clock menu more-arrow no yes mobile

Filed under:

Some Trojans Agree About Discipline

Over the last several weeks, I've written a good deal about the off-the-field problems facing USC and UCLA, and the coaches' of each teams role in enforcing rules and meting out discipline.  I've also spent a fair amount of time criticizing others who have written articles which I felt were intended to excuse and/or explain away episodes of misconduct, focusing particularly on those rationalizing mischief at USC.

But, not everyone fits into this mold.  Trojan fans included.

In his new blog, Cardinal and Gold, USC fan Paragon SC recently had this to say about players behaving badly:

A recent post on CFR attempted to illustrate that regardless of coach or program bad acts by players do happen and there's not much that we can do about it. Opposing views, mostly from Bruins Nation, say that no matter what the infraction coaches have a responsibility to enforce punishment regardless of the legal issues that may also follow. CFR counters that a coach punishing a player outside of other institutional disciplinary actions, regardless of the legal issues, could be construed as piling on. Throughout the give and take of both threads a number of solid points were made by both sides, too numerous to mention here.

I've always thought that BN has been on the right side of the character issue, though their tone is a bit trite and sometimes self serving. Schools do have a responsibility to ensure that their players act in a manner that reflects well upon the schools image. When they don't then the schools need act decisively and with prejudice. It is a privilege to play college sports and that doesn't mean that players have a right to break the rules wantonly.

I will give BN credit; they have been consistent that the Dorrell regime needs to take a harder line on bad behavior than their cross-town rivals. It's their attempt to take the moral high road and they should be commended for it. But why stop there, character is important and all programs should strive to have decent people in their programs. If you're going to criticize any program outside of your own then you should criticize all programs that have these issues, not doing so only shows a partisan tone. The whole tit-for-tat thing really doesn't move the issue in a positive direction.

I have taken SC to task for not enforcing a stricter form of punishment for bad acts. I am on the record for stating that Maualuga should have been suspended and that Sanchez if charged should be off the team and if not he should be suspended for the year for the fake ID alone....

As I've said before, I am happy to welcome and embrace any football fan who seriously confronts the discipline/character issue. There is no doubt that some SC fans are on the right side of the issue, Paragon SC included.  And that's a good thing.

Of course, Paragon and I don't totally agree.  It isn't trite, in my book, to consistently demand a standard of conduct from both your own team and your rivals.  And I don't feel I have any obligation, not to mention the time or inclination, to comment on every infraction by every athlete in college football.  UCLA is my team.  USC is its main rival.  What happens other places, I will leave others to write about.

But, that all said, its encouraging to see that recent events have spawned a productive debate, where people of good faith from both schools can find some common ground.