The Fish Stinks from the Head Down
This is on DG -- Not KD
And, the head of the fish is DG.
There is no excuse for not firing KD NOW. Or, announcing that he is gone as of the end of this season.
I hear lots of excuses for why DG hasn't acted -- but there's one that really troubles me: He hasn't made up his mind to pull the trigger -- he's giving KD more chances.
After all, we can still win the Pac 10. (The fact that we have lost to the worst teams in the Pac 10 -- and in fact to the worst teams in the country, doesn't seem to faze him. Does he really think we will win out? And, if we do, how does he explain losing to all of the weak teams on the schedule? -- Ah, but all of this is so obvious to all of us who have been saying it since the nut bowl.)
If he really needs to see more before making a decision, he's not just drinking the Karl Aid, he's mixing it.
People blame KD for sucking the fun out of UCLA football.
Yes, KD sucks -- Duh, surprise?
KD is not in charge of the football program, DG is. Plain and simple, this pile of shit is on his doorstep, not KD's. DG has to clean it up. KD won't; we cannot really expect him to walk away.
DG's treatment of KD is, sadly, analagous to KD's treatment of our QB's. KD leaves the QB's on the field behind a non-existent O line. Predictably, they get beat up.
DG leaves KD on the field to take hit after hit -- so many hits that he's punch drunk.
I cannot get over the haunting picture of KD from last week's press conference. In his eyes it is clear he has had enough.
Yet, DG leaves him out there to suffer loss after loss.
This isn't just bad for UCLA football, it's bad for KD and his future. He may never get another coaching job. Every game exposes his ineptitude.
He is so much like our QB's. We cringe when they step on the field for fear they will suffer the career ending blow.
Every time KD steps on the field, he suffers similar blows.
KD does not have the skill to devise a scheme to protedt our QB's. I am sure he would if he could.
But, DG does have the power to protect UCLA football, and KD.
He can fire him, now.
Or, he can announce that KD is not coming back next year -- no matter what the team does in its last games.
If the team likes KD, it will play hard to send him out a winner and prove all the doubters wrong. It will rally to protect KD's future.
If the team has fallen so low under KD it cannot rally with him at the helm, we may see new energy and better play.
ACTING NOW has many benefits.
The recruits will know we are serious about football. (Fox and I have been calling for the firing of KD since the nut bowl. We renewed after Utah. Some argued we would lose our recruits. We disagreed. I think the empirical evidence supports our contention -- our recruiting class is more at risk under KD than it would be without him.)
If DG acts NOW, all the agents for all of the potential coaches will put us in the equation.
I cannot see any reason DG won't do this -- unless he hasn't made up his mind yet. And, if he hasn't we are in deep shit and ought to replace him, too.
Maybe we can get a package deal -- the Boise State AD and football coach. To get rid of the stench, we may need to throw out the entire fish, head and all.
sjh
PS. I just cannot explain all the deference given DG around here. It's almost like people are afraid to go after him for fear that he will retaliate by moving into KD's corner. Guess what? He is in that corner. What has been gained by giving him a free pass? What has been gained by saying "DG we're watching you and if the day after sc KD isn't gone, we won't like you, too"?
Sorry, my brothers and sisters who can want to wait -- I respect you -- but not focusing a strong light on DG is enabling him to continue this nonsense unchallenged. In fact, I think it's easier to find a good AD than a good coach. If DG doesn't act, soon, I'm ready for both.
This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of BruinsNation's (BN) editors. It does reflect the views of this particular fan though, which is as important as the views of BN's editors.
0 recs |
12 comments
Comments
Amen
Well, the Arizona game was part of that "rest of the season."
So for the umpteenth time, I ask a simple question. How is the UCLA football program adversely affected by an announcement today or tomorrow that CTS will not be coming back next season? No one in his right mind should think that CTS is the best possible coach for UCLA the rest of this year and into the future. So for the umpteenth and first time, why is DG refraining from pulling the trigger? How does UCLA benefit from his inaction?
by Fox 71 on Nov 4, 2007 4:54 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
pulling the trigger
by ranelar on Nov 4, 2007 6:56 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
First think I would do is to thank DG profusely
by Fox 71 on Nov 4, 2007 12:47 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
100% on the money
I don't care what his nickname was when he played baseball, I don't care what he did at Irvine, I don't care about his demeanor at the games, I don't even care that he hired Howland (who fell into his lap), - if he continues to let DOOFUS make a mockery of UCLA and its football program, he needs to go himself.
by Tommy Bruin on Nov 4, 2007 7:31 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
The right move
A move like this right now would be incredibly cathartic to all Bruin fans, as we can now firmly root for victory from here on out without fear of Dorrell saving his job.
by godblesstyus95 on Nov 4, 2007 8:25 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I have changed my mind on the subject
On top of that, I think it will help with recruiting if we get rid of him now, and let recruits know he will be replaced with a "name" head coach.
by silverlakebruin on Nov 4, 2007 9:38 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
No-action till season's end
I am afraid -- very, very afraid -- that this is DG's thinking.
by bluegold on Nov 4, 2007 10:16 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Very Interested?
No Guerrero fan here, but I think the main problem with the athletic program by far is the football coach (for the moment). Cure that, and a lot of other ills go away.
by whp68 on Nov 4, 2007 11:05 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Maybe DG has learned the lesson of Lavin
Why? My take is that he didn't want anyone on staff to catch fire, win a few games and then have the same interim thing all over again. He knew he was going outside the program, so why chance anyone lucking out and getting on a roll.
Perhaps DG is doing the same thing here. Making damn sure no interim guy gets any momentum to put his resume on the pile. And face it, if we fire KD now, we have an interim coach who is coaching enough games (including SC and a possible bowl if we win some) to make a name for himself.
I still say fire KD after Oregon and have an interim for the SC game only.
by Free the 16 on Nov 4, 2007 7:09 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
That's a stretch
But not to worry. The CAD will let us and CTS know where we stand tomorrow. He'll give another of his very clear and informative press conferences, and if anything is ambiguous the crack reporting team covering it will get clarity.
by Fox 71 on Nov 4, 2007 7:22 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
No Doubt Kezerian could be a figure head coach
by Free the 16 on Nov 5, 2007 9:11 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs

by 



















