Ben Ball Game Day Roundup & Notes
At this point it's evident DC and his team-mates have no intention of mailing today's game in. We are going to need DC and RW to be lot more aggressive with ball pressure if they want to get on Stanford early today.
From the preview in Bruin Basketball Report:
Stanford dominated for most of the game at Pauley last Thursday. The Lopez twins controlled the paint, changing a number of shot attempts by the Bruins who ventured in. UCLA stepped up its defensive pressure in the second half to rally and set up Collison's late game free throws.
UCLA will need to bring the same defensive pressure, especially on the perimeter, to prevent Stanford from setting up offensively and to make it hard for the guards to make a pass into the post. While Stanford is big inside, the Bruins have a decided advantage at the guard spots with both Collison and Westbrook.
Freshman Kevin Love held his own against the Lopez twins in the last game, recording 17 points and 10 rebounds, but he will need either Aboya, Keefe, or Mata-Real to step up big without Mbah a Moute next to him on the baseline.
However, that doesn’t mean that UCLA will win the game. That will come down to three factors: the intensity that UCLA brings to the game; the ability of UCLA’s frontcourt players to make the Lopezes, especially Brook, work hard for points and rebounds (and perhaps get one or both of them in foul trouble); and the ability of UCLA to offset the loss of Mbah a Moute.
As usual, this game could very well come down to which UCLA team shows up, especially defensively. Will it be the team from the Cal game on Thursday and the second half last night? Or will it be the one that allowed USC to score 34 points in the first half last evening? The Bruins are now going to face the second team that they played last week that led sports writers around the nation to question UCLA’s "luck". The Bruin players could very well be looking at this as another "statement" game, ala Cal. If that’s the case, then the Stanford guards and wings are going to find it difficult to get initial entry passes into the Lopez twins. However, the Cardinal should also look at this as a redemption game. They were the team that supposedly got "jobbed" on the foul call with 2.5 seconds left. However, the way the Cardinal composed themselves after the game, generally not commenting on the call, (as opposed to Cal who openly complained about the supposed non-call for Ryan Anderson until they got their clocks cleaned by the Bruins in the quarterfinals), indicates a team with maturity and a more emotionally dangerous team than the Cal team UCLA faced two days ago. The bottom line, however, is that Stanford brought a great deal of intensity to the game last week and the Bruins only brought their intensity at the end of the game. Yet UCLA won, clearly indicating that if both the Bruins and the Cardinal play their best, most focused and intense basketball, that the Bruins are the better team.
JK had a great game last night. And we hope he can show the same kind of effort this afternoon. However, it sounds like Coach Howland is going to go with AA2 to start the game today:
As much as some of us want (including myself) our guys to treat this game like an exhibition, our boys thankfully will not listen to yahoos like me and instead pay attention to their head coach. :-)
They are going to come out fighting for the tourney championship. Andy Katz on how Coach Howland has the program operating like a machine this time of the year:
Howland has been dogged of his pursuit of a No. 1 seed, the first- and second-round advantage in Anaheim and a regional in Phoenix. Getting the No. 1 overall seed isn't as much of a concern. Getting another championship this week is for UCLA because the players and staff know that a tournament title keeps them on target for a national title.
Here is to a great game with no injuries (again knocking on my desk).
Game thread will be up later this am.
GO BRUINS.
16 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
NCAA title run hinges on LRMM's ankle
Luc
by SmrtGuy82 on Mar 15, 2008 8:38 AM PDT reply actions
Honestly, that would be unwise...
Just read the same article
by bruinbabe2000 on Mar 15, 2008 10:24 AM PDT up reply actions
Pointing Out
Both of these guys know how to step up. They're coached by Howland, after all, and they know how to play.
I was sickened by what happened to Luc, too, believe me. Mostly because he was in such pain and distress, but also because is simply an amazing emotional and physical force for this team.
Great teams have many ways to win. This is a great team.
Why are some against having a Pac-10 tournament?
Because we play a true round robin
Why Have this Tournament?
At the end of the tournament, we will have played Cal and Stanford this week.
We played Cal and Stanford last week. Why do we need to play them again?
If we need this tournament to get ready to play in the Big Tournament, we don't belong in the Big Tournament.
We are a team that practices and plays hard. Don't forget, some of our key injuries have come during our practices.
We don't need this tournament to get ready. I trust BH's practices to do that.
We did need this tournament to rest some tired and/or injured warriors.
There is absolutely no upside for us. And, yesterday, we saw the downside.
These tournaments are for conferences in which not all of the teams play each other the same number of times.
They are for teams that sucked all season long and whose only way to make the BT is by winning a conference tournament. How fair is that?
Both UNC and UCLA will play 34 games
We got a rematch against Cal and destroyed them to shut up the MSM. We now get a rematch against Stanford and will soundly beat them as well to guarantee a #1 seed in the West (and maybe a #1 overall seed).
by mark the bruin on Mar 15, 2008 10:09 AM PDT up reply actions
If the best case scenario is
I know I'm excited about "getting" a rematch with a team we've already beaten twice. I'll be glued to my TV. And by glued to my TV, I mean writing my research paper on campus and praying that this stupid tournament doesn't claim another of our starters to injury.
Not to mention teams like Memphis
by uclachem87 on Mar 15, 2008 11:39 AM PDT up reply actions
Agreed that Memphis has it easy
The injury to Luc is just aweful.
by bruinofthenorth on Mar 15, 2008 12:21 PM PDT up reply actions
No fan of conference tournaments
The reason, of course, for these silly tournaments is money. There are so many sports networks that are so hungry for programming that even if attendance is poor, the conferences apparently make money with these things by selling t.v. and advertising rights.
The Pac 10 tournament is absolutely not helpful for a team like UCLA, that probably came into the conference tournament with a number 1 seed in its pocket and could only lose it with a poor performance like last year. This year, even if UCLA wins, it is extremely costly because of the injury to Luc (hopefully no more today). It is only helpful for also ran teams in that it gives them one more chance to get into the NCAA tournament. Again, I think it is silly to reward teams with a bid just for winning a few games in one week when the rest of their season has been mediocre to lousy.
Keep in mind
I never liked it then and I don't like it now.
I'm off to Staples Center. Make some NOISE!!!
GO BRUINS!!!
by mark the bruin on Mar 15, 2008 11:41 AM PDT reply actions
Post-Tourney
There was no doubt that the team was going through the motions for the first part of the season against inferior opponents. Remember most projected the winner of the PAC 10 to have 4 losses and we had only 2.
For those who think that Memphis and North Carolina look really good now, trust me we will make them look ugly during the tourney (e.g. Memphis & LSU 2006, Kansas 2007) Our defense will step it up an extra notch during the tourney when the refs let them play and bang!
Moute Kicks Boute...and will be back for some more!
by UCLA Champions Made Here on Mar 15, 2008 2:49 PM PDT reply actions

by 




















