Bruin Bites: Garden Embarrassment Followup, Mora (Brash) Football Talk, & UCLA Sports Irrelevancy in Los Angeles
Hope everyone is enjoying their President's Day holiday. It is somewhat slow news time in BruinsNation, given that Dan Guerrero's dumpster fire UCLA basketball program is totally irrelevant in the national scene. Normally around this time in the good ole days - harkening back to Jim Harrick era (not Wooden era) - we'd start thinking about closing out strong for the Big Dance, taking it for granted that UCLA would be in the Big Dance.
To be fair, during Harrick years there were some seasons when Bruins closed out the regular season with a stumble dropping a game or two in the last road trip. We did not have to deal with the BS Pac-10 tournament those years. Still though - we'd at least have the tournament to look forward to and we never imagined Bruins being in a situation of having to consider life in the Not-Invited-Tournament. Well we are in that situation now and we have become a national embarrassment. I thought Jon Gold's top lines after the St. John's game give us a good picture of just how epic the humiliation was at MSG (emphasis added):
UCLA was out-savvied by a team starting five true freshmen.
UCLA was out-hustled by a team down to just six players in its rotation.
And UCLA ultimately was outplayed by a team that had lost its previous four games by a combined 87 points.
Guess we can add those numbers into the pile of datapoints here, here and here. Bruins were out-savvied by a team coach by Steve Lavin's lieutenant, which was anchored by 5 freshmen. Yet there was Chianti shamelessly throwing out the "young" excuse to New York based reporters. Couple of additional notes in a shortened President's Day edition of Bruin Bites after the jump.
- Chris Foster from the LA Times reports that Coach Jim Mora sat in an "impressive panel" that addressed the issue about LA and the NFL featuring Bruin legend Troy Aikman, UCLA economist Lee Ohanian and Los Angeles Times NFL columnist Sam Farmer. During the panel Mora predictably was asked about quarterbacks issue at UCLA during which he observed, "If you have two quarterbacks then you have no quarterbacks. We're going to identify a guy and ride him." Those are interesting comments that we will have to keep in mind while tracking spring ball.
- Mora also took a jab at Southern Cal, when he was asked about whether LA can support an NFL team and both Southern Cal and UCLA. He replied, "I think this area can support a pro football team as well as support UCLA and that other school." That kind of quote is fun to read as a UCLA alum, but it will not be fun if Mora doesn't back it up by beating them at the Rose Bowl next season.
- Switching back to basketball, Howland on the "hot seat" continues to play up nationally this time in the New York Daily News. Dick Weiss from the New York Daily News notes, "no one expects Howland to duplicate Wooden's string of 10 NCAA championships, but Bruin fans expect UCLA to honor the Wizard's legacy by earning an invitation to the NCAA Tournament every season and advancing past the first weekend."
- Lastly, Bill Shaklin from the LA Times shared a survey of the "most popular" team in the Los Angelesarea. Lakers are number 1. Not a surprise. Dodgers came in second (again not a surprise). Southern Cal was third. Where is Dan Guerrero's UCLA? Bruins did not make the list. That is right. During Guerrero's incompetent and disgraceful reign as the athletic director of UCLA, Bruins have become totally irrelevant in Los Angeles, as UCLA did not even make the list of eight most popular teams in Los Angeles.
Chew on that last bullet, next time you hear Chianti (we will keep calling the highest paid AD in the Pac-12 by that title until he resigns from UCLA), offer up shameless excuses of team being young, struggles being a "blip in the radar screen," and how the Bruins were in the race for Pac-12 football championship last season.
The school of John Wooden, Jackie Robinson, Kareem Abdul Jabbar, Bill Walton, Red Sanders, Troy Aikman is now less popular Los Angeles Galaxy, Anaheim Ducks and Los Angeles Clippers in LA. Chew on that next time Dan Guerrero and his cronies at Morgan Center hit you up for donation to the Wooden Athletic Fund. Nothing is going to change at UCLA as long as you keep supporting Guerrero with more contributions his athletic department. Just another point to underscore the need to complete a wholesale regime change at UCLA, focusing on removing Guerrero before transitioning a lame duck Howland out of Westwood.
GO BRUINS.
33 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
"I Can't Believe it's Not Photoshop"
Great pic. ’nuff said.
The Mad Bruin
Your choice
Every penny you give to UCLA AD enables Chianti.
by Nestor on Feb 20, 2012 8:22 AM PST via mobile up reply actions
Every post that outlines how far we've fallen makes me want to cry.
I ache for a calculated move to relevancy. The kind that Larry Scott makes. The kind that (so far) Jim Mora Jr. makes. The kind that Ben Howland used to make. I want to feel like the guy in charge of our athletic department knows how to do his job better than I do. I want to say “wow…what a move”, then have it pan out.
Every time I get a solicitation for money ...
I send a note to the sender explaining that I will not give a penny to UCLA, in any form, until Strap On is gone.
And, I give a donation to UCSD. They don’t pretend to have Div I revenue sports.
sjh
Starts with Chianti
I have progressed from unimpressed with our AD, to thinking surely we can do better, to complete contempt.
You need to start thinking of this in terms of Chianti is actually ruining the Dynasty and Legacy that Coach has created. He is not competent enough to fix this!
Howland has to go…period!! But we cant trust the process of replacing Howland with Chianti E. Newman at the helm. He has to go first.
The Lakers and Dodgers will likely always come in at #1 and #2 in Angelino’s hearts. Pisses me off that we are behind SC, even if we came in 4th. To not even be listed, with our sports history, is unacceptable. And if you are a Bruin and you arent pissed off than shame on you!!
Chianti needs to be booed by the students and alumni at every event he dares to attend. It will probably take the big donors (Wasserman, Samueli, etc.) gettting involved for anything reasonably quick to happen.
I think I am actually MORE depressed than after the 50-0 arse kicking $UC sent our way.
by WestlakeVillage Bruin on Feb 20, 2012 9:18 AM PST reply actions
Yep - as we keep hammering home the point
Howland is irrelevant even though its his record that we keep focusing on. Guerrero needs to be removed first bc he should not be allowed to run another search for a coach leading UCLA’s major revenue program.
by Nestor on Feb 20, 2012 9:43 AM PST via mobile up reply actions
Agree Completely
Strap On has to go before we replace our basketball coach. If that means another season for CBH, so be it.
My biggest fear for the program? That CBH will find another job and leave, on his own, before we replace Strap On.
Strap On will hire the first person to call him — pick the lowest piece of fruit on the tree — and give him big bucks on a multi-year contract. And, we will sink into Div II.
sjh
by Class of 66 on Feb 20, 2012 11:15 AM PST up reply actions
chianti's list
Let’s save the charade because we all know the “list” Guerrero will lay out: Lorenzo Romar, Mark Gottfried, Cameron Dollar, Tyus Edny (no offense, Tyus), and Kerry Keating.
Seriously, someone make it stop…
by DoubleTroubleBruin on Feb 20, 2012 1:29 PM PST via mobile up reply actions
Guerrero's superiors
They have to step up and say, this is not acceptable at UCLA and a new direction is needed now. But all I see is apathy. They are tearing down the house that Wooden built, plank by plank.
Not just apathy
I sometimes sense contempt from UCLA’s top adminstators towards alum base who wants to maintain the legacies of our major revenue programs.
by Nestor on Feb 20, 2012 9:47 AM PST via mobile up reply actions
I know what you mean
I think it bothers block and some of the other top administrators that they even have to consider silly things like sports. But, you would think then that they would want to hire a more than competent AD so that they wouldn’t even have to bother with those annoying alumni that complain about their precious football and basketball teams.
Keep e-mailing and calling Gene Block
I just received an Optimists e-mail from him and made sure that he received the unadulterated truth about Dan Guerrero.
Dump Dan!
by bruinclassof10 on Feb 20, 2012 11:02 AM PST up reply actions
Marketing UCLA in LA
I’m incredibly disappointed that UCLA does not have a stronger foothold in its own market. I live in the South Bay, which has at least equal representation of UCLA/USC alumni, but you wouldn’t know it by the merchandise available at the stores.
Its a bit chicken and egg
Tough to “market” UCLA athletics when Chianti has overseen the worst decade in the history of Bruin hoops and basketball … With those 3 Final4s standing out as aberrations.
by Nestor on Feb 20, 2012 9:51 AM PST via mobile up reply actions
It isn’t even so much the athletic gear that’s available. There’s an equal representation of shirts, jerseys, and hats being sold at Sports Authority or Sport Chalet, but it’s the non-sports related stores like Best Buy, CVS, Office Depot, and 7-11 peddling stuff like USC mugs, mouse pads, trash bins, and binders that bother me. That’s the stuff parents like me would love to buy for their kids to bring to school.
I thought I couldn't find UCLA merchandise anywhere cos I live in Temecula...
Then I went up to LA for an overnight on Sunday, was at the Grove on Monday and checked one of the outdoor kiosks along the main drag there that sells hats and other sports memorabilia. Couldn’t find a single UCLA item, asked the lady if she had any UCLA hats.
“UCLA? No….” Like she never even heard of them…both telling and depressing.
Most stores here in Temecula have USC stuff comin’ out there arses, but I can’t find UCLA gear to save my life. I finally found a T-shirt at Old Navy, of all places.
Pretty sad…
I worry that this problem goes far beyond just replacing the Athletic Director
The entire UC system is in crisis mode. The funding is being slashed and the outreach to alumni, never great, is worse than ever. UC Berkeley is doing a little better than us, but they’re hurting too.
I do agree that the current administration we have in place is beyond terrible, but even after Guerror and Howland are replaced, the problems we have still won’t go away immediately.
That also said, I’m still astonished how badly Howland has mismanaged our program the last few years. I don’t want to lose focus on just how dreadful Howland has been on every level.
This is an easy local fix that will generate revenue
Block can’t solve the state wide problems. But, he can fix the athletic department, easily.
Successful sports programs, which drive brand identity, in a way that cannot be matched by superior academics or a great medical center, generate income for his local campus.
Yes, the state and the UC are in trouble — but that’s not an excuse for not fixing what is easily fixable. How much attention do you think it would take to say “You’re fired!” and then hire Kiki or some of the other very qualified people out there?
Block is blocking this because he does not give a shit. It’s our job to make him care — and I’m afraid that the only way to do that is to refuse to contribute, in any way, to UCLA.
sjh
by Class of 66 on Feb 20, 2012 11:12 AM PST up reply actions
Does anyone trust Block to bring in the right AD?
Who hired Dan?
Has Block hired for any sports positions?
You fix the things that can be fixed
Nobody is blaming block for the increases in student fees and tuition, those choices are made by the idiot lawmakers in sacramento. But firing an incompetent employee is something that any leader can and should do.
I agree with you 66 and jwher
Firing an incompetent AD does seem like a no-brainer. But I also agree with kev that I don’t really trust Block to make a good hire. And I’m not going to give up my point that I think the UC’s are at a competitive disadvantage to private schools and elite public schools in other states because we don’t have the resources they do, and the UC’s never seem to place the importance on athletics that we would like.
So of course I won’t be contributing any money and I want Guerror fired yesterday, but I’m not sure that’s going to be a fast fix. Meantime, I’m still very anxious for Howland to leave. I really can’t stand watching what is happening to our team every game. Another year of this will kill whatever enthusiasm I still have left for our once proud basketball program.
How Much Inaction Can We Take?
I don’t buy the comparison about competitive disadvantage. Sandy Barbour, AD at Cal, started in 2004. Since then Cal has gone 64-37 (63%) in football. Jeff Tedford was already there, so the argument could be made that she can’t take credit for that record. But in that same time, UCLA has gone 50-51 (50%) in football, with 2 terrible hires by Guerrero- Dorrell and Neuheisel. So as much as he would like to deflect the blame, this terrible record is on Guerrero.
Cal has gone 152-103 (60%) in basketball on Barbour’s watch. In those same years, UCLA has gone 193-78 (71%) in basketball. But Barbour let Braun go after 2008 and hired Montgomery. Since his hire, Cal has gone 86-43 (67%), while UCLA has gone 79-50 (61%). And Cal has won the conference once and is on pace to win again this year- 2 times in Montgomery’s 4 years, while UCLA is playing for that all important 6th seed in the tourney with no conference title in that same period.
We could argue whether UCLA is at a competitive disadvantage to private schools and other public schools outside California. But UCLA also seems to be at a disadvantage compared to UC Berkeley. And there can be no excuse for that.
If we don’t trust Guerrero to make a good hire, then Howland stays. If we don’t trust Block to make a good hire, then Guerrero stays.
This is a vicious cycle. Block needs to can Guerrero.
Your numbers don't lie.
I guess it’s just that I don’t see Guerror on the court mismanaging our treasured program. I do see Howland. It is a vicious cycle.
State Schools Can Hire Competent AD's
There are a lot of good AD’s at state schools.
WSU’s made a great move on Leach — read his book, visited him and won him over.
Illinois’ AD made a strong statement about the bball program and it’s coach.
It simply takes someone with vision to make the hire.
sjh
Watched the hoops game for about the last 5 minutes of the first half.
That was enought for me. I’ve tuned this team out, Went mountainbiking instead (I know, an oxymoron in Central Florida). Much healthier for the body and mind . . .
On the flip side, can’t want to hear about spring foobtball . . .
I guess CBH learned in NY how to box out!
Wow.
Gaurds tip dunking over frontline men.
And the Goodyear Blimp in the middle.
smh
Big Problem ...
This information and alumni feeling, though having some truth, does very little for the football and basketball talent we must get to compete us to the top.

by 



















