Michigan Loss: The Bruin Angle
Before I post my initial notes and thoughts on the BYU Cougars, I wanted to bring to your attention the dominant topic that has been exploding like fire crackers in every corner of the internets, talk radio, and television dealing with college football: Michigan's epic loss to Appalachian State. I believe there is a Bruin angle to this story.
Obviously, a lot of Michigan fans took the loss very hard and some of them are still trying to figure out how to deal with the embarrassment of losing to some non D-1 team.
One particular Michigan alum though - Joey at Straight Bangin' - whose writing I have highlighted here on BN in previous years, posted these thoughts, that I thought were very germane to what we often talk about wrt UCLA football program (and would have about our basketball program as well if we were around during the Lavin years). Here is Joey (emphasis mine throughout):
Yet for years, most Michigan fans have tried to shout down any polemicist who has tried to point out the cracks in the foundation. Mainstream writers like Jim Carty and Drew Sharp are ridiculed on message boards for their anti-Carr bias; bloggers are nattering nabobs of negativity who can be easily dismissed as fringe crackpots; and even casual fans who'd like more from a program than empty consolations are told to be realistic. What's unrealistic about job accountability? What's so wrong with wanting a football team that doesn't make you fear a collapse or gird for disappointment? Is there any powerhouse program that does less with more? That makes winning feel like losing so often? That is so vainglorious that it will happily adhere to its old-world tactics, training regiments, and public relations protocols while everything else changes around it? Lloyd Carr is the man who inherited this great institution of college football and has allowed for this steady decay. And he no longer even runs a clean program, so what is he doing all day aside from seeking out more sand in which he can bury his head?
The saddest part, though, and perhaps the most damning, is that this has all been countenanced by the fan base at large. No Michigan alumnus or fan--not me, not my friends, not other "haters" who speak out of frustration and not malice--wants to see the school compromise its values or elevate winning to a place that forces the University of Michigan to become Ohio State. But there is a long way in between that and the prevailing mindset now: led by Carr, a culture of inertia and acceptance of mediocrity has enveloped Michigan football. It's the reason that Carr can fail in predictable ways year after year without being held accountable or asked to make real changes. And it needs to end if Michigan is still serious about college football.
I certainly didn't envision Michigan losing to a team that isn't even eligible for the BCS, but Saturday's loss to Appalachian State was just a miserable capstone in the continued decline Lloyd Carr has presided over. Anyone who can't see that, or who wants to pretend that lost Rose Bowls mitigate these damages, needs to move to whatever alternate reality Lloyd Carr has found.
The culture has gone from "Leaders and the Best" to "Cover Your Ass." It's not about being the Champions, it's about not losing the championship. Do just enough to win. Never more, often less. And it is Carr's players' penchant for mailing in efforts against teams it considers beneath them that has delivered Michigan its greatest humiliation.
The sad thing is given the incredible talent the Wolverines have on offense and given the mediocrity of the Big-10, I can still see this team rebounding from that horrific loss and end up having a 8-9 win season, which may just be enough to save Carr's job given what he has done at Ann Arbor.
Sounds familiar? It reminds me of having to suffer through Donahue football in his later years when he was being able to stick around despite being an all around horrific and uninspiring head coach because of the Rose Bowl victories he accumulated early in the season.
Anyways, that post reminded me of posts on UCLA message boards during the days after the UCLA basketball team lost to CSUN at Pauley.
I know we haven't reached our final verdict on Karl Dorrell. I know we have to wait for a while to get our answers on whether Dorrell can deliver a money season at UCLA, which he can use as a base to replicate successful seasons in the coming years.
What we do know is that many of us here may never have been coaches in our real lives, but at this point we are experienced enough after following and obsessing about our football and basketball programs on a day-to-day basis, to know whether they are well coached, well prepared to be successful on the short team and long term basis.
Currently, the data point doesn't favor Dorrell. And a blowout win over a pathetic Stanford team doesn't do much to change the big picture. Dorrell still has to put together a season in which his team plays like a well-coached and well-prepared team on a week-to-week basis, finally delivering at least a BCS bowl game in his fifth season. And, even if he does deliver a 10 win season, we will have to take very close look at how those 10 wins came, so that we don't allow it to be spun as a "successful" and "gratifying" season as the "10 win" season from 2 years ago in which desperate, come-from-behind wins against lesser teams, hid the deficiencies of a mediocre football team. And even if Dorrell delivers that "Show Me" Season, that doesn't mean he gets a pass for sliding back to mediocrity of his previous four seasons. He needs to bring it every year and if he doesn't he needs to hear from us.
In other words, we have to stay vigilant.
We can't get complacent after few cheap wins. It sounds like certain Michigan football fans are getting their due, despite seeing all the signs in years of timid, self-defeating, predictable, naive football. In that Michigan loss there are some prescient signs and valuable lessons for everyone who loves UCLA football. I wanted to make sure no one misses those signs when it comes to our football program in this particular Nation.
GO BRUINS.
0 recs |
22 comments
Comments
The similarity is amazing
by SuperBruinMan on
Sep 4, 2007 6:08 PM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
If push comes to shove,
by bluegold on
Sep 4, 2007 6:20 PM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
That's not automatic
When I watched the Rose Bowl (with the sound off, of course) I was struck by the fact that Michigan's passing game had one and only one feature. Henne would take the snap and do a seven step drop. You could put an "X" on the field seven steps behind the center, and shortly after the snap, that's where Henne would be. It took justsc no time to figure that out, so the DE's just took off for the "X" and waited for Henne to get there. That's no different from two up the middle runs then a quick 3 yard out.
I didn't watch the MU ASU game, but from what I've heard, nothing came as a surprise to ASU. Coach Carr seems to be more predictable than Mr. Dorrell.
So I am not ready to automatically trade Mr. Dorrell for Coach Carr. Since we didn't fire him before the season, we can't very well trade him after he started with a win. And bluegold, you didn't specify whether there were any other choices for the trade. For example, a picture of Vince Lombardi might be available. But Coach Carr is really bad.
by Fox 71 on
Sep 4, 2007 7:03 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
And think about this
by Nestor on
Sep 4, 2007 7:06 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Valid points
by bluegold on
Sep 4, 2007 7:52 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I admit I'm stuck
I feel like I'm strapped to the gurney waiting the needle in the vein, and the warden runs in with some sort of important news, but I can't understand what he's saying.
Maybe if I just close my eyes real tight, I'll wake up and it will be basketball season.
by Fox 71 on
Sep 4, 2007 8:16 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
wow
by BruinCore on
Sep 4, 2007 6:23 PM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Replace Carr/Michigan...
by Ajax on
Sep 4, 2007 6:27 PM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
I would point out
by CAJason80 on
Sep 4, 2007 6:31 PM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Yeap
My comparsion was more between Carr and Donahue because I think that's more apporpriate one in this case. We should have fired Donahue a while before left UCLA.
Dorrell doesn't compare to Carr in terms of achievements, however the same mentality that has plagued Michigan football can be seen in UCLA football as well.
by Nestor on
Sep 4, 2007 6:35 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Thanks for the shout, guys
As an outsider, my sense of KD is that he has his moments but just isn't equipped to lead a team to an elite level. From strategy to in-game decisions to recruiting (though that seems to be getting better, especially this year), UCLA seems like it deserves better. And, of course, I think you should keep applying the measured scrutiny that you already do. People may not want to hear it, but what else is new? This is a country that has allowed George Bush to lead it further and further down the wrong side of the prosperity bell curve while "facts" are ignored. Fight on. (That's a joke.)
by straightbangin on
Sep 4, 2007 9:06 PM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Thanks, Joey
Nothing prevents you from choosing whatever figure of speech you choose. But in my family (and the BN is family) we considered it a gaffe of the first magnitude to discuss politics or religion at the dinner table. I think you detract from your main point when you take that tack, but that's just my opinion.
by Fox 71 on
Sep 4, 2007 10:14 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Ben Olson=Mormon
by MOlson on
Sep 4, 2007 10:50 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Was just trying to draw a parallel
by straightbangin on
Sep 4, 2007 10:54 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Hm...
by jatteratious on
Sep 4, 2007 11:17 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
You didn't cross any line
by Nestor on
Sep 5, 2007 4:33 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
GWB is outta here, definitely, soon
by bluegold on
Sep 5, 2007 7:22 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
We are all adults here
by Steven on
Sep 5, 2007 1:56 AM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
We disagree about where the lines are, I guess
by Fox 71 on
Sep 5, 2007 5:40 AM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Politics and Religion
Bill
by BillSouthBay on
Sep 5, 2007 9:03 AM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
The point is not political
by tasser10 on
Sep 5, 2007 1:27 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs













