NICE
Well, how should we start this? Oh, how about going with this from Rusty Simmons in the S.F. Chronicle:
Anyway, let's talk about last night's game. And we will start with Kevin Love, who right now IMHO is not only in the running for Pac-10 FOY, if he keeps up what he did in the Bay Area this past week, he will also have to get some serious consideration for the MVP award as well. The guy made defending the monster front courts of the Lopez brothers and Hardin-Anderson look like a cake walk. From the Daily News:
Neither Hardin nor Anderson made a field goal in the first half as the two combined to go 0 for 8 from the field. They finished with a combined 20 points but were 6 of 18 from the field.
The Bears made just 5 of their first 19 shots.
"We got two wins and that's what counts," Love said. "Two wins on the road against two very good teams. Most teams are going to be hard to sweep."
It would seem any freshman - even one as good as Love - would have a learning curve once he entered the Pac-10. His defense was somewhat shaky at the start of the season, but even Howland - a defensive guru - has marveled at Love's improvements in that department.
Love, who's averaging 16.7 points and 10.2 rebounds, also liked what he did offensively. He made 8 of 10 field goals - his two misses were from 3-point range - and played 30 minutes.
He is looking even smoother on the offensive side, making it easy for his team-mates to find him down low. He is even being smarter with his outlet passes. Watch Kevin closely when he is launching those "Laser Loves." Last night, he was going through reads, just like a QB checking off his first and second options in a football game. He has been doing this a lot more since the Texas game at Pauley, when the Horn were getting back and breaking up some of his long bombs. Not last night. He was going through his reads in split seconds before launching them out. Just a delight to watch.
Also a delight to watch was our team defense during this Bay Area trip. And let's hear how the opponents feel about it. From Jeff Faraudo in the San Jose Mercury News:
Sophomore forward Ryan Anderson, the Pac-10's top scorer at 21.6 points per game, shot 0 for 6 in the first half and wound up with 12 points only after hitting two three-pointers in the final four minutes.
"I wasn't playing like my normal self. I was a little soft," Anderson said. "I need to embrace the double teams when they come, and hit the open guys."
The Bears (10-3, 1-1) had been outrebounding opponents by six a game this year, but UCLA had 43 to California's 30.
And if we want to talk about team-effort, we have to talk about James Keefe. Keefe played for 4 mins yesterday. In those 4 mins, he managed to get a basket, pull down 2 rebounds, including one on the offensive end. To me, what is impressive above Keefe this year is that he looks a lot more sure of himself. He knows where to be on the court, and what his role is in the scheme of Coach Howland. And he knows the value of team. From Painter in the DN on Keefe's perspective re burning his redshirt year:
But UCLA is essentially playing with a seven-man rotation and needs Keefe to play key minutes off the bench.
"You've got to put the team first and the team needed me," Keefe said. "I'm not sure what's best for me."
Keefe said he understands that UCLA has a chance to win a championship now, and that he had to play "to accomplish what we want to accomplish."
Despite all the positives from yesterday, I do want to bring up a couple of points just to nitpick. Again, I am only bringing up these points up because I do believe there is room for improvement.
I will start with Shipp. Shipp had a great night against Stanford. He was feeling it. And he was connecting on those long range bombs as he was in rhythm. He was not in rhythm last night, going 2 for 8 from the 3 point line, finishing off the night at 4 for 13. Now I love Shipp's smooth game and his demeanor of a stone cold assassin. He never looks frazzled and always has that calm demeanor. However, I still think he needs to recognize that when he is not connecting from the outside, he can contribute in other ways to get his confidence back. One thing I loved about AA was, during the nights he was not connecting from outside, he would focus all his energy on defense, and try to get points another way by trying to drive inside (without being out of control). My guess is, at this point, Coach Howland knows what he is going to get from Shipp offensively (and not get defensively) and he is willing to live with that. All I am asking from Shipp is to play in control a little more, recognizing the limitations in his game. That is all.
Second, I understand Coach Howland's reasoning in bringing Russell off the bench and keeping Luc at the 3. It helps with his substitution pattern and it was great yesterday. But, to me, Luc still looks out of place at the 3, picking up unnecessary fouls chasing around the other team's SF. The team looks so much better off when he is at the 4, swarming around the boards both offensively and defensively, and being a total menace.

Photo Credit: AP Photo/Ben Margot(via ESPN)
Again, we will see how long Howland stays with the current lineup starting AA2. For now though, you can't argue with the results.
Anyway, I think those are nitpicks. But I am sure the coaching staff is aware of them and I have no doubt they are going to try to find ways to work around them.
Going back to last night's game, big ups to the Bay Area Bruin Nation. Even with the quality of FSN broadcasting, we could hear the Bruins often dominating the Bear contingent at Haas with all the UCLA chants. It was awesome to hear them own that place.
And we will end this wrap up with Russell. From the LA Times again:
Nice is definitely a word for it.
GO BRUINS.
0 recs |
30 comments
Comments
Hey! Jamal Boykin!
Oh, that's not what you meant?
by Fedup on Jan 6, 2008 9:58 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Rivalry
Maybe it's more of a recent student thing, but we sure do hate them bears.
by mitch on Jan 6, 2008 10:00 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
JS's 4-Pt Play
by charnaw on Jan 6, 2008 10:03 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Starting Line Up
by bruininthelbc on Jan 6, 2008 10:04 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
I think
by uclachem87 on Jan 6, 2008 10:16 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Rivalry = "So Cal" jealousy
Cal fans in particular are resentful of UCLA for using their song, their colors and for surpassing them in athletic success, international popularity and just about everything else. Although they call it a rivalry what they are really describing is unacknowledged jealousy and resentment.
Nice job RW... it must be the water.
by UCngLA on Jan 6, 2008 10:07 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
And they think SF is "The City."
I think Dragnet and Jack Webb is a more authoritative source than some NoCal version of Doh!.
And doesn't "NoCal" sound like it's a diet version of "So Cal."
by Fox 71 on Jan 6, 2008 10:24 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Nor Cal...
But I agree, NoCal sounds dumb :-).
by kidro2001 on Jan 6, 2008 1:31 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I think it's OUR song now
by Tydides on Jan 6, 2008 10:35 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
one nitpick
by bruinhoo on Jan 6, 2008 12:02 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Speaking of "Nice"
by bruin7982 on Jan 6, 2008 11:40 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
I Can't Get Enough...
by apbruin on Jan 6, 2008 1:12 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Could it be
by yarrrp on Jan 6, 2008 1:34 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Yep, but unlike Ginoseli, he doesn't flop! :-D
by Howland on Jan 6, 2008 1:56 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
T-Shirt?
by Allofmybros on Jan 6, 2008 2:33 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Westbrook alleyoop
On the alleyoop, Westbrook was bumped pretty good - it would have been Pass Interference if they were playing football. Then, he catches the ball cleanly and gently bounces it off the backboard for two points before he hits the ground.
by bornagainbruin on Jan 6, 2008 3:00 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
On the rivalry
There's nothing offensive about calling something a rivalry. Fact is that we own them for the most part, making it a rivalry that hurts Cal fans a ton as they keep losing to us. It's also (to me) a rivlary without bitterness and hatred, both of which run rampant in the UCLA-USC rivalry. I wouldn't go as far as to say we have mutual respect, but it's nice to have a friendly rivalry with the other great public university in the Golden State, knowing that the two universities are excellent in so many respects and that, as I said, we own them in sports (and they counter that they have more Nobel laureates, whoop de do).
by BruinsRule on Jan 6, 2008 1:44 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
It's SoCal v. NoCal
From the NoCal perspective, a win for any NoCal team over a SoCal team -- any win -- is a victory of good over evil, of one way of life over another. They hate us for stealing their water. They hate us for Hollywood. For our beautiful women. And I guess now because we're pretty much dominating them in every sport.
Since their 49ers went belly up in the 90's, they haven't won a thing. Since the turn over the century, we've got three championships with the Lakers, one each for the Angels and the Ducks, as well as two of the most successful collegiate programs in the country (sorry, but for purposes of this discussion, the TrOJans get lumped into the discussion).
So when we beat Cal and Stanford over an early season week-end, it's a couple of nice wins for us. When they beat UCLA or the TrOJans, it's a victory of epic proportions. Talk about a lack of perspective, the NoCals are silly and petty, kinda pathetic really. At any rate, when we win, I never rub it in their faces. But I do wear my championship hat around (my favorite was when the Angels beat San Francisco in that very memorable World Series) and don't say a word. I've got scoreboard, and that's enough for me.
I think what you see at Pauley says it all - no banner goes up unless it's an NCAA Championship, and as we know, those 11 banners take up a lot of real estate. And that, my friends, is the difference between SoCal and NoCal and why I count the days until I can come back home.
Go Bruins and SoCal really does rule!!!
by waters96 on Jan 6, 2008 2:46 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Cal/UCLA Rivalry
But it does feel great to brag of our football and basketball victories to all my friends at Cal.
by bhbruin on Jan 6, 2008 3:25 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Again with the rivalry
For me the two rivalries are summed up rather succinctly by the immortal phrase:
"Cal sucks but USC swallows"
by irishbruin on Jan 6, 2008 4:13 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Will those who feel there is a rival...
by UCngLA on Jan 6, 2008 5:25 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
UCLA/Cal
by bhbruin on Jan 6, 2008 6:09 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Not a rival
by Fox 71 on Jan 6, 2008 7:43 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
A Minor Rivalry, but still...
But the rivalry issue is interesting. In case any capable historians are around, perhaps they can talk about how the Bruins fared during Cal's resurgence, which was led by two elite NBA PGs, Kevin Johnson and Jason Kidd. I'm not sure how it worked for Cal (AD-wise), but at a certain point their athletic programs decided to be serious. Todd Bozeman came in, cheated, but brought top players in. It's an ugly chapter in the long run, but goes under "if you're not cheating you're not trying," and the Bears were finally trying. And Braun seemed to be a very solid hire, especially when Lavin was at UCLA. And then Cal brought in Tedford, and all of a sudden they had a football team.
Another important thing happened during this transition. The UC system was no longer generously supported by the state, and Cal and UCLA both set about raising money and building private endowments to go along with their public support. We know about this at UCLA (and BN has covered the football coaching side exhaustively). At Cal it coincided with the growth of the "NorCal" high tech explosion and a much more dynamic Bay Area economy in 2005 than in 1985. From what I hear Haas Pavilion is now a great place to watch basketball, and Tedford is trying to push through football stadium improvements that are further advanced than any Pauley upgrade.
In the end, it's a California thing, and a public university, UC thing. Cal (or UCLA) is not the enemy: it's pretty obvious that USC and Stanford are the enemy. But if Braun could recruit a little bit better, and if Howland wasn't such a stone cold killer, there might be a little bit of a rivalry going. The hope is that Neuheisel will pass Tedford and Bellotti by like they're standing still, and go straight for Carroll's throat, but that's not going to happen overnight.
But one could go on and on about NorCal vs. SoCal, and then you could get into the academics... And the saddest thing (Neuheisel/Guerrero/Howland/Kevin Love/RW/DC/JS/LRMM/AA/LRM aside) is that the biggest academic upsurge is coming from USC under Samples... that's really annoying, and came out of nowhere.
by zhivooden on Jan 6, 2008 8:21 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Pac-10 FOY
by turs12 on Jan 7, 2008 1:54 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Nice try
by tasser10 on Jan 7, 2008 7:34 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs

by 


















