Signs
So it is clear after last two weeks that coaches will not hesitate to blame the players for covering up their own shortcomings during the game. Well this is not the first time players have been blamed for Dorrel's (lack of) leadership on the field.
Does anyone remember Vegas gate of 2004?
That was when stories about players (recruited by Toledo) who were showing up drunk during team-meetings before the game, and reportedly laughing off the loss off after the game, surfaced after a disgraceful, embarrassing loss against Wyoming:
So, in the locker room Chris Kluwe and Tab Perry are talking. They're two seniors who have been through a lot, and they started talking about their experience at UCLA, reminiscing some. At one point they were laughing, going over old times.
At that moment is when Dorrell happened to come into the locker room.
Now, Dorrell is so damn livid, remember, he can't see straight. But he does see Kluwe and Perry laughing. So, Dorrell, his temper flared, went off on both of them -- ripping them for being able to laugh after such a disappointing loss.
Perry, never one to back down, got back in Dorrell's face, but Dorrell then kept in Perry's face. It was pretty heated, and got pretty personal from what I understand.
Kluwe, being pretty smart, left the locker room.
Yes back then it was convenient for Dorrell supporters to blame all those fiascos on the field on the antics of players (recruited by Toledo) off the field. And the bootlicking press was all too willing to buy that spin and throw Toledo recruits under the bus. Check out this from the Daily Bootlicker during 2004 spring practice, which came after the debacle against Fresno State:
But maybe it's not his fault entirely. Perhaps the old guard from the Bob Toledo era still maintains a foothold on this team.
And does this passing the buck somewhere else remind you of someone else? Well here is a little blast from the past from SI's Seth Davis:
However, as we experience more games under Karl Dorrell as the head coach (we have had 40 now I think), the more we see the same disturbing tendencies that kept coming up during the Lavin era during which we accustomed to see ill prepared Bruin basketball teams losing against clearly inferior opponents or barely escaping with sloppy ugly wins. We saw how coaches were blaming players and how players were losing respect for the coaching staff. It was a total implosion.
After four years of Dorrell, we have now seen at least eight games in which a Dorrell coached Bruin team lost to clearly inferior opponents due to poor coaching, total lack of preparation, and in-game adjustments:
*Colorado (03)
*Stanford (03)
*Fresno State (03)
*Arizona State (04)
*Washington State (04)
*Wyoming (04)
*Arizona (05)
*Washington (06)
And yet here we are after four years of Dorrell, we continue to see he and his coaches blaming the players for underachieving performances due to their own lack of preparations, lack of in game/season adjustments, and total lack of leadership on the field.
It's a trend folks.
And as Dump Dorrell notes from the fall out from last couple weeks, the troubling signs are not encouraging for the Bruins Nation.
GO BRUINS.
0 recs |
3 comments
Comments
Insightful Comments
by bostonusurf on Sep 25, 2006 9:40 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Lavin to sum it up
Lavin was a never good recruiter. He got those great recruiting classes in his first two years living on the good name of UCLA winning banner no. 11 two years before he got the job, and getting to Elite Eight in his first year using Harrick's talent.
After he was exposed in the recruiting circuit as a total fraud his recruiting went into the toilet, which resulted in a motley crew of players that Howland inherited in 2001 featuring players like Cummings, Ariza, Walcott, Fey et al. who had no concept of team game.
Lavin was a fraud. A spiteful a**hole who scraped and clawed to hang on to his job by raging a PR war against UCLA fanbase depicting it as unreasonable and too demanding, which has proven to be untrue after three years of Howland. Lavin also lied like a little b!tch by constantly whining and complaining about how difficult it was to succeed as a UCLA basketball coach, covering up his failings as fraud of a head coach.
Oh and from pretty decent sources ... he was a lazy piece of sh!t who was showing up late at work and instead of watching game films was watching Montel in his Morgan Center offices.
He is scumbag. A piece of sh!t gasbag who destroyed one of the hallmarks of American sports by burning a proud incomparable basketball tradition into the ground (Thank God for Howland).
F*ck Lavin.
by Nestor on Sep 26, 2006 5:44 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Don't beat around the bush
You described him perfectly.
Just a guess but I think he holds most of the lopsided (largest point margin)losses in UCLA history.
Pretty amazing for a "defensive" oriented coach.
Ass & gas bag truly apply to him.
Good Post!!!
by artybruin on Sep 26, 2006 12:34 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs

by 


















