Mazzone Offense - Goalline/Short Yardage
-Bumped. BN Eds.
For background, read parts on philosophy, the base zone key game, the snag/quick passing game, protecting base concepts, putting base concepts together, and dropback passing.
One major criticism of spread offenses is that they struggle in the red zone. I think there's some truth to that - you need to be able to run the ball downhill especially when you're inside the 10-yard line. Spread offenses are meant to create space and attack voids, but as you approach the goal line, you lose space. There's no vertical threat when you're inside the 5, so defenses can concentrate on stopping the run and the short passes.
Feel free to chime in with a comment below about this either way, as the stats aren't really all that conclusive - there was a mix of "spread" and "pro-style" teams in the top of the red zone efficiency rankings, so make of that what you will (also keep in mind those stat factor in FGs as red zone "success" - count only TDs and the rankings look fairly different). I think that plenty of other things affect how well you do in the red zone, as no matter what you run it's hard to overcome missed blocks, penalties, turnovers, etc in the red zone.
Either way, when you're inside the red zone, you have to change up your offensive philosophy no matter what you do. Mazzone's short-yardage/goal line package is going to look familiar as he uses the pistol formation, specifically with 3 backs in what is generally called the "pistol diamond".
The pistol diamond is something that started becoming popular a few years back. I remember seeing Oklahoma and Oklahoma State messing with it, and Dana Holgorson over at WVU has really started integrating it into his offense (Tavon Austin just scored another TD on Clemson with that jet sweep out of the pistol diamond). I don't remember seeing us run anything with 3 backs in our little pistol experiment (maybe someone can correct me - I only got to watch half the games this season). I know we used a 2-back pistol formation inside the red zone a lot.
The advantage of the pistol, in Mazzone's case, is that he can still use his zone key game by motioning out one of the upbacks, just like how he does out of his 3 and 4 WR sets, but use alignment to run the ball more downhill. If the defense doesn't respond to motion, the QB can take the snap, pivot, and throw it immediately, instead of dropping back, planting a foot and throwing. Otherwise he can hand it off to the back on the inside zone.
The pistol diamond series is fairly cheap, meaning that it's similar enough to the rest of the offense that it won't take up a lot more practice time (keeping in mind it's a situational package). For the most part, Mazzone ran inside zone, zone key, and some kind of playaction out of his look, all things they do in their regular offense as well.
Inside Zone
Zone blocking is the basis of the rest of Mazzone's running game, so this is nothing new - just a different way to line up. Out of the regular shotgun formations, Mazzone controls the backside defenders (prevents them from playing the run too hard) by reading them with the quick backside screen or the zone read. Out of the pistol, he just blocks them with an upback. Simple stuff. Note that there's an unblocked safety backside - this play only really works if he stays at home. If he cheats in to play the run, then you have to do to protections, like playaction or the zone key to force him to stay out there.
Zone Key
This is the same concept out of the base formations, just a different look. Linemen block the same and the QB makes the same reads. Main difference is the path of the back, he takes a more downhill path as he's directly behind the QB. Motion either removes a defender from the box to open up the inside run, or puts a speedy guy on the edge with the ball quickly. This is very similar to how West Virginia uses their jet sweep out of pistol diamond to get speed to the edge quickly. If you've been paying attention to the previous cutups, you've probably already seen a few TDs scored off of this concept.
Playaction
If the defense stacks the box anticipating run, Mazzone will run playaction. They like the fade if they get 1-on-1 coverage with either their big 6'4" WR or their quick little guy and either throw it up or hit the back shoulder fade. You've got to think that they'll put Joe Fauria out there next year and throw it up to him if they get him singled up on a corner. This was the playcall in the Vegas Bowl on the 100+ yard pick-six by Boise State. They had the look they wanted, no safety help and WR all alone, but the WR didn't get open. They'll also do things like sneak the FB/TE upback out of the backfield (Anthony Barr would probably do well here as he did this last year) or the WR on the post, like you get with an I-formation playaction passing game.
Sneak
Mazzone will run QB sneak for very short yardage - just shift the QB under center and have him fall forwards, nothing special.
Cutups
The pistol diamond stuff was fairly limited and situational from what I saw. They like it in the red zone and when coming out of their own endzone. As it's fairly new I'd expect it to develop a bit more as time goes on. It adds a new dimension for spread teams to operate in a pseudo-2 back look and get out of their regular 3x1 or 2x2 4WR stuff. It's a cheap change-up as you don't have to install anything completely foreign to your team, but you still force the defense to play you as if you've got a couple backs in the backfield.
Mazzone still uses it to put bodies inside and run downhill, but still forces the defense to think about defending the entire field sideline to sideline with constraints like the swing to the motion man combined with the inside zone or playaction to the deep middle, fade, and flat. As you can see in the cut-ups below, they're looking to run inside whenever possible but when the defense leaves CBs singled up outside or stays bunched in against motion, they'll hit the quick swing route to get to the edge.
West Virginia is probably the best I've seen with running stuff out of the pistol diamond, as they've mixed in stuff from a more traditional 2-back running attack that works in downfield playaction. They've gotten away from the Mike Leach stuff that relies on short passes and crossing routes, and have gone to looks with more backs in the backfield and downfield vertical routes off of their PA game. If we really wanted to get more "pro-style" as Mora said when he got hired then I think this would be the way to do it, with what WVU is doing as a model.
This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of BruinsNation's (BN) editors. It does reflect the views of this particular fan though, which is as important as the views of BN's editors.
16 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
One thing that really annoyed me with CRN and very short yardage situations...
… was that the QB never was under center when the best call would be a QB sneak to get that one yard. Never made any sense to me.
Go Bruins
Great series.
I just prefer a pro set with the QB under center and smash mouth football with plenty of options, especially throws to multiple tight ends, in short yardage. The spread, even with the diamond, just seems too soft to me. I would even much prefer the old single wing with the double tackles and the fricking serpentine out of the huddle. Talk about power football. Shades of Red Sanders! That would be awesome. Why the Hell not? IIRC the spread dates from the 50s anyway. So why not play UCLA football circa 1954 and scare the crap out of ‘em every time we’re near the fricking goal line?
Love your detailed posts. Still makes my head hurt. Thanks!
Under center vs pistol
I don’t think that there’s a huge difference between the two – either way the back lines up 7 or 8 yards deep and runs straight ahead, the only difference is the QB receives the ball via shotgun snap and turns around to hand it off, vs the QB receives the ball directly and runs backwards to hand it off.
The main advantage under center gives you is that you can easily QB sneak it.
Pistol diamond isn’t necessarily “spread” – stanford used it a bit with 3 and 2 backs, and most would consider Stanford a power running team. If anything it’s less “spread” than a 3 TE formation that forces the defense to spread out and defend more gaps, with the diamond all upbacks are in close to bunch the defense up.
http://www.thekeyplay.com/sites/all/images/2010/stanford/diamond.jpg
http://www.thekeyplay.com/sites/all/images/2010/stanford/pistol-power-1.jpg
ASU uses this to open up space to the outside, they’ve got 2 WR wide or they’ll motion a guy out on the swing in space. But what makes the ASU version “spread” is they use their regular line splits that they use in their base offense to widen out the DL. This gives them more room inside to run it but it also forces their OL to play mistake-free, as it’s hard to get double teams and if one guy gets beat badly then there’s no one to help out. There are pretty big gaps between each lineman which is unusual in short-yardage. Doesn’t mean you can’t run the ball though….Georgia Tech and other spread option teams use pretty wide line splits as well and they don’t have a problem running the football.
by jtthirtyfour on Jan 21, 2012 9:09 AM PST up reply actions
jthirtyfour
There have been some studies on Smart Football or elsewhere that have indicated that in short yardage, the QB sneak is the most effective play. For this reason, I think it’s good to go under center in 3rd and short or 4th and short (we’re talking somewhere between inches and 2 yards), also you want to go under center and run plays other than the QB sneak in short yardage so teams don’t know that the QB sneak is coming when you go under center in short yardage (this happened to the Atlanta Falcons this year — they made the correct call to go for it, but scouting had revealed that they ran the QB sneak pretty much every time).
And while we're talking about studies, thirtyfour
what’s your take on the Texas high school coach who never punts no matter what? We had a long thread about that here a year or so ago, and the studies showed that it was better to go for it probably 20 times more often than coaches do. What do you think?
Pistol Diamond
Sam Houston State runs the pistol diamond situationally but all over the field with great success. I know it’s 1-AA but if you watch their tape, you can see the number of different plays you can run from pistol diamond when you’re not constrained by the redzone.
by Traz2000 on Jan 21, 2012 9:17 AM PST via mobile reply actions
Redzone effectiveness worries me the most...
I am curious to hear what others think about this but it seems that ASU wasn’t all that effective in the redzone. It seems that their fans had concerns about it also. ASU was 46 of 58 (79%) with 34 TDs ranking them 78th. Just to compare UCLA was ranked 101st with 43 of 57 (75%) and 35 TDs. I rarely watched ASU games so I don’t know at all what the stats mean because I hate to assume it is the playcalling and not the players.
Go Bruins
Pistol-like formation on the goal line
It really doesn’t bother me. Especially when you have a fast, athletic QB. Yes, the QB not being under center means you can’t run the straight-ahead QB sneak. But being in the pistol formation, as said earlier, changes nothing for the running backs (who you’re going to give the ball to 90% of the time anyway).. Also, it allows for the zone read QB Option, which let us see our QB’s walking into the endzone untouched several times.
Besides, it’s not like it’s all that hard to install an under-center goalline package if you REALLY think the straight ahead QB sneak is that vital.
Great analysis
I’d be inclined to agree with those that would like to see a more pro style type offense. But, I saw Dana Holgerson mess around with the pistol diamond and liked what I saw.
And I don’t remember us running anything with 3 backs, but I could be wrong.
Honestly, I don’t care what we run I just want to see a coaching staff that utilizes the talent we have. Fauria and Coleman were so under utilized this past year.
they're not the only ones
Barr, J James, M Jones and (in 2010) Thigpen would all fall under the category of “under-utilized”. I really don’t get why RN seemed to have issues with giving his most explosive/fastest/talented (in Jones’ case) playmakers the ball on offense; I’m hopeful that Mazzone and Mora will change that
by bucknellbruin on Jan 24, 2012 12:39 PM PST up reply actions
Thigpen (along with J James)
Could be really interesting in Mazzone’s offense. I am still waiting to see a coach put Thigpen/James in the slot – get them in space – and let them go.

by 























