UCLA at USC: Not Just Another Game
Last year Reeves Nelson was nonplussed about the USC vs. UCLA game, infamously saying it was a bigger deal to alumni. While Reeves is coming up short in Lithuania, this year Bruins team seeming has the right attitude for tonight's game at 6 p.m. PST, no matter how bad USC is looking right now. .
"Us versus USC, that's the battle of L.A. and one of the biggest rivalries, so we always want to beat them," Lamb said. "It's still a big deal. This game is not just between us. It's for us as well as our alumni, and they're playing for themselves as well as their alumni. USC and UCLA has always been a huge rivalry, and that's part of the reason why I came here."
While another "professional player" who left early Tyler Honeycutt (the king of playing with less than 100% effort) is gone. Tyler would have certainly cruised in this game, knowing that he could probably turn it on whenever he wanted and UCLA would likely still win. Fortunately some of the guys still around from last year have the right attitude. Lazeric Jones got it right when he said last year:
"I felt like I wasn't a true Bruin until I beat USC."
Jones is evening talking about the history of the game:
Monday night UCLA senior guard Lazeric Jones, who as a junior college transfer has only briefly experienced the rivalry, sent a message on Twitter that he was watching the rebroadcast of a 2002 UCLA-USC game from the Sports Arena.
"It was nuts, it was crazy," he said. "It was really good." Jones noted how impressive it was to see eventual NBA players Earl Watson and Dan Gadzuric on the floor. And USC's Brian Scalabrine, who is still playing in the NBA. "I knew Brian was good," Jones said. "I did not know he was that good."
Jones said he realized how important the USC-UCLA rivalry was when he walked onto the Galen Center court last year, well before tipoff. "I was the only person, by myself, and I got booed. Everyone knew exactly who I was."
And it is not just the veterans who understand the importance of this game.
"This is a big game for us," said David Wear, UCLA's top rebounder who will be playing in the rivalry for the first time. "I don't think we're going to overlook them just because they haven't won a game in the Pac-12."
Yes, USC is bad and UCLA should take advantage of that but I also agree with a USC player and Howland when they say:
"It's a rivalry game, so we've got to come out and play like it's a rivalry game with energy and force," USC's Dewayne Dedmon said.
. . .
"They're going to be very difficult on their home floor," Howland said. "You can throw out all records. It's all about UCLA playing USC. They're going to have all their fans there. We'll get a couple hundred tickets."
The home court factor in the Pac-12 can't be underestimated. Going into the week, Colorado was undefeated at home. On the road they lost twice, including getting blown out by Stanford. But this is a game UCLA "must win" over a bad USC team that is just not ready, according to their coach:
"These guys are going to end up having a lot of success, probably not this year," third-year USC coach Kevin O'Neill said about his team. "They're just in roles they can't handle now. They're a little overwhelmed."
This team can go a long way not only toward their goals of winning but winning over fans if they play hard the whole game against USC and put them away. While there have been too many articles and ink recently on Josh Smith, he is obviously a guy who really needs to show not only UCLA fans but his teammates he is going to give a 100%. In that vein, Jerime Anderson is teasing him a bit for costing him assists when he misses the bunnies and or doesn't dunk.
Guard Jerime Anderson is one of the main catalysts in that effort. A senior point guard, Anderson makes sure Smith hears about it whenever Smith misses an inside shot because he layed it up instead of dunking it.
"I tell him all the time ‘You owe me one' because sometimes in a game he goes up and he's right there at the basket and he'll lay it up softly," Anderson said. "And I'll just say ‘You owe me one.' And it just kept growing to two, three, four. Now he's starting to make up for lost time."
USC should be a "bunny" tonight but this team needs to play hard. Not just for tonight for the students and fans who need a win over USC but for themselves to set the tone for the rest of the must win season.
Go Bruins. Beat SC!
34 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
The last couple of years, that which "should be"
rarely actually is for this team. It sounds like a number of our players actually get that this game matters more than most. I’m eager to see if they can convert should win and need to win into actually did win.
With this being a home game for $c, I’m actually tempted to follow Fox’s advice – not to avoid the announcers, but to avoid their ‘band.’
Roses are red, violets are blue...f*** $C.
I think I hate their band most of all
This is the only song we know
This is the only song we play
Over and Over.
One more reason to want a blow out….so we do not hear their band as much.
by Bruin Dad and Grad on Jan 15, 2012 11:03 AM PST up reply actions
An insult to the word "band"
By calling their one note, horse worshipping clowns a “band.”
by Nestor on Jan 15, 2012 12:47 PM PST via mobile up reply actions
Horrible song
This is the only song we know.
It’s boring and it’s slow.
We really wish you’d go.
But hey, what do I know. I’m just the 800 lbs bruin in the room.
I'm hoping this is where the team gets a killer instinct.
I will NEVER forget hearing Bill Walton say, “Why beat ’em by 20 if you can beat ’em by 30.”
Bruin Home Game in Next Game vs. $C
I am guessing that we are the only team in the country which will be playing its rival twice on its campus in the “home” and away series this season. Thanks Dan.
UCLA- U$C
I am glad that at least some of these players get the importance of beating $C. I graduated from UCLA in 1971. Back then, UCLA- U$C was THE matchup in every sport, except baseball where UCLA unfortunately wasn’t that strong (although I remember a great win at Sawtelle (as it was called then) in 1969.
I think it was bigger back in the day, because only 1 team from the conference went to any bowl game (Rose Bowl or bust), and only 1 team from the conference went to the NCAA basketball tournament. So if you beat $C, not only could you shut them up, but you also ended their season.
In football, that meant that Gary Beban’s 1967 team stayed home, despite being the 2nd best team in the country (if not the best except for a missed PAT). But in basketball, that meant that $C stayed home in 1971, despite being the 2nd best team in the country, having only 2 losses both to UCLA.
It is hard to see the rivalry in football, thanks to DG’s reign of error. We need to get back to their level of wins-losses (not how they do it), to make the rivalry relevant.
That makes it all the more impressive that these basketball players get it. For their sake and ours, I hope they play like their words imply, and the rest of the team gets it as well going forward.
Especially when we're getting killed in football every year
We need to absolutely own these guys in basketball.
Shabazz is watching
Let’s light ’em up!
by Strathmore&Gayley on Jan 15, 2012 9:22 AM PST reply actions
Holy Crap SC is a 1 point favorite
Could that be true?
You are kidding!
Someone thinking home court is the big advantage?
by Uclaart1970 on Jan 15, 2012 10:09 AM PST up reply actions
I just checked three sites -- YES
Wow. How low have we slipped?
As to “home court”, we really don’t have one or that advantage.
Sad.
sjh
by Class of 66 on Jan 15, 2012 10:12 AM PST up reply actions
Seats were still available
We could create some noise for the team, albeit a small group of us.
by Uclaart1970 on Jan 15, 2012 10:13 AM PST up reply actions
Sounds like SC fans are betting and UCLA fans are uncertain about this team.
Facts dont matter in Las Vegas odds…what matters is who is betting.
by Bruin Dad and Grad on Jan 15, 2012 11:05 AM PST up reply actions
Tydides is right
Kevin O’Neill trogans have played better against UCLA then other teams. I am more worried about this game then I was ASU but still.
Even more reason to kick some butt and don't let up until the clock runs out.
Take no prisoners.
Been a Bruin since birth
Going tonight to the game-wondered how hostile USC can be
To the fans of blue and gold? I am taking my grandson and daughter and we are die hard UCLA—anybody out there been to Galen? Are we going to run into issues beyond a few comments? We are sitting in section 219. My friend’s son plays drums for Trojan band, (broke my heart when he picked USC) but he said we would be fine, but how would he know?
So it should be fine
but others who have been there more recently should weigh in
You'll be fine.
I went a few years ago with a Togan friend and his Trogan family. I sat among Trogans and not so much as a single unkind word was said to me.
My favorite part was when they went on a run and took a good lead and their fans were besides themselves with joy thinking they were going to win. During a timeout in the silence that followed, I turned to my friend and said matter of factly but just loudly enough that everyone around us could hear me I said, “It’s kind of impressive how much everybody around here thinks they are going to win.”
I got a lot of glares for that, but nothing else. We won the game, which made it that much sweeter.
Winning is not a sometime thing; it's an all the time thing. You don't win once in a while; you don't do things right once in a while; you do them right all the time. Winning is a habit. Unfortunately, so is losing. ~ Vince Lombardi
Just a comment on tickets at Galen
This comment goes with the issues we are having with the AD and Chianti Dan. The Galen tickets range from 15-40 or a family pack of 4 with hot dog/drink for $5 more. Service charge $5 and print at home charge $1.50 (for all). This is way more affordable than our tickets and hence why the $40 section was sold out.
But their student section is horrid (behind the basket)
I guess another thing Howland struggles with is teaching his players the importance of
beating SUC.
You would assume that would be ingrained into their DNA the first day they arrived on campus, and certainly on the first day of practice. I’m glad to hear a few of the players are figuring it out for themselves.
A little bit OT, but it is mentioned.
Who measures athletes without shoes on? There is no point and time where an athlete is competing without shoes, why wouldn’t you want the height that they play the sport at?
That’s ridiculous to me. IDK.
"I have one word for you...Be careful."
-Jose Guillen
It is not the shoes it is the heels
Reeves was much shorter than his 6’’8" listing. Kevin Love is not 6’10". To get those heights those guys are cheeting with heels or combing their hair straight up.
Crap
Gus Johnson is calling the game.
Expect an exceedingly close thriller in the 50s.
I'd take a Gus Johnson-announced
5 point win over a 15 point win with most any other crew.
Roses are red, violets are blue...f*** $C.

by 



















