Carnesale (Lavin & KD's UCLA father) - good riddance
So UCLA Chancellor Albert Carnesale (Carny) is leaving Westwood in June 2006 to resume to "resume teaching, scholarship and engagement in international affairs,national security policy." Here is the release from UCLA's Office of Media Relations, listing all the "accomplishments" Carny had at UCLA. It doesn't mention the fact before Carny arrived in Westwood, UCLA was around no. 19 in the US News & World Report rankings in 1991 (our entering class), and we are now barely hanging into the top-25 slot, while USC (which still is a joke school) have crept into the second tier of academic rankings. But the issue whether UCLA has advanced its already elite stature as one of the premier higher education institutions is debatable and we can talk about that another day. But in terms of athletics it is probably a good think that this guy (who is not an alum unlike his predecessor Charles Young) is leaving because his actions showed he knew nothing about either UCLA basketball or football.
Yes Carney is a tool when it comes to understanding UCLA football or basketball. Carny was the guy who kept Lavin, providing that con artist administration cover time and time again. Here is an example. From Michale Miller, a Lavin apologist from back in the day (emphasis mine):
SL: Pete Dalis and I have a working relationship. My senior administrators -- chancellor Albert Carnesale and vice chancellor Pete Blackman -- have been very supportive throughout my coaching tenure during both good and challenging times. Their communication style has been honest, direct, and eyeball to eyeball.
I have said before that head coaches at UCLA have been shuffled in and out of the basketball office faster than Domino's delivers pizzas. Since John Wooden retired, there have been seven coaches in the past 25 years. If my math is correct, that works out to about a 3 1/2-year career lifespan per coach. This lack of continuity and stability affects the long-term success of a basketball program. I have been fortunate to have senior administrators that appreciate the success we've had to this point, and understand the natural learning curve involved when a 31-year-old head coach takes over a program the magnitude of UCLA with no previous head coaching experience.
Carnesale (and Blackmun) did not have much better judgement in football either. It was them who made the call on UCLA's hiring Karl Dorrell (emphasis mine):
Even if there were many who were lukewarm about Riley -- he did not have a winning record in his five seasons at Oregon State and San Diego -- few thought there was a more likely hire.
However, according to a source close to the search, Dorrell, dressed in a stylish dark suit and white shirt, had an extremely impressive interview with Carnesale and vice chancellor Pete Blackman on Tuesday.
"The bottom line is, Karl kicked (tail) in the interview," said the source close to the search. "He really showed passion and demonstrated from a philosophical standpoint the importance of discipline, what it means to be a Bruin, what it means to wear that uniform, to go to school and graduate from here and to beat SC and win Pac-10 championships."
Dorrell, as he prepared Tuesday to return home, thought he left a good impression, too.
"It was very positive, he said. "I told them I could redirect the program back to the level it should have been and bring the toughness, discipline and integrity that the program should have."
''There's a sense of quiet maturity, poise and leadership that he possesses,'' Carnesale said. ''You can spot passion without him jumping up and down.''
Now going back to Carnesale. I cannot wait for this Ivy League loser to get out of Westwood. Perhaps UCLA will bring in someone who understands college sports, gets how important it is to the fabric of UCLA's tradition, the Bruin culture, and how it is engrained in the history and identity of this great university. Carnesale never got it. He never had a clue as evident in his clueless support of Lavin over the years, and the role he played in the hiring of Karl Dorrell. He cannot leave the campus sooner.
GO BRUINS.
0 recs |
4 comments
Comments
re: ''Winning the Pac-10 and
You are mocking KD as if he was the only Bruin head coach since WWII not to achieve either of those things in their first 3 seasons.
Well, your wrong...
Donahue didn't do it either...
LaBrucherie
Conference championship in year 2
Beat USC in year 2
Sanders
Beat USC in years 2 & 3
Barnes
Conference championship in year 2
Beat USC in year 2 (tied in year 1)
Prothro
Conference championship in year 1
Beat USC in years 1 & 2
Rodgers
Tied USC in year 1
Vermeil
Conference championship in year 2
Beat USC in year 2
Donahue
Conference championship in year 7
Beat USC in year 5
Toledo
Conference championship in years 2 & 3
Beat USC in years 1, 2, & 3
Dorrell
Conference championship in ...ha, ha, ha, yeah right
Beat USC in ...
See, it's unreasonable to expect KD to do what every other coach (except TD) has done.
-/sarcasm off
by McCloskey on Jun 12, 2006 9:31 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Now you've confused the heck out of me...
However, if this piece is true, then why do you guys so often blame DG for the KD hiring? That seems inconsistent.
It seems to me that pressure from these two bozos (carny and blackmun), combined with the pressure to hire KD from football alums, was too much for a new AD to overcome. It just seems like DG had a lot less to do with this poor hire than your previous comments regarding DG would suggest.
If anything, the hiring of Howland and Savage, combined with this piece, tells me that DG is a pretty damn good AD. I'll take him any day over that idiot at SUC that had one lucky hire.
by bornagainbruin on Jun 14, 2006 12:37 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I think you're right. It wasn't up to DG*
by McCloskey on Jun 14, 2006 1:07 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
You are right ...
My beef with DG re. Dorrell hire is that he was so hands off when this football coaching search was going on relegating all of the searching responsibilites to Bob Field who came up the finalists list of KD, Riley and Robinson.
DG was preoccupied with basketball search and also the baseball one. I wish DG was more involved in the football one.
Our crticism towards DG on Dorrell has been around the issue on how he has been making excuses for Dorrell (i.e. after the close USC game and the Oklahoma game) desperately trying to make believe as if Dorrell is really the answer. It hasn't turned out to be the case.
If Dorrell doesn't get it done we are hoping DG will pull the trigger. If he doesn't it will merit criticism coming towards his way.
by Nestor on Jun 14, 2006 6:46 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 




















