. You don't win once in a while; you don't do things right once in a while; you do them right all the time. Winning is a habit. Unfortunately, so is losing. ~ Vince Lombardi
I still don't understand why our football team doesn't practice on the IM field
and IM sports doesn’t use Spaulding. You would think that a “feasibility study” would reveal this. Heck, I used to walk by both when I lived on the Hill and in the apartments and thought this to myself.
Dump Dan!
by bruinclassof10 on Jan 1, 2012 7:23 PM PST up reply actions
Uhhhh
That wasn’t a question, it was quote from our illustrious athletic director.
The same exact field
When I attended in 1980.
Maybe Morgan Center will understand this measure of DG’s performance: my 84 yr old mother called today and apologized for not watching the entire bowl game because it was too “pathetic”.
Kind of says it all.
by NorthernNeckBruin on Jan 1, 2012 7:31 PM PST reply actions
Why Chianti Dan still has his job.
I spend a lot of time evaluating work performance and ways to improve the workplace. It has been puzzling to me how such an incompetent individual like Chianti Dan can still have his job. I have given this a great deal of thought and I think it maybe one of two things.
1. Chianti has some dirt on Block or someone hire up the food chain.
2. This is more likely I think. In this era of political correctness run amuck, Its very possible that Block is afraid that he will offend the Hispanic community by firing Chianti Dan. Believe me he sees what’s going on around him and knows how upset a large portion of alumni are that he hasn’t pull the trigger and fired him. What is apparently floating around now about Chianti Dan getting a promotion. That would be a perfect way for block to worm out of doing the right thing and at the same time save face with the Hispanic community.
Whether or not the promotion story is true, I still think Block is afraid to fire him because of what I previously said.
Agreed
Block is too afraid to fire him, so he’ll probably take the easy way out.
Firing people is no fun and he won’t want to get his hands dirty.
Unfortunately, because of that, he will be doing the university a great disservice. The alumni won’t be too happy, either.
by Geronimo21 on Jan 2, 2012 11:15 AM PST via mobile up reply actions
I have a pretty good contract right now?
Says guerrero when asked if he talks to Block about his future.
Why is he even talking about his contract?
What does his contract have to do with his performance?
It sounds like:
a. He’s either threatening Block, or
He’s more focused on his money than on actually doing his job.Either way, he sounds like a bureaucrat with a sense of entitlement.
Hopefully, there’s a strict performance clause in his contract or, at least there will be for the next AD. The university needs to tighten these contracts up and hold people accountable.
The top executives have to lead by example. It’s not fair to ask the athletes to hold themselves accountable, if they are not willing to lead by example.
“I’ve got a pretty good contract.”
What a ridiculous thing to say.
by Geronimo21 on Jan 2, 2012 11:38 AM PST via mobile reply actions
"We’re working on a $160-million renovation of our football situation."
Please define “football situation”.
Does anyone here know about this $160M renovation and what it entails?
by Geronimo21 on Jan 2, 2012 12:15 PM PST via mobile reply actions
$160 million renovation
I believe he was referring to the cost of the ongoing Rose Bowl renovation.
So, his definition of “football situation” is apparently our Rose Bowl tenancy.
Just Called the Chancellor's office
Keep Calling. I added what Donut said in the OC Register as being delusional and that is another reason for his ouster.
I kept hammering the point that this is all in the media, which is damaging the UCLA name brand.
"Players with fight never lose a game, they just run out of time"
~ John Wooden
The world has passed us by...........
After absorbing the New Years weekend of football, I can only hang my head as a die hard Bruin fan. So many good teams, great uniforms, sparkling passers, super receivers, sharp quarterbacks, we, as Bruins, have the unique status of watchers not doers. Bad team, bad quarterback, bad uniforms——-isn’t about time to get with it?????//





















