Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: On Hazards And Hulks And Tigers, Oh My!

UCLA Basketball Thoughts: In the Abyss of Irrelevance

Last week we were talking about Ben Howland team making a season-saving run in our remaining regular season games to somehow get into the Big Dance. The closing stretch on paper at least was set up favorably for UCLA. Bruins theoretically could finish up the regular season with a 7-1 or 8-0 record, and then somehow sneak into the Big Dance by winning at least 2 games in the Pac-12 tournament. DC Bruins had laid out the blueprint noting how the Bruins could have positioned themselves for a run in the tournament by finishing in the top-4 of the conference.

Well after getting drubbed by a very well coached Cal team at home, those scenarios are not looking so hot for the Bruins. Think about it for a moment. In perhaps the worst Pac-12 conference in last 30 years, Bruins may not finish even in the top-4. Perhaps the Bruins can still manage to put together a 6-0 finish to the regular season, but at this point winning a game against Arizona at Tucson looks to be a long shot. On top of that it is hard to imagine a realistic scenario of Bruins getting into the Dance by winning 4 games in 4 days during the Pac-12 tournament. A program like UCLA should never be in that situation.

Yet that is the situation we are in. It looks more than likely UCLA is set to miss the Big Dance for the second time in three years under Howland. This will of course be the third time under Howland's career Bruins will find themselves without a dance ticket. But we have always given him a mulligan for his first miss attributing it the preceding dysfunctional and incompetent regime.

This brings us couple of issues - a short term one and a long term one - pertaining to UCLA basketball. Let's get to them after jump.

Star-divide

Let's start with the short term one and we have already had some vigorous discussion concerning this issue in the comment threads from this weekend. The question we have in front of us is whether the Bruins should accept a bid to the NIT or some other junk post-season tournament. Currently statsheet projects Bruins as an 8th seed in the NIT (I can already picture Chianti talking this up in his weekly BS "word from Westwood").

Let's be clear here. These days we have 68 teams making it to the Big Dance. So for any tournament that at best positions a program as the 69th best program in the country ... is well junk. Not sure how many people will actually watch the Bruins playing in the NIT except for the reasons of morbid curiosity. Still there are some good points on why Bruins could consider playing in the tournament.

Class of 66 makes some compelling arguments on why Bruins should not think about the NIT:

We Are UCLA -- We should not accept invitations to meaningless tournaments and bowl games.

We need to put to rest the idea that backing into bowls or begging into tournaments is a good thing.

We should not enter post season play unless we have earned the right with a season worthy of reward.

We demean post season play, and diminish our brand, when we accept invitations to loser bowls/tournaments.

We need to just say no. Strap On won't. So we need to stake out the position.

(And, BTW - the fan base has made clear that it does not want to go to these bowls - it does not buy tickets. So, we embarass ourselves and lose money. Nice brand management, strap on.)

BlueMe's perspective is a bit different but is also worth taking note:

I agree that the NIT/CBI is a bullshit tournament. Even the real tournament is bullshit now...69 teams. There is no way in hell that 69 teams are out there that deserve to be playing for a national title. We are having a bullshit season in a bullshit conference. We play in front of 5,000 mosly listless fans and haven't been relevant in almost 4 years now. We have no right to "have standards" and calling tournaments not worthy of our participation. Play the goddamn games with pride and integrity and be thankful anyone wants to showcase this garbage. Then after the games are over fire the goddamn coach and bring someone in that will put this program back to where we all want it.

DC Bruins thinks players should decide but islandbruin wants to add caveats that make sense:

I like the idea of the players deciding. After all, they are the ones juggling their schedules and "strapping it on" for real.

However, if they choose to go, it has to be for the right reasons- the seniors aren't ready to say goodbye to UCLA basketball, the players want more time to be on the court with their teammates, etc.

It can't be because they are proud to make the NIT, they are in the postseason, etc. The last thing this program needs is tweets bragging about making the NIT.

I don't know how you can figure out the motivation for a "yes" vote. But if it is for the right reasons, then I agree that letting the players decide makes sense.

By the way, I would not give Howland a vote.

Those are all valid takes. At this point we are still not sure how to feel about it. The anger and frustration here is that we are even in this position in a year during which we were supposed to build on last year's average season and bring home the conference crown. At this point we will include a poll at the end of this post and would love to hear from more members of the community on this topic.

Now that is the short term issue. There is a long term topic that we should also think about as we head into this week. There is a lot of talk about looking forward to next season as Bruin fans are hoping the arrival of blue chips recruits such as Shabazz Muhammad, Tony Parker, Kyle Anderson and Jordan Adams will do the trick and wash away all the problems of this dysfunctional program. I'd think again.

If Chianti Dan wants to hold on to Howland and his own job for another season by pointing to the hope around these recruits, we should be skeptical of those short-sighted arguments for number of reasons.

First, even if those recruits arrive in Westwood, the chemistry issue stemming from Howland's questionable personnel management issues will not go away. At this point we do not have any elite point guard on our roster. May be folks want to pin their hopes on Larry Drew Jr. However, we are not going to be counting on North Carolina transfers to getting the job done after going through Brian Morrison (you remember him? ) and the Wear Twins.

It is not clear whether Kyle Anderson can handle pg duties at D-1 level and there is also the question about his lateral quickness (he is after called "Slo-Mo"). It is also not clear how Drew will react to the min allocation to a freshman. After all he came over here from Chappell Hill after losing his mins to a freshman guard at UNC.

I am sure Shabazz will get his mins for the year before waltzing into the NBA. But what about the other guys? We also have no idea how Howland will give mins to guys like Jordan Adams, when Tyler Lamb is entrenched at the 3 spot. What about mins for Norm Powell. Howland hasn't had a good track record of managing the roster effectively, keeping people happy, resulting in a toxic, unhappy atmosphere around his program. How will that dynamics improve dramatically within a year when we are going to have a logjam in the backcourt? How are we going to find minutes for someone like Tony Parker at the 5, when Howland remains in love with the Wear Twins?

There is also the issue of Howland's schemes. He no longer is the defensive oriented coach we all worshipped in his early years. It is not clear any more that he gives out mins based on defensive mindset, based on what we have seen on the court for last 3 years. There is also the offensive issue. The idea of Kyle Anderson dribbling around the perimeter aimless for 25-30 seconds before getting ready to drive doesn't really sound all that exciting. It is unclear how Howland's schemes will actually optimize the talents of Muhammad and Anderson.

Even if the Bruins achieve some short term success in the form of a Pac-12 title and then a deep run that results in flameout at the Elite-8, we will be back to where we are now - the abyss of irrelevance- once Muhammad jumps over the NBA. That is why UCLA alums, students and fans, who care about the long term health of this program, should think beyond instant gratification of landing couple of blue chip recruits.

This is a deeply dysfunctional and sick basketball program under a basketball coach who has lost his touch and is too stubborn to realize it. It's an unstable situation that will only get worse, unless there is new and fresh leadership at the top of the athletic department. It underscores the need for a new athletic director, who can make the decisions on recharging the greatest basketball program that represents the legacy of Coach John R. Wooden.

GO BRUINS.

Poll
Should the Bruins accept a bid to NIT or CBI basketball "tournament"?
Yes
192 votes
No
242 votes
Unsure
25 votes

459 votes | Poll has closed

Comment 60 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I voted "yes" to NIT

I think gametime minutes are more valuable than any practice, and the young guys should have every chance to sweat it out on the court against an opponent.
I think “abyss of irrelevance” is a pretty accurate characterization of the state of affairs. Call me crazy, but I think CBH would make a badass NBA coach. There he would actually have the time and control to cultivate good fundamentals in his players. Lets face it, in the era of “one and done” its all “fun and gun” in college. Its great for the NCAA tournament, (I remember the putrid tourneys we had before the rule change), but it has been pretty crummy for quality of play in the NBA. I am not surprised that John Wall is getting lit up nightly, nor am I surprised that our cherished Ben Ball Warriors are all getting significant PT in the big leagues. Can you imagine what CBH could do at New Orleans or Charlotte with a few years of high draft picks. I think Howland’s message is outdated, I am thankful for what he brought here, and I think UCLA as an institution should help him find the right fit for the next station of his career.

by Strathmore&Gayley on Feb 13, 2012 6:37 AM PST reply actions  

There is a serious issue with "game time minutes" argument

The extra minutes will not matter much if we have a coach who continues to play favorites and stick to stubborn, boneheaded in game tactics. The extra mins will not matter much if a disinterested UCLA team gets blown up in the first round of NIT with it’s joke man to man defense, and weak jumpers from the Wear Twins.

by Nestor on Feb 13, 2012 6:41 AM PST up reply actions  

Can I make the argument

that I like the idea of us ruining another team’s chances no matter how small ours may be? lolol #GONZAGA

by Ganplosive on Feb 13, 2012 7:44 PM PST up reply actions  

The Extra Minutes/Extra Practices Fallacy

That argument was made on behalf of the football team — and not once did we see the “benefits” in the following season.

A wise old sensei once said: “Practice makes permanent. Perfect practice makes perfect.”

Having more minutes to practice the wrong schemes the wrong way hurts, not helps, a program.

And, Nestor is right — the minutes rarely go to develop the young players, they usually stay with the players who have performed poorly all season long.

sjh

by Class of 66 on Feb 13, 2012 6:52 AM PST up reply actions  

I disagree

He would be just as bad in NBA as he is in college. His teams would have problems scoring, his teams would be dysfunctional. Just because he is a good coach of fundamentals and defense, he really hasn’t excelled in any other aspect of the game over a long period of years.

by cyberdbk on Feb 13, 2012 6:56 AM PST via mobile up reply actions  

He would not be good in the NBA

The NBA is all about managing egos and CBH is terrible at it. Very few NBA players are interested in learning fundamentals once they get there. That’s what the D-league is for. In the NBA they just want to shine and get big contracts.

He’d be good coaching the national team or olympic team.

But hey, what do I know. I’m just the 800 lbs bruin in the room.

by tasser10 on Feb 13, 2012 8:42 AM PST up reply actions  

I think he will excel at a slightly lower profile program ...

… where he won’t have access to blue chip athletes like he can get at UCLA. At a program like Minnesota he will be forced to recruiting hard working, hard nosed defensive oriented players, instead of going for shiny blue chippers. Career wise it would make more sense for him to get a fresh start and go back to the root of what made him a really good coach. I don’t see him going back to those roots here at UCLA. It’s too bad because many of us fell in love with “Ben Ball.”

by Nestor on Feb 13, 2012 8:49 AM PST up reply actions  

It's not just the team that has declined

There has been a big decline in quality and expectation level of the fan base. If you remember durIng or before the Lavin era the fan base and alumni would not tolerate anything less than making the tournament every single year. Despite frequent trips to sweet 16 Lavin was called to be fired after only one losing season. Now? Howland has 2 of them already and a dysfunctional team this year, his third time missing the tournament this year. UCLA brand of basketball has become irrelevent this year and not many are even concerned or care. I have many family members who are UCLA students who have not been to a game, don’t know anything about the BB program much less watch one on TV. Do you really think this many years of decline has no future consequences?

by cyberdbk on Feb 13, 2012 6:47 AM PST via mobile reply actions  

Yep

This culture has been peddled by an incompetent athletic department that seems to be more concerned about generating short term revenues (and lining up their pocketbooks) than building the program.

In Chianti Dan’s world nothing else matters if Bruins somehow sneak into the Dance. Look for this guy to pump up the Pac-12 tournament saying how Bruins will still have a ‘chance’! There is no accountability for mediocrity and no sense of expectations that are on part of a modern day elite basketball program. No, we are not expecting NCs or NC runs every year. But we should absolutely expect the kind of season programs like Kansas, Duke and UNC produce year after year.

by Nestor on Feb 13, 2012 6:50 AM PST up reply actions  

We have a "chance" in the Pac 12 basketball tournament just like we had a "chance" in the football tournament.

Making both championship tournaments will be high on Doughnut Dan’s list of achievements. Oh, wait. Everyone makes the basketball tournament. Well, let’s just not tell anyone that, and maybe they won’t know.

by Fox 71 on Feb 13, 2012 6:52 AM PST up reply actions  

Yes

Strap on Dan has lulled the fan base into submission and acceptance.

by cyberdbk on Feb 13, 2012 7:01 AM PST via mobile up reply actions  

NIT

Additional games in the NIT means additional time playing with a broken offense and a broken man to man defense. I think running the stairs at Drake and consulting with a school nutritionist would make more sense.

by Bruins44 on Feb 13, 2012 8:01 AM PST reply actions  

Just move Josh

into a dorm room in Hedrick so he has to walk all the way up the hill…then make him take classes in the Botany building followed right after by classes in Bunche or Melnitz. Don’t pass Taco Bell. Go directly to class.

Then you can strap some french fries to Zeke and Jerime’s ankles and have the squirrels chase them throughout campus. They’ll get quicker after a week.

Finally, just make the Wears do wall squats for 2 hours at a time while taking punches.

But hey, what do I know. I’m just the 800 lbs bruin in the room.

by tasser10 on Feb 13, 2012 8:50 AM PST up reply actions  

haha!

Tasser, you just described my first quarter as a freshman! Hedrick, Botany for Calc 3C followed by Theater school for LS1 (I got a whole 10 minutes to make it).

by Strathmore&Gayley on Feb 13, 2012 10:39 AM PST up reply actions  

I can describe it

because I did it too! Not Hedrick but Rieber → Botany → art history class on north campus with no shuttle service. FML!

But hey, what do I know. I’m just the 800 lbs bruin in the room.

by tasser10 on Feb 13, 2012 10:46 AM PST up reply actions  

Shuttle service?

I rode the shuttle exactly once in my college career and that’s because a certain coed I was studying with was getting on it to go home from the library at night, and I ended up even further away from my apt for it. Which was ok.

They don’t really have a shuttle to class in the day nowadays, right?

greg in denver, U.C.L.A. guy for life - BruinsNation.com

by gbruin on Feb 13, 2012 1:29 PM PST up reply actions  

I can't remember

I do remember a shuttle, but I remember that either I couldn’t rely on it for classes, or it didn’t serve the route I needed…it was a damn long walk.

But hey, what do I know. I’m just the 800 lbs bruin in the room.

by tasser10 on Feb 13, 2012 1:38 PM PST up reply actions  

What a summary,

and a damning statement at that:

In perhaps the worst Pac-12 conference in last 30 years, Bruins may not finish even in the top-4.

Roses are red, violets are blue...f*** $C.

by KSBruin on Feb 13, 2012 9:57 AM PST reply actions   1 recs

There is no upside participating in the NIT

for the various reasons mentioned in this post. But there is a horrific downside. We are already in the cellar by UCLA Basketball standards, why risk getting eliminated and/or blown out in the early rounds of the NIT tourney! Stop the bleeding now.

by Angelitos on Feb 13, 2012 10:23 AM PST reply actions  

I don't know...

I think it would be great to get some more home games. Oh wait…

BWAHAHAHAHA!!!

But hey, what do I know. I’m just the 800 lbs bruin in the room.

by tasser10 on Feb 13, 2012 10:47 AM PST up reply actions  

Just noticed on statsheet

That there is no pie slice on the tournament graphic for the Pac-12. It is lumped into the “other” category with 1 bid. I think we’ll get more than that, but man is that depressing, and our place within that already crappy conference is even more so.

by Tydides on Feb 13, 2012 10:56 AM PST reply actions  

Time to tell the Emperor he's not wearing any clothes !

It’s been 37 years since Coach hung it up. There will never be another Coach and his record will never be surpassed! Nobody even comes close to equalling what Coach accomplished. I was a Bruin during those glory years and can remember fondly watching the nets being cut down for our final championship under Coach.
It’s time to face reality! 37 years is a long time to live on past glories. During that time we have had 8 coaches that have tried to live up to the expectations set by Coach and the thousands of Alumni that wish year in and year out that we could relive those glory years.
We have hung just one banner in those 37 years and that was 17 years ago. Most of the current members of our basketball team weren’t even old enough to remember.Back in 1985 we won our only NIT Championship. I don’t remember if we even hung that banner in Pauley.
It’s time to come to the realization that this year’s team is really not very good. We can argue that Ben might not be playing the right players but that doesn’t negate the factor that we don’t have a squad of talented player who play together as a team.
We have a big man who is a big man! He doesn’t care enough about the game, his team and his future to even show up in game shape. We can go down the squad and find hard worker playing up to their potential and players who are dogging it. But collectively, we are just a 50/50 team. We have no gunner who can shoot lights out and who is our go to man at the end of the game. Where’s our Jimmer?
Ultimately, this all falls back on the person who is coaching our team. Ben is responsible for recruiting, motivating and teaching our players how to play basketball. Ultimately, he will take the fall and lose his job because he didn’t deliver what 8 others coaches couldn’t deliver either, another string of 10 banners.
I’m not a Howler, but I think there is something deeper going on at UCLA that has poisoned both our Basketball and Football teams. We have alluded to it here on BN but it goes down to the bedrock. The culture of sports at UCLA has been ruined from what I knew as a kid, as a student and as an Alumni.
I have discussed this numerous times with my son the prep sports writer and he seems to think that there is such a pervasive negative atmosphere surrounding UCLA sports. We can’t attract quality players or if we do, they get to campus and never live up to their potential or in the case of basketball, split to the NBA at the first chance they can get.
Everybody knew this year’s basketball season was doomed from the get go. Smith came in looking like the Sta-Puff Marshmellow Man from Ghost Busters. Reeves was gone before we knew it. Donut Dan doomed our team from the get go by scheduling our games in the dump that passes for the Sports Arena.
What did we really expect? We can’t even get our students out to support our team. Let’s just admit it…."We’re a bad f…king team man, a bad F…king team.

by Twothphry on Feb 13, 2012 11:54 AM PST reply actions   1 recs

Forget Coach

I just want a program that rivaled what Jim Harrick built at UCLA (without the off-field issues).

by Nestor on Feb 13, 2012 11:55 AM PST up reply actions  

What an offensive and inaccurate comment.
Ultimately, he will take the fall and lose his job because he didn’t deliver what 8 others coaches couldn’t deliver either, another string of 10 banners.

No one is asking Ben Howland for another string of 10 banners. For the past 30 years, no one has been demanding that the U.C.L.A. basketball coach produce another string of 10 banners (although there was that kind of pressure on Coach’s first couple of successors). People do expect U.C.L.A. to be consistently near the top, like Kentucky, North Carolina, Duke and other elite teams. Given that U.C.L.A. is in California, near the beach, in the middle of a hotbed of talent, and in the second-largest TV market, that’s a reasonable expectation.

The culture of sports at UCLA has been ruined from what I knew as a kid, as a student and as an Alumni.

I have discussed this numerous times with my son the prep sports writer and he seems to think that there is such a pervasive negative atmosphere surrounding UCLA sports. We can’t attract quality players or if we do, they get to campus and never live up to their potential or in the case of basketball, split to the NBA at the first chance they can get.

Tell that to the baseball team. Or the volleyball teams. Or the water polo teams. Or the women’s gymnastic team. There’s no "pervasive negative atmosphere surrounding U.C.L.A. sports. We have had some poorly coached players in football and basketball and some prima donnas in basketball in recent years. Overall, our teams aren’t always champions, but they are in the hunt across the board year after year.

BTW, you aren’t an alumni. You are an alumna or an alumnus. “Alumni” is the plural form.

by Seth Chandler on Feb 13, 2012 12:24 PM PST up reply actions  

It was Lavin's favorite excuse

But hey, what do I know. I’m just the 800 lbs bruin in the room.

by tasser10 on Feb 13, 2012 12:53 PM PST up reply actions  

The classic "pathology of UCLA fans"

We then had Vitals and Digger rinse, lather and repeat that cycle during all the UCLA telecasts.

by Nestor on Feb 13, 2012 1:26 PM PST via mobile up reply actions  

Why didn't Howland recruit Jeremy Lin?

I hate to lose recruits like Shabazz Muhammad if we lose Howland. However, if CBH cannot win a National Championship with Love and company, I don’t think he will win a NC with Shabazz and company either.

by ehuang on Feb 13, 2012 11:55 AM PST reply actions  

See fanshot section

There is a discussion on this where you will see that your question has been answered.

by Nestor on Feb 13, 2012 11:58 AM PST up reply actions  

Jeremy Lin played

at Palo Alto HIgh School and was a straight A student, yet we didn’t see him suit up at Stanford either. Guess we should blame Ben for not getting him too? It’s a bit of a stretch there…a lot of Monday morning expertise…a lot of people missed on him…at least given the week or so that he has had. We may want to wait a little while before we put him in Springfield.

by WoodenMan88 on Feb 13, 2012 5:55 PM PST up reply actions  

We're not just at the abyss of irrelevance

We’re totally irrelevant. Outside the conversation. Beside the point. Thanks, Ben.

by waters96 on Feb 13, 2012 1:10 PM PST reply actions  

We are so irrelevant that.......

nobody is pirating our basketball telecast and streaming them on the internet. The last several games I couldn’t find a stream of our games on the Net. Sites that had announced that they would show a stream all had other telecast besides our game.

by Twothphry on Feb 13, 2012 1:56 PM PST up reply actions  

LOL

yeah dude I saw freaking CSU FULLERTON vs somebody and there was no UCLA vs Stanford, I was very dumbfounded

by Ganplosive on Feb 13, 2012 9:54 PM PST up reply actions  

A string of 10 banners?

Will never happen again in any collegiate sport in our lifetime. Like others who post on here, we just want one thing. CONSISTENCY worthy of one of the greatest, if not the greatest, college basketball program ever. As far as Ben’s mismanagement of playing time, well I can’t help but think of Rick Pitino’s Kentucky teams who often went 12 deep, using an uptempo style. And I dont think Kentucky had as much NBA level talent on those teams than UCLA has had over Howland’s span as coach.

by BrewinGold on Feb 13, 2012 1:18 PM PST reply actions  

Irrelevance is

When your head coach walks the row asking students to please attend home games…..
I’d like to think CBH might not be in the straights he’s in had he a viable partner for an AD with whom he could have honest and direct give and take about te challenges facing the program and come to agreement on a turn around plan involving changes in both their approaches. Sadly, I don’t get the feeling that has ever taken place or that DG had the wherewithal to be that kind of supporter.

Go Bruins!

Hail to the Hills of Westwood.

by Mr. Hilgard on Feb 13, 2012 7:27 PM PST reply actions  

I echo close to 99% of what is said here

Our once proud programs are now a joke, our athletic director is causing more harm than had that position been empty, Howland is still being stubborn and not playing to win (though I’ll give him SOME props for sticking to his guns just to prove a point lmao), but please stop taking cheap shots at the 5000 fans that’re still sticking it out, and spending their evenings supporting the team.

Perhaps they don’t understand the politics behind the scenes, perhaps they’re “howlers” still rooting for Howland, perhaps they’ve never heard of BN and are wondering where everyone else is, perhaps they’re really just there to support our boys in blue, but whatever it is – in a sh*t economy such as this, where it seems as if everyone else has something better to do, they’re still donning their (different) shades of blue and gold, out cheering for every basket our team makes, and causing (however minimal) ruckus for opposing teams. Which is much much more than I can say for a lot of us.

by Ganplosive on Feb 13, 2012 7:33 PM PST reply actions  

BTW

it wasn’t meant towards anyone, certainly not the OP hahah, I meant it for the general peoples

by Ganplosive on Feb 13, 2012 7:40 PM PST up reply actions  

Who took a shot at the fans?

That’s not who we call Howlers anyway.

But hey, what do I know. I’m just the 800 lbs bruin in the room.

by tasser10 on Feb 13, 2012 9:25 PM PST up reply actions  

I've read some comments throughout the past couple of months -

that talked about retarded fans still wasting time showing up at games, indirectly supporting a failed regime at Morgan Center etc. etc. I mean yeah, the product on the field could definitely be better but we can’t assume that everyone knows about DG and the efforts to remove him. Just giving a little credit to those that’re still forking over hard-earned green doing what they feel is their contribution I suppose. It’s more so a call to not lose focus on keeping the heat up on Morgan Center, not on other Bruin fans.

by Ganplosive on Feb 13, 2012 9:34 PM PST up reply actions  

Then you should have taken issue with what you didn't like when it happened

So that your concerns could be addressed by those individuals directly. Not take some broadsided random potshot at unnamed posters in a completely unrelated thread. Do not derail this thread with this nonsense. Thanks.

by Tydides on Feb 13, 2012 10:13 PM PST up reply actions  

It's hard to keep focus

when you bring up a complaint unrelated to anything in the thread.

It’s too bad because I partly agree with you, there are definitely fans who are not as well-informed and who, despite all the things that Chianti Dan is doing wrong and despite the poor product provided to fans, continue to show up and support the teams. Well dammit, they deserve better and lazy unqualified bureaucrats like Chianti Dan should not be taking advantage of them (by, say, raising ticket prices when there’s a good opponent coming to town).

You have a point. But it’s misplaced and thus loses its effectiveness. So don’t be so damn sensitive.

But hey, what do I know. I’m just the 800 lbs bruin in the room.

by tasser10 on Feb 14, 2012 11:13 AM PST up reply actions  

Finally, just finally, I come across another person here on BN

that has something nice to say about Jim Harrick’s program. That’s you, Nestor.

I know the guy will get more credits, acknowledgements for what he did

by Htse005 on Feb 13, 2012 11:34 PM PST reply actions  

Now that you brought up the only coach to win it after COACH

Maybe you already knew, but let me share with you some tidbits about the guy whom I thought really was too harshly punished, utterly overboard in my opinion With the passage of time, that infamous decision by both Young & Dalis just looks more and more incredulous to me.

Harrick himself was a capable assistant to Gary Cunningham when the latter coached two consecutive, near perfect seasons at Pauley.

When he was at Pepperdine later, Harrick’s team, under the shadow of an UCLA program still very much nationally prominent then, was competitive also. He ruined Larry Farmer’s debut at Pauley too, with COACH looking on at his familiar corner seat.

In fact, Harrick came within a whisker of upsetting Jim Valvano’s NC State, the eventual champion that year. The starting center of that team currently works as a TSA luggage screener at LAX American Airlines terminal. Because I regularly flew that 10:05 am nonstop flight to Toronto, his height and build, much taller than most, aroused my interest. My bruin sweater aroused his too. Eventually we made small talks and I learned of his background.

As the coach at UCLA following the footsteps of the late Walt Hazzard, he had Romar as his assistant. Now, I consider the latter an a _ _ hole of a man for reasons I said before, but grudgingly, Romar served Harrick and UCLA well.

Then of course Harrick had the service of an original snake oil salesman in Lavin to recruit for him. No matter how much disdain, contempt we all have for this dude, he can recruit even though UCLA missed out on Cherokee Parks, and a few other big names locally. You can’t win them all but we got some good ones.

Compare with Howland’s assistants, Harrick’s contributed so much better in so many ways that impacted the program conspicuously. Another one, whose names escapes me now, went to Alabama and fared quite well for a while too.

You can say all you want about his off the court infractions at Pauley, and then some other allegedly uncalled for stuffs at Rhode island and Georgia, but the fact remains that he coached at UCLA.

We got #11 BECAUSE OF HIM.

by Htse005 on Feb 14, 2012 12:16 AM PST reply actions  

I was aganostic about Harrick when he was here

But I’d take him over Howland any day (provided Harrick operated within rules).

by Nestor on Feb 14, 2012 5:19 AM PST via mobile up reply actions  

Harrick

produced some great teams, that won the Pac-10 regularly. Sure, he could have done better in the tournament a few times, but he got it done in the end.

The thing is, he could have stayed and wouldn’t even have needed to get outside the rules to keep winning. He was getting the players already. But Dalis had it in for him, because their personalities didn’t mesh. And Harrick gave him the excuse he needed to get rid of him. Everyone lost in that decision.

But hey, what do I know. I’m just the 800 lbs bruin in the room.

by tasser10 on Feb 14, 2012 11:16 AM PST up reply actions  

In retrospect

The punishment for Harrick re. the expense account scenario was totally disproportional. That was nothing compared to what we have seen in the NCAA last few years.

by Nestor on Feb 14, 2012 12:45 PM PST up reply actions  

Indubitably

But hey, what do I know. I’m just the 800 lbs bruin in the room.

by tasser10 on Feb 14, 2012 9:17 PM PST up reply actions  

My position is . . .

nebulous.

I believe UCLA should have standards, and aim to meet those expectations. But, I also believe it is hubris to look down our noses as being ‘beneath us.’

So in descending order, these are the unlikely scenarios I would like to see and the manner I would like to see them play out in.

A) We have been invited to the NIT, and we accept it. Dan Guerror makes a public statement to the effect of, “We are UCLA and we aim higher than the NIT, but we will honor our opponents and give them the best game we have in the spirit of competition. I will accept this invitation while serving notice to our leaders that our results are unacceptable this season and should we fail again next year to meet UCLA high standards of competition, they will be looking for another job at the end of that season. I include myself in that pronouncement.”

B) We have been invited to the NIT, and we decline it. Dan Guerror makes a public statement to the effect of, “We have declined our invitation to the NIT because here at UCLA we aim higher than a 69th place finish in the country. And truthfully, I can not guarantee we would win the NIT and therefore claim this 69th place finish. Because we have so completely fallen short of our expectations for UCLA basketball, I am stepping down immediately and serving notice that my replacement is not as likely to accept mediocrity as I have been.”

Winning is not a sometime thing; it's an all the time thing. You don't win once in a while; you don't do things right once in a while; you do them right all the time. Winning is a habit. Unfortunately, so is losing. ~ Vince Lombardi

by MexiBruin on Feb 14, 2012 11:47 AM PST reply actions  

Bravo ! Now I have two of you that think of Harrick the same way I do

You know, tasser, Dalis lacked the persona, clout of Morgan. But he wanted to emulate Morgan’s perception.

Harrick’s background never clicked with the power that be at Westwood.

West Virginia is a far cry from California both socially and culturally. Even though Harrick has been in California for quite a while, he lost little of his roots. Besides the accent, his etiquette especially displeased his boss sometimes.

From LATimes after the dismissal now.

The iconic Riviera Country Club, right by Beverly Hills, caters to the glamorous, powerful, glitzy money crowds. An athletic director from UCLA barely qualifies there, if not for his prestigious bureaucratic ties. So when he golfed with his coach and the latter, perhaps out of awe and excitements, utterly let his hair down by using choice words and, the worst of the worst, relieved himself at a convenient , albeit shielded spot the same way many folks did fishing out in the country somewhere, Pete Dalis reacted like he just received a sucker punch to his guts.

That did it for the athletic director from UCLA.

I understand Harrick’s wife Sally passed on already. He has a new companion in tow now. When I saw them at the Loyola Marymount game, Harrick looked considerably greyer and slimmer. But at least he sounded happy, amicable chatting up with Toby Bailey & Tyus Edney. The game itself understandably dismayed him. His team at least was feistier, fought better.

Harrick was next to last on the list of candidates Dalis had to replace Hazzard. UCLA grudgingly hired him after Jim Valvano, Larry Bown, coach K, Roy Williams etc said no. Harrick got the nod, didn’t disappoint either performance wise.

It is sad he was let go of reasons other than that.

by Htse005 on Feb 14, 2012 11:50 AM PST reply actions  

I pee on golf courses too

I have been with CEOs who do the same. It’s ridiculous of Dalis to judge a person that way.

We held a silent auction every year for our rowing team. In the years after the school cut our budget, this had become even more crucial to raise funds for us to continue rowing. Jim Harrick always attended and always made a generous contribution. So, in my eyes, he is a man worthy of praise, much more so than Pete Dalis who was one of the ultimate decision-makers in cutting the rowing team (along with swimming and gymnastics). I will forever hold him in contempt, Title IX or not.

But hey, what do I know. I’m just the 800 lbs bruin in the room.

by tasser10 on Feb 14, 2012 12:34 PM PST up reply actions  

Funny how I contributed more to Wisconsin than UCLA now

Wisconsin’s campus locates between Lake Mendota & Menona. It’s men & women’s rowing teams always got the best of receptions whenever they were out practicing on Lake Mendota, in full view of the crowds at Memorial Union dining hall and patio areas.

Of course they cheered that much more lustily, raucously when the coeds, in their bright red rowing tanktops, perhaps in tight shorts we guess, splashed right by the pier in their bullet fast aluminum boats.

Some dudes called out names of those girls, perhaps their girlfriends, acquaintances from the same hometown etc as the boats sped by.

Those were the fun filled springs days at Wisconsin. Too bad Pete Dalis ruined it for you my friend.

The guy is actually a waverer. He talked to Rick Pitino when the latter was available, admitted certain interest in the Pauley job too. Yet Dalis didn’t have enough gumption to pursue him further, waited for whatever reasons he still needed to sack Lavin. Then ultimately he punted the decision to the incoming Guerrero.

All I can say is WE STILL LOVE YOU HARRICK.

by Htse005 on Feb 14, 2012 1:34 PM PST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Bruins Nation, an unofficial daily online scrap book covering the greatest collegiate athletic program in the nation. Established June 16, 2005. GO BRUINS.

Managers

Uclabear1_small Nestor

Arron_afflalo1_small Tydides

Brad_pitt_as_achilles_small Achilles

377011_2642084725867_1068030137_32302525_1166539782_n_small Ryan Rosenblatt

Telemachus_small Telemachus

Licenseplate_small gbruin

2761_small tasser10

Blue_bellerophon_small Bellerophon

Img_0052_2_small Patroclus

Small DCBruins

Of Counsels

094_small Ajax

Menelaus2_small Menelaus

Small Meriones

Small Odysseus

Associates

Eee_small freesia39

Uclabruins_small AHMB