[UPDATED] Report: UCLA Hires Reggie Moore as Recievers Coach
According to a published report this morning, the scoop Dumpdorrell.com identified last night regarding UCLA's hire of Reggie Moore seems to be confirmed. Still no word from UCLA, but here's the report:
The opening is a direct result of the Bruins hiring Rick Neuheisel as their head coach this week. Neuheisel was Moore's position coach at UCLA when Moore played for the Bruins. Neuheisel then hired Moore as a graduate assistant in 2003 when he was the head coach at the University of Washington.

Obviously, Coach Neu isn't wasting any time assembling his staff. And it's great to welcome back another UCLA alumni back home. Here is Moore's official bio from the Bison's website. And here is more from Tracy Pierson on the UCLA/Moore/Neuheisel connection:
As you may recall, Moore was in the mix last time around. Here is a blurb from last February from Dohn:
UCLA part-time intern Eric Scott and San Jose State receivers coach Brent Brennan also interviewed for the job Moore played in the NFL with the New York Jets and Los Angeles Rams as a receiver and return specialist.
As I mentioned in the comments, I'm not disappointed at all in letting Scott go. UCLA doesn't need guys hanging out with thugs mid-day in Norwalk.
It's a Neu day my friends. Another day, another good move by Neuheisel. Let's hope this keeps rolling.
UPDATE -M: As Free the 16 noted in the comment thread, UCLA has made a formal announcement type thingy:
"Reggie is a great Bruin and he will be an asset to our staff," said Neuheisel. "I haven't put all the pieces to the puzzle together yet, but he has a lot of experience in different areas. One thing I do know is that he will be involved in alumni relations."
GO BRUINS.
0 recs |
28 comments
Comments
Welcome to Moore
by bluestreet on Jan 3, 2008 6:51 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
..and a little jab at DW
by whp68 on Jan 3, 2008 7:05 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I am missing how replacing the receivers coach
Contrary to public opinion, I am taking RN at his word that he wants DW here, and I am sure that they will work together and produce very good results for us.
by silverlakebruin on Jan 3, 2008 8:07 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Two things..
(2) This was posted before I heard the news about DW being on board and listened to his and Neuheisel's comments on the conference call.
Nonetheless, it sounds like things -- with DW and his two cohorts on board less Scott -- are rounding into shape nicely. DWs remarks went a long way towards dispelling the suspicions and mistrust (at least for me). It's a pity he did not speak sooner. But, then again, I guuess he had his own negotiations to mind.
by whp68 on Jan 3, 2008 10:04 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Stop the bashing
by beentie on Jan 3, 2008 7:34 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
How well they did their jobs?
by bluestreet on Jan 3, 2008 7:36 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
that would be more appropriate.
by beentie on Jan 3, 2008 7:40 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah
by bluestreet on Jan 3, 2008 7:44 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Keeping it positive
by bornagainbruin on Jan 3, 2008 8:59 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Former coaches
YOU take the high road. I have a right to be bitter about what they did to the program. Have you been watching the bowl games? This team left behind by the former coaches do not belong on the same field with any of the bowl teams.
And yes, E. Scott has been convicted. That is a fact.
by bluegold on Jan 3, 2008 7:52 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Bitterness is always a terrible choice.
This however, is good news, and an upgrade. I think E Scott was put in a bad position, as he had no college coaching experience, and was supposed to receive guidence from KD, which either happened poorly or didn't happen at all. He did do a great job recruting for us, and I wish him the best.
by silverlakebruin on Jan 3, 2008 8:04 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
guidance from KD
by Tommy Bruin on Jan 3, 2008 8:10 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
More bashing
by godblesstyus95 on Jan 3, 2008 10:28 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Welcome home, Bruin!
by Tommy Bruin on Jan 3, 2008 8:06 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
I Don't Fault Eric Scott
Apparently, KD knew of Scott's previous problems. Whether sufficient disclosure was made by KD, is on KD, not Scott.
I've written way too much defending the hire of Scott and discussing his charges and convictions. Bottom line, I think it was good to give him a second chance.
As pointed out, above, Scott may have been the victim of an HC, one of our great receivers, who did not help him grow into or master his job. In the same way, DW may have been a victim of the same syndrome; it's hard to learn to be a great DC when you practice against a shitty O.
Yes, the receivers had a bad year. And, I think it appropriate to replace Scott.
But, I think some of the ill will toward Scott is not of his own making. His name was thrown around in the "holding the hostages ransom" play and I'm sure that hurt him. He didn't say or do anything at that time to deserve ill will. Once more, the damage was done by DW supporters -- maybe not DW, and certainly not Scott.
Eric Scott is a member of our Bruin family; he did his best for us. I wish him well. I hope life is good to him.
by Class of 66 on Jan 3, 2008 8:27 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Totally agree
Remember that ES was the same ES that suited up for us and was in the living room when PC & Norton bad mouthed UCLA and tried to woo Price away. To me, that is the true ES that bleeds blue & gold. I will welcome him if he is in another capacity and if not, I wish him the best.
by BlueReign on Jan 3, 2008 11:21 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I don't see anything that says Scott is out
by Fox 71 on Jan 3, 2008 8:39 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, is Scott being retained in different job?
by SinnerBoy 99 on Jan 3, 2008 9:19 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Coach K was there when Toledo was coach
by bruinbabe2000 on Jan 3, 2008 9:27 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I doubt it
As others have noted, he did a poor job as WR coach, lacks experience and has a checkered past (his poor judgment in even being there for the Norwalk incident, plus what I recall as him only being partially forthright with UCLA prior to the scandal, are enough for me without needing to consider the priors).
Also, while I can understand Neu holding some guys over on defense, I would be shocked if any besides, maybe, Dino Babers staying on the offensive side of the ball. Neu is an offensive guy; he'll want his own guys. So, even if Scott was doing a good job (which he wasn't), I still think he'd be gone. I suppose some recruiting post is an outside possibility, but I doubt it.
As for Coach K, I doubt he's going anywhere (he's just the academic guy and has been around forever).
by Menelaus on Jan 3, 2008 9:49 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Coach K is Not Just an Academic Guy
On a personal note, we both lived in Dykstra Hall. I remember him as one of the nicest people you would ever want to meet. He was not the typical jock. He did not go to UCLA to just play football, he came for the education. His enthusiam for UCLA over the years has been incredible. While he may now be known to the younger generation of Bruin fans as "the towel guy" there is much more to Coach K and is involvement with UCLA football.
He also hold the distinction of being the only undefeated coach in UCLA history when he was the interim coach that lead the Bruins to a win in the Las Vegas Bowl after Toledo was let go.
by Bruin77 on Jan 3, 2008 10:04 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Second that
He may have become the academic liasion when Toledo became coach.
by bruinbabe2000 on Jan 3, 2008 10:48 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I hope he's cleaned out his office
by OutOThsWrld on Jan 3, 2008 9:20 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
May be
by bluestreet on Jan 3, 2008 9:21 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Note
Might he coach special teams? RBs?
by Free the 16 on Jan 3, 2008 2:39 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I'm thinking special teams
by silverlakebruin on Jan 3, 2008 2:41 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs

by 

















