Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: The MMA Hour Is Back

UCLA Drops The Ball Again With Jackie Robinson Stadium Renovations

Jackie Robinson Stadium just falls further and further behind and the Morgan Center knows it. They just won't admit it.

At some point, UCLA is either going to get the message through its skulls or they're going to give up the charade. Until then, the baseball program is stuck with more small renovations to Jackie Robinson Stadium, trumped up by the Morgan Center as massive achievements, while programs around the conference and country that already had facilities superior to UCLA's take steps to improve that the Bruins can only dream of. This year is no different either as minor, overdue renovations have been made and then touted as major while everyone else just snickers and laughs at UCLA, simultaneously saying a little prayer of thanks as they know what can become of a Bruin program with proper support.

Over the winter, UCLA got a few renovations to their 31-year-old stadium. The most visible renovation saw the two grass berms above the dugouts ripped out and replaced by seats that adds a total of 580 chairback seats to the stadium and brings its total capacity to 1,820. Maybe an even more important renovation came in the clubhouse though, where a wall was knocked down and the old lockers were ripped out and replaced with new wood lockers, while turf was put in on the floor of the clubhouse with a big, blue UCLA baseball logo painted in the center.

The renovations were badly needed and there's no getting around that. Jackie Robinson Stadium's capacity was insufficient and the old clubhouse was an embarrassment so credit to UCLA for acknowledging where their facilities needed upgrading, but here's the real issue. UCLA recognized these problems with the stadium years ago.

Four years ago they started work to increase seating with seats over the dugout, but that plan stalled for a year, then another year, then another and another. Years ago they also recognized the need for a new clubhouse, with visions of building an entire new building with a new clubhouse, training room, lounge and all of the other amenities that have become the norm around the country. Obviously, that never happened.

More seating and clubhouse renovations were a priority and that UCLA got addressed is a plus, but they were a priority years ago. Getting them done years too late and not on a scale that makes them equally as good as the other top programs in just the Pac-12, let alone the country, is not a reason for celebration.

Star-divide

It can't be said enough just how behind Jackie Robinson Stadium is with the rest of the conference and country. Even with the extra seats, the capacity still isn't anything to write home about because the seats replaced grass berms where people used to sit (and were very popular so it's a knock against the game day experience) and part of that capacity is made possible by a dirty, rickety old bleacher above the third base line. The concessions and restroom facilities were insufficient for the capacity as is and the press box is still so small that it is nearly non-existant for the press, let alone the fact that it is unable to handle two radio teams and a TV team for the Regionals. The scoreboard is still too small, difficult to read at night and lacks video. The clubhouse is better, but it doesn't compare to the top places around the Pac-12 and the entire facility lacks all of the amenities and niceties that wow recruits and make patrons feel like they're watching something that matters.

Run down that list of deficiencies and try to say with a straight face that minimal and late renovations, even if they were needed, are a major step forward? Now take a look at what else is happening around the Pac-12 and west coast.

This offseason, Arizona St. announced that they would be moving into a new $84 million complex in Mesa, which they will share with the Cubs for spring training. The decision was made because moving there, with Mesa chipping most of the money, would be cheaper than renovating their current stadium, which they estimated would cost $20-25 million.

Additionally, Arizona announced plans to leave their on-campus stadium and move to Hi-Corbett Field, the former spring training home of the Indians and the Rockies as recently as 2010. The Wildcats took a blow in moving off campus, but they did it to a stadium with a 9,500 seat capacity and one that was MLB quality just two years ago, then they spent another $5 million in the offseason to make further upgrades.

A jaunt to Seattle further embarrasses UCLA. Up there, Washington has broken ground on a $15 million renovation that will see an entire new building built, complete with new clubhouse, player's lounge, coaches' offices and team meeting room, as well as a club suite. A new 2,500 seat grandstand, press box, six suites, two party decks, concession and restroom facilities and team shop are due to follow. That is otherwise known as a brand new facility, addressing everything that also happens to be deficient at Jackie Robinson Stadium.

Do you think the idea of a $20-25 million renovation to Jackie Robinson Stadium has ever crossed the minds of those at UCLA because it did at Arizona St. Can you imagine UCLA getting a MLB spring training quality stadium then chipping in another $5 million? There's no chance they would do either. Getting $5 million for Jackie Robinson Stadium has proved to be nearly impossible at a time when Washington is getting $15 million, but when an overdue minor improvement to a stadium begging for a major overhaul is done, UCLA wants to tout it as a big deal.

The stadium race isn't limited to the Pac-12 either. Just down the road at the University of San Diego, the Toreros announced plans for a $30 million improvement to their sports facilities, the centerpiece being a $13 million overhaul to their baseball stadium. It comes complete with Spanish Renaissance arches to match the rest of the campus, a new clubhouse, player's lounge and coaches office that look out over the stadium, all designed by the top sports facility designed firm in the country, Populous.

Even the Toreros are besting the Bruins, joining their neighbors San Diego St., the Arizona schools, USC, Stanford, the Oregon schools and Washington as the short list of teams with facilities that put what the Bruins have to shame.

UCLA basically needs a new stadium. Call it a renovation if you'd like, but if the Bruins want to have a top-notch facility then everything at the stadium needs to be completely rebuilt, with the hitting facility being the lone exception and the Morgan Center know it. The problem is they don't want top-notch or even good. They are content with one step above embarrassing, which is what they have and what they keep reaching for every time they put in new lockers, replace the netting or give the place a new paint job.

For the next 10 years we are going to hear about this winter's renovations, the same way UCLA still touts the new netting they put in five years ago. At the same time, its competitors are blazing ahead with millions of dollars and thousands of seats and perks, while the Morgan Center still wants us to believe they care and are committed to excellence. Sorry, but that's a lie. They know what excellent is. They see it all over the conference and up and down the coast and new lockers are not it.

Comment 25 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Another reason Dan Guerrero needs to go

Thanks for the info Ryan. Our baseball program definitely needs more attention.

by Bruinator on Jan 30, 2012 5:08 PM PST reply actions  

The terrible baseball facilities always surprise me

You would think that since strap on played baseball at UCLA he would care more about the facilities of our team.

by jwher on Jan 30, 2012 5:11 PM PST reply actions  

I wondered that myself.

Maybe it’s for nostalgia’s sake

Been a Bruin since birth

by LongtimeBru on Jan 30, 2012 6:54 PM PST up reply actions  

Haha

I have images of strap on downing a bottle of chianti as he runs around the field doing his own play by play.

by jwher on Jan 30, 2012 6:57 PM PST up reply actions  

"What's wrong with being Flounder?"

Maybe if we wish hard enough and make enough phone calls, we’ll get a nice press conference saying a feasibility study is underway and if we’re lucky enough, maybe VC Turtletaub will “officially” tell us to be nice to Chianti and The Duck/Tree Who is Currently Acting as Chancellor Gene. Does anybody have any info on the Spaulding Field feasibility study?

Dump Dan!

by bruinclassof10 on Jan 30, 2012 9:00 PM PST up reply actions  

I cringe

every time they dump money in to that place. Most students don’t even know how to get to JRS. IM field. That’s all I have to say. Can whoever did that great YouTube video on a possible football stadium at drake do one for a baseball stadium on the IM field as well? North Carolina has a great stadium that would look great with ucla’s campus. A man can dream can’t he?

by 0725brui on Jan 30, 2012 5:19 PM PST via mobile reply actions  

Fat Dan has done it again

Is he also planning on increased student attendance by letting them sit at the beach in Santa Monica as we must use stadium seating for rich donors who are italian wine importers. This baseball player has done nothing to enhance the Jackie Robinson imaqge and all he has done in his community service punishment tour is to disgrace UCLA> Send this clown off on his wine tour and revoke his passport

by john4justice on Jan 30, 2012 7:59 PM PST reply actions  

Does the lawsuit against the VA for misuse of land have anything to do with it?

I can see the Morgan Center using the lawsuit as an excuse to NOT invest in the facilities. The lawsuit is a pretty big deal as it may reach class-action status and Congress might get involved:

Plaintiffs and their attorneys are also calling for congressional hearings to investigate the misuse of the West Los Angeles Campus and the VA’s failure to ensure its benefits programs are accessible to seriously disabled veterans.

ACLU of Southern California News Release

Here’s the LA Times’ article which says the suit seeks class-action status. UCLA is mentioned since the baseball facilities are on VA grounds.

by BruinsRUs on Jan 30, 2012 11:47 PM PST reply actions  

Considering they refused to make meaningful renovations

in the decades before the lawsuit, no.

Two roads diverged in a wood and I – I tweeted my followers to ask which I should take

by Ryan Rosenblatt on Jan 31, 2012 12:04 AM PST up reply actions  

That's what I figured

I just thought they would use this as another excuse (at this point, they’re running out of them).

by BruinsRUs on Jan 31, 2012 12:16 AM PST up reply actions  

Yeah it is like a donor needs to die before we get improvements.

Rip Jack Gifford. After reading this post, I have to wonder even this would have happen without his death two years ago. This is his legacy. Nothing more. Fortunately I am a lot of younger and better shape than donut Dan otherwise I would rethink about my estate contributing to athletics.

by Bruin15 on Jan 31, 2012 2:24 AM PST via mobile reply actions  

The VA has something to do with it.

While I agree that the baseball facility is not even close to the rest of the leagues’ or even the countrys’, and I would also agree that the Morgan Center has something to do with that, I would be cautious of throwing all the blame on the MC when I know that the VA is culpable as well. From my understanding, since the opening of JRS, the agreement between the two parties has been a revolving 3 year lease. And throughout this relationship, there has been some serious conversations about many things involving parking, renovations and a longer term lease. There has been meetings with politicians (Waxman was one) and a letter written to a President (Bush) in the last 5 years in order to work out an arangement with the VA so that UCLA can have a long term lease (remember, state officials don’t have anything to do with this facility). Only then would it make sense for a total renovation. As many of my fellow baseball alumni have talked about “why would I give money toward a total renovation of JRS when the VA can take it away from us in 3 years?”…which they have threatened to do many times over the last 3 decades. At other schools, that wouldn’t be a big deal, but since UCLA is land locked and I don’t think they are going to give athletics any more of its campus IM land, then JRS is where the baseball team has to stay. Aside from this, i heard that the class action suit has made this past year’s lease negotiation a little more difficult
for UCLA Athletics.
I feel for Coach Savage because I know that he is trying to do the best he can with the situation he has been given. But from a former players perspective, his program is doing well and he keeps improving JRS in ways that make us proud. Understanding the entire situation with the VA helps the baseball alumni cope with the reality that JRS isn’t what it could be. And right now, throwing money at this situation won’t be the way to fix all these challanges.
Also, no donor needs to die in order for improvements. Jack and Rhodine gave the money for he hitting facility prior to his unexpected death.

by movielover99 on Jan 31, 2012 8:52 AM PST reply actions  

There are definitely problems with the lease

and UCLA is quick to tell anyone about all of the problems you listed above, but those problems completely absolve UCLA of any culpability, which isn’t the truth. There have been opportunities and the lack of creativity and use of leverage from UCLA have put them in a situation where the “woe is me, our lease gives us problems” line is their go-to when it comes to JRS. The lease is a problem, but it is not an insurmountable hurdle and there have been opportunities.

Two roads diverged in a wood and I – I tweeted my followers to ask which I should take

by Ryan Rosenblatt on Jan 31, 2012 9:38 AM PST up reply actions  

It's true

but what are the VA’s options? I suppose they could sell the land? If so, UCLA should buy it. Who else could they lease it to? As usual, UCLA just does not throw its weight around and instead takes the passive route and negotiates against itself.

But hey, what do I know. I’m just the 800 lbs bruin in the room.

by tasser10 on Jan 31, 2012 1:36 PM PST up reply actions  

My guess- zero chance of buying the land with Block in charge

This administration seems to be in the selling mode (Japanese garden), not the buying mode. And JRS certainly would not fit his rigid “academics or research” standard. Maybe we could have a wealthy alum buy the stadium and then donate it. That would probably intrigue Block, because he would have the opportunity to piss off another donor like the Carter family, by trying to sell the stadium once the donor dies.

by islandbruin on Jan 31, 2012 2:41 PM PST up reply actions  

Nice work Ryan ...

great summary of the situation.

Unlike the football stadium thing — which we are still advocating but we also recognize there are hurdles — the baseball thing could happen. The land is there. There are no homeowners around to complain or protest.

All it would take is initiative and money.

BTW — It’s a disgrace to the memory of Jackie Robinson that the stadium named for him is a dump with a nice facade.

by Achilles on Jan 31, 2012 9:25 AM PST reply actions  

Not absolving.

I’m not trying to give the MC any way out of this…all I am saying is that when you have two bureaucratic organizations involved, there is plenty of blame to go around. And if you know of “opportunities and the lack of creativity and use of leverage from UCLA”, please share, because it seems like you are closer to the program than I am and you know about specific opportunities that the MC are keeping hidden. As an alum, and in the name of progress, I would love to have those hidden opportunities exposed.

by movielover99 on Jan 31, 2012 10:16 AM PST reply actions  

I've always been amazed at this stadium

When the Bruins rose back up in stature, I figured that a stadium reno was in the works, but it still hasn’t happened. The small capacity is what really amazes me, especially in comparison to some of the other stadiums around the league. I definitely feel for you all.

by RedOscar on Jan 31, 2012 10:43 AM PST reply actions  

Among other things

They’re also overpaying and underdelivering on the long overdue renovation of the Mecca of College Basketball: Pauley Pavilion. These guys just have no pride at all, and it’s sickening. Stanford gets it. All of the other schools in our conference get it. Meanwhile our AD gets 700K a year to take a dump all over our athletic programs.

by Tydides on Jan 31, 2012 1:22 PM PST up reply actions  

The Stadium Doesn't Bother the players

they come to UCLA to play because it’s UCLA! and thanks to G.Cole, the locker room gets an upgrade. I like the fact that the Bruins will compete with anyone, they won’t let their facilities be an excuse. The lack of capacity is in line with the attendance, why build a stadium that holds 10,000 when only a few hundred show up? Unless the stadium is on campus, the students will never bother to come. Same with football. Unlike what FatPauley thinks, UCLA will never be a serious sports school until all the stadiums are on campus.

by SDJBruin on Feb 1, 2012 3:44 PM PST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Bruins Nation, an unofficial daily online scrap book covering the greatest collegiate athletic program in the nation. Established June 16, 2005. GO BRUINS.

Managers

Uclabear1_small Nestor

Arron_afflalo1_small Tydides

Brad_pitt_as_achilles_small Achilles

377011_2642084725867_1068030137_32302525_1166539782_n_small Ryan Rosenblatt

Telemachus_small Telemachus

Licenseplate_small gbruin

2761_small tasser10

Blue_bellerophon_small Bellerophon

Img_0052_2_small Patroclus

Small DCBruins

Of Counsels

094_small Ajax

Menelaus2_small Menelaus

Small Meriones

Small Odysseus

Associates

Eee_small freesia39

Uclabruins_small AHMB