Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: NFL Safety Ryan Clark's Motivational Workout

Although I've watched UCLA basketball on and off since the 1960s (I'm an old guy), I don't understand the intricacies of the game nearly as well as the front pagers, so I'll leave the analyses to them.

But it occurred to me that Bill Plaschke's story in the L.A. Times may hint at another way Howland has failed. Joshua Smith says, "I've let my team down" in talking about his lack of conditioning during the off-season.

Now this is a tricky point, since the main responsibility for keeping his weight down is Smith's, but I wonder if Howland laid out a conditioning plan — not just goals — for Smith to follow while he was home in Washington last summer. Did Howland and Smith sit down with a trainer and develop a specific program of exercises, running distances and calories per day? And did Howland call Smith every week to check on his progress?

Although the main responsibility is Smith's, without a specific program, lofty goals can be meaningless. That's why people seek expertise for a host of problems — because good intentions are often not enough.

4 months ago Tiny bruinfollower 31 comments 0 recs  | 

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

HOWLAND & SMITH

I think Coach might have said something like, “You’re not playing for me until you can go full speed for at least 30 minutes with no drop-off in intensity. It’s up to you. If you don’t believe me, check with Walton about his hair.”

by 1955 on Feb 12, 2012 12:27 PM PST reply actions  

Makes sense to me

Everyone keeps talking about how Howland had no control over Smith during the offseason. That’s not entirely true. He could always say “this is the weight you will report to workouts at if you want to see any PT next year, here’s the number of our nutritionist and our trainers”.

by Tydides on Feb 12, 2012 1:16 PM PST up reply actions  

I agree with pg29, 1965, Ty and Kenneth.

Especially Kenneth.

Those four comments consisted of four separate paragraphs with a total of seven pararagraphs. That is quite a bit like a reading SplaSChme article, but these paragraphs make more sense.

by Fox 71 on Feb 12, 2012 4:18 PM PST reply actions  

I had mentioned it once before

When Howland was first hired, he said that the team needed to improve it’s conditioning and get much stronger. And for years it seemed he followed his own mantra. The failure of Josh Smith to not keep himself in condition can be construed as an indictment on Howland. There just seems to be a disconnect between the coaching staff and the players.

by UCLA4Life on Feb 12, 2012 7:32 PM PST reply actions  

Not on Howland...

Does anyone really think Howland didn’t make suggestions? What about the rest of the team? Did they just sofa surf? C’mon.

Here are some telling quotes from big boy Josh…

“This has been embarrassing,” he says.

“I’ve let my team down,” he says.

“My whole career, I’ve never been in great shape,”

“I can only imagine what would happen if I was.”

Says Smith: “I didn’t do anything.”

Grow up Josh, the NBA is not impressed so far.

And, I gotta wonder what the parents were saying (or not) all off season.

No trophies for showing up.

by kevb75 on Feb 12, 2012 7:48 PM PST reply actions  

Uh, the dreaded "underbelly" point

First, it was Drew Gordon who was the bad apple. Then it was Drago and Bobo. Then it was Honeycutt who was lollygagging all over the basketball court. Then it was Reeves Nelson. We have always had Jerime Andersen prancing around, without suffering any serious consequences for stealing laptop. Now it is Joshua Smith’s fault for not being motivated at UCLA.

I am wondering who will get thrown under the bus in next year. Tyler Lamb? Norman Powell for going through motions?

It has been everyone else but Howland’s fault for having the Bruin hoops program mired in the abyss of irrelevance.

by Nestor on Feb 12, 2012 8:01 PM PST up reply actions  

One slight disagreement

The problems with and created by each of the players you mentioned, N, is the fault of each of those players, not the fault of the coach. It is 100% the fault of the coach that there were no adverse consequences for most of the failures or lapses of judgment by each player. Smith gets a scholarship worth what – $100,000 or thereabouts? One condition of that scholarship is that he play basketball, and if he can’t because he can’t (or won’t) show up in condition to play basketball, then he should not have the scholarship. That ultimate adverse consequence will never happen, of course, but not even little consequences seem to follow from conduct that should not be tolerated. At some point the toddler doesn’t need a time out when he’s having a tantrum of some sort. At some point, the toddler needs a spanking. Coach Howland is the over-indulgent yuppie mom who doesn’t understand why her pampered child turns out to be head cases like we read about in the tabloids.

That’s entirely Coach Howland’s fault. He doesn’t seem to have the ability either to perceive it or to do anything about it. That means he has lost the privilege of coaching here. In my opinion.

by Fox 71 on Feb 13, 2012 7:18 AM PST up reply actions  

kevb75 misses the point

What’s more important in coaching than leadership skills? Most college coaches are at least in their 40s. Are their years of experience meaningless? Was Coach a teacher or just one of the guys?

Athletes with the potential to excel in college don’t automatically develop a sense of maturity when they graduate from high school. What’s unreasonable about expecting a coach to insist that an athlete develop SPECIFIC STEPS to achieve a goal instead of depending on “I wish” or “I hope”?

by bruinfollower on Feb 12, 2012 9:17 PM PST reply actions  

How does anyone know what Howland told Josh before the off season?

It is clear that whatever, if anything, Howland told Josh, it did not sink in.

I feel that Howland gave his team, as a whole, the message of what was expected of them. Some were mature enough to take it upon themselves to stay or get in shape. Josh simply did not. By the quotes, one could opine that Josh simply doesn’t take it seriously.

And, what specific steps should a coach tell his guys about the off season? How many court laps to take? C’mon. Just play basketball with the boys. Anyone will do really. It’s just not that hard.

And, are you suggesting Howland really just depended on “I wish” or “I hope”? Really?

by kevb75 on Feb 13, 2012 8:42 AM PST up reply actions  

So, you're not going to hold Josh accountable for any of this?

Sure, as it turns out (hindsight is 20/20), Howland should have done more, said more to Josh. But then, all the other players on the team seemed to take responsibility for something so basic, so simple as returning to school with a modicum of ‘shape’.

I mean, look at those quotes…

Says Smith: "I didn’t do anything." What? Nothing? Yikes!

Is Howland supposed to change his diapers, too? All right, that’s a bit of an exaggeration.

And, how does one know that Josh didn’t tell Howland he would make an effort. We just don’t.

There is little doubt that Josh will not be jumping to the NBA. I also feel there is little doubt the message for next off season will be a tad stronger. OK, that’s an exaggeration, too.

by kevb75 on Feb 13, 2012 10:11 AM PST up reply actions  

I would agree with this line of thinking

If Josh were an isolated incident of Howland’s players getting into offseason hijinks that jeopardize the team the following season, but anyone who even casually follows this program knows that he’s not. Howland cultivates a lack of accountability during the season, so is it a surprise to anyone that our players take that into the offseason and dick around?

by Tydides on Feb 13, 2012 11:07 AM PST up reply actions  

Not the point

the point is that Josh didn’t do squat in the offseason, because he didn’t have to. He’d come back and get to play anyway, even if he wasn’t in shape, because Howland doesn’t hold him accountable.

Motivation is cultured in an environment of accountability, which Howland has not cultivated at all.

But hey, what do I know. I’m just the 800 lbs bruin in the room.

by tasser10 on Feb 13, 2012 11:26 AM PST up reply actions  

Did the Wears have to? Did Anderson? Lamb?

I wonder why the culture didn’t affect them.

I really can’t believe you guys are letting Josh off the hook so easily. Not one ounce of responsibility at his age?

Hey, to each his own.

by kevb75 on Feb 13, 2012 12:31 PM PST up reply actions  

He's not off the hook at all

but it’s not like it’s an isolated incident with Howland.

It absolutely affected Anderson, who was completely unprepared to take over the reins from DC in 2010, so unprepared that Howland had to play Malcolm Lee at PG. Even Anderson himself acknowledged this.

You can’t compare those players to Josh Smith, their ceilings are completely different. And to form, if Smith is not prepared then he should not play so much, Stover should be getting a lot more minutes. But as you can see, Howland doesn’t give a F and plays him a lot more anyway.

You can keep continuing to push this on the players, but when it happens so often you should start looking at the top.

But hey, what do I know. I’m just the 800 lbs bruin in the room.

by tasser10 on Feb 13, 2012 2:06 PM PST up reply actions  

This getting away from my context...

I am only addressing the issue of getting in shape for the upcoming season.

You’re going off in the direction of talent. That’s OK, but I just wanted to stick with off season workouts. Any comparisons I drew were only within the confines of putting in the work in the off season.

I believe Josh will do a whole lot more this coming off season. Especially since he will likely have a lot more time to work with.

by kevb75 on Feb 13, 2012 2:16 PM PST up reply actions  

You give every player an offseason workout plan and have a conditioning test on the first day of camp.

That is literally what is done for every college sport at every level. That might be more on the S&C coach than Howland; but there is absolutely a plan for what a player is expected to do in the offseason.

"I have one word for you...Be careful."
-Jose Guillen

by IE Angel on Feb 13, 2012 6:20 PM PST up reply actions  

Howland should have done what Bochy/Sabean did

Even after winning the WS, they told fan favorite and really round person Pablo Sandoval to get to a certain weight, and if not, he’d be sent down to AAA.

by maccabita4life on Feb 13, 2012 11:34 AM PST reply actions  

It's Not That Complicated, kevb

To start with, it’s silly to ask what specific steps a coach should tell his players to take. How about how many calories per day? How do you arrive at that figure? You sit down with a nutritionist. How about a specific regimen of weight training? How do you determine that regimen? You sit down with a trainer.

And your repeated use of Josh Smith’s quotes only make your case weaker. It’s clear that Josh Smith has a problem with personal discipline. Was Howland unaware of this? I doubt it. What’s wrong with recognizing that Smith has a problem with conditioning and then giving him a specific program to follow?

If Howland helps Smith develop a specific program and Smith still fails to follow it, Howland should toss him off the team. You seem to believe that a one-size-fits-all approach is the only way to go. I believe there should be ONE STANDARD to play (you’re in condition or you’re not), but DIFFERENT WAYS to get there.

by bruinfollower on Feb 13, 2012 11:56 AM PST reply actions  

Josh has regressed from last year...

both in his mindset and his on court play. He didn’t come where he left off last season.

Josh made great strides during his first year, both nutritionally and on the court. By that I mean from the first game and throughout the season, he took responsibility for his actions both on the court and off.

He followed someone’s advice about diet and did an OK job. He had a specific plan, he stayed with it for the season, maybe even the rest of the school year (how would anyone here know otherwise). So, when did the ‘personal discipline’ problem start? Was it so obvious? So, from my distance, Howland could be reasonably expected to think Josh was serious about his weight and continue working on it, the rest of the school year and through the summer.

Sorry about the repeated use of quotes. Actually, my ‘repeated use’ of quotes was limited to a single quote used again, once. But hey, sorry anyway. I used that quote again because it is just so revealing.

I’ll agree with you about the one size fits all, but then again socks are made to fit several sizes at once (did I really just say that). I could say the same about what ‘in condition’ means but neither of us have the time, nor do many here probably want to read about such specifics.

I believe I get that you are apologetic for Josh for having done zippo to become a better player. Okie doke. That is your prerogative. I’ll bet you can figure by now that I won’t share it. And, it’s really no big deal either way.

by kevb75 on Feb 13, 2012 1:09 PM PST reply actions  

Don't use strawman arguments

No one is being “apologetic” for Josh. We have taken him to task plenty, but you have to start wondering why these types of things keep happening to Howland.

And if you keep extending your argument, no coach will ever be responsible.
- a player’s not in shape: he should motivate himself to get in shape
- a player can’t run the plays: he should spend more time learning them
- a player doesn’t play defense: he should be more dedicated

Finally, if the players don’t listen to Howland…isn’t that just another problem? Josh Smith was supposed to be a crucial part of this team. It’s his responsibility for not getting himself ready for that and it’s Howland’s responsibility for not being convincing enough to get him to do so.

But hey, what do I know. I’m just the 800 lbs bruin in the room.

by tasser10 on Feb 13, 2012 2:17 PM PST up reply actions  

As I mentioned in a response post on another thread...

the context of my opinion is strictly about getting in shape for the upcoming season. I believe it was a response to one of your replies and only a minute sooner than yours above. I’m not interested in extending the argument beyond the very basic issue of off season training, mostly because there really isn’t one. It’s only about getting in shape. Period.

You make points about getting in shape, running plays and playing defense. I feel there is a distinction between points 1 and the other two, 2 & 3. The distinction is talent. It doesn’t take any talent to get in shape, but executing offense and defense does. Think of all the kids playing basketball or field sports on the campus. They don’t need external motivation. They certainly don’t have scholarships, but hey, there they are in better shape than one of our scholied BB players. There is just something wrong with that picture. That is my point, my opinion.

Finally, regarding the ‘straw man’ and being apologetic for Josh, well, maybe I mistook bruinfollower’s post’s content as offering an excuse (definition of apologetic) as to why Josh did nothing in the off season. My bad. As some TV show character used to say…nevermind.

by kevb75 on Feb 13, 2012 5:10 PM PST reply actions  

You're 100% right that anyone can get in shape, regardless of talent.

But holding your players accountable for showing up out of shape when they have been given a workout plan and a known level of conditioning to be in once camp starts is a coaching issue.

Josh showing up out of shape is his own fault for being lazy, no one would dispute that. But, after he showed up out of shape, he was not reprimanded or forced to get in shape is on the coaching and S&C staff.

It isn’t like basketball players show up when football guys do before school starts. He had an entire quarter on campus where the entire team works with the S&C probably 4 or 5 times a week to get himself into shape for the season. After this entire quarter where the coaching staff had control of his condition and shape, he was still horribly out of shape.
That is 100% coaching. It would not have been hard for the coaches to say, “Hey Josh, you don’t get to play in open-gym until you are under 350 pounds or 20% body fat.” or for the S&C coach to constantly be on him in the weight room, making him work extra or run extra.
It isn’t the NBA, the coaching staff controls what these kids do in the offseason. College sports are year-round, you don’t get to take the summer off.

"I have one word for you...Be careful."
-Jose Guillen

by IE Angel on Feb 13, 2012 6:32 PM PST up reply actions  

See, that's where I just don't know...

about coaches having control of their players. Is there no time of year when coaches are not allowed to oversee their players? I believe there is some amount of time when coaches are not allowed to see, watch, oversee, coach etc, their players, but I just don’t know.

I’m pretty sure it is not year ‘round, but then when do they, the coaches, have the ability to contact and ’control’ the players? Would be great to know the ins and outs of this aspect of college sports, especially football and basketball. It would make it a lot easier to intelligently comment on numerous topics.

by kevb75 on Feb 13, 2012 9:07 PM PST up reply actions  

You do know

He just told you how it is.

by Tydides on Feb 13, 2012 10:20 PM PST up reply actions  

There are limits on organized team practices and meetings for coaches.

But there aren’t any true limits on communication with the Strength and Conditioning coach for offseason conditioning and strength training, which was the issue with Josh.

I don’t know how it exactly works at UCLA; but every guy I know who is at a D1 or D2 is pretty much working out and conditioning year round. A lot of places require enrollment in a class strictly for that purpose, usually a one unit class.
The few UCLA guys I follow on Twitter are constantly talking about the workouts they go through all around the year.

Like I said, you are 100% right that Josh deserves a ton of blame for the way he has wrecked his body; but it is an easily corrected issue that was never corrected.

"I have one word for you...Be careful."
-Jose Guillen

by IE Angel on Feb 14, 2012 2:10 AM PST up reply actions  

Maybe not be the entire quarter...

since school began 9/19 and BB practice started 10/15 or so, but I get your point. We also have to remember he spent his summer in Washington.

I will try to look into the NCAA rules to see what I can find. Might be some interesting reading there.

Thanks for your info.

by kevb75 on Feb 14, 2012 11:25 AM PST up reply actions  

For the record,

I never wanted to excuse Josh Smith’s failure to get in condition; it’s inexcusable. My point is that Ben Howland has a responsibility, too.

I don’t know whether Smith made “great strides” in his diet last year. What I do know is that he obviously has trouble with conditioning, and I think that’s been apparent for some time. That means unless Howland wants to treat all players as if they have exactly the same strengths and weaknesses, he should have helped Smith develop a program of specific steps to meet his needs. And, again, I believe there should be one standard to play but different ways to get there.

That said, I share your feeling about not wanting to extend the argument. If Josh Smith dedicates himself to getting in shape next year, he’ll have the support of everyone on Bruins Nation.

by bruinfollower on Feb 13, 2012 6:29 PM PST reply actions  

'Great strides' might be a relative term...

I said that because as I remember, there were comments everywhere that indicated Josh had attempted and succeeded at trimming down…some.

I’ll agree to your point about one standard of play and different ways to get any one player there.

I just think Josh has a ceiling he hasn’t come close to reaching and he should take some of the responsibility in getting there. Do the stuff he can do on his own, let Howland take it from there.

I very much look forward to a Josh sans about 30 lbs or more, in shape (wind) and hungry to score. Question is will Josh be willing to do his part. I personally think he will.

by kevb75 on Feb 13, 2012 8:59 PM PST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Bruins Nation, an unofficial daily online scrap book covering the greatest collegiate athletic program in the nation. Established June 16, 2005. GO BRUINS.

Managers

Uclabear1_small Nestor

Arron_afflalo1_small Tydides

Brad_pitt_as_achilles_small Achilles

377011_2642084725867_1068030137_32302525_1166539782_n_small Ryan Rosenblatt

Telemachus_small Telemachus

Licenseplate_small gbruin

2761_small tasser10

Blue_bellerophon_small Bellerophon

Img_0052_2_small Patroclus

Small DCBruins

Of Counsels

094_small Ajax

Menelaus2_small Menelaus

Small Meriones

Small Odysseus

Associates

Eee_small freesia39

Uclabruins_small AHMB