The 1st law of Physics as it Pertains to College Football
Bumped. Even though Alabama won the game last nights (congrats to Roll Bama Roll), the underlying points in this post doesn't change. - BN Eds.
I know what you're thinking, Athletes colliding at high speed, but that is not what I am going to discuss today. Let's start by stating (or restating) a fundamental law of the universe.
a body at rest will remain at rest unless an outside force acts on it, and a body in motion at a constant velocity will remain in motion in a straight line unless acted upon by an outside force.
For the purpose of today's examination I am going to define a "Body" as in Student Body or Body of Alumni. I find it interesting that when discussing fans, however, it is referred to as a "fan base" and we simply take for granted that it is comprised of both Student Body, and Body of Alumni as well as those fans whose only tie to the university is generally regional or circumstantial.
I'm going to get back to that. For now, join me after the jump for another example put to work.
I found this little blurb on today's Column by Ivan Maisel.
Four years ago, when LSU pounded Ohio State, 38-24, to win the BCS national championship, the Buckeye fans gradually grew silent beneath the onslaught of the Tigers and their fans in the Superdome.
What we're talking about here is the outside force of LSU fans acting upon another body; the OSU football team as well as it's fans. Maisel's column focuses on the largely home field advantage LSU enjoyed by playing in the Superdome in New Orleans. The above mentioned clause emboldened by me for emphasis really hit a nerve with me. We're talking about a very physical reality of a rather large fan base silencing their counterparts, and affecting the way the Buckeyes performed on the field. This is a very real and tangible effect. It can be measured. Television broadcasts routinely show some form of audio meter during really big games to illustrate exactly how boisterous a crowd can be.
I found this factoid particularly noteworthy, because as a self described connoisseur of American College Football, I take pride in having attended games where we took on some of the longest standing Football powerhouses across the nation: Michigan, Alabama, Tennessee, Texas, Ohio State, Oklahoma. Out of all the fanbases I have had the pleasure of observing first hand, Ohio State was the only one that made me feel like I was at an away game when I entered the Rose Bowl grounds. The phrase "travels well" really hit home when I saw how the Buckeye fans "bring it." Similarly, I watched first hand when what I thought a largely over rated Seminole fanbase began their 'Tomahawk Chant' at the Emerald Bowl in the 3rd quarter and we promptly blew what I thought was an insurmountable lead.
We are clearly A Body at Rest.
How did we get here? How do we resolve this? In 1998, UCLA debuted at #1 in the inaugural BCS rankings well on our way to the National Championship game. While we fell short, we did end up playing on our own home field, the Rose Bowl. Again, some of Maisel's words hit home with me.
. . . every time the crystal football shows up in New Orleans, LSU shows up to claim it.
Followed immediately after by:
"This is our stadium," Tiger defensive end Sam Montgomery said.
While we are all aware what happened next, it bears repeating. Perhaps disapointed by falling just shy of the National Championship game, Bruin "fans" sold their tickets en masse and turned what has been described by those members of Bruins Nation that were there as a Wisconsin Home Game. Compare that to this climate:
"I think this game is going to be about who wants the tickets more," said Alabama offensive tackle Barrett Jones, the Outland Trophy winner. "Who's willing to pay for them? I think we're allowed the same amount they are. The other ones are going to be who pays more for them, and I have great confidence in our fans. They followed us all the way to Pasadena (for the 2010 BCS title game). We had more fans than Texas there. I know that they're going to show up and support us."
There are 4 BCS Bowl games that take turns hosting the National Championship game on a rotating basis. They are the Rose, Fiesta, Sugar, and Orange Bowls. Those bowls reside in Pasadena, CA; Glendale, AZ; New Orleans, LA; and Miami, FL respectively. This is important because Maisel is referring to the synergy created when LSU plays in the Super Dome; coincidentally each time has been for the National Championship. So, for the above mentioned Bowl Games, we have these universities that can potentially take advantage of their regional proximity:
- Rose Bowl - Pasadena - UCLA/USC
- Fiesta Bowl - Glendale - ASU/UofA
- Sugar Bowl - New Orleans - LSU
- Orange Bowl - Miami - Miami University
LSU has obviousy benefited the most, capturing 2 National Championships in their 'home' stadium. While Southern Cal can make a similar argument by winning 4 out of 5 Rose Bowls; the lone defeat being a loss in the National Championship game. Meanwhile, Miami won 3 National Championships in the Orange Bowl before there was a BCS system.
And UCLA? Well, UCLA squandered the one opportunity at a BCS bowl win when its fans sold all their tickets to the 99 Rose Bowl. Perhaps the fans alone cannot be blamed for the loss against Ron Dayne led Wisconsin, but we can see from Maisel's quotes that a raucous fanbase can make a difference.
Between 1998 and 2001 we were the pre-imminent football program in Los Angeles. Then something happened. I cannot say exactly what happened, but I can describe it.
The Second Law of Motion states that if an unbalanced force acts on a body, that body will experience acceleration ( or deceleration), that is, a change of speed
UCLA was very much an unbalanced force. While we had achieved some rare heights, have never truly enjoyed the active support of the administration, and unbelievably enough the Atheletic Department. We find ourselves in that surreal position where our Athletic Department IS the outside force. The Football and Basketball teams are largely unsupported and mismanaged. The fans are viewed as sheep to be fleeced, and the students are viewed as serfs; to be harnessed but not truly considered.
As with Maisel, I look upon all that LSU has achieved; how it has curiously harnessed synchronicity and won two National Championships and now play for a 3rd in their own backyard. I realize that if we want to even approach the same results we the fans, alumni, and students must be the outside force that weeds out apathy, refuses to accept mediocrity, and demands the kind of excellence from our two signature sports programs that we demand from our scholars.
Unfortunately our own Athletic Department and quite possibly the Administration itself seem fit to play the equal and opposite reaction.
This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of BruinsNation's (BN) editors. It does reflect the views of this particular fan though, which is as important as the views of BN's editors.
28 comments
|
5 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Unfortunately,
While we bodies were obeying Newton’s Laws of Motion, our major sports programs were following Guerrero’s Laws of Inaction.
A body at rest shall remain at rest. Period. We’re first to 100. We had John Wooden. We’re the most applied-to university in the world. Why shake things up?
Wow
We find ourselves in that surreal position where our Athletic Department IS the outside force. The Football and Basketball teams are largely unsupported and mismanaged. The fans are viewed as sheep to be fleeced, and the students are viewed as serfs; to be harnessed but not truly considered.
…truth be told…
ps: we need to hire some Domers in Administration, because they Get It
"Players with fight never lose a game, they just run out of time"
~ John Wooden
Bravo!
Great article, MexiBruin! It is, indeed, such a sad time to be a bruin.
by UCLA_beer&mathematics on Jan 8, 2012 3:14 PM PST reply actions
UCLA Film Major discussing physics
More proof why Bruins are the best. Great work, Mexi. I almost used Newton’s laws of motion for one of the Morning After football posts this year.
I think the law of inertia really captures the 1980 groupthink mentality that has permeated and paralyzed the Morgan Center. What will be our catalyst for change? Will we as fans be that unbalanced force to change direction? I intend for BN to be a leader in that force for change.
greg in denver, U.C.L.A. guy for life - BruinsNation.com
Not just physics, but meta-physics.
deep waters run, er, deep.
Winning is not a sometime thing; it's an all the time thing. You don't win once in a while; you don't do things right once in a while; you do them right all the time. Winning is a habit. Unfortunately, so is losing. ~ Vince Lombardi
Bravo, indeed
That’s the word that came to mind while reading…
As a non-scientist, I avoided the post due to the physics reference. Glad I came back to read it. Great post.
by Geronimo21 on Jan 9, 2012 10:32 AM PST via mobile reply actions
UCLA Fans poor showing dates back longer than 99...
It was the same scene for the 94 Rose Bowl against Wisconsin. Students were selling off their tickets left and right to that game, and by the time Jan 1 rolled around, the Rose Bowl was a veritable sea of red. So disappointing to see so many folks sell out for a few dollars.
As the article states, had Bruins fans been out in full force, the outcome of that game might have been different.
We can only hope that Mora affects a true change in culture in the football program. If he succeeds, and the Bruins go balls out every game and refuse to accept losing as an option, it will trickle down to the fans, as well.
Here’s to brighter times ahead!
I was in the band
for the ’94 Rose Bowl. It was embarrassing. We must have been the biggest (if not the only!) concentration of blue in the whole d*mn place.
Roses are red, violets are blue...f*** $C.
No matter how much
the administration has screwed up on football, I will never forgive UCLA football fans for that.
But hey, what do I know. I’m just the 800 lbs bruin in the room.
Yep
I was at both of those games. Ridiculous the way many fans sold out our Rose Bowl tix in 1994 (and 99).
My wife to the '94, I was at the '99... painfull.
I couldn’t believe how flat we were at the ’99, should have expected it I guess.
That's great perspective
I was there (with Tazmiami) that beautiful New Year’s Day when a dairy cow hot air balloon drifted over the Rose Bowl! We were shocked to be in the "alumni" section and surrounded by Badger faithful. It was easy to feel defeated, or at least disappointed. We still cheered until we lost our voices.
As a fan not only of UCLA but of college football in general, I take extra pleasure in attending our away games at some of the other legendary stadiums. Of course that means I had my heart broken in the Orange Bowl in 1998 and in South Bend in 2006 (just to name a few). But just like a bad boyfriend, I can’t give my Bruins up. Maybe that is because I still see the potential.
To me, UCLA symbolizes what it means to achieve in every aspect of your life; academic, athletic, creative, professional, etc. We don’t accept that you can achieve excellence in only one thing. We know you can do it all – it just takes hard work. We should be proud of and celebrate that truth as fans. However, until we have leadership on campus that shares that vision, why would we expect our fan base to buy in?
Student tickets
I’m a student and I was never given a physical ticket. My tickets were placed on my Bruin Card. I do think guest tickets are print outs.
Anyhow, as a student I wish the athletic department did more on campus to attract fans. All I see is one sign on Bruin Walk, that’s it.
Add the Alumni Association to list of culprits!
Our official Alumni Association is just as clueless as the Morgan Center. Recently, we moverd from Northern California to Las Vegas. My wife is an active member of the K-State Alumni. She was asked to head up the Alumni group here in Vegas. They gave her a list of over 500 Alumns living in the area. the other night she held a watch party for the KSU-KU basketball game. She had over 60 people attend with several even coming from Flagstaff, AZ.
I looked up the Alumni group for UCLA and found we didn’t have an official group in the Las Vegas area. Outside of California and a few east coast cities, UCLA has no active alumni presence throughout the country.
How can we have an active fan base when we don’t even have alumni clubs throughout the country? My wife’s K-State has active groups throughout the country. They had a hugh group attend the Cotton Bowl last week.
As an alumn, I never received any information about tickets to the Hunger Bowl. I’m a life member of the Alumni Association and I don’t receive ticket information about games .
Until the Alumni Association does a better job of cultivating Alums, we will never have an active fan base that travels well!
Wow...
no alumni club in Vegas? That’s a big failure. I think you should start one!
But hey, what do I know. I’m just the 800 lbs bruin in the room.
Well, here is one of the sticking points;
I have tried to go to the Alumni Association to look up other Bruins. They have told me point of fact, that they don’t give that information out. Second, I have to provide them with really specific information Name, Graduating Year, etc. to look someone up. They still won’t give you the information. They will send your information to the person you are trying to look up and ask them if they wish to be contacted.
K State sent Twothphry’s wife a list of 500 Alumni in the area!
What exactly does UCLA fear by allowing its Alumni to network?
Winning is not a sometime thing; it's an all the time thing. You don't win once in a while; you don't do things right once in a while; you do them right all the time. Winning is a habit. Unfortunately, so is losing. ~ Vince Lombardi
UCLA Alumni Network on the web
They are pretty bad. I have no idea what people who get paid to promote and build this network at UCLA do all day. It is amazing how weak their digital component is considering what we have built here strictly through doing it as a hobby for last 6+ years.
I partly understand
Any list with that kind of information is valuable. It prevents spammers and marketers from getting access to a pretty specific group. And it protects the privacy of some famous alumni. But there has to be a way to improve this. You have to voluntarily opt in to a specific mailing group in order to get any type of information from the Alumni Association…otherwise they don’t even know you exist. It starts right at graduation, they need to keep updated info on everyone., and they’ve done a piss poor job of that.
But hey, what do I know. I’m just the 800 lbs bruin in the room.
My wife said she'd help me start a group in Sin City.
For a small University, the KSU people know how to do it right. My wife started their alumni group in Richmond, VA and they had one of the best in the country. KSU has the most alumni donations in all of the Big 12 year in and year out.
UCLA seems to take things for granted. We have become so complacent and we wonder why we don’t travel well or support our athletic dept. It takes promotion from dedicated alumni and we don’t support that effort.
My son is a grad of Wisconsin and I was embarrasses in 1994 when we played them in the Rose Bowl. That was a down right shame how UCLA sold out their school for a chance to scalp their Rose Bowl tickets.
Great Post
I wasn’t there, but it really pissed me off when those fans of the University across the River outnumbered our own in our home stadium. Just wrong.
Los Angeles Rams and the UCLA Bruins!!!!!
by Minnesota Bruinfan on Jan 10, 2012 10:51 AM PST reply actions
This shouldn't be that difficult
Great university. Natural attractiveness. Many rabid fans and alumni. There is a huge, untapped market of fan interest out there. Unfortunately, between Alumni Associations and Athletic Departments, there is a pathetic under-performance in tapping, let alone growing, that market.
It might take a while to cultivate and nurture, but it’s there. All it would take is a bold, unflinching leader who is determined to boost enthusiasm among students, fans, and alumni, alike. Someone in charge needs to develop a “We’re UCLA, dammit” attitude, and stay with it until a kind of critical mass is achieved. It’s certainly not impossible, UCLA. Look around.
Oh, yeah. The Morgan Center. Seems like the Alumni Association suffers from the same don’t-rock-the-boat malaise. I’m so sick of seeing road games in the Rose Bowl. DIdn’t our vaunted (ha!) marketing geniuses take out ads in the Fresno Bee, so as to sell tickets to see a visiting Fresno State squad just a few years ago?
Does anybody there have even the smallest clue how to tap the reservoir of latent interest? Self-answering question.
Great job, Mexi. Sometimes, it takes a film major to help us see real life.
No, Thank You!
I was inspired in many ways by your Teachable Moments fanpost to write this.
I think the big lesson to be learned here is that UCLA needs to actively reach out to its students and ask them to engage more as fans. They also need to reach out to their alumni and let them know that selling tickets will not be tolerated.
As you say, someone in charge needs to take bold and assertive action to make it happen.
Winning is not a sometime thing; it's an all the time thing. You don't win once in a while; you don't do things right once in a while; you do them right all the time. Winning is a habit. Unfortunately, so is losing. ~ Vince Lombardi
Make the Rose Bowl more student friendly!
Prior to moving to No. Cal. in 2003, I was a season ticket holder for 20 years. During that time I saw the atmosphere at the Rose Bowl become more and more unfriendly to students and football fans in general.
I don’t know if it was something the Morgan Center promoted or if the city of Pasadena and the Rose Bowl Authority were behind it.
Little things began to be eliminated from the football atmosphere. It use to be a nice thing to have the crowd shaking pom poms on a stick….gone. Signs in the crowd…..gone. This year tail-gating was severly restricted.
The whole experience of college football has been systemetically eliminated for our students. We don’t even have rooter buses. When I was a student we could ride a rooter bus to the Crapaseium.
Two years ago I attended our game against K-State, the first one since 2003. I was surprised how docile the fans were and how bland the whole experience was. Next year, I went to Manhattan to attend the game against K-State. Totally different atmosphere. It felt like I was at a college football game.
We suffer because we don’t have an on campus stadium. Basically our university is totally removed form football games by being 35 miles away. The village isn’t involved when it game day on Saturday. The neighborhoods aren’t a part of the football scene. We have totally removed the campus from game day.
It’s time to re-involve the student body into UCLA athletics not excluded it!
by Twothphry on Jan 10, 2012 2:29 PM PST reply actions 1 recs
Thirty-five miles
is a large gap, and it contributes to UCLA football apathy.
But, a bigger and more contributory gap is the one between doing what’s right for UCLA football and the Morgan Center mindset. In this mindset, students are a minor factor in the equation.
If the MC thought that students were truly important, they’d place them in sideline seats where they could be heard and seen, and possibly influence, the entire game. They’d see to it that there was plentiful, inexpensive transportation from Westwood to the Rose Bowl on game days, from several hours before the game to several hours after. When driving in traffic and parking in L. A. are deterrents to attendance, they would address that issue, eagerly and creatively, as a crucial problem in need of solution.
They would market, not just seats at a UCLA football game, but UCLA football. They’d be all over the UCLA brand, with enthusiastic marketing campaigns, involving famous ex-Bruins, that would reach students, alumni, and fans all across the country. They would make sure that they worked in concert with the Alumni Association, keeping alums involved throughout their Bruin lives. There would not be strings, such as requiring donations, in order to remain in the network. They would be more like BruinsNation, providing bountiful Bruin food for all who are hungry. They would do this just to keep the UCLA brand vibrant and accessible to all.
They would see to it that UCLA had first-rate practice facilities, with full-sized fields. They’d set and declare their advocacy of ambitious goals, such as an on-campus stadium.
They would …. Oh, never mind.
They would
be worthy of praise if they did that. And now? Not.
But hey, what do I know. I’m just the 800 lbs bruin in the room.
A small, but important correction
Should be “former players,” not “ex-Bruins.” As BN demonstrates across several generations every day, no one is an ex-Bruin.
I must disagree, nut.
I agree that most of our former players are “former players,” but there is at least one “ex-Bruin” – the boxer’s son. I don’t consider him a Bruin any more. I can’t explain why I still have Henry Bibby in the “former player” category, while Norton is truly an “ex-Bruin” to me, but that’s the way it is.
Fair enough
Feeling magnanimous, I overspent on emotion. Norton is certainly an ex-ception. Like you, I could go either way on Bibby, probably because I watched and cheered him in Pauley so many times.

by 


















