clock menu more-arrow no yes mobile

Filed under:

Looking for a complete package

So Karl Dorrell was a great WR at UCLA.  When UCLA brought him into Westwood it hyped his experience as "WR Coach" in the NFL. So you'd expect the UCLA team, which is loaded with talents at the WR position to have a productive receiving corps. Right? Well not exactly. From the LA Times today:

Since 1978, UCLA has produced numerous go-to wide receivers who had big seasons.

From J.J. Stokes, who made 82 receptions in 1993, to Freddie Mitchell, who grabbed 77 passes in 2000, to Craig Bragg, Kevin Jordan and Sean LaChapelle, who each had 73 catches in a season, the Bruins always seem to have a main target in their passing game.

But not this year. After four games, UCLA's leading receiver is tight end Logan Paulsen with 10 catches. Wide receivers Brandon Breazell and Matt Willis are tied with tailback Chris Markey with nine, followed by Marcus Everett and Junior Taylor with eight each.

At this pace, UCLA's leading receiver will finish the season with no more than 30 catches. That has happened only twice for the Bruins over the last 27 years.
So a team which is supposedly "coached" by a former WR, who brings NFL "experience" of being a "WR Coach" doesn't have a productive WRs, despite having loads of good players at this position. Am I the only one perplexed at this situation?

Well Junior Taylor is frustrated and he is talking about it:
Taylor has eight catches in four games. In the last two games, two passes were thrown his way.

His frustration isn't going unnoticed, because Bruins coach Karl Dorrell addressed it Monday, saying nagging toe and ankle injuries curtailed Taylor's involvement in the offense.

"It's hard because (the coaches) know I'm frustrated. They know I want the ball," Taylor said Tuesday. "They can say health reasons. Whatever. I'm out there. I'm open. I want the ball. I want to make plays. We need playmakers.

"I'm just making sure I'm doing the right things, taking care of my body, running the right routes, getting open, making my blocks. Just keep doing what I need to do, because if we're going to be the team we want to be, the ball has to come to me eventually. And not just me. It's got to come to the receivers, period."

Taylor made 32 catches in 2004, but tore a knee ligament in third game last season.

He said he was advised to sit out practice and rest his ankle, but he decided to suit up and participate.
Now only if his coaches show the same sense of urgency this week, perhaps the Bruins will have a breakout performance against a mediocre defense this Saturday. If the coaches get their offensive issues fixed this game week, the Bruin receivers should have a productive weekend against a secondary which has given up 248 yards per game (not counting Zona's joke outing against D-AA Stephen F. Austin. Again it would be nice if the coaches come to this game with a plan that includes play action on some obvious running situations, use a short passing game to loosen up their D, and set up Ben and the offense on short yardage situations on 2nd and 3rd downs.

We had some spirited discussions in our last post on the merits of Zona's rushing defense. Take a look at its opponents rushing logs. Sure they looked like world beaters against BYU and Stephen F. Austin. None of them have a legit running game.  To be charitable I will discount their performance against LSU because of that game was on the road. But in their two Pac-10 home games (against Southern Cal and UDub) they gave up an average of 178 yards on the ground (4.34 yards per carry). This is a challenge UCLA should be able to meet, which has the 3rd best running attack in the Pac-10, averaging 173 yards per game. The average of course should be higher considering they didn't get the job done against Stanford failing to crush a pathetic team with the worst rushing defense in the country. Hopefully the trend of underachievement will come to a stop this weekend, when the Bruins finally put together a complete package on the offensive side of the ball against another mediocre (arguably less than mediocre) defense this weekend.

In short there should be no excuses for the Bruins not to feature a balanced attack on offense, driving the Bruins to a 4-1 record (should have been 5-0) heading up to Eugene with some modicum of positive momentum.

It will be up to Dorrell and his coaches to get the job done and finally show that they can have a team that has a complete package on offense, along with a credible defense.