UCLA Trashes Southern Cal Trojans, 66-47
So much for the line in Vegas and the tough 13 mile trek across town (or the hop skip and a jump from the cesspool we currently call "home"). The Bruins used a late first half surge to blitz the Trogans, leaving them dumbfounded, stunned, and with no answers, delivering a solid 66-47 pounding (box score).
As many complaints as we've heard about UCLA's offense throughout the Ben Howland era, leave it to usc to show us what offensive ineptitude really looks like. A team as discombobulated and disjointed as the Trogans makes it really difficult to tell how effective our defense was. There were as many signs of the Bruins being active and moving their feet and being in good position as there were signs that usc may have had trouble achieving tonight's score in an empty gym. Besides more poor decisions, especially early on, from Joshua Smith on his fouls, there isn't a lot to complain about when a team suffocates offensively like the Trogans did. usc's hobbit-like guard Maurice Jones led the Trogans with 13 points, but clearly lost the overall battle of the Joneses to Lazeric Jones. Maurice was also their best offensive weapon. It was that kind of night.
Offensively, again, there's not a lot to take away from a game where we entered garbage time 5 minutes before halftime. Perhaps Tyler Lamb fouling out with a goose egg in the score sheet, but everyone else seemed to get what they wanted in the first half. The second half devolved into Ben Howland's typical game shortening ball control offense which left little in the way of offensive excitement, but given that I didn't complain about it when we were winning consistently and it was working, I'll refrain from expounding too much on that now that we're not.
It was basically as uneventful as a rivalry game could be, and confirmed the same trends we've been noticing about this team recently. Powell is awesome, rebounds well, and needs to play more. The Wears are fantastic when they choose their shots wisely, and at least attempt to defensive rebound. Lazeric Jones is going to shoot, and we need him to make a good percentage against good teams. Smith still isn't in great shape but better than he was at the start of the season and still commits bad fouls. So no surprises really. The only question remaining is whether Utah or usc is the worst team in the conference, and I think usc just took the lead.
Up next, on the road in Corvallis on Thursday night, the high scoring Oregon State Beavers. That means dust off your "President Obama mention" drinking games.
18 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Second half offense
It was more UCLA not converting the layups than anything wrong with Howland’s offense. I thought they had a number of pretty decent looks… but a lack of focus finishing the play and sloppy turnovers made the FG% worse.
Good stuff
Another thought – we can’t take anything from this game. Trojans are HORRIBLE. Just awful. There don’t have one player in their garbage program who can be a starter in our team. Actually I won’t take any of their players as a bench player on our team. They are a joke.
While holding serve at home and getting a convincing win in their piece of crap gym is OK, if this team is truly putting it together, then it will sweep the Oregon trail next week. As DC said earlier this week … ever game is a must win. No slip up allowed if Howland wants to maintain his viability as the long term coach at UCLA.
I take nothing on Defense BUT
We shot 51% on the road in the PAC 12 against a very good defensive team. Kansas only shot 41% against SUC, as did Las Vegas. For the last 12 minutes in the first half we looked pretty dam good on offense.
On Defense I agree with Tydides “empty gym” comment. They are terrible
Exactly...Anti-Howland agendists can spin it anyway they want...
but we executed very efficiently on offense, on the road, against one of the better defensive teams in the country.
The first few weeks of this season were a completely embarrassing cluster*#$%, and Howland and staff deserve their fair share of responsibility for allowing the chemistry issues and Nelson situation to spiral out of control to the extent that they did. However, since the Nelson cancer has been excised, our Bruins are 8-2, and seemingly getting better in all phases of the game on a weekly basis. Like it or not, Howland is doing a good job with this team.
by nachosgrande on Jan 16, 2012 9:34 AM PST up reply actions
DC Bruins and all the frontpager are on the same page
This is nothing about spinning an “anti-Howland” agenda. UCLA has played well since Nelson has been gone but the 8-2 record has been compiled against tomato cans and one of the loss was a bad one when we blew a winnable game against a mediocre Stanford team. The fact remains if this team does not make the tournament, we will need a new coach to lead this program. No ifs and buts.
"No if and buts" about it...
Even with Howland going 8-2 since reeves, and us losing to a terrible 5-1 (15-3) Stanford team, despite it being the first pac-12 game for our relatively young team, Howland and his staff deserve to take all the blame if we don’t make the tourney. We will need a new coach to head our program and Howland shall never coach another game at the college level for his inability to take our supremely talented team to the tournament.
Stanford has fattened up on an easy schedule
They have not beaten any decent team. That was a game a UCLA team with most talent in the conference should have won. And that 8-2 rercord against a group of pathetic opponents designed to fattened up the record is expected not handkerchief around to show fruition of great coaching.
If UCLA misses the tourney for the second time in three years we will be calling for a coaching change. There will be no compromises on that. If you have different standards for success at UCLA you will have to take them somewhere else.
by Nestor on Jan 16, 2012 7:23 PM PST via mobile up reply actions
Nestor and I have same point, just different styles
I wrote the following in another post:
Today is a day to feel good about UCLA basketball. For this feeling to last longer than a few days UCLA needs to continue to win on the road against OSU on Thursday.</blockquote>
So Nestor is looking at the glass half empty and I am looking at it half full. We should not be in this spot and I agree with him. The SUC win was nice but it does mean that much if we don’t continue to win.
Thus if we make the Tourney and get Shabazz, Nestor will be "happy." On the flip, if we can’t get even a split for the Oregon trip, I will sound more like Nestor.
LOL
“He’s doing a good job with this team”.
As if this team was just handed to him. His troubles are his own makings. No excuses. Once we get some real road wins against actual good teams, then we’ll have something to talk about. U$C is terribly bad.
But hey, what do I know. I’m just the 800 lbs bruin in the room.
I missed the game but just saw the box score...
We out rebounded them 39-17? Wow. More of that please…
by DoubleTroubleBruin on Jan 15, 2012 8:22 PM PST reply actions
Was at the game
First time at Galen Center and I was very impressed. Hope Paley looks at least as good. Suc never sells out though I hear.
Nice amount of Bruins at the game. Anthony Stover was a beast and Josh Smith looked slow but also well-guarded. You can’t fault Suc for their defense and it seemed they saw the asu game and practiced to make sure Josh Smith wasn’t a factor. Suc free throw shooting was atrocious too.
Fun time, I’m excited for the obamafest Thursday!
by PopnFried on Jan 15, 2012 8:44 PM PST via mobile reply actions
Highest output against So Cal vaunted(?) defense...
Well, UNLV put up 66 as well, but let So Cal score 8 more points than we did, both games being at Galen.
I like our trend!
Josh Smith not being a factor
is more about his lack of intensity. Cant believe he isn’t the most dominate player in college ball.
"Success is never final, Failure is never fatal. It's Courage that counts" - John Wooden.

by 



















