Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Miami Wins Opener Over Boston, 93-79

The Power of Coach Compels You! Bruins Beat Down Arizona 65-58

It's been a long, odd, frustrating season so far. Part of that weirdness is the scheduling of the John R. Wooden Classic being a conference matchup at the Honda Center rather than a marquee nonconference tilt as it normally is. We also learned before the game that Joshua Smith would not be available for the first time this season (in body, but not really in mind). This deprived the Bruins of a potentially favorable matchup against the undersized Wildcats.

Then the Wears happened.

Whether it was the spirit of Coach getting the 6' 10" twins to finally play like they were 6' 10" or merely the knowledge that Smith would not be there weighing down the offense and anchoring their defense, the Wears collectively put together a game on both ends of the floor that made me want more from them for the first time all season.

Indeed, for the first 30 minutes of the game, it was not only the Wears, but the majority of the team that could seem to do no wrong. UCLA exploited its height advantage repeatedly (what a concept...), which led to a nearly 50% shooting percentage for the most of the game while holding the Wildcats under 40%.

Star-divide

Sadly, such prosperity rarely lasts with this team, and an unfortunate turning point occurred when Tyler Lamb came down hard off of a foul. As he lay on the deck in pain, a classless, bush league "U of A (holes)" chant started up while our training staff tended to Lamb. A few typical SPTR foul calls later on the already foul troubled Wears, and a few Arizona baskets later and it looked like all that had gone right for UCLA was about to go very wrong. David Wear fouled out on a incredibly weak call with 5 minutes remaining and the Wildcats would end up closing to within 3 points off of a 7-0 run.

Fortunately, Tyler Lamb would end up returning to action, and made key plays down the stretch defensively along with Travis Wear to ice the game for UCLA and send the classless U of A fans home as losers.

It must be very concerning to Ben Howland to watch how this team is doing without Smith in the lineup. There's a limit to the "addition by subtraction" maxim, but it can't be a good sign that removing players is helping the team play more cohesively. Next up, perhaps Lazeric Jones, whose rather poor offensive play in the last ten minutes seemed to be largely responsible for the Arizona comeback.

There's also the question of how good Arizona really is, which seems to be "not very". This is the third time all season the Wildcats have ventured out of McKale and their only victory out of those three games is a close one against New Mexico State.

Whatever the circumstances, the Bruins' 65-58 victory was sorely needed after they got skunked on the NorCal road trip. Next up, a severely undermanned Arizona State team.

Comment 56 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Anyone from BN at that game?

How was the crowd? Seemed like the atmosphere was much more lively than your typical game at the Sports Arena. Of course, it could’ve been because it was the Wooden Class, but still, I thought the turnout was a pleasant surprise.

by mjfanatic42 on Jan 5, 2012 10:46 PM PST reply actions  

I was at the game

Pretty good sized crowd, although lots of U of A fans. Only the upper bowl had lots of empty seats. We should have more games at the Honda Center instead of that ghetto Sports Arena. Really bush league chant by U of A fans right behind me. Nice to shut them up by beating them.

Go Bruins!

by Bruin1996 on Jan 5, 2012 11:13 PM PST via mobile up reply actions  

Chanting

Was just the u of a chant while lamb was down

by glassbruin on Jan 6, 2012 7:12 AM PST via Android app up reply actions  

was at the game as well

Much more fans than I expected and the noise level was alright down the stretch. Could not believe Arizona fans chanting while Lamb was down. UCLA students chanted “have some respect” back at them. I always love beating Arizona. GO BRUINS

by zigggzzz on Jan 5, 2012 11:17 PM PST up reply actions  

I was there

It was a bigger crowd than I expected and it appeared to be what it would have looked like if it was Pauley. The upper levels were almost completely empty though. The student section was pretty decent. There was a bunch of U of A fans though, go figure since almost all of their alums are from California. Th e turnout was better than any game I went to at the Sports Arena.

by notaznguy on Jan 6, 2012 12:13 AM PST up reply actions  

The best part...

…was when they played that video of a ‘noise meter’ on the jumbo tron. The needle consistently goes up while the crowd just watches and giggles quietly.

by Orz on Jan 6, 2012 10:19 AM PST up reply actions   1 recs

I'm into addition through subtraction

Smith and Jones not getting it done.

I’m proud of the rest of the guys.

by waters96 on Jan 5, 2012 10:47 PM PST reply actions  

I was thinking that when I went to bed at halftime...

if we just got down to three players, we’d win another championship!

Roses are red, violets are blue...f*** $C.

by KSBruin on Jan 6, 2012 4:04 AM PST up reply actions  

Still too much one and one from Jones and Lamb who cannot make..

…the short and medium jumper .. and Powell is too jittery…..

by velo route on Jan 5, 2012 11:10 PM PST reply actions  

+1

For a player that by body-type & game looks like a slasher, Lamb might be the worst finisher I’ve seen on a Howlans squad. He’s rarely under control or looked out of rhythm tonight. On a positive note, I liked how hard he hit the defensive glass. Bottom line, it’s refreshing to watch a game that featured solid effort throughout.

by Nor-Cal Bruin on Jan 5, 2012 11:23 PM PST up reply actions  

What went...right?

So much of being a fan of the UCLA Bruins revenue sports lately has been all about the constructive criticism. This game had such a better feel than many others so far this season. We may have forgotten how to do this, but I would like to ask you all to answer, what did the Bruins (players and coaches — gosh announcers and food vendors) do right at this game?

I am still getting over CBH having time outs available toward the end of play!

by Joe Bruin on Jan 5, 2012 11:16 PM PST reply actions  

the game had a better feel...

because UCLA and Arizona have combined for 23 out of the last 30 conference championships. Bruins vs Wildcats is the biggest basketball rivalry on the West coast and one of the top-10 in the nation. That might have had something to do with it.

by MadN on Jan 6, 2012 1:52 AM PST up reply actions  

Not having to rely on Smith...

was the difference… Wears new he wasn’t there… Coach new he wasn’t there and most importantly Stover new he wasn’t there… we have guys that can score… Smith needs to just be on a treadmill until he can physically be out there… Stover may not score but he’s all over the defensive side of the ball…

by UCLAman7 on Jan 6, 2012 12:40 PM PST up reply actions  

Intensity

Even when they made mistakes they were trying. This team does not jog back at times (Reeves) or cruise (Honeycutt) but played hard for the game. I liked their effort last night.

by DCBruins on Jan 6, 2012 2:46 PM PST via mobile up reply actions  

Damn Tydides

Your post title nearly scared the bejeezus out of me. Just can’t get that scene out of my head of the two priests throwing holy water on Linda Blair as she floats slowly back to bed. Definitely one of my all-time scariest movies ever.

Congrats to our team on a huge win tonight.

by Kerckhoff405 on Jan 5, 2012 11:26 PM PST reply actions  

I never really understood that "compels" you line

Didn’t seem like it would cut it, I always thought throwing more holy water on her and surrounding her with crosses and figurines would do it.

by Angelitos on Jan 6, 2012 7:13 AM PST up reply actions  

If that movie scared you

check out this one

But hey, what do I know. I’m just the 800 lbs bruin in the room.

by tasser10 on Jan 6, 2012 8:24 AM PST up reply actions  

Clearly this team has talent!

There’s absolutely no reason they should be at a miserable 8-7. Had they put forth the effort they did tonight every night, they’d easily be 14-1, if not undefeated. They absolutely have the horses to run with the best.

But trying to juggle PT and massage the personalities has cost this team a stomach-turning seven games. I just hope that Josh took notice of how easily his teammates moved about the floor without him.

Great to see the Wears ball out, to see Lane step right in and step right up.

I also hope this game fully dispels the myth that Miller’s Wildcats are a fast, uptempo running team. If Howland saw fit to run M2M most of the game, it’s pretty safe to say that UA plays downtempo and by the other way around.

by indigo27 on Jan 5, 2012 11:37 PM PST via iPhone app reply actions  

Don't read too much into this win

UCLA defense is streaky & the offense is serviceable at best.

We need Smith to wake up, Powell to shoot lights out, JA & Zeke to not turn the ball over, Lamb to dazzle, and the Wear twins to play like the McD All-Americans they’re suppose to be. It also wouldn’t hurt if we could have them all out on the floor at the same time :-)

by impaulv on Jan 6, 2012 12:26 AM PST up reply actions  

Good news, bad news

Good news is if we play hard we have a chance to be a top team on this conference. Bad news this conference is not that good and a team needs to win the PAC 12 tourney to go to the dance

by DCBruins on Jan 6, 2012 2:48 PM PST via mobile up reply actions  

Stover

I think Stover looked great tonight, except for the missed free throws, I thought his presence made a big difference in the paint when it came to D. Especially the last few minutes.

by Altecfour on Jan 5, 2012 11:39 PM PST reply actions  

+1

Stover did what Stover does. His defense was great and the blocks well-timed. Watching him get excited over making free throws had me chuckling a bit and watching him run up and down the court is awesome.

Dreaming of Westwood while in permanent exile in Virginia

by VABruin on Jan 6, 2012 7:28 AM PST up reply actions  

Stover

CBH only used him for about a minute in the first half (correct me if I’m wrong). Whe the Wears got in foul trouble and Lamb went down, then Stover got minutes in the second half. Lane wass the first go to guy.

Did Stover get into the CBH dog house due to lack of rebounding?

by chrissorr on Jan 6, 2012 9:11 AM PST up reply actions  

I'm still a Josh Smith fan,

but I’m getting disturbed by many things, as are most people here. How does someone his size get kneed in the head? I do notice he falls alot, and someone his size s/b making everyone else fall, not falling himself.

I’m guessing that CBH didn’t announce until gametime for strategic reasons, but that was unusual too.

All that said, I don’t come down on the side with the group that says bench him for Stover/Lane. I’m happy for this win, but don’t read too much into it. Arizona is a bunch of midgets with a couple of overrated freshmen who made a ton of mistakes.

I don’t like our three guard lineup, especially when they are not of the highest calibre. Obviously, there is a big motivational problem here, but the frontcourt lineup needs to be Smith and the Wear twins.

by chrissorr on Jan 6, 2012 10:48 AM PST up reply actions  

I dont think he was in the doghouse

it was just his length wasn’t as important. Lane is taller than almost everyone on the Az squad, can rebound a bit better and has a bit more offensive game, so CBH went with Lane. I think Lane and Stover both did pretty well, I might be right but with either one of them in it looked like we played more m2m and it worked.

by JimmyBurke on Jan 6, 2012 10:24 AM PST up reply actions  

Stover has a problem on d

You read that right. Stover is a great shot blocker and disrupter but terrible rebounder. Lane is a bit better on offense a bad defender but a good rebounder. The Wears were able to be “disrupters” against AZ but still are not good rebounders. Thus we needed Lane more than Stover.

I like Stover and think he has a bigger upside but I will give CBH credit. Against AZ the Weats were able to play like intimidators and Lanes rebounding helped.

by DCBruins on Jan 6, 2012 2:55 PM PST via mobile up reply actions  

Honestly, I did not watch this game until the last 3-4 minutes

I thought that our team really had no chance, even against a struggling Arizona team, but clearly I was wrong. Maybe I need to stop watching games more often, in case I am cursing the team.

by BruinEngy on Jan 5, 2012 11:41 PM PST reply actions  

Half full v. Half empty

The Final Four teams would kill this team. Further, I am not sure any player on this team could crack the top 8 of those teams.

On the other side, this is the worse PAC X I have ever seen. Once proud AZ has no one who could play on those Final Four teams either. USC lost at home to a team with only 6 scholarship players.

Thus, with the exception of CAL, we should have a chance against every team.

by DCBruins on Jan 6, 2012 3:15 PM PST via mobile up reply actions  

Congrats to Bruins fans

30+ year season ticket holder and supporter of UofA basketball here, just wanted to congratulate you fans on a hard fought victory and to apologize for any of the kids who were chanting while Lamb was down on the court. Obviously a large number of UofA students are from the LA area and kids will be kids, especially when they are home for the holidays and drinking heavily during a rivalry game. There is no excuse for disrespecting a rivals player while they are laying injured on the court. The vast majority of UofA fans are classy, and respectful, so please don’t take the actions of a few morons to represent the fan base as a whole. Personally I always hope that UCLA is a dominant team and only root against them when they play the Cats. The conference suffers when Arizona and UCLA are not top-25 teams. They are the two best West Coast programs,and are the only two teams that people in the East are even aware play basketball on this side of the country.

It’s been a rough year so far for Bruins fans, but there’s a long way to go yet and the pac12 is just that bad that it wouldn’t surprise me at all if Howland turned things around in a big way to finish in the top-3 by the end of the year. Best of luck.

One correction to the OP if I may, this was not in fact the “3rd time all season the Cats have ventured out of McKale”, it was the 6th. The third true road game yes, but there were also 2 games at MSG against St. Johns and MSST and a forgettable performance against Gonzaga in Seattle.

by MadN on Jan 6, 2012 2:59 AM PST reply actions  

We appreciate the comments

Def hope one of these days we can go back to those classic Arizona-UCLA hoops games.

by Nestor on Jan 6, 2012 5:01 AM PST via mobile up reply actions  

Classic Arizona-UCLA hoops games

like the one at the McKale Center, exactly 20 years ago…remember that, Nestor? Mitchell Butler…sigh…

But hey, what do I know. I’m just the 800 lbs bruin in the room.

by tasser10 on Jan 6, 2012 8:28 AM PST up reply actions  

At the Game

The crowd was pretty good but not like Pauley against UofA. The UofA fans, and not just “a few” chanting while Lamb went down in obvious pain was right up there with a few of the tasteless SC antics we have had to witness in the past few years. I still want our football team to wipe that smirk off of Barkleys goofy mug. CJM seems like a tough guy, if it translates to good coaching we will see, but the attitude is football tough. Bruins actually had a gut check and did not go soft, they pulled it out and it was a great victory. GO BRUINS

They looked more energized without JS out there. I wish we could see more Stover and NP. BL still looks lost and he gave UofA 3 or 4 and 1’s, his defense is just not respected by the officials.

by BruinDoc on Jan 6, 2012 5:47 AM PST reply actions  

I would love to see

A starting five of Anderson, lamb, Powell, t wear, and stover…jones can’t shoot a lick and likes to drive one on five into the lane and then complain for a foul call during the ensuing defensive possession. Stover deserves more time for his defense alone and Powell is the only exciting player on the squad. Then we could have a wear first off the bench and bring in jones to play against second team folks (he is a juco player after all).

by TNbruin52 on Jan 6, 2012 8:14 AM PST reply actions  

Hate hate hate the whining trying to get a foul called after taking a crappy shot

Jones needs to get over it and play defense.

I like your starting 5 suggestion, athletic and Anderson has enough experience and fire to give the team the right leadership.

by JimmyBurke on Jan 6, 2012 10:27 AM PST up reply actions  

Lane/ Rotations

I have always thought Lane should get more PT. However, after watching last night’s game it is apparent that he can’t keep anyone in front of him on defense. When Anderson, Lamb, Powell, Stover, T. Wear were in the game all at the same time, I thought we were going to get obliterated because we couldn’t score. The only thing that saves that lineup, is the opposing team can’t score either because that is by far the closest lineup to a Ben Ball Defensive team.

by Waitingfornumber12 on Jan 6, 2012 8:20 AM PST reply actions  

What do you think

Of running a high pick and roll offense with that lineup you mentioned. Take Anderson and wear and give them some room to operate with a high pick and roll. It would be more of a pro style offense, but would produce open lanes and looks for the others as well. Plus wear can actually hit the pick and pop shot if they don’t want to crash the lane

by TNbruin52 on Jan 6, 2012 8:38 AM PST up reply actions  

Pro's and Con's

Con’s
1.) Anderson isn’t a great decision maker when he gets the ball in the lane as he leaves his feet nearly every time. He is most effective when going to the basket.
2.) The Wear twins are most effective when their backs are to the basket, not picking and popping.
Pro’s
1.) Powell is a good shooter from the corners and Lamb is pretty good with an open look.
2.) I imagine Powell going back door for an alley oop.
3.) As much as I like this lineup, Josh Smith is still our best offensive threat. His weight is as low as it was at the end of last year.

All in all, most times we run a high pick and roll when the shot clock is running down. I just don’t want to see Smith running the pick.

by Waitingfornumber12 on Jan 6, 2012 1:21 PM PST up reply actions  

Here's What I thought was good:

In response to a post up thread:

1. CBH coached one of his best games in a while. Challenged by the loss of players, he used his personnel well. I particularly liked the moment where he “taught” Powell after a bad shot but left him in — no quick hooks last night. He saved his time outs. And, mixed his D’s well. CBH is usually intense — but last night was off the charts. He looked like he’d run a marathon and maybe more. Good job CBH!

2. The team energy was amazing. This was a true “team” victory. All of the players were intense and supportive. I don’t recall one dirty look or disparaging moment — and we’ve seen some this year — displacing blame. They played like a team and seemed to take responsibility as a team. No pouting either.

3. Obviously, we were quicker without Josh. But, I don’t see that we can’t play with the same intensity and cohesion with him. It’s not just Josh who slows this team down. It’s the other guys on the floor who, when they don’t give complete effort, slow it down.

4. We had players play monster minutes AND step up when dead tired. Yes, Zeke takes some dumb shots, but this kid plays hard, motor running for loooong minutes. At the end of the game, it’s clear there’s not much left in the tank, but he uses it all. Before criticizing him, I’d like to know what CBH is saying. There were times when Zeke may have been the best scoring option and he may have been told to shoot — but so soon in the clock? Lamb has an amazing upside. And, is it possible that the Wears are growing into their minutes? Remember, they’ve really not played that much since high school — didn’t play much at UNC and then sat out last year. They really stepped up. (I usually think it wrong to refer to Travis and David as “the Wears” because they really are different and different by game, but last night, they were “one” — tough and intense battling.)

5. Great effort from Stover and Lane. For a while, Lane was our second best rebounder — with very few minutes. Again, necessity prevented the quick hook — and he settled into the game. Stover’s enthusiasm and energy lights things up. Watching him run the court fires me up. I think he will turn into something special. I remember that both LMR and PAA had problems catching the ball early on, and LMR’s FT’s were an issue for a while. I think Stover will be a great senior.

6. The crowd sounded great over the TV. (It sounded great at Maples, too.) Good to hear that.

So, there was a lot of good, last night — not just the victory but the way it was done. I hope we build on it.

The bad? The SPTR’s continue to suck. They’ve embarrassed the conference on national TV in a bowl game and continue to have a negative impact (both ways) on our BB games. Come on, Scott, deal with them.

sjh

by Class of 66 on Jan 6, 2012 8:23 AM PST reply actions  

More minutes for Stover and Powell is paying off

even when they don’t have a great game both bring positves on the defensive side.

This team can improve, they show signs, the big question is will they?

by JimmyBurke on Jan 6, 2012 10:30 AM PST up reply actions  

Good post

You are a bit more optimistic than me but I liked a lot of what you wrote. I was thinking of you and UCLA.

I was thinking in a way these players were a lot more fun to root for than Honeycutt, Smith and Nelson past year because they were always trying hard. I know you did not like the team last year, house cats as you called them.

The problem is last year’s team had the potential to be tigers, just parts of most games they were house cats. This year’s team has more barn cat but that’s just it, they don’t have the talent to be tigers.

If you have the time 66, I would love to read a far post on your thoughts on this .

by DCBruins on Jan 6, 2012 3:31 PM PST via mobile up reply actions  

I've been wanting to do a FanPost on basketball for a while --

but, every time I think I know something things change. The constant is what has been discussed, in great depth, here — CBH’s struggle to be an effective coach with the players he’s chosen.

I love the idea of being more optimistic than someone because I’m usually very optimistic about all things in life; but, for the last few years, i think I’ve been “negative Nelson” (bad choice of names I guess) about our revenue sports. And, of course, I see nothing positive in our culture, the AD or the isolated and “give a shit” Chancellor.

So, watching last night’s game — where our guys seemed to really care, and played their hearts out AND played like a team (with one exception who I think is a team player but cannot define his role) was a breath of fresh air.

I think I enjoyed last night’s game more than most any recent UCLA sports even in a long while. And, I almost didn’t watch it. I thought for a while I’d just stay away — but like most of us, it’s in the blood and we can’t.

I’ll write something, soon.

sjh

by Class of 66 on Jan 6, 2012 3:50 PM PST up reply actions  

I was worried about this game since the summertime. Go Bruins!

Good addition by subraction thread.
We played looser and more free, without Josh.
We were quicker, scary thought.
Zeke needs to understand the mental part of the game,
where you make quality decisions-per the momentum and flow of the game.
I know what he’s thinking. NBA…..Wow……C’mon LJ = Team baby………
How about thinking “Best Decision” for the team, OR when to be a PG vs SG. Go Bruins..

by look closer on Jan 6, 2012 10:01 AM PST reply actions  

Who would have thought...

that all CBH had to do was whack Josh Smith in the head, and we would win. Literally and figuratively this could be his wake up call. We did better without him. I have been saying for the past few games that Smith was killing us. His effort is poor.

I am starting to really like the Wears, and I have always liked Lane. For those fools that want to continue to bash Lane, think about the number of minutes this kid has played in his 3 years. Not many!! And yet, he helped us win against UofA last night. Think of what he could do with more productive minutes. What does Lane give us: he is a better fundamental rebounder than the Wears, he is faster up and down the court than the Wears, and he plays better arms straight up defense than the Wears. Ok, he gets beat off the dribble too easily. I like the rotation of the Wears first, then Lane as the next option. Smith and Stover next. Based on effort. The Wears give a big plus based on freethrow shooting and offensive understanding, and therefore earn the top 2 spots.

This team now has some life.

Louisville, KY for UCLA class of '87

by kingslook on Jan 6, 2012 10:05 AM PST reply actions  

The best thing I saw the Wears do last night

was when TWear (I think T and not D) has the ball on the block, was feeling pressure and looked like he was going to do a turnaround jumper but head faked it and stepped through to the basket. Perfect execution and a good realization that feeling the defense doesn’t mean that you need to back down and take a fallaway jumper. Use the fake and keep going to the basket. Once the defender left his feet, Wear was going to score or get fouled, guaranteed.

If the Wears continue to learn how to use their height instead of trying to be 3s, they can be really good.

by JimmyBurke on Jan 6, 2012 10:34 AM PST up reply actions  

Parity in the Pac?

Or, should that read patheticy?

A bit off topic for this thread, but I noticed what seemed to be a lot of ‘upsets’ last night.

Looking at the last Power Poll, 5 of the 6 games would be deemed upsets. Probably just one of those once-in-a-while aberations, but I thought it a bit curious.

Colorado… the only unbeaten?…yikes!

Wouldn’t surprise me to see the season champ have 5 losses.

by kevb75 on Jan 6, 2012 10:17 AM PST reply actions  

In the absence of Smith

I did not understand why Smith was allowed to play this season given the glaring absence of any individual preparation or skill maintenance over the summer. Had he been benched until he demonstrated some regard for the team or the university I think the team win-loss record would be very different. The total team effort we witnessed last night should leave little doubt that when he plays everyone else must adjust to his adolescent attitude, excessive weight, impaired skills, lumbering footwork, compromised coordination and predictable fouls. If he had been benched Powell would have had much more time to adjust to the complexity at this level and Stover might have developed his offense. They, at least, earned their time in the game. Think Smith will look at film from last night and suddenly wake up? No…not this season. The unintended result of giving him playing time is that his attitude of entitlement has been rewarded by the coaching staff.

by Vernon Cook on Jan 6, 2012 11:03 AM PST reply actions  

The Smith Situation Is More Complex Than That

Yes, there is no excuse for the fact that he came back so out of shape.

But, weight is not the only thing slowing Josh down or cutting down his minutes.

Fouls have taken him out of more situations than fatigue.

Some are real fouls, but not his fault. We don’t play good man D against quick teams. When our guards allow penetration, Smith steps in and often picks up a foul. Those should not be on him.

And, he is the victim of more BS calls than anyone I’ve seen, recently. People run into him or fall into him and a foul is called on Josh. When he is on offense, people hang on him or hack him with impunity. This “anti-big man” syndrome is what took Shaq out of college, early.

CBH has to take some responsibility here — both for insisting on playing man against teams that our guards can’t stop AND for continuing to let Josh get screwed by the STPR’s. Both he and DG should strap it on and have a talk with the officiating office — supported by some of the horrendous calls surrounding Josh.

Also, I’m not sure he has an “attitude” problem. People choose to look at his face or body language; there is absolutely NO empirical evidence to support the theory that either reflect true emotions. Some of the shit eating grins you see on people are not arrogance or aggression but much rather covers for embarrassment or self-directed anger.

On the bench, Josh is supportive of his ’mates. And, from what they say, publicly, they like him.

Is he where he should have been? No way. I wish he were. But, I’m not down on him the way some are.

sjh

by Class of 66 on Jan 6, 2012 4:07 PM PST up reply actions  

Good Followup

Excellent points. My impression is that the coach decided to build the team around him at center based on his performance as a freshman. Then, unbelievably, they allowed him an unstructured summer. We have current evidence he lacks the discipline to create his own summer program. I’ll assume there are many big man camps. Actually, I do not know if a scholarship player can be coached, tutored, or advised in his time off. I can find out. I witnessed a lot of potential in his freshman year. All the freshman potential has been reversed. In that regard he has become the victim. More alarming is that his weight gain[s] may [will] compromise his cardiovascular health. I would hope someone is monitoring his diet and blood chemistries.

by Vernon Cook on Jan 6, 2012 8:03 PM PST up reply actions  

Glad the Bruins won.

I haven’t stayed up to watch a Thursday night game for a while and didn’t last night. I’ll see how UCLA does in the next few weeks before I commit to a 1 a.m. bedtime on a “school” night.

by orlandobruin on Jan 6, 2012 11:27 AM PST reply actions  

Starting Five

David and Travis with JA TL and LJ in backcourt. supporting NP followed by equal time for JS, BL and Stover. Don’t give Josh any real time until he gets his act together. One thing you don’t have to worry about Josh is his turning Pro early. He couldn’t make it, at least in the NBA. The most likely to leave UCLA early for the NBA would be Tyler and Norman. I think Reeves plays tonight or tomorrow. Who? and who cares.

by ucla2010 on Jan 6, 2012 2:50 PM PST reply actions  

A win is a win

There still is a lot of developing among the players that needs to happen for this team to reach another level. They still need to do a better job of rebounding in my opinion. Stover, Lane, and the Wears may be tall, but they’re not the toughest in grabbing boards. SPTRs are awful… so many blocking fouls that were called on the Bruins that were pretty poor… then to follow most of them up with some touch foul on UCLA? UA clearly benefited from them and I hate to see what the calls will be at the McKale Center.

by UCLA4Life on Jan 6, 2012 4:14 PM PST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Bruins Nation, an unofficial daily online scrap book covering the greatest collegiate athletic program in the nation. Established June 16, 2005. GO BRUINS.

Managers

Uclabear1_small Nestor

Arron_afflalo1_small Tydides

Brad_pitt_as_achilles_small Achilles

377011_2642084725867_1068030137_32302525_1166539782_n_small Ryan Rosenblatt

Telemachus_small Telemachus

Licenseplate_small gbruin

2761_small tasser10

Blue_bellerophon_small Bellerophon

Img_0052_2_small Patroclus

Small DCBruins

Of Counsels

094_small Ajax

Menelaus2_small Menelaus

Small Meriones

Small Odysseus

Associates

Eee_small freesia39

Uclabruins_small AHMB