Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: On Hazards And Hulks And Tigers, Oh My!

Big Picture Thoughts On The State of UCLA WBB

-Bumped. BN Eds.

I know this is my first post in a long time and the womens basketball team is already well on it's way into conference play. I had decided a while ago to step away from posting for various reasons (the biggest being I have moved from Los Angeles to New Orleans for grad school), but as I have continued to both watch the womens team and read on BN, I have thought about putting together a post on my thoughts of the status of the womens team. This may be a little free flowing or long, so bear with me.

On Nikki Caldwell leaving:

I think the last time I posted it was my thoughts of Nikki leaving. I understand why there was such outrage that we could let her go, and I have no idea what happened behind the scenes or what (if anything) DG tried to do to keep her. That being said, there are 3 major reasons why the move neither surprises me nor makes me too mad, at either UCLA or Nikki

1) Money. Someone on the BRO other message boards brought up a great point. Everyone loved Nikki, and the womens basketball team was starting to generate some interest online. But the fact remains without a consistent fan turnout or TV contracts, the team was non-revenue just like every other olympic sport. LSU offered i believe 800,000 a year, way beyond what we pay our non-revenue coaches. The same BRO poster pointed out that as much as we love Nikki, she never advanced beyond the 2nd round of the tournament. Imagine if we gave her a significant pay raise, all the other olympic coaches who have won numerous conference crowns and national championships lining up demanding their increase as well.

2) Location. Location both in region and school I think had an effect here. Regionally, LSU is in the SEC and I think Nikki always wanted to return home (heck, i'm in New Orleans and I think about opportunities to try and get back to the west coast, it happens). Coaching at LSU puts her in closer proximity to the Tennessee job that may need filling soon. And in terms of schools, LSU is more of a womens basketball school. Living in New Orleans, I made the 2 hour drive out to Baton Rouge to see our team take on the lady tigers this year. The fan support is noticeably bigger at LSU, and when I was looking around on the rafters, I noticed LSU made 5 straight final 4s in the mid 2000s, meaning that LSU is a big step up in terms of prestige in the womens basketball world.

3) Business sense. I think Nikki could sense the same things fans were sensing: she was coming off 2 great years full of improvement and many school records and looked like an amazing commodity, but the next year was going to be a step back. UCLA returned a very talented front court, and had an incoming recruiting class to add some size to that front court. However, guard play was about to suffer big time. Leading scorer Darxia Morris and important PG Doreena Cambell were graduating, our 1 guard coming in was an unranked recruit, and all that was left was Mariah Williams and Thea Lemberger, neither of whom really had shown much of anything to that point. It was easy to predict a backward step this year for UCLA and I think Nikki could sense that so made a play while she was at her best, and I can't really fault her for that. This ties me into the team now.

Star-divide

On the 2011-2012 Bruins

As I said above, the roster coming into this season had definite question marks, but was by no means an empty cupboard. Here is the roster Cori Close inherited:

0 Moriah Faulk 5-10 Guard FR Phoenix, AZ (Santa Monica HS)
1 Thea Lemberger 5-7 Guard SO Santa Monica, CA (Santa Monica HS)
2 Jackie Shepard 5-10 Guard JR Atherton, CA (Menlo School)
5 Mariah Williams 5-4 Guard JR Aurora, CO (Regis Jesuit HS)
10 Kacy Swain 6-3 Forward FR Los Angeles, CA (St. Bernard's HS)
11 Atonye Nyingifa 5-11 Forward RS JR Torrance, CA (Redondo Union HS)
20 Rhema Gardner 6-1 Forward/Guard SO Upland, CA (Ayala HS)
22 Madeline Brooks 5-8 Guard FR Temecula, CA (Temecula HS)
23 Markel Walker 6-1 Guard/Forward JR Philadelphia, PA (Schenley HS)
25 Alexis Perry 5-5 Guard FR Cerritos, CA (Brea-Olinda HS)
33 Jasmine Dixon 6-0 Forward SR Long Beach, CA (Rutgers)
34 Corinne Costa 6-4 Forward/Center SO Brentwood, CA (Liberty HS)
35 Rebekah Gardner 6-1 Guard SR Upland, CA (Ayala HS)

Alyssia Brewer 6-3 Forward SR

Sapulpa, OK (Tennessee)

This was the roster after 2 of Nikki's recruits left, Justine Hartman being poached by Cal (the player i'd want more) and Shiela Boykin following Nikki to LSU. A few important points to mention. You'll notice Alyssia Brewer has no number. She is a transfer from Tennessee and is sitting out the season. You'll notice a freshman guard, Alexis Perry, who Coach Cori Close recruiting as soon as she arrived at UCLA for some much needed guard depth. Madeline Brooks and Jackie Shepard are walk-on players.

But then what no one could expect occurred, injury after injury occurred, especially to star players. First and perhaps most tragically, Jasmine Dixon was lost for the season with a torn Achilles tendon. Jackie Shepard and Alexis Perry went down with season injuries during the off season as well. Markell Walker had a thumb injury that kept her out until the LSU game. Then during the season the hits kept on coming. With Dixon out, our team leader Atonye Nyingifa goes down with an ACL injury during the Tennessee game, and just this past weekend at ASU Moriah Faulk went down with an injury as well which i believe is season ending. If that is the case, our roster of available players currently looks like this:

1 Thea Lemberger5-7 Guard SO Santa Monica, CA (Santa Monica HS)

5 Mariah Williams5-4 Guard JR Aurora, CO (Regis Jesuit HS)

10 Kacy Swain6-3 Forward FR Los Angeles, CA (St. Bernard's HS)

20 Rhema Gardner6-1 Forward/Guard SO Upland, CA (Ayala HS)

22 Madeline Brooks5-8 Guard FR Temecula, CA (Temecula HS)

23 Markel Walker6-1 Guard/Forward JR Philadelphia, PA (Schenley HS)

34 Corinne Costa6-4 Forward/Center SO Brentwood, CA (Liberty HS)

35 Rebekah Gardner 6-1 Guard SR Upland, CA (Ayala HS)

Yikes! 7 scholarship players (only 1 which was a starter last year) and a walk-on. Not only that but if you followed the team last year or my posts, you'll remember that Mariah Williams, Thea Lemberger, Corinne Costa and Rhema Gardner were almost non-factors on last year's team and played very few minutes.

With the given state of things I decided that this season to use as BN loves the eye test more than the W/L record to see how much Cori Close could get out of her players. One of the major bugga-boos on Nikki Caldwell was that she got her teams to play phenomenally as a cohesive team unit, but that individual talent development was lacking, and if there was ever a season for talent to develop, this was it. I've been able to watch a few games in person, as well as all home games online via the wooden center video hook up, and road games have an audio broadcast. (on that note: if you hate the am570 UCLA radio announcers, the people who do the online uclabruins.com radio for womens volleyball and basketball are amazing, very educational, fair, and entertaining).

The individual development on this roster has been astounding this season. Rhema Gardner may have to be considered the most improved player on the roster, going from a garbage time player only last year to holding her own defensively, providing good strong interior defense, along with developing her shot. Challenging her for most improved has got to be Thea Lemberger. UCLABruins.com radio team had an interesting stat on her (and Mariah Williams) during the first game. They each scored more points in our first game this season than all of last season combined. She seems more comfortable shooting the ball and has her confidence back, and is a sorely needed 3-point threat to replace the departing Darxia and Campbell. She has been a savior in several games this year, especially the Cal game.

Speaking of the Cal game, Corinne Costa who has been having a great season broke the UCLA record for blocks in a single game during that game, and not only is she using her size better on defense, but has started to develop some post moves to actually become a scoring contributor. Finally Mariah williams, the tiny point guard was chided last season for being such a non-factor on offense that you could guard 4 on 5. While she isn't a major scorer on this year's squad, her speed and confidence has led to her to be willing to drive to the basket for some timely layups or drawing fouls that we wouldn't get last year as well as creating well for her teammates.

So far on the season I actually think Coach Cori Close has been successful in managing a 7 person roster and pulling out some tough wins. Teams have tried pressing the short handed bruins, and any foul trouble can spell disaster. Nikki's teams last year with their ferocious defense could rack up fouls, but this squad doesn't have the bodies to have the luxury of getting into foul trouble, which has been a management issue this season. It could be a rough conference stretch, especially in the back half if fatigue sets in. I was at the Cal game in person and 2 of our biggest contributors, Markell Walker and Thea Lemberger were cramping up in the end but there was no one else to replace them.

As a final note, I'd like to advocate waiting until next season to make any judgements on the quality and caliber of Cori Close as a coach. I think between the sadness of the departure of Nikki Caldwell and the mistrust bruins have of any decision DG makes, people look at the record and assume she's a poor choice or perhaps having a poor season. Jury is still out for me until I see more and next year will go a long way to discovering what her career will look like. But with the major player development this season, the returning of valuable talent currently sitting out the season, and a highly ranked recruiting class that provides much needed depth at guard, next season could be a great season.

This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of BruinsNation's (BN) editors. It does reflect the views of this particular fan though, which is as important as the views of BN's editors.

Comment 26 comments  |  2 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Very sensible post

Thanks for the recap, trueblue.

I think for the most part, the team’s struggles this year are more a case of pouring salt on the wound than an indictment of Coach Close. It definitely makes sense to give her some time, it is not her fault that UCLA is in this situation. The roster issues should be much improved next year, so we will have a better idea. IMO there is still a good opportunity to make a big impact.

But hey, what do I know. I’m just the 800 lbs bruin in the room.

by tasser10 on Jan 10, 2012 9:25 AM PST reply actions  

Interesting note about the possible lack of individual development

Can’t argue with the win/loss record though, nor the ferocious defense that should have put the men’s team to shame. I don’t know what kind of identity the new coach is bringing to the program (haven’t seen the games), but I hope it’s a strong one, despite the injuries.

by BruinEngy on Jan 10, 2012 9:54 AM PST reply actions  

Very thogutful post...

However I will not give CDG a pass on losing CNC. If there was any effort made to placate or support her maybe, but there was not. To me, this is one of the biggest of a long string of embarrassments and should not be dismissed. I agree CCC should get a chance before being judged, but my anger in losing a great young coach has not subsided.

by pg29 on Jan 10, 2012 10:45 AM PST reply actions  

Yup

Two separate issues.

Coach Close should be evaluated on her own merit and not be unfairly associated with the failures of her boss.

However…LOL at “CDG”! No, the C does not stand for “Coach”. Or “Cockroach” for that matter, even though the man seems to survive everything…

But hey, what do I know. I’m just the 800 lbs bruin in the room.

by tasser10 on Jan 10, 2012 10:49 AM PST up reply actions  

You nailed the reasons Nikki left...

No way a savvy girl from the south doesn’t jump at the chance to get back there. Great points about the LSU support and the potential to land the Tennessee job.

About the injuries this year, did the team practice at Spaulding at all?

Thanks for the post, great effort.

by kevb75 on Jan 10, 2012 12:32 PM PST reply actions  

+1

Who wouldn’t jump at the chance to be closer to home and get a nice little wage increase at the same time. Even so, I am still upset about the fact that we couldn’t keep her. The interest level in the woman’s game jumped considerably while she was here.
It will be interesting to see how recruiting goes in the next couple of years.

Been a Bruin since birth

by LongtimeBru on Jan 10, 2012 3:57 PM PST up reply actions  

What a mistake to let Nikki go

Get rid of Adidas and switch to Nike
Screw Dan Gurrerror

by Bruin1396 on Jan 10, 2012 4:05 PM PST reply actions  

Thanks trueblue

In following along, I had no idea if Coach Close was struggling or she just walked into a difficult situation. Seven scholarship players sounds really difficult. Things are starting to make sense now. Do you have any idea how next year’s recruiting class is looking? IIRC, Caldwell was a great recruiter so it will be interesting to see how Close recruits.

Two roads diverged in a wood and I – I tweeted my followers to ask which I should take

by Ryan Rosenblatt on Jan 10, 2012 4:46 PM PST reply actions  

Recruiting

Cori Close is a well known recruiter. During her time at Santa Barbara she was recruiting circles around all california schools not named Stanford and continued her strong recruiting at Florida St.

For her first class it looks like she’s focusing on guard play to replace the departed Cambell and Morris, as well as Rebekah Gardner who graduates at the end of this season. Her class next year has 3 guards ranked in the top 100 recruits.

  1. overall prospect Nira Fields leads the recruiting class to go along with Lauren Holiday (sister of Jrue) and Kari Korver. This class is good enough to be ranked #12 nationally and currently highest of the pac-12

by truebluebruin24 on Jan 10, 2012 4:54 PM PST up reply actions  

weird error

should say #11 overall prospect.

by truebluebruin24 on Jan 10, 2012 4:55 PM PST up reply actions  

Thanks, trueblue

I enjoyed reading your thoughtful post.

While I don’t dispute the many tangible reasons why Coach Nikki Caldwell would leave UCLA for LSU, do you have a feeling for, perhaps, intangible reasons why she might have cut short her tenure here?

I’m thinking, mostly, of that good old-fashioned notion of feeling truly valued and appreciated. You and I are not flies on the wall, and we have no way of knowing. But, as an example, the incident of UCLA’s being placed on, effectively, a lower-seed’s home court in the NCAA playoffs, while UCLA did and said absolutely nothing, strikes me as giving out the opposite vibe of feeling valued and appreciated.

Any thoughts?

Again, thank you for your informative and enjoyable post. Go Bruins.

by Bruinut on Jan 10, 2012 6:22 PM PST reply actions  

I'm not an expert on how the womens seeding works

But I think in many ways it was inevitable to happen. Unlike mens NCAA tournament, not only are womens teams allowed to host at their own regional site but MUST host their own regional, due to an attempt to try and get as many fans as possible to the games. Then teams with high seeds are tried to be kept regionally. Not only that, but teams seedings can be bumped up or down 1 for the sole sake of making home regions work. There-in lay the disaster. Normally going to Spokane would be good for UCLA, staying out west. Problem was the west had 2 host sites: Stanford and Spokane. With Stanford hosting as a clear 1 seed, there was no way UCLA would wind up as a 7, 8, or 16 seed. Thus UCLA due to being a 3 seed “earned” the right to stay west, but at the same time had to face Gonzaga. Now Gonzaga might actually be better than an 11 seed but because 1) Gonzaga had to host and 2) UCLA had to stay west as a 3 seed, that meant Gonzaga had to be the 11 seed by default.

I think it is a horrible, stupid, and broken system that hurts teams in the desire to generate ticket sales. To be fair, having followed the womens NCAA tournament somewhat lightly the last few years, it seems that something like what happened to UCLA happens to 1-2 top seeded teams every year, where due to regional tie-ins, and forced hosting, multiple teams get forced to play a lower seed on their home court (the year before us, it was Ohio St)

As i mentioned at the end of last season this system (which seems universally disliked by fans/espn/blogs) is the worst possible way to run things. Either be like basketball where you don’t host ever, or be like the NIT where higher seeded teams host until the final 4 until it is then played on a neutral site.

As far as Nikki being appreciated, I honestly have no way of knowing about that. The question i guess is was this inevitable. If yes, she always wanted to return to her SEC roots, then that perhaps means more than any money. If no, well then we let a good one get away. I honestly can’t answer that question.

by truebluebruin24 on Jan 10, 2012 8:36 PM PST up reply actions  

Another frustrating thing about the site placements - the 4 seeds got better spots than higher seeds

There was actually a third western site, Salt Lake City, which is actually much closer to LA than Spokane. We would’ve still been playing Utah on their home court, but Utah was a much worse team than Gonzaga. UCLA (and Notre Dame) (a 2 and a 3 seed) got pushed to far away sites, while 4 seeds like Ohio State and Maryland got to stay on their home court, and 4 seeds Michigan State and Kentucky got to play at sites that would’ve been better for higher seeds like us and Notre Dame. Hell, we could’ve done a straight site swap with Kentucky – Albuquerque is still closer to LA than Spokane.

The NCAA’s rules that the set for themselves are dumb, and they don’t even follow them very well.

by jaffa on Jan 11, 2012 12:07 AM PST up reply actions  

I appreciate the response

Thanks, trueblue.

Even given a high liklihood of her leaving, for all the reasons that you mention, and even given the rigid NCAA seedings and team placements, and even given that DG could not have changed anything, I still would have liked to see him be vocal about it.

Given all the circumstances, UCLA got a raw deal, and I think Dan should have had Nikki’s back. It probably wouldn’t have affected Nikki’s leaving, but she would have known that her boss was trying his damndest to help her succeed.

As Mike Leach confirmed following his recruitment by Bill Moos, knowing that your boss really, really wants you matters.

Thanks again for your great post and response. Super stuff.

by Bruinut on Jan 11, 2012 8:08 AM PST up reply actions  

Thanks trueblue.

Unbelievable with the injuries.

by LA Bruin on Jan 10, 2012 7:30 PM PST reply actions  

Great writing! TrueBlue

I swear, any one of us could do a better job than the hacks at the Times.

Winning is not a sometime thing; it's an all the time thing. You don't win once in a while; you don't do things right once in a while; you do them right all the time. Winning is a habit. Unfortunately, so is losing. ~ Vince Lombardi

by MexiBruin on Jan 10, 2012 8:40 PM PST reply actions  

+1

Now there is an accurate statement!

by pg29 on Jan 10, 2012 8:42 PM PST reply actions  

Wow. Fantastic.

I don’t like thinking I might have been unfair to DG, but your analysis of why Caldwell left looks pretty sound. Great detail on everything else, too. I really learned something today!

by Seth Chandler on Jan 10, 2012 9:28 PM PST reply actions  

Disagree with Point #3

Recruiting commits, signings snd subsequent releases from obligation probably would not hasve happened if CNC remained. Incomming class was very promising. Now we have three major injuries and probably more considering off-seaon ones which could not be forseen. Next yeasrs recruits are good and will provide more offense, much better depth, and be more exciting(Fields is the real deal). DG is not totally to blame for DNC leaving but he does little to promote womens sports-remember Coach Wooden always said he preferred the womens game as they were more fundamentally sound. Give Coach Close a chance to be a winner-I think she will be.

by john4justice on Jan 11, 2012 3:55 PM PST reply actions  

Interesting article. It’s kind of a strange coincidence, but the reasons Caldwell left UCLA are strikingly similar to the reasons Joanne Boyle left Cal at almost the same time. Virginia offered Boyle a substantial pay increase to around $800,000, I believe. And she is from North Carolina, and her family is there. Added to that, her father passed away a couple of years ago, and she says she really wanted to be closer to her mom. It’s hard for any school to compete with a big pay raise and, even more, the lure of family and old friends. And I can’t blame a coach for leaving in such circumstances.

And it seems to me that your new coach is doing just fine — at least based on the game her team played against us!

CGB: The Strangest Blog

by CalBear81 on Jan 12, 2012 11:22 PM PST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Bruins Nation, an unofficial daily online scrap book covering the greatest collegiate athletic program in the nation. Established June 16, 2005. GO BRUINS.

Managers

Uclabear1_small Nestor

Arron_afflalo1_small Tydides

Brad_pitt_as_achilles_small Achilles

377011_2642084725867_1068030137_32302525_1166539782_n_small Ryan Rosenblatt

Telemachus_small Telemachus

Licenseplate_small gbruin

2761_small tasser10

Blue_bellerophon_small Bellerophon

Img_0052_2_small Patroclus

Small DCBruins

Of Counsels

094_small Ajax

Menelaus2_small Menelaus

Small Meriones

Small Odysseus

Associates

Eee_small freesia39

Uclabruins_small AHMB