UCLA Football Recruiting: Updated Rankings, More on Fuller’s Commitment & Other Quick Hitters
Let's start what is shaping up to be a pretty great week with a quick reset for the National Signing Day. Right now UCLA has 26 recruits committed for the class of 2012. Bruins as of this morning are ranked number 8 on Scout.com and number 12 on Rivals.com. With 2 days left till signing day Bruins are going to be on holding pattern for few more blue chip recruits. I will share this blurb from SBNation's UCLA capsule on our remaining targets (prepared by none other than BN's AHMB):
Moving forward, UCLA has a legitimate shot at a number of highly ranked prospects. Most notably, five-star safety Shaq Thompson and five-star WR Bryce Treggs are both looking at UCLA following Tosh Lupoi's exit from California, as are other former California commits four-star receiver Jordan Payton, four-star defensive tackle Aziz Shittu, and to a lesser extent, five-star lineman Arik Armstead. Others currently in the mix are four-star linebacker Seth Jacobs, four-star WR Kodi Whitfield, four-star quarterback Devin Fuller, three-star receiver/cornerback Randall Goforth, three-star offensive tackle Simon Goines, three-star athlete Kenny Walker, three-star linebacker Jeremy Allison and three-star receiver Javon Williams. Signing day will be hectic in Westwood, and the Bruins faithful are definitely anxious to see how it plays out.
Armstead is off the board (Oregon). Whitfield also shore up his commitment to Stanford (which is not a surprise). None of that should put a damper on UCLA's recruiting as we got amazing news yesterday when Fuller decided to jump on the growing Bruin bandwagon. If you have not seen it yet, you can check out the video of Fuller's commitment here and also a YouTube "movie" of Fuller's senior year highlights at the Old Tappan HS in New Jersey. Here were Fuller's quotes published in local NJ.com:
"I just like everything about UCLA. I'm excited about working with coach Mora in that offense. It makes it a lot easier when my family is out there, too."
It seems quite likely that the talented Fuller, who ran and passed for more than 10,000 yards and 100 touchdowns in four years at the Bergen County school, will be a good fit, just as he figured to be at any of his final five options.
I think it is worth noting what a big deal Fuller's commitment to UCLA really is. With Fuller's commitment UCLA for the second straight year will have an elite athlete coming in to play QB. Not to mention with Brett Hundley and T. J. Millweard, Bruins now have some solid pieces to work with to build out viable depth at this position for the first time in years.
We will see if Fuller ends up playing QB at UCLA but either way Mora adds an elite athlete in our roster, who will hopefully be put in position to contribute at other skill position such as WR as well. Either way Fuller is a fantastic get for UCLA, who gives us yet another reason to be excited about upcoming signing day.
Now we are sure many Bruin fans are greedy and are thinking about flipping elite recruits committed to other Pac-12 schools. However, from my stand point I am already excited with what Mora has put together. Once Mora got here, my expectation was for Mora to finish with a top-20 class that would address our depth issues at OL, DB, WR, get us at least one solid QB and an elite DL. So far this class appears to have filled all those needs except for stocking it with WRs. Thankfully the Bruins are still in running for few good WRs and there is a good shot Bruins may be able to nab couple of more on signing days.
Some other quick recruiting quick hitters that I thought were worth noting:
- TX OL Simon Goines is down to UCLA and Missouri and will decide on Wednesday (signing day). UPDATE: this "Mizzou".
- Former Bruin commit OL Mario Yakoo from Spring Valley (Calif) Steele Canyon ended up committing to Boise State. That's a great landing spot for him. We wish him luck.
- ICYMI there was a really interesting note from Sacramento area reporter Joe Davidson. He identified UCLA and Oregon as the only two schools, that were not doing any negative recruiting (at least around the 916 area code). Perhaps not a coincidence that Arimstead ended up committing to the Ducks.
- Speaking of the Sacramento area Jacob Ruffman has a pretty nice Q&A wit Bruin commit Nate Iese. According to NI Mora and UCLA LB coach Jeff Ulbrich see him as "a hybrid linebacker who can put his hand in the dirt and rush the passer but also be able to drop back into coverage." They told Iese they may play him a "bit" at TE if they "need" him there.
So those are the notes to start this Monday am. If you have other recruiting tidbits you want to share that have not been blogged on the homepage or in the fanpost/fanshot sections yet, please share them in the comment thread.
GO BRUINS.
53 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
A great quote from the Q&A with Nate Iese mentioned above
I know that coach Mora is going to give everyone a fair shot to fight to play at their position so I can’t wait to get out there and compete.
A welcomed departure from the old regime (IIRC). Hopefully the best players make it to the field, and not necessarily the oldest.
Also, I can’t wait to see what the new recruits and current UCLA players will look like at spring ball after an off-season with S&C coach Alosi!
by UCLA_beer&mathematics on Jan 30, 2012 6:08 AM PST reply actions
Yeah, that got my attention as well
We will see how it plays out. If that turns out to be more than rhetoric, I will be a happy camper.
of course, I agree
but if we have to keep putting "We’ll have to wait until we see…" on every post, it gets a bit too pedantic don’t you think? It keeps things a bit shorter, fun, and reactionary! =)
by UCLA_beer&mathematics on Jan 30, 2012 6:45 AM PST up reply actions
That's a good point beer
The main reason we keep hammering home that point is because folks tend to have short term memories.
It's how I honestly feel.
I’ve been fooled so many times by good news, mistaking that for the probability of on-field results.
I’m filled with hope, though. Things look very different with Mora in charge. When someone makes good, calculated decisions, puts faith in capable people, and “has a plan A, B, and C” for important parts of this process, it speaks well to the possibility that the guy has his professional career down to a science. The NFL can be rough on coaches who have talent for the college game, but we don’t know yet if Mora is one of them. Nonetheless, I haven’t seen a red flag since he was hired.
We’ll have to wait and see….
Are you talking about the Presidential campaign?
Or UCLA football? :)
But hey, what do I know. I’m just the 800 lbs bruin in the room.
Love the depth at the QB position
and really love the athleticism!! Great Job coach Mora.
"Success is never final, Failure is never fatal. It's Courage that counts" - John Wooden.
Treggs is not going to happen . . .
unless someone who is in love with Cal has hijacked his Twitter account. On the other paw, it seems like Payton may be a real possibility as the guy “loves being near home”.
Casting a wide net
Pulling an elite east coast QB, developing the GA pipeline and being in the running for recruits in TX and elsewhere is a big deal. Im glad to see that CJM has cast a large net. Not to mention landing the biggest defensive get from Monrovia-about 8 miles from the Rose Bowl.
Nestor, thanks for getting our Monday started off in the positive! Now, everyone call GB’s office and inform the polite secretary of your input on the annual 700k investment in Chianti & Donuts.
(310) 825-2151
Go BRUINS
by NicoBlue&Gold on Jan 30, 2012 8:03 AM PST via mobile reply actions
Mora & Staff have been outstanding
They’ve really transformed this class and gotten some big targets. If we can close with Jacobs, Williams, Goines and 2 out of Payton/Goforth/Treggs, I’ll be ecstatic. The other guys seem to be leaning heavily or leaning elsewhere.
Posted this in Fanshots also
According to ESPN’s Max Olson, Jameis Winston, the nation’s No. 1 quarterback, is still seriously considering signing with Stanford. Writes Olson:
On Saturday, Stanford coach David Shaw called Winston’s father to confirm Winston has been admitted into the school should he choose to sign there. Winston remains verbally committed to Florida State, but he said gaining admission into one of the country’s most prestigious universities was an honor
That would be a major coup for stanford
But I don’t see that happening.
Do We Need Any Kickers
Great post. Unless I missed the list, do we need to recruit any good kickers?
Fairburn firmed up his commitment.
He was wavering between CAL and UCLA, but he stuck with the good guys.
Formerly AllHailMightyBruins
Are we still in need of quality Outside Linebackers...
There is a local prospect, Nick Januska from Ventura, CA that is a 2 Star but should be a 3 Star. He is being recruited by Air Force, Cal Poly, Colorado State, Hawaii, Montana State, Nevada, Northern Arizona, Northern Colorado, Oregon State, San Diego State, UCLA, UNLV, Utah, Utah State, Washington State.
He really wants to go to UCLA. He is a great athlete and could even move to TE or Strong Safety due to his athletic ability. From Scout: “2011, as a senior at Ventura High School was named to the 2012 Polynesian All American Bowl, named All CIF Western Division, First Team All Ventura County, First Team Channel League and Channel League Most Valuable Player – Defense.”
This is the school (Ventura High School) that produced former UCLA great Eric Turner and Tyler Ebell. I know that UCLA has a limited number of scholarships, but the fact that 14 other schools also have recruited him and he really wants to go to UCLA according to his Coach and my Father (also a Coach/Instructor at VHS), I hope that the Staff can give him another look.
Not if Seth Jacobs commits.
Doesn’t seem like we’ll have room.
I think we’re past the point of giving someone another look with 2 days to go until signing day. Plus it’s the dead period.
by Kenneth Powers on Jan 30, 2012 10:26 AM PST up reply actions
Jacobs is in my backyard, Arroyo Grande, and is being recruited by a ton of schools.
As a freshman he started at safety and has played offense and defense. AGHS won CIF this year and his coach said he could play any position. And in this area a lot of kids go to UCLA so I’ve got my fingers crossed.
OLB is one position where I think we're fine for the forseeable future
With the young guys already on the roster (Kendricks, Olinyan, Graham, Barr, Koster) and the list of guys already committed (Iese, Castro, Orijoke), I think we’r efine for this recruiting class. Would rather the scholie go to a WR.
by BillytheSid on Jan 30, 2012 11:09 AM PST up reply actions
Congrats to him
CSU may turn out to be a rising program with a new coach, who was Saban’s OC at Alabama.
Mora has thus far done his part.
Not bad for a coach who some called “the most disappointing hire of this year’s college football coaching carousel.” While the hiring process was absolutely dreadful, the actual hire of Mora is looking pretty optimistic. Definitely not disappointing.
Just remember
Not only was the process dreadful, but Coach Mora was Chianti Dan’s fourth or fifth choice. Just because he is prepared, has a plan and knows what he’s doing, does not mean that Chianti Dan gets any credit.
If Mora had been his first choice, if he had hired him without wasting any time, then I think all of us would be seriously impressed. But he struck out on a teaser, was blinded by the light and chased some unicorns before settling on him.
But hey, what do I know. I’m just the 800 lbs bruin in the room.
I'm not defending Dan Guerrero at all.
I’m merely pointing out that while some argued that Mora was a terrible hire, a “wait and see” approach has proven (thus far) that Mora is capable of at least moving the program in the right direction. Additionally, some were not upset because Mora was Guerrero’s fourth or fifth choice, but that he was a choice at all. Now some are arguing that he wasn’t the first choice? In any case, Mora has done all the right things to justify his hire no matter how much of a debacle the process was.
Not sure what you are arguing here
In your first sentence you are talking about a “wait and see” approach and then in the very last you conclude that Mora has already justified this hire. It sounds like you are here to argue for the sake of making arguments. That is not exactly the way to generate a constructive discussion.
Let me clarify.
Coach Mora has justified his hire as best as any coach could given that the season has not started. If he made poor coaching hires and we all heard crickets on the recruiting front, we would all be criticizing his decision making and how he is not suited for the job (as we should and other before he had a chance). On the other hand, he has proven to do the right things thus far. Basically he is generating a constructive culture of winning.
Ultimately it will be about results on the field
I am glad that he is off to a good start but the final judgment will not be in until we see the on field results in his first two seasons. It’d help if he wins 8/9 games and beat SC next season.
Absolutely.
So maybe we will leave the hiring of Coach Mora off the list of reasons to fire Chianti Dan…well at least until we see the results on the field.
The hiring process leading to Mora's arrival was still an indictment against DG
If you review the history, you will see DG wanted to hold on to Neuheisel even after 0-50. He had no plan in place to bring in an elite coach. Mora pounced on the UCLA job as he didn’t get consideration from anywhere else.
If Mora turns out to be a great hire, then good for UCLA. However, the hiring process will remain a huge indictment against DG for reasons extensively detailed on BN.
Please see original comment and
the following post: “#NoMoraDan: If Its Mora Then No Support for UCLA Athletics Until Chianti Dan is Booted From Westwood.”
Yes, and?
That post calls for withholding financial support for UCLA Athletics to get Chianti Dan ousted from UCLA. It was written before Mora was hired and was an indictment of the hiring process. We are still pursuing that and condoning that.
What is your point? Are you saying that Dan Guerrero should get a reprieve and is all of a sudden a qualified athletic director for UCLA because Coach Mora is bringing in a good recruiting class?
But hey, what do I know. I’m just the 800 lbs bruin in the room.
If anything you should be joining in on this
Since you’re already on Mora’s jock, then why not get a competent AD in place to get him what he needs to succeed? He sure as hell didn’t do Neuheisel any favors. Why should I believe it’s going to be different this time around?
Somehow confusion erupted...
and some think I’m in favor of keeping DG. Where was this argued? And, yes the post calls for withholding financial support for UCLA Athletics to get Chianti Dan ousted from UCLA. And, yes it was written before Mora was hired and was an indictment of the hiring process. Those were not the only two points, but that’s okay.
If this thread
Isn’t enough to convince you that no one here actually knows what you’re trying to say, then perhaps you just found the source of the confusion.
Is my memory incorrect,
or did DG actually have a pretty focused plan to immediately bring in Chris Petersen. I think it was after Petersen declined that there appeared to be no plan B or C.
by BruinsinceBarnes on Jan 30, 2012 1:21 PM PST up reply actions
The Petersen plan was facilitated by some influential alumni
That was not really Chianti’s decision. In fact, Dan’s mishandling of the meetings/negotiations seems to have prolonged what turned out to be an inevitable declination, and further delayed the process of going for Plan B, C, etc
greg in denver, U.C.L.A. guy for life - BruinsNation.com
Not at all
DG wanted to keep Neuheisel, even after 0-50. He had no intention of firing him. His hand was forced.
Good ADs keep a list of potential coaches, DG keeps a list of 90+ rated chiantis. He had no plans.
But hey, what do I know. I’m just the 800 lbs bruin in the room.
The "plan" was not a plan at all
It was pretty much Chianti going to Boise to try to throw more money at a guy who is happy in Boise and had said no to us before. If that’s a pretty focused plan, I think a group of us here would’ve convinced Petersen to come here for less money than Chianti makes in a few months. That’s how much faith I have in Chianti’s plan.
Dump Dan!
by bruinclassof10 on Jan 30, 2012 9:09 PM PST up reply actions
Mora hasn't won a game yet.....
…nor beaten $C, or won a Pac-12 championship or had UCLA in a BCS bowl.
Hasn’t done anything so far other than assemble coaches that can recruit.
Can they develop the talent UCLA has on roster and in this class?? We’ll see.
No sense handing out “attaboys” when they haven’t done anything yet.
Now known as "Tazizona"
Somewhat Disagree
Most of us agree that W’s are the only measure of success. But you can’t win wars without winning battles. Recruitment is a key battle and Mora is doing a hell of a job. If this class sticks, he’s certainly earned an “attaboy” from me. I’m hoping I can hand out at least 9 or 10 more “attaboys” come next fall. If he collects 20 “attaboys” over the next two years, then I’ll take back everything I’ve said about him.
I wasn't singling you out
Sorry, I was talking to the community.
I’m not arguing that he wasn’t the first choice. I’m arguing that, if Chianti Dan really knew what he was doing, and if he really knew that Mora would hit the ground running at the outset, he would have hired him right away and not chased those other candidates. I’m saying that at best, Danny boy got lucky.
The “wait and see” approach is what you do after the hire because you have no choice. You don’t go into a hiring process expecting to have that approach, which is exactly what we got when Mora got hired.
Coach Mora will only justify his hire once he starts winning games and improves the program as much as his salary (and his recruiting) would indicate that he should. I think he will, I hope he will, and I’m excited about it.
I’m not sure what you’re getting at, but if I’m not mistaken you are simply defending the “wait and see” approach. I’m glad it has worked so far, but it’s essentially a call to do nothing after a bad decision has already been made, when you don’t really have a choice anyway…and kind of falls in the Captain Obvious department.
But hey, what do I know. I’m just the 800 lbs bruin in the room.
The problematic aspect of this flurry of activity and all the great recruiting by Coach Mora
is that it is just about exactly what Coach Neuheisel did when he first landed in Westwood. I was convinced that the savior of UCLA football had just walked through the door, and all would be well. Then we won our first game, CTS was totally forgotten, and I was thinking that finally we would humble Cheatie Petie. Remember our second game? At BYU? It was our worst loss since 1931 (I checked.)
The honeymoon is always a passionate love affair. Let’s see how things go when the honeymoon is over and everyone has to go back to work. Or to put it another way, as of now, Coach Mora’s lifetime coaching record is still 31-33.
I think [hope] the difference is
CRN took over when the cupboard was bare so it was very difficult for him to create that momentum of success and swagger while the losses piled up.
Mora is taking over a fully stocked team that can achieve 9 wins even with a coach going through a learning curve. I think [hope] we can create that needed momentum of success this time. We’ll see come September.
Biggest issue was a complete lack of o-line.
Our defense was stacked still. But, even though we recruited well our defense quickly regressed.
Fuller's family
Didn’t know that he had family out here. That should certainly help in lessening any potential homesickness. Signing Day will be interesting.
IIRC Chatsworth
Been a Bruin since birth
by LongtimeBru on Jan 30, 2012 2:46 PM PST via mobile up reply actions

by 




















