UCLA Basketball: "Every Game is a Must Win"
Those are the words of Ben Howland. Every game is now a must win. We are obviously at this point because CBH knows UCLA needs to get to the Big Dance and to do that we must do very well the rest of the year. Ben Howland has gone so far as to say we must win the Pac-12 tournament.
While part of me thinks it is refreshing for a coach to be overly pessimistic instead of Chianti Dan like on the Pac-12 South football title; I wish he had had not said it. I think the Pac-12 regular season champion has a good shot to go to the 68 team tourney. Also, anything can happen in any one game in a tourney like the Pac-12 so it would be very good to still win the Pac-12 regular season title. I think CBH realizes that when he says every game is a "must win."
And every game is important not just for this year but for next. Shabazz Muhammad, the number one recruit in the nation, has still not decided where he is going. To sum up, here is a best guess (and when you are talking about the minds of 18 year olds, it is a guess): he knows UCLA and CBH is the best place to go to learn basketball and believes in the "UCLA factor" for the NBA. He also wants to play for a team that has a chance to win a title, thus the University of Kentucky. If UCLA can finish strong, it gives UCLA a better chance. If UCLA finishes like it started, Shabazz is going to Kentucky.
Of course, putting aside Shabazz, CBH really needs to finish strong. What does it take to win the Pac-12 this year? Probably no more than four, and certainly no more than 5 losses in Pac-12 conference play. UCLA already has two. Thus to win the Pac-12 title, UCLA has the following game grouping (after the jump):
Can't lose games home games against Utah, Colorado, USC, Stanford, Washington and WSU and road games against USC, Oregon State, Washington State, and Arizona State.
Games that we need to win with maybe one slip up as a group include: on the road against Oregon, Arizona and at home against Cal. Oregon's Matt Court should be illegal as it is ridiculous, that game will be really tough. Arizona the crowd will be loud and the game is on CBS which will make it louder. The good news is we are a better team than Arizona, the bad news is all the three pointers Arizona missed at the Honda Center could easily start to fall in that home environment. Cal is the only team in the Pac-12 that may be a cut above the rest and we will need some home court help.
There is one game we will likely not win: at Washington. It has not happened in years for any UCLA team, even the legitimately good ones. I hope I am wrong, but I don't see it. Washington has talent and the home environment helps make up for the coaching.
Now to the glass is half full and half empty part. First half empty. We are not going to do this because:
Howland will play man to man too much and this team is just not athletic enough. It is frightening to think that right now the best starter and defender for the season is Lazeric Jones, who was arguably the worst last year. UCLA has been destroyed at times this year and it is not like it has been great teams or players destroying our defense. How many times this year has the opponent shot over 60%? Despite having five players 6'10" or taller UCLA ranks 201 in the nation in rebounding.
On offense, a similar theme, our best player for the season has been Lazeric Jones, once again the worst of the five starters last year. Howland is so desperate for offense that he recently moved Jones to two guard to create more shots for him.
On the intangible front, UCLA plays the rest of its home games at the Sports Arena. The negative effect of this arena on fans and players cannot be discounted, except by Chianti Dan who did not seem to realize that playing home games on your rival's campus in an arena that a football school rejected is not a good thing.
But then there is the glass is half full side of the argument.
On defense, since December 14, in its last eight games UCLA opponents have shot over 40% only twice, the same number of times opponents have shot 25% or under. The defense, while not classic Ben Ball Warriors, has been effective. UCLA has also done better in the rebounding wars in the last 7 games, having only lost that rebounding war twice. The Wears in particular are rebounding better.
On offense, playing two point guards in Jerime Anderson and LJ, has paid off in an unexpected way. UCLA averages only 10.8 turnovers per game, good enough for number 9 in the nation. Led by Jerime, UCLA also ranks number 18 in the nation in assists to turnover ratio. And UCLA is now taking better shots. A prime example, not only is David Wear no longer playing small forward, but the Wears are shooting inside more.
On intangibles, the team chemistry is now very good. But the key to success may be similar to the start of the season: Josh Smith.
He's shown flashes of brilliance, tenacity and utter dominance, but has also had moments of immaturity, laziness and complete ineffectiveness.
With Reeves Nelson having been permanently dismissed from the program in early December, the burden on Smith is bigger than ever.
The Wear twins are effective players when they're going well, but neither has the ability to take over a game the way Smith did against Arizona State last Saturday. . . .
"We need Josh to play as he did Saturday," coach Ben Howland said earlier this week. "He was very inspired. He played really hard, with a little animation." . . .
A Smith resolved to make 2012 his most productive year yet means there's hope for a somewhat-floundering program. Without the leaner version of the big man, though, chances of success are slim.
Bad puns aside. UCLA knows what it must do. Play hard every night as all games are now "must win."
Go Bruins, Beat SC!
33 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Excellent Post- But What Happened to Our Program?
Great analysis. Makes that loss at Stanford all the more painful.
The longer term question is whether this is the state of affairs for the basketball program in the future- figuring out whether we can win the regular season conference championship, whether that will be good enough to make the NCAA tourney, etc.
In my mind, there are 5 fabled programs in college basketball- UCLA, North Carolina, Kentucky, Kansas, Duke. One could argue whether other names should be added or subtracted. But the point is that there are very few programs at this level.
And for sure none of the other programs are going through an analysis like this. Making the tourney is a given at the other fabled programs, and used to be at UCLA. The question at the other fabled programs is champion, final 4 or only elite 8.
We need to get back to that level, and pronto. And if the current regime is not capable of doing that every year, then out they go.
And DG has to go in any event, for putting us in the situation of playing our must win home games on Southern Cal’s conference. When Cal renovated Haas, they moved their games to the Oakland Arena, an NBA facility. They didn’t go the old gym on Stanford’s campus. So DG, even if totally ignorant, had a prior example to follow. But it was too much to ask, I guess.
Anyway, again, great info. Thanks.
Great Point on Cal
I wish played all our games at the Honda Center, we won all our games there.
The atmosphere at Honda is so different than the Sports Arena
You can feel in the air that the fans do not want to be there. The cheerleaders and pep band do their best to make it feel like home but it sucks.
by Bruin Dad and Grad on Jan 12, 2012 9:15 AM PST up reply actions
Cal played at least one game at the old Cow Palace
Against UCLA. I know because I was there! The Cow Palace makes the Sports Arena look like the Staples Center by comparison. While I am no fan of Chianti Dan, I must say that it is unclear to me what UCLA should have done this season rather than play games at the Sports Arena. I like the Honda Center (although I think it is unnecessary to magnetically wand everyone before they enter the arena), but it took me 2 hours to drive down there last Thursday and that was using the car pool lane! My understanding is that the Staples Center wasn’t available because of all the teams that use it and the Forum wasn’t available because it, too, is being remodeled. Maybe Gersten Pavilion at LMU or Firestone Fieldhouse at Pepperdine? Our attendance has been crappy this year, but I am guessing that the capacity of those arenas would not accommodate the number of season ticket holders that we have (even if people don’t show, they still pay for the tickets). Build a temporary facility on campus? How much would that cost and how many people would it hold?
Maybe the renovation of Pauley could have been planned differently so that the season would not be lost. I know at Stanford that they built an entire new football stadium in place of the old one without missing a season. But maybe a renovation is trickier and takes more time or the cost of accelerating the process would be prohibitive. Hey, at least they serve beer at the Sports Arena!
Combination Instead of C Dan Epic Fail
I think for those early games (non-conference) playing at Gersten or Firestone would have been fine. It would have actually in one way helped. We would have filled the smaller places and it helps to play to a full house even if that house is smaller. I really think we beat LMU at Firestone. The depressing Sports Arena and crowd certainly contributed to that lose. We even could have played LMU, EWU, MTSU etc. at the Wooden Center. There are season ticket issues in those places but we are not getting huge attendance for those games.
For the PAC 12 move to Honda. Yes the travel is harder but the OC crowd hopeful would help out.
The worst possible move is to play games on your football school rival’s campus in an Arena so bad they no longer use it. Anyone who works for UCLA has to understand the unique rivaly between UCLA and SUC.
How much would it have cost to play at the smaller venues?
It would be interesting for me to know how many people bought season tickets this year? If the gym only seats a couple thousand people, not all season ticket holders would be allowed to purchase tickets for that game. As a long-time season ticket holder, I would not be happy if I wasn’t allowed to purchase tickets for a game (even to watch this team play). But maybe it would be worth it to have a better atmosphere and perhaps the team would play better (the performances against LMU and Middle Tennessee were uninspiring, to say the least)! And I will say that the Honda Center games have been better and the drive is tolerable on the weekends. Plus they serve beer too!
Perhaps my “affinity” for the Sports Arena is because my Dad took me there to see my first Laker game, Lakers vs. Celtics featuring Jerry West, Elgin Baylor, Bill Russell and Red Auerbach! I don’t think they have changed the upholstery since that game, but that all adds to the nostalgia for me!
Nostalgia
is why Pauley is being renovated instead of UCLA getting a brand new stadium. Sometimes, it works against you.
I still would have liked a temporary stadium on campus. That would have been awesome.
But hey, what do I know. I’m just the 800 lbs bruin in the room.
Yeah but do they serve Chianti?
If they serve wine, it may have influenced Dan’s decision.
They do serve wine!
Looks like Old Rotgut – probably not up to Chianti Dan’s standards!
In response to bruin7982
Build a temporary facility on campus? Yes. Tent the LATC or build something similar to Towell Library. It could have been done.
How much would that cost and how many people would it hold? Questions The Donut should have researched and known down to a nickel before he went with the Sports Arena. I would venture to say the lost revenue is greater than the cost of the project.
Winning is not a sometime thing; it's an all the time thing. You don't win once in a while; you don't do things right once in a while; you do them right all the time. Winning is a habit. Unfortunately, so is losing. ~ Vince Lombardi
Missed that game
Cal had to play 2 full seasons outside Berkeley, because it took that long for old Harmon Gym to morph into Haas Pavilion. The Cow Palace game must have been in 1998. I went to the 1999 game in the Oakland (now Oracle) Arena. Bay Area Bruins rented a giant suite behind one basket- it was an excellent place to watch the Bruins.
I looked through the Cal press releases, and they definitely played 100% of their “home” games in 1998-99 at Oakland Arena. Their press releases also sound like they played all their home games the prior season at Oracle (then called New Arena). So the Cow Palace must have been a fluke, unlike DG’s purposeful march to the U$C campus for the rest of this season.
Our chances of winning every remaining game are slim and none...
And Slim didn’t show up for the season.
Louisville, KY for UCLA class of '87
I know but
to have a shot we need to win all but 2. I think that difficult but not impossible.
if I had to stab an optimistic guess
The UW away game is a sure loss, but I don’t see how we can lose other conference games (Cal/Stanford is the other hard road trip in my mind)
I refuse to believe Oregon should be a threat…what a turn around if they are.
Actually, Colorado is off to a hot start too huh? Oh how UCLA has fallen…
What do you make of Colorado?
They have a pretty weak SOS, but they’ve also beaten some “good” teams in the Pac12. Are they for real?
But hey, what do I know. I’m just the 800 lbs bruin in the room.
They are 3-0 at HOME
Against Utah, WSU and UW is a streaky team. (If I am Cal I don’t want to play UW because they could suddenly shoot lights out, but if I am UTAH or ASU I want to play them because no matter how bad you are, you still have a shot.)
Also, altitude probably helps them at home. We may have had a slight break in not playing them on the road.
As far as the team, they have a good inside player in Andre Robinson and are lead by a 5th year senior in scoring. Not deep, can’t get any injuries, but in a bad PAC 12, it makes some sense they are doing better than expected.
That said, I would be surprised if they do not go 0-2 this weekend. They are not beating Cal. Stanford is their first true test. If they play close or win, they are more likely for real as far as the PAC 12 goes. If they get blown out, that is a sign they are only a threat at home.
Thanks
I don’t know how real Stanford is either. Looks to me like they have already peaked. I can see Colorado splitting this weekend. I’d feel a lot better if we had beat Stanford…
But hey, what do I know. I’m just the 800 lbs bruin in the room.
I know that is the loss that kills
If we beat Stanford, after this weekend we would likely be tied for first (in the loss column at least.) We had chances in that game and I think we are the better team.
I am not sure about Stanford either, but road wins this year in the PAC 12 are the place you determine how good a team is. (Or how bad in ASU’s victory over USC.) Thus your point may be valid on Stanford but ether way if Colorado loses big to Stanford, they are likely not for real.
Well you are looking good for your split prediction
Colorado played Cal tough and Utah almost beat Stanford.
I wanted Utah to beat Stanford
That would have helped us.
Colorado led by 7 at the half, then lost by 7. Looks like Cal is a good 2nd half team. Coaching anyone?
But hey, what do I know. I’m just the 800 lbs bruin in the room.
Stanford wasted CO
CO has a few good players and a few raw ones. Might be tough for them on the road for a bit.
2 different thoughts in this thread
1) Want we want to see/expect to see for the rest of the year
To me the real goal for the rest of the season is to see continued improvement. Smith staying mentally and physically committed to the game. The Wears playing hard nose, physical games. Lamb continuing to grow. Jones and Anderson getting better.
If we make the tourney with that great. If not, I would still be “OK” if the team is fighting, clawing and getting better. With the start we have had, it may not be enough.
The team has, at least, become reasonably fun to watch again.
2) How did the program get to this place.
And on that I agree with everyone else. My expectations for the rest of the season are not acceptable at a top notch program like UCLA.
by Bruin Dad and Grad on Jan 12, 2012 9:23 AM PST reply actions
I agree with both your points
1. UCLA needs to make the Tourney. I do not think anything else is acceptable. if we win the PAC 12, we may even stay out west.
2. This team has become as you said “reasonably fun” to watch. By that I mean you can see they are trying and growing as players. You want to root for them unlike say last year when at times some of the team was going through the motions and not trying.
CBH can coach X and Os and teach fundamentals. But that said, losing talented players like Lee, Honeycutt and Nelson really hurts. With the exception of Josh (if he gets in shape) and maybe Norman Powell, no one on this team has a likely pro-future. That does not seem right for a UCLA team. Having pro-players is not the goal, but have talented players is a goal.
The recipe for winning the PAC has been and will continue to be
Win at home, split on the road. Despite getting swept in the bay area, it is not inconcievable that we can either sweep the Oregons or the Arizonas trip.
I really think that 4 losses wins the league, and even 5 might be able to do it.
Your bucketing is spot on, though I think we can “slip up” against 2 teams and still win the regular season – or at least tie for it.
How much do you wish we had Utah/Colorado on the road instead of the Bay Area schools?
Anderson and Jones
I think this is going to work out to be the best move of the season. It may, indeed, SAVE our season. Fact is that guard play is essential, and when we tried to go big at the beginning of the season we just got killed out on the floor. By letting Anderson and Jones to be almost co-point guards, we can maximize the time on the floor of our two best smaller players. 30+min for each of them a game is OK for me…they can handle it.
We’ve still got a lot of size and with JS and the WTwins and should continue to have an advantage inside.
I think Cal and UW are going to drop a couple of games coming up, so I’m gonna say that 5 losses in conference should still get us the regular season title. I think how we finish the season is going to be more important than that though. A long win streak would also help.
By now CBH should know the proper combinations at the proper times.
But does he?
We’ll see.
Hopefully, D’End can get back in the rotation,
and Powell’s game improve.
The more Lamb relaxes, the better he plays.
Our wings will tell the tale.
And the Wears must become better Defensive rebounders.
And with Josh, it’s: How much do you want it??
Go Bruins!
Check Parker's Twitter feed
according to the feed, he will redshirt this year, looking at surgery on his knee. Too bad, we need him now. He does mention that he will be graduating in the Fall, which is terrific.
http://twitter.com/#!/deendparker
As much as I hate to say....
It seems like no one really cares, or not expressing their cares about basketball…I myself not interested this year anymore, because they are boring to watch…I’m not a CBH fan never really was, I’m happy that he took UCLA to the final four 3 straight years but just not enough…I think it’s time for a change!
by Trojanswearskirts on Jan 12, 2012 3:14 PM PST reply actions
It's Howland's program
I will give him credit for success and hold him responsible for failure.
honestly
if the wrong team wins the pac 12 (ie UCLA) then the PAC could easily be a 1 bid conference (that is to say the tourney winner). Even at 16-2 in conference which is probably not worth discussing until lets say we string 10 wins together we would at best be on the bubble. I just don’t see the sense in breaking down the next 14 games to see if we can win the conference. It may sound nice, but even if UCLA were to accomplish that at 14-4 it is probably cosmetic because I would be shocked if they were to be able to grab an at large winning the conference at 14-4.
We are probably better served having 2 teams like Cal and Colorado or Washington make a big run.. get thier RPIs solidly in the 20s and get wins off of them. The reality is if we win the conference it will actually do more to hurt our chances unless we tied with the two top teams with say 3 losses each. With 1 current top 50 RPI team left on the schedule and an awful record of 1-7 vs the top 100 it is nearly impossible to conceive of an at large berth. PAC 12 tourney or bust to make the NCAA as it stands now.
That being said the team has no business worrying about crap like this. They need to get better and win each and every game as decisively as they can. You can only do what you can do and looking past winning the next game is a fruitless endeavor.
You may very well be right
CBH agrees with you.
by DCBruins on Jan 12, 2012 7:55 PM PST via mobile up reply actions

by 




















